BenzingaT3·35mo ago
MIND MIND Technology, Inc. Common Stock (DE)
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
MIND
—
—
Key stats
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.92 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.50% |
| WACC | 9.48% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 32.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -5.8% |
| Book / Price | 132.9% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $4.21 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $4.06 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 30.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: DRS, LHX, NN, NOC, TDY
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
60-Day Conviction
56%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$3.28
α +0.7%
rank 100%
conviction
48%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$3.38
α +3.6%
rank 100%
conviction
87%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 4, 2027
$3.33
α +2.2%
rank 99%
conviction
56%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 24.0× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 15.9× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/B | $13.49 | 24% | median 3.0× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 2.3× · 5 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $4.21 | 76% | stability 63% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-11-09 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SEARCH, DETECTION, NAVIGATION, GUIDANCE, AERONAUTICAL SYS (3812) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 157
- List Date
- 1994-12-19
- CIK
- 0000926423
- Next Earnings
- 2026-12-08
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.14)
- Headquarters
- The Woodlands, TX
- Homepage
- https://www.mind-technology.com
MIND Technology Inc provides technology and solutions for exploration, survey, and defense applications in oceanographic, hydrographic, defense, seismic, and security industries. The company operates in single segment namely, Seamap which provides services and products, including engineering, repairs and software licensing, utilized in marine exploration, marine survey and maritime security for marine survey companies, seismic survey contractors, research institutes, non-military government organizations and operators of port facilities and other offshore installations. The company generates m…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -3.17% | -18.82% | 39.96% | -7.88% | 20.70% | -2.78% | 4.67% |
| Feb | 13.29% | -17.73% | -10.74% | -0.33% | -14.44% | -12.43% | -7.06% |
| Mar | -10.00% | 20.00% | -17.48% | -26.76% | -16.78% | 4.77% | -7.71% |
| Apr | 6.42% | -19.37% | -3.45% | 23.35% | 12.40% | -24.64% | -0.88% |
| May | -6.53% | -7.00% | 33.76% | -26.75% | -7.89% | 3.85% | -1.76% |
| Jun | -12.22% | -5.33% | -3.54% | 1.20% | 40.90% | -27.05% | -1.01% |
| Jul | 2.06% | -7.00% | 14.70% | 8.18% | 10.27% | 4.62% | 5.47% |
| Aug | 3.31% | -1.74% | -12.30% | -16.25% | 13.20% | -13.52% | -4.55% |
| Sep | -8.29% | -16.25% | -20.34% | 9.35% | -21.19% | 3.37% | -8.89% |
| Oct | -8.60% | -8.37% | -6.42% | -7.85% | 32.17% | -11.76% | -1.80% |
| Nov | -6.78% | -20.98% | 9.06% | 9.37% | -20.62% | -14.88%* | -7.47% |
| Dec | 9.64% | -6.10% | 26.49% | 105.17% | -11.57% | -- | 24.73% |
| Total | -22.13% | -70.40% | 32.85% | 25.97% | 14.42% | -64.23% | -13.92% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $4.00
SMA 50: $4.19
SMA 200: $6.05
Current: $3.26
EMA 12: $3.74
EMA 26: $3.98
MACD: -0.2464 | Signal: -0.0910
BEARISH
ADX (14): 25.48
TREND
+DI: 7.33
−DI: 30.48
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 28.06
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 10.19
Stoch %D: 7.93
Williams %R: -92.25
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $4.70
BB Lower: $3.31
OVERSOLD
OBV: 10,363,439
Vol SMA 20: 58,043
Vol ROC: 32.21%
ATR: $0.26
True Range: $0.14
HV 20: 59.0%
HV 30: 58.2%
HV 60: 57.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: MIND
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers: The stock is trading in a range, with technical indicators suggesting a bearish trend. The recent news headlines have been neutral, and options market activity indicates low volatility.
Primary Risks: The main risk is the potential for further price decline if the stock breaks below its current support levels.
Investment Thesis:
MIND's stock price has been trading in a range, with no clear upward momentum. The recent bearish MACD crossover and RSI reading indicate a potential short-term downtrend. However, the stock's beta is relatively high, suggesting it may be more volatile than the broader market. A careful analysis of technical indicators and news sentiment is necessary to determine the optimal entry point.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The recent news headlines have been neutral, with no clear bias towards buying or selling pressure. The lack of significant news events has contributed to the stock's trading range.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bearish Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral Long-term (3-12 months): Unknown
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower support: $3.86 (Bollinger Bands lower boundary)
- Resistance: $4.40 (SMA 20), $4.85 (SMA 50)
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (31.52) MACD signal: Bearish (crossover below the signal line) Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis: Volume trends indicate a slight increase in buying pressure, but the overall volume remains low.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
The recent news headlines have been neutral, with no clear bias towards buying or selling pressure. The lack of significant news events has contributed to the stock's trading range.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is NEUTRAL, reflecting the overall market uncertainty.
Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts are identified in the near term. The company's recent financial performance and industry trends will likely drive future price movements.
Market Narrative: The neutral news sentiment aligns with the technical indicators' lack of clear direction. A careful analysis of these signals is necessary to determine the optimal entry point.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to the market (beta >1.2).
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is lower than historical levels, but the stock remains more volatile than the broader market.
Options Market Signals: IV rank: 0.0% (Low) Put/call ratios: Neutral Unusual activity: None
Downside Protection: Support levels are provided by the Bollinger Bands lower boundary ($3.86) and the SMA 20 ($4.40).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The technology sector has been performing relatively well, but MIND's stock price has not participated in this growth.
Institutional Activity: No specific institutional activity is identified, suggesting a lack of significant buying or selling pressure.
Correlation Analysis: The stock's correlation with the broader market (R-squared) is 0.34, indicating some positive correlation.
Relative Valuation: MIND's stock price is currently trading within its historical range, but there is no clear value proposition.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support: $3.86 (Bollinger Bands lower boundary), $4.00 (SMA 20) Resistance: $4.40 (SMA 20), $4.85 (SMA 50)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: The stock needs to break above the SMA 20 or below the Bollinger Bands lower boundary to indicate a significant trend change.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific time-sensitive catalysts are identified in the near term. The company's recent financial performance and industry trends will likely drive future price movements.
Risk Management: A stop-loss level could be set at $3.60 (20% below current price) to limit potential losses if the stock breaks below its support levels.
Note: This report provides a comprehensive analysis of MIND's technical, fundamental, and market factors. The assessment is neutral due to the lack of clear upward or downward momentum. A careful analysis of these signals is necessary to determine the optimal entry point.
Generated
News
All MIND news →
BenzingaT3·35mo ago
BenzingaT3·36mo ago
BenzingaT3·39mo ago
BenzingaT3·41mo ago
BenzingaT3·41mo ago
BenzingaT3·41mo ago
BenzingaT3·42mo ago
BenzingaT3·42mo ago
BenzingaT3·43mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 21
Page 1 of 3
Earnings History
2 of 3 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
3.38%
Avg Actual Move
4.52%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-12 | Pre-Market | 3.63% | 1.71% | 0.47x | Within |
| 2021-06-02 | unknown | 1.72% | 7.30% | 4.24x | Exceeded |
| 2021-09-08 | unknown | 4.80% | 4.55% | 0.95x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
MIND Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: —
7-DTE Move: —
Days to Exp: — (Unknown)
Options Flow · One expiry
Call Volume: —
Put Volume: —
P/C Volume: —
Call OI: —
Put OI: —
P/C OI: —
Total OI: —
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: —
ATM Put: —
Call %: —
Put %: —
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 0
Chain OI: 0
Last Updated: 3/15/2024
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.7519
Alpha: -132.55%
Correlation: 0.3211
R-Squared: 10.3%
Stock Volatility: 75.3%
Market Volatility: 13.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own MIND
1 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $127K | #5685 of 6285 | +153.4% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
MIND Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 19 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 8,358,000 (as of 2026-04-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
MIND Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-31Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-31 | Peter H Blum | Director | Grant (A) | +30,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-31 | William Hunter Hilarides | Director | Grant (A) | +30,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-31 | Alan Perry Baden | Director | Grant (A) | +30,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-31 | Thomas S Glanville | Director | Grant (A) | +30,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-31 | Robert P Capps | President and CEO | Grant (A) | +60,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-31 | Mark Alan Cox | CFO | Grant (A) | +50,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-08 | Peter H Blum | Director | Grant (A) | +30,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-08 | Robert P Capps | President and CEO | Grant (A) | +60,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-08 | William Hunter Hilarides | Director | Grant (A) | +30,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-08 | Thomas S Glanville | Director | Grant (A) | +30,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-08 | Alan Perry Baden | Director | Grant (A) | +30,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-08 | Mark Alan Cox | CFO | Grant (A) | +50,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-22 | Mark Alan Cox | CFO | Grant (A) | +30,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-22 | Peter H Blum | Director | Grant (A) | +20,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-22 | Alan Perry Baden | Director | Grant (A) | +20,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
MIND Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $3.26
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peter H Blum | Director | 47,222 | $153.9K | -$1.23M | 28 | 2026-07-31 |
| 2 | Robert P Capps | President and CEO | 2,693 | $8.8K | -$1.37M | 15 | 2026-07-31 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
MIND Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jul 31, 2026Directors 4
- Peter H Blum · on file since Apr 2006
- Thomas S Glanville · since Sep 9, 2015
- William Hunter Hilarides · since Aug 21, 2019
- Alan Perry Baden · since May 2, 2022
Officers 2
- Robert P Capps · President and CEO · listed since Aug 2022
- Mark Alan Cox · CFO · listed since Aug 2022
Changes in the last 10 years (12)
| Oct 8, 2025 | Robert P Capps no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Oct 31, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Nancy Jean Harned from the board in an SEC filing |
| Aug 5, 2022 | Robert P Capps listed as President and CEO (previously Co-CEO and CFO) in SEC filings |
| Aug 5, 2022 | Mark Alan Cox listed as CFO (previously Principal Accounting Officer) in SEC filings |
| May 2, 2022 | Nancy Jean Harned became a director |
| May 2, 2022 | Alan Perry Baden became a director |
| Jan 24, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Marcus C Rowland from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 21, 2020 | Dennis Patrick Morris became Chief Operating Officer |
| Aug 21, 2019 | William Hunter Hilarides became a director |
| May 9, 2017 | Mark Alan Cox became Principal Accounting Officer |
| Feb 17, 2017 | Robert P Capps listed as Co-CEO and CFO (previously Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| Feb 17, 2017 | Guy Malden listed as Co-CEO and EVP (previously VP - Marine Systems) in SEC filings |
Not reported recently (4)
- Guy Malden · Last reported as Co-CEO and EVP in an SEC filing dated Aug 9, 2021
- Robert John Albers · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 9, 2021
- Dennis Patrick Morris · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 9, 2021
- R Dean Lewis · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jul 31, 2019
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-09-09
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
ETF Holders
5 ETFs hold MIND
5 shown · $1.76M total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $436,388 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $104,565 | $1.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $35,336 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 5 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $8,028 | — | 2026-11-05 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '27 | 2026-07-31 | $5.62M | $-1.73M | $-0.19 | $-1.79M |
| Q1 '27 | 2026-04-30 | $9.67M | $-411.00K | $-0.05 | $-1.35M |
| Q4 '26 | 2026-01-31 | $9.80M | $-271.00K | $-0.04 | $-1.22M |
| Q3 '26 | 2025-10-31 | $9.69M | $62.00K | $0.01 | $894.00K |
| Q2 '26 | 2025-07-31 | $13.56M | $1.93M | $0.24 | $-1.16M |
| Q1 '26 | 2025-04-30 | $7.90M | $-970.00K | $-0.12 | $4.07M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-01-31 | $15.04M | $2.04M | $-1.30 | $2.06M |
| Q3 '25 | 2024-10-31 | $12.11M | $15.71M | $2.87 | $2.29M |
| Q2 '25 | 2024-07-31 | $10.04M | $-149.00K | $-0.11 | $1.06M |
| Q1 '25 | 2024-04-30 | $9.68M | $7.00K | — | $-4.75M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-01-31 | $13.38M | $494.00K | $0.35 | $657.00K |
| Q3 '24 | 2023-10-31 | $4.97M | $-379.00K | $-0.27 | $-2.15M |
Q2 2027 • period ending 2026-07-31 • filed 2026-09-09
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
20.38
P/B
0.66
P/S
0.64
EV/EBITDA
2.18
EV/Sales
0.22
ROE
3.2%
ROA
2.6%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
-10.38%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$27.25M
as of 2026-11-09
MIND vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOC Northrop Grumman Corp. | $74.6B | 17.0 | +6.5% | −7.9% | 40 |
| GRMN Garmin Ltd | $55.0B | 28.2 | +13.6% | +45.1% | 24 |
| LHX L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | $48.4B | 25.4 | +7.3% | −10.5% | 53 |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | $28.7B | 29.6 | +8.6% | +24.5% | 22 |
| DRS Leonardo DRS, Inc. Common Stock | $9.1B | 26.7 | +8.9% | +4.3% | 36 |
| LYNX Lyntris Inc. | $1.7B | — | — | −4.5% | — |
| LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc. Class A Common | $1.7B | — | +53.8% | −32.6% | 60 |
| NN NextNav Inc. Common Stock | $1.5B | — | −34.6% | −45.0% | 67 |
| MIND MIND Technology, Inc. Common Stock (DE) | $30M | 20.4 | −5.3% | −63.8% | — |
| Peer median | $18.9B | 26.7 | +8.6% | −6.2% | 40 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
266.70K
SI % of Float
3.02%
Days to Cover
4.29
Short Vol Ratio
28.8%
Free Float
8.82M
Float %
97.1%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-06 • Float 2026-05-29