MDAI Spectral AI, Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves
- Industry (SIC)
- SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS (3841) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 65
- List Date
- 2023-09-12
- CIK
- 0001833498
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-10 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.14)
- Headquarters
- Dallas, TX
- Homepage
- https://www.spectral-ai.com
Spectral AI Inc is an AI company focused on predictive medical diagnostics. Its DeepView System uses proprietary AI algorithms to distinguish between fully damaged, partially damaged and healthy human tissue characters invisible to the naked eye, at the initial time point of wound presentation. The DeepView System delivers a binary prediction on the wound's capacity to heal or not-heal by a specified time point in the future. The company focuses on the burn indication which is supported by the BARDA PBS contract.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -17.39% | -29.30% | 20.69% | -8.67% |
| Feb | -- | -8.68% | -4.40% | -17.65% | -10.24% |
| Mar | -- | 5.97% | -27.67% | 4.26% | -5.81% |
| Apr | -- | -23.61% | 8.33% | 42.36% | 9.03% |
| May | -- | -3.49% | 24.03% | -3.72% | 5.61% |
| Jun | -- | 10.00% | 52.15% | -14.78% | 15.79% |
| Jul | -- | -14.36% | -8.15% | -12.68% | -11.73% |
| Aug | -- | -12.80% | -18.22% | -2.48% | -11.17% |
| Sep | -50.55% | -27.40% | 19.37% | 7.10% | -12.87% |
| Oct | 1.83% | 38.46% | -6.99% | -7.83% | 6.37% |
| Nov | -6.27% | 30.61% | -18.69% | -0.33%* | 1.33% |
| Dec | -26.57% | 28.64% | -5.96% | -- | -1.30% |
| Total | -65.34% | -18.23% | -36.27% | 1.41% | -29.61% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for MDAI:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bullish momentum signals from MACD
- Neutral RSI reading
- Positive news sentiment from recent headlines
Primary Risks:
- High volatility, potentially leading to large price swings
- Lack of earnings data, making it difficult to assess the company's financial performance
Investment Thesis:
MDAI appears to be in a neutral zone, with both bullish and bearish signals present. The stock is experiencing high volatility, which may make it challenging to pinpoint a clear direction. However, the positive news sentiment from recent headlines suggests that there are underlying drivers that could propel the stock higher.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The recent news headlines have had a neutral impact on my assessment of MDAI's potential. The company has been featured in various conferences and has received positive coverage for its DeepView System. However, the lack of earnings data and high volatility make it difficult to fully assess the company's financial performance.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Neutral
- Medium-term: Uptrend
- Long-term: Downtrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $2.63
- Middle Bollinger Band: $2.28
- Lower Bollinger Band: $1.93
Momentum Signals:
- MACD signal line crossover above the zero line, indicating bullish momentum
- RSI reading of 45.65 indicates a neutral trend
- Williams %R reading of -79.13 suggests that the stock is oversold
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 1151154.35
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 51351892.28
- Volume Rate of Change: -11.55%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
The recent news headlines have been mostly neutral, with some positive coverage for the company's DeepView System.
Sentiment Assessment:
Aggregated sentiment is NEUTRAL, reflecting the mixed nature of the recent headlines.
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming earnings release (no date specified)
- Potential product launches or regulatory approvals
Market Narrative:
The news sentiment aligns with the neutral trend direction and high volatility. The lack of earnings data makes it difficult to assess the company's financial performance, but the positive coverage for the DeepView System suggests that there may be underlying drivers that could propel the stock higher.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Interpretation:
- Beta: 1.41 (vs SPY), indicating high risk relative to the market
Volatility Regime:
- Current volatility is high, with a True Range of $0.19 and an Average True Range (ATR) of $0.22
Options Market Signals:
- No options data available
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: Lower Bollinger Band ($1.93), RSI oversold level (30)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
- MDAI is performing relatively well within its sector, with a positive correlation to the broader market
Institutional Activity:
- No recent institutional activity data available
Correlation Analysis:
- Correlation coefficient: 0.22, indicating a low degree of correlation between MDAI and the broader market
Relative Valuation:
- Position within trading range: Neutral
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: Lower Bollinger Band ($1.93), RSI oversold level (30)
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($2.63)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- No specific levels identified, but the stock's high volatility suggests that there may be opportunities for large price movements
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Upcoming earnings release (no date specified)
- Potential product launches or regulatory approvals
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels: Lower Bollinger Band ($1.93), RSI oversold level (30)
- Position sizing considerations: Based on the stock's high volatility, it may be prudent to maintain a smaller position size.
I hope this comprehensive analysis meets your requirements!
MDAI Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $0K | #4635 of 4729 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
MDAI Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 8 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
MDAI Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-29| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +32,000 | $1.62 | $51.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-25 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +60,000 | $1.67 | $100.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-21 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +32,000 | $1.66 | $53.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-14 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +32,000 | $1.58 | $50.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-17 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +35,000 | $1.64 | $57.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | Award (A) | +44,000 | $1.72 | $75.7K | EDGAR |
MDAI Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $1.51| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Michael DiMaio | Director | 2,922,847 | $4.43M | $0 | 6 | 2026-09-29 |
MDAI Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 29, 2026Directors 5
- Martin C.B. Mellish · since Sep 11, 2023
- Richard John Cotton · since Sep 11, 2023
- John Michael DiMaio · listed since May 2024
- Marion Ann Snyder · on file since Apr 2026
- Deepak Sadagopan · on file since May 2026
Officers 1
- Vincent S. Capone · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Apr 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (50)
| May 20, 2026 | Deepak Sadagopan first on file as a director |
| Apr 27, 2026 | Marion Ann Snyder first on file as a director |
| Apr 6, 2026 | Vincent S. Capone listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously CFO and General Counsel) in SEC filings |
| Jun 10, 2025 | John Michael DiMaio no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Oct 14, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Peter M Carlson from the board in an SEC filing |
| Oct 14, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Peter M Carlson as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| May 14, 2024 | Stan Micek first on file as Chief Operating Officer |
| May 14, 2024 | John Michael DiMaio first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| May 13, 2024 | Vincent S. Capone listed as CFO and General Counsel (previously General Counsel) in SEC filings |
| May 13, 2024 | Peter M Carlson first on file as a director |
| May 13, 2024 | Peter M Carlson first on file as Chief Executive Officer |
| May 13, 2024 | Jeremiah A. Sparks first on file as Chief Commerical Officer |
| May 13, 2024 | Erich Spangenberg first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Mar 29, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Nikolaos Pagoulatos as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing |
| Feb 29, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Wensheng Fan from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 29, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Wensheng Fan as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 30, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Michael Patrick Murphy from the board in an SEC filing |
| Sep 13, 2023 | Michael Patrick Murphy first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Sep 13, 2023 | Heather Bellini reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Sep 13, 2023 | Franklin S. Edmonds Jr. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Sep 13, 2023 | Brian J Radecki reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Xiaojia Cynthia Cai became a director |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Wensheng Fan became a director |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Wensheng Fan became Chief Executive Officer |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Vincent S. Capone became General Counsel |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Richard John Cotton became a director |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Nils Windler became Chief Financial Officer |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Nikolaos Pagoulatos became Chief Operating Officer |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Martin C.B. Mellish became a director |
| Sep 11, 2023 | John Michael DiMaio became a 10% owner |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Jeffrey Edward Thatcher became Chief Scientist |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Erich Spangenberg became a 10% owner |
| Sep 11, 2023 | ELS 1960 Family, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Dec 23, 2022 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc became a 10% owner |
| Dec 23, 2022 | Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC became a 10% owner |
| May 6, 2021 | Paul J Glazer reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| May 6, 2021 | Glazer Capital, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Paul J Glazer became a 10% owner |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Glazer Capital, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Rosecliff Acquisition Sponsor I LLC became a director |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Rosecliff Acquisition Sponsor I LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Rosecliff Acquisition Sponsor I LLC became Chief Executive Officer |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Michael Patrick Murphy became a 10% owner |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Kieran Goodwin became a director |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Kieran Goodwin became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Jordan Zimmerman became a director |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Jordan Zimmerman became President |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Heather Bellini became a director |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Franklin S. Edmonds Jr. became a director |
| Feb 11, 2021 | Brian J Radecki became a director |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (13)
- Erich Spangenberg · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated May 17, 2024
- Stan Micek · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated May 14, 2024
- Jeremiah A. Sparks · Last reported as Chief Commerical Officer in an SEC filing dated May 13, 2024
- ELS 1960 Family, L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Sep 26, 2023
- Jeffrey Edward Thatcher · Last reported as Chief Scientist in an SEC filing dated Sep 14, 2023
- Rosecliff Acquisition Sponsor I LLC · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 13, 2023
- Nils Windler · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Sep 13, 2023
- Xiaojia Cynthia Cai · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 13, 2023
- Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 10, 2023
- Goldman Sachs Group Inc · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 10, 2023
- Michael Patrick Murphy · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 11, 2021
- Jordan Zimmerman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 11, 2021
- Kieran Goodwin · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 11, 2021
MDAI Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-07-21What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-21 | Erich Spangenberg; ELS 1960 Family, L.P. | Former Director | 736,131 | $1.85M | 2025-07-21 | B. Riley Wealth Management, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-11 | 0001213900-26-087764 | EDGAR |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
MDAI vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYK Stryker Corporation | $124.1B | 34.7 | +7.9% | −6.4% | 26 |
| MMM 3M Company | $95.5B | 28.4 | +1.7% | +17.6% | 23 |
| BSX Boston Scientific Corp. | $62.0B | 18.8 | +8.9% | −53.2% | 20 |
| BDX Becton, Dickinson and Co. | $57.7B | 54.8 | +6.4% | +11.1% | 28 |
| MDLN Medline Inc. Class A common stock | $34.8B | 0.0 | — | +1.5% | 4 |
| RMD ResMed Inc. | $33.1B | 21.6 | +9.0% | −3.3% | 22 |
| DXCM DexCom, Inc. | $29.6B | 31.9 | +13.0% | +21.8% | 41 |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | $27.9B | 46.2 | +12.6% | +49.0% | 17 |
| MDAI Spectral AI, Inc. Class A Common Stock | $48M | — | — | +4.5% | — |
| Peer median | $46.3B | 30.1 | +8.9% | +6.3% | 23 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.