INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corporation
XNYS
26.22
+0.00%
After hours
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves- 52-Week Range
- $19.03 – $31.69
- YTD
- +23.04%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 31.54
- Straddle Price
- $3.25
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 5.66
- Market Cap
- $5.8B
- Open
- $25.62
- Day Range
- $25.41 – $26.64
- Volume
- 2,903,258
- Prev Close
- $25.45
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.14 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.17% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.00% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +26.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +2.3% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.02 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 10.6% |
| Book / Price | 74.1% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 6.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 0.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.65 |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $27.32 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $27.24 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 15.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $1.8B |
| Market Cap | $6B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $2.44 | 16% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $4.84 | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $47.66 | 10% | median 23.5× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $60.62 | 10% | median 12.0× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $41.70 | 10% | median 2.2× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | $382.76 | 10% | median 1.5× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $27.32 | 46% | stability 72% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $25.22 | 0% | 5 strikes · skew +0.63 |
- Industry (SIC)
- WHOLESALE-COMPUTERS & PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT & SOFTWARE (5045) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $5.8B
- Employees
- 22,200
- List Date
- 2024-10-24
- CIK
- 0001897762
- Last Earnings
- Oct 29 after close · −0.7% vs ±10.9% expected
- Headquarters
- Irvine, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.ingrammicro.com
Ingram Micro Holding Corp is a technology company for the global information technology ecosystem. The company plays a vital role in the IT sales channel, bringing products and services from technology manufacturers and cloud providers to business-to-business technology experts. The company also provide a broad range of technology services, including financing, specialized marketing, and lifecycle management, credit terms and availability, price, speed of delivery, and other related services.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 17.78% | -0.89% | 8.45% |
| Feb | -- | -7.11% | -3.36% | -5.24% |
| Mar | -- | -14.46% | 9.18% | -2.64% |
| Apr | -- | 0.00% | 26.89% | 13.45% |
| May | -- | 6.46% | 1.22% | 3.84% |
| Jun | -- | 9.05% | -7.21% | 0.92% |
| Jul | -- | -7.42% | 3.45% | -1.98% |
| Aug | -- | 0.72% | 0.97% | 0.84% |
| Sep | -- | 12.87% | -2.90% | 4.98% |
| Oct | -1.42% | 3.66% | 2.20% | 1.48% |
| Nov | -1.65% | -5.77% | -2.82%* | -3.41% |
| Dec | -16.82% | -0.28% | -- | -8.55% |
| Total | -19.35% | 11.38% | 25.54% | 5.86% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
INGM (Ingram Micro) - Comprehensive Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with Confidence Level: 6/10
Investment Thesis: Ingram Micro presents a mixed technical and sentiment picture with positive recent analyst upgrades contrasted against weakening momentum indicators and elevated implied volatility. The stock is trading within a consolidation range with conflicting signals—bullish options positioning and positive news sentiment are offset by bearish MACD divergence and declining volume momentum. The high IV rank (21%) relative to current IV (121%) suggests the market is pricing elevated risk premia that may not be justified by historical volatility patterns.
Key Drivers:
- Positive analyst sentiment (recent Buy upgrade from Zacks, 2026-09-30)
- Bullish options market positioning (17.4x call-to-put volume ratio)
- Neutral-to-range-bound technical setup with low trend conviction
Primary Risks:
- Bearish MACD histogram (-0.34) indicating momentum deterioration
- Elevated implied volatility creating compressed risk-reward at current levels
- Low ADX (8.90) suggesting weak directional conviction—vulnerable to whipsaw
- Data quality concern: News dates span 2025-2026 with inconsistent timelines
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction Analysis
Short-Term (1-4 weeks): RANGE-BOUND/MILDLY BEARISH
- Price ($27.79) is sandwiched between SMA 20 ($27.10) and SMA 50 ($27.94)
- Current price sits 7.8% above SMA 200 ($25.76), confirming longer-term uptrend base
- EMA 12 ($27.05) below EMA 26 ($27.29) suggests early-stage momentum loss
- ADX at 8.90 indicates extremely weak trend strength—market in low-conviction consolidation
Medium-Term (1-3 months): MILDLY BULLISH
- Price above all major moving averages (20, 50, 200 SMA)
- SMA 200 at $25.76 provides solid long-term support floor (+7.8% buffer)
- EMA positioning still favorable despite recent crossover concerns
Long-Term (3-12 months): BULLISH (Context-Dependent)
- Established above 200-day MA suggests structural uptrend
- However, requires confirmation through stronger momentum and trend indicators
Support/Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Significance | |-------|------|--------------| | $28.63 | Resistance | Upper Bollinger Band; recent ceiling | | $27.94 | Resistance | SMA 50; short-term pivot | | $27.79 | Current | Price currently at this level | | $27.10 | Support | SMA 20; intraday support | | $25.76 | Strong Support | SMA 200; structural support base | | $25.57 | Support | Lower Bollinger Band; downside buffer |
Critical Observation: Price is within the Bollinger Band middle zone ($27.10), indicating neutral positioning within volatility bands—neither compressed squeeze conditions nor extended breakout signals present.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 53.34 - NEUTRAL
- Positioned in neutral zone (30-70 range)
- Not overbought (>70) nor oversold (<30)
- Indicates balanced buyer-seller pressure with no extreme condition
- Slightly bullish bias as reading sits in upper-neutral zone but without overbought extremes
MACD: -0.24 (Line) / +0.10 (Signal) / -0.34 (Histogram) - BEARISH DIVERGENCE
- MACD line (-0.24) remains below signal line (+0.10)—classic bearish crossover structure
- Histogram (-0.34) shows NEGATIVE and expanding, indicating accelerating downside momentum
- Critical Signal: MACD divergence suggests momentum is rolling over despite price holding above moving averages
- This is the strongest bearish indicator in the technical setup
Stochastic Oscillators: MIXED
- %K (64.66) in overbought zone (>50) but not extreme (>80)
- %D (50.24) lagging, suggesting momentum may be topping
- Williams %R (-9.25) shows strong buying pressure (reading near -0 = near-term highs)
- Interpretation: Stochastics suggest overbought conditions in short-term but without full reversal signal yet
Bollinger Bands: NEUTRAL
- Price at $27.79 sits between middle band ($27.10) and upper band ($28.63)
- Band width (11.29) is moderate—not in squeeze condition (which would suggest breakout potential)
- No mean-reversion signal; no breakout signal
- Price positioned for either direction with equal technical probability
Volume Analysis
Volume Trends: SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE
- Volume Rate of Change: -5.42% (declining volume relative to SMA 20)
- Volume SMA 20: 2.61M shares average
- Interpretation: Declining volume into price near moving average resistance suggests institutional commitment weakness
- OBV (404,613.93) appears low relative to average volume, but without historical context difficult to assess trend
Institutional Interest Assessment:
- Volume decline during sideways price action typically indicates:
- Reduced conviction from large players
- Setup for potential consolidation break (either direction)
- Lower liquidity = higher spread risk and slippage for large positions
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
Positive News Themes (6 of 7 headlines):
- Analyst Upgrade (2026-09-30, RECENT): Zacks initiated Buy rating—most recent and time-aligned with current price
- Valuation Comparison (2026-09-18): INGM positioned favorably vs DUOL in value analysis
- Valuation Comparison (2026-08-31): INGM positioned favorably vs AMPL in value analysis
- Subsidiary News (2025-08-07): CloudBolt (INGM subsidiary) named GigaOm Leader in Cloud Management
- Subsidiary News (2025-06-05): Arctic Wolf (INGM portfolio company) expansion into Singapore for AI security products
- Market Context (2026-03-03): Positive macro commentary (oil spike, war escalation) rated as positive sentiment
Neutral/Infrastructure News:
- Portfolio company announcements (CloudBolt, Arctic Wolf) provide operational updates but limited direct impact to INGM parent company valuation
Sentiment Assessment: POSITIVE (Aggregate: +68%)
- Recent (Sept-Sept 2026): Strong positive bias with analyst upgrade and value comparison favorability
- Historical (2025-2026): Consistent positive news flow regarding portfolio company performance
- Macro Context: No negative industry-specific headlines; macro news treated as positive
⚠️ Data Quality Flag: News timeline shows inconsistent dating (2026 future dates mixed with 2025 dates). This suggests either:
- Analysis is being conducted during late 2025 looking forward
- Dates may represent planned/projected news
- Recommend verifying actual publication timeline for news recency assessment
Catalyst Identification
IMMEDIATE (1-7 days):
- No specific catalysts identified
- Monitor for potential earnings announcement dates (no earnings data provided—flag)
NEAR-TERM (1-4 weeks):
- Analyst upgrade momentum continuation (positive catalyst from 2026-09-30 rating)
- Potential follow-up analyst coverage given recent Buy initiation
- Monitor for earnings date announcements
MEDIUM-TERM (1-3 months):
- Arctic Wolf Singapore expansion execution progress
- CloudBolt platform performance metrics and customer wins
- Q3/Q4 earnings announcements (dates not provided—critical data gap)
- Potential additional analyst upgrades/downgrades following upgrade cycle
Market Narrative Alignment
Bullish Case (Supported by News):
- Positive analyst sentiment momentum
- Portfolio company operational wins (CloudBolt leadership position, Arctic Wolf expansion)
- Value relative to peers positioning
Bearish Technical Divergence:
- MACD breakdown contradicts positive news sentiment
- Declining volume into resistance suggests skepticism about upside
- Conflict Assessment: News-driven optimism NOT yet reflected in institutional volume commitment—potential gap between sentiment and conviction
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: HIGH RISK (Beta: 1.27)
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-04 | After-Close | 10.49% | 5.53% | 0.53x | Within |
| 2025-05-08 | After-Close | 6.86% | 2.39% | 0.35x | Within |
| 2025-08-06 | Pre-Market | 8.19% | 1.82% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2025-10-30 | Pre-Market | 14.10% | 0.36% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2026-03-02 | After-Close | 18.97% | 14.33% | 0.76x | Within |
| 2026-04-30 | After-Close | 11.70% | 9.29% | 0.79x | Within |
| 2026-07-30 | After-Close | 12.25% | 7.20% | 0.59x | Within |
| 2026-10-29 | After-Close | 10.92% | 0.73% | 0.07x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
INGM Options Activity & IV Rank
INGM IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow · All expiries
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 3rd percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $72.3M | #456 of 3716 | +114.9% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $7.2M | #870 of 1945 | +84.5% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $6.6M | #1887 of 6285 | -45.9% | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $5.7M | #156 of 251 | -47.9% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $697K | #2473 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $18K | #3774 of 4729 | 0.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
INGM Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 77 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CastleKnight Management LP | $3.29M | 81.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $369.98K | 9.19% | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $362.08K | 8.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $2.74K | 0.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $8.04K | 100.00% | 2026-09-30 |
INGM Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-11-06| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-06 | Platinum Equity Investment Holdings IC (Cayman), LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −12,650,000 | $25.76 | -$325.81M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-27 | Michael Zilis | Executive VP & CFO | Tax (F) | −18,008 | $27.50 | -$495.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-27 | Scott D Sherman | Executive VP, Human Resources | Tax (F) | −12,985 | $27.50 | -$357.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-27 | Paul D Bay | Chief Executive Officer | Tax (F) | −23,983 | $27.50 | -$659.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-27 | Augusto Aragone | Executive VP, Secretary & GC | Tax (F) | −9,789 | $27.50 | -$269.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-27 | Carolyn Hornstein | SVP, Controller & CAO | Tax (F) | −912 | $27.50 | -$25.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-17 | Tom Gores | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −1,968,750 | $27.19 | -$53.53M | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-14 | Imola JV Holdings, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −13,125,000 | $27.19 | -$356.84M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-17 | Platinum Equity Partners V, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −5,167,069 | $29.03 | -$150.00M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | Augusto Aragone | Executive VP, Secretary & GC | Sell (S) | −60,000 | $29.41 | -$1.76M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | Alain Monie | Director | Award (A) | +7,031 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-14 | Felicia Alvaro | Director | Award (A) | +7,031 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-14 | Heisz Leslie Stone | Director | Award (A) | +7,031 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-14 | Jakki L. Haussler | Director | Award (A) | +7,031 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-14 | Sharon L Wienbar | Director | Award (A) | +7,031 | — | EDGAR |
INGM Insider Holdings
17 insiders · @ $26.22| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PLATINUM EQUITY, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 197,104,541 | $5.17B | -$28.80M | 1 | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | Platinum Equity Investment Holdings V, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 182,633,388 | $4.79B | -$361.20M | 1 | 2026-05-08 |
| 3 | Platinum Equity Partners V, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 177,466,319 | $4.65B | -$150.00M | 1 | 2026-06-17 |
| 4 | Imola JV Holdings, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 164,341,319 | $4.31B | -$839.22M | 4 | 2026-09-14 |
| 5 | Tom Gores | 10%+ Owner | 162,372,569 | $4.26B | -$53.53M | 1 | 2026-09-17 |
| 6 | Platinum Equity Investment Holdings IC (Cayman), LLC | 10%+ Owner | 149,722,569 | $3.93B | -$325.81M | 1 | 2026-11-06 |
| 7 | Alain Monie | Director | 1,352,439 | $35.46M | $4.99M | 3 | 2026-05-14 |
| 8 | Paul D Bay | Chief Executive Officer | 632,093 | $16.57M | $1.00M | 5 | 2026-10-27 |
| 9 | Michael Zilis | Executive VP & CFO | 287,306 | $7.53M | $621.5K | 5 | 2026-10-27 |
| 10 | Scott D Sherman | Executive VP, Human Resources | 218,942 | $5.74M | $200.2K | 5 | 2026-10-27 |
INGM Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 6, 2026Directors 11
- Alain Monie · since Oct 23, 2024
- Bryan Kelln · since Oct 23, 2024
- Christian B Cook · since Oct 23, 2024
- Craig W Ashmore · since Oct 23, 2024
- Eric Alan Worley · since Oct 23, 2024
- Felicia Alvaro · since Oct 23, 2024
- Heisz Leslie Stone · since Oct 23, 2024
- Jakki L. Haussler · since Oct 23, 2024
- Mary Ann Sigler · since Oct 23, 2024
- Paul D Bay · since Oct 23, 2024
- Sharon L Wienbar · since Oct 23, 2024
Officers 5
- Paul D Bay · Chief Executive Officer · since Oct 23, 2024
- Michael Zilis · Executive VP & CFO · since Oct 23, 2024
- Augusto Aragone · Executive VP, Secretary & GC · since Oct 23, 2024
- Carolyn Hornstein · SVP, Controller & CAO · since Oct 23, 2024
- Scott D Sherman · Executive VP, Human Resources · since Oct 23, 2024
10% owners 10
- Imola JV Holdings, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 23, 2024
- Ingram Holdco, LLC (entity) · since Aug 27, 2025
- Platinum Equity InvestCo, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 23, 2024
- Platinum Equity Investment Holdings IC (Cayman), LLC (entity) · since Oct 23, 2024
- Platinum Equity Investment Holdings V, LLC (entity) · since Oct 23, 2024
- Platinum Equity Investment Holdings, LLC (entity) · since Oct 23, 2024
- Platinum Equity Partners V, L.P. (entity) · since Oct 23, 2024
- Platinum Equity Partners V, LLC (entity) · since Oct 23, 2024
- Platinum Equity, LLC (entity) · since Oct 23, 2024
- Tom Gores · since Oct 23, 2024
Changes in the last 10 years (30)
| Aug 27, 2025 | Ingram Holdco, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Oct 25, 2024 | Alain Monie no longer listed as Executive Chairman in SEC filings |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Tom Gores became a 10% owner |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Sharon L Wienbar became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Scott D Sherman became Executive VP, Human Resources |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Platinum Equity, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Platinum Equity Partners V, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Platinum Equity Partners V, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Platinum Equity Investment Holdings, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Platinum Equity Investment Holdings V, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Platinum Equity Investment Holdings IC (Cayman), LLC became a 10% owner |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Platinum Equity InvestCo, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Paul D Bay became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Paul D Bay became Chief Executive Officer |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Michael Zilis became Executive VP & CFO |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Matthew Louie became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Mary Ann Sigler became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Jakki L. Haussler became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Jacob Kotzubei became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Imola JV Holdings, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Heisz Leslie Stone became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Felicia Alvaro became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Eric Alan Worley became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Craig W Ashmore became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Christian B Cook became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Carolyn Hornstein became SVP, Controller & CAO |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Bryan Kelln became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Augusto Aragone became Executive VP, Secretary & GC |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Alain Monie became a director |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Alain Monie became Executive Chairman |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (2)
- Matthew Louie · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 23, 2024
- Jacob Kotzubei · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 23, 2024
INGM Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-06-15What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-15 | Ingram Holdco, LLC | 10% Stockholder | 5,167,069 | $155.48M | 2026-06-15 | Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-12 | AUGUSTO P ARAGONE COPPOLA | Officer | 60,000 | $1.75M | 2026-06-12 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Event | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | Material agreement · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-29 | Earnings results · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-10 | Material agreement · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-30 | Earnings results · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | Shareholder vote results | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-07 | Material agreement · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-30 | Earnings results · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-09 | Material agreement · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Earnings results · Other events | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | Avantis | 0.17% | $55.2M | $31.6B | 2026-11-05 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $49.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $34.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.97% | $24.0M | $2.5B | 2026-11-06 |
| 5 | CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF | Capitalgroup | 0.64% | $22.6M | $3.5B | 2026-11-05 |
| 6 | VBR Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $22.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $18.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | First Trust | 1.30% | $16.7M | $1.3B | 2026-11-06 |
| 9 | FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | Nport | 0.09% | $8.0M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 10 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $6.1M | $56.9B | 2026-11-06 |
| 11 | ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF | Nport | 3.17% | $5.7M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 12 | TCV Towle Small-Cap Value ETF | Nport | 2.33% | $4.8M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 13 | TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | First Trust | 0.11% | $4.5M | $4.1B | 2026-11-06 |
| 14 | FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.27% | $3.8M | $1.4B | 2026-11-06 |
| 15 | EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Fund | Nport | 0.36% | $3.4M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $3.2M | $82.9B | 2026-11-06 |
| 17 | VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | Vanguard | 0.16% | $2.8M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 18 | VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | Vanguard | 0.23% | $2.6M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 19 | IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $2.4M | $14.8B | 2026-11-06 |
| 20 | PRFZ Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $1.9M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 21 | IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $1.8M | $22.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 22 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.8M | $93.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 23 | VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | Vanguard | 0.15% | $1.4M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 24 | CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | Nport | 1.91% | $1.3M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 25 | INRO iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.19% | $1.0M | $542.6M | 2026-11-06 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (8 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 '26 | 2026-09-26 | $15.22B | $131.08M | $0.57 | $251.36M |
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-27 | $14.53B | $110.87M | $0.48 | $-533.22M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-28 | $13.96B | $98.87M | $0.42 | $-977.88M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-27 | $14.88B | $121.41M | $0.51 | $1.56B |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-27 | $12.60B | $99.46M | $0.42 | $-146.04M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-28 | $12.79B | $37.83M | $0.16 | $-297.96M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-29 | $12.28B | $69.19M | $0.29 | $-200.43M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-28 | $13.34B | $83.12M | $0.37 | $309.96M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
INGM vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTC Intel Corp | $299.1B | — | +12.1% | +50.8% | 25 |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | $59.4B | 24.5 | +27.3% | +96.7% | 64 |
| CNC Centene Corporation | $34.5B | 23.6 | +9.7% | +64.0% | 39 |
| VTRS Viatris Inc. Common Stock | $22.8B | — | +4.3% | +64.4% | 33 |
| HST Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | $16.9B | 17.3 | +6.2% | +39.2% | 39 |
| ARWR Arrowhead Research Corporation | $8.2B | — | +16.8% | −27.4% | 42 |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. Common Stock | $7.0B | — | +30.6% | +76.2% | 44 |
| NOV NOV Inc. | $6.3B | 38.5 | +0.4% | +7.8% | 25 |
| INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corporation | $5.8B | 13.2 | +14.8% | +23.0% | 32 |
| Peer median | $19.8B | 24.1 | +10.9% | +57.4% | 39 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.