NEOV NeoVolta Inc.
XNAS 3.07 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
NEOV
$3.07
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
$3.07
- 52-Week Range
- $1.36 – $7.13
- YTD
- -6.69%
- Straddle Price
- $1.18
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.39
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- Open
- $3.05
- Day Range
- $2.94 – $3.12
- Volume
- 125,200
- Prev Close
- $2.97
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.84% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.98 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.75% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.34% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +74.7pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -54.3% |
| Book / Price | 19.3% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 21.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -123.5% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $2.81 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $2.25 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 36.1% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: AYI, BE, FSLR, MPWR, NXT, ON, RIVN, TSLA
60-Day Conviction
45%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 9, 2026
$2.92
α +1.0%
rank 44%
conviction
65%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 7, 2027
$2.95
α +2.1%
rank 34%
conviction
65%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 5, 2027
$2.94
α +1.7%
rank 33%
conviction
45%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 35.8× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 19.2× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $2.61 | 50% | median 4.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $1.90 | 50% | median 4.2× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $2.81 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-11-10 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES (3690) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- Employees
- 41
- List Date
- 2019-10-21
- CIK
- 0001748137
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.15)
- Headquarters
- Poway, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.neovolta.com
NeoVolta Inc is engaged in designing, manufacturing, and selling high-end Energy Storage System which can store and use solar energy via batteries and an inverter at a residential site. Its marketplace includes the solar industry, installers, new construction homebuilders, home remodelers, and homeowners. Its ESS product portfolio includes the NV14, NV24, NVPlus, NV7600 stand-alone inverter, and the NV16 kW AC hybrid inverter with 24 kW PV input and a 250 kW / 430 kWh C&I system.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -17.39% | -4.70% | -31.95% | 27.96% | -6.52% |
| Feb | -- | 17.92% | -19.23% | 7.27% | -38.25% | -8.07% |
| Mar | -- | -4.83% | -6.72% | -29.89% | -10.98% | -13.11% |
| Apr | -- | -32.65% | 81.89% | 47.79% | -16.83% | 20.05% |
| May | -- | 106.25% | 10.04% | -5.90% | -28.31% | 20.52% |
| Jun | -- | 13.32% | 4.35% | 1.85% | 59.09% | 19.65% |
| Jul | -0.76% | -1.23% | 8.03% | 40.65% | -25.44% | 4.25% |
| Aug | -5.12% | -12.23% | 18.96% | -28.34% | 71.66% | 8.99% |
| Sep | 28.32% | -15.02% | 1.98% | 26.70% | -28.77% | 2.64% |
| Oct | -22.43% | -10.17% | 3.40% | -8.90% | -14.29% | -10.48% |
| Nov | -8.85% | -14.18% | 46.26% | -10.57% | 47.18%* | 11.97% |
| Dec | -20.29% | -10.61% | 6.33% | -21.45% | -- | -11.50% |
| Total | -31.90% | -25.91% | 216.04% | -40.76% | -23.27% | 18.84% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $2.31
SMA 50: $2.77
SMA 200: $2.92
Current: $3.06
EMA 12: $2.54
EMA 26: $2.50
MACD: 0.0369 | Signal: 0.1349
BEARISH
ADX (14): 23.00
WEAK TREND
+DI: 33.41
−DI: 15.89
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 64.03
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 92.49
Stoch %D: 86.65
Williams %R: -5.43
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $2.92
BB Lower: $1.70
OVERBOUGHT
OBV: 72,187,674
Vol SMA 20: 966,815
Vol ROC: -88.84%
ATR: $0.25
True Range: $0.15
HV 20: 119.9%
HV 30: 119.9%
HV 60: 128.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-12T00:00:00 – 2026-11-10T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Written before NEOV’s Sep 23 earnings report, so it doesn’t reflect the results.
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: NEOV
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bullish momentum from MACD signal
- Neutral RSI reading
- Lower Bollinger Bands indicate potential buying opportunity
Primary Risks:
- High volatility and beta
- Recent negative news headlines may impact sentiment
Investment Thesis: NEOV is a volatile stock with mixed technical signals. The recent uptrend is supported by positive news sentiment, but the high risk profile and recent negative news headlines need to be carefully considered.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive news headlines dominate the past 10 articles, indicating overall optimism around NEOV's growth potential.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bearish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $3.20 (support)
- EMA 12: $3.32 (resistance)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $3.90 (resistance)
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (58.17), not oversold or overbought MACD signal: Bullish, above the signal line Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, price within the bands
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: 1619016.46 (increasing) On-Balance Volume (OBV): 77684571.86 (increasing)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- 4 positive news headlines about partnerships and supply agreements
- 2 neutral news headlines about routine announcements
Sentiment Assessment: Positive (60%)
Catalyst Identification: Earnings release scheduled for Q2 FY2026, potential catalyst
Market Narrative: Positive news sentiment aligns with the bullish momentum from technical indicators.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta 2.53)
Volatility Regime: Historical volatility is high, indicating significant price movements
Options Market Signals: IV Rank: Low (22.4%), Options market pricing a relatively low volatility environment Put/Call Ratio: Bullish (0.70), more calls than puts
Downside Protection: SMA 50: $2.66 (support)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: NEOV is outperforming the broader technology sector
Institutional Activity: Increasing volume and OBV suggest institutional interest
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation suggests NEOV has a moderate correlation with the market (0.24)
Relative Valuation: NEOV is trading within its historical range, not overvalued or undervalued
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $3.20 (support)
- EMA 12: $3.32 (resistance)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $3.90 (resistance)
- Lower Bollinger Band: $2.51 (support)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Q2 FY2026 earnings release
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at SMA 20 and EMA 12, position sizing considerations around high volatility.
Conclusion
NEOV's mixed technical signals, high volatility, and positive news sentiment make it a challenging stock to analyze. While the bullish momentum from MACD is encouraging, the recent negative news headlines and high risk profile require caution. The upcoming earnings release will be a key catalyst, and investors should carefully consider the potential impact on NEOV's price movement.
Generated
News
All NEOV news →
Earnings History
2 of 2 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
42.34%
Avg Actual Move
5.67%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | Pre-Market | 52.68% | 5.69% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2026-09-23 | Pre-Market | 31.99% | 5.65% | 0.18x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
NEOV Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $1.18
7-DTE Move: $3.17
Days to Exp: 37 (2026-12-18)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 553
Put Volume: 215
P/C Volume: 0.389
BULLISH
Call OI: 11,409
Put OI: 2,057
P/C OI: 0.18
Total OI: 13,466
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.78
ATM Put: $0.40
Call %: 25.2%
Put %: 13.0%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 768
Chain OI: 13,466
Last Updated: 11/11/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 45th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
45%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.23
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.28
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.07
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 6 ATM contracts, 5k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$1.18Nov 11
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.6323
Alpha: 34.26%
Correlation: 0.2537
R-Squared: 6.4%
Stock Volatility: 142.0%
Market Volatility: 13.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own NEOV
2 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $831K | #2399 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $499K | #4468 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
NEOV Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 21 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 35,745,536 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
2 filers$273.74K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $240.66K | 87.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $33.08K | 12.08% | 2026-06-30 |
3 filers$295.15K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $183.65K | 62.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $70.25K | 23.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $41.27K | 13.98% | 2026-06-30 |
NEOV Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-11-04Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | John A Hass | Director | Award (A) | +40,212 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-11-04 | Chandler G Weeks | Director | Award (A) | +31,834 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-11-04 | Susan H Snow | Director | Award (A) | +29,148 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-15 | John A Hass | Director | Buy (P) | +25,000 | $2.61 | $65.2K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
NEOV Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $3.06
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John A Hass | Director | 147,178 | $450.0K | $65.2K | 2 | 2026-11-04 |
| 2 | Chandler G Weeks | Director | 82,413 | $252.0K | $0 | 1 | 2026-11-04 |
| 3 | Susan H Snow | Director | 40,179 | $122.8K | $0 | 1 | 2026-11-04 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
NEOV Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 4, 2026Directors 4
- John A Hass · since Jul 27, 2022
- Susan H Snow · since Jul 27, 2022
- Chandler G Weeks · since Jan 2, 2025
- Henry Ardes Johnson · listed since Feb 2026
Officers 5
- Henry Ardes Johnson · CEO & President · since Apr 24, 2024
- Steve Bond · Executive Vice President · listed since May 2026
- Jing Nealis · Chief Financial Officer · since May 18, 2026
- Amany Ibrahim · Chief Operating Officer · since Oct 1, 2025
- Thomas Enzendorfer · Chief Technology Officer · since Oct 1, 2025
10% owners 1
- Brent Willson · listed since Oct 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (18)
| May 20, 2026 | Steve Bond listed as Executive Vice President (previously Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| May 18, 2026 | Jing Nealis became Chief Financial Officer |
| May 14, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Steve Bond from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 25, 2026 | Henry Ardes Johnson first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Oct 10, 2025 | Brent Willson first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Oct 1, 2025 | Thomas Enzendorfer became Chief Technology Officer |
| Oct 1, 2025 | Amany Ibrahim became Chief Operating Officer |
| Jan 2, 2025 | Chandler G Weeks became a director |
| Jan 1, 2025 | Michael Mendik became Chief Operating Officer |
| Dec 31, 2024 | The company announced the departure of James F Amos from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 24, 2024 | Henry Ardes Johnson became CEO & President |
| Jan 4, 2023 | Brent Willson first listed as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jul 27, 2022 | Susan H Snow became a director |
| Jul 27, 2022 | Steve Bond became a director |
| Jul 27, 2022 | Steve Bond became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jul 27, 2022 | John A Hass became a director |
| Jul 27, 2022 | James F Amos became a director |
| Jul 27, 2022 | Brent Willson became a director |
Not reported recently (1)
- Michael Mendik · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 15, 2025
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-10-30
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | 0001683168-26-007333 | EDGAR |
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
ETF Holders
5 ETFs hold NEOV
5 shown · $5.98M total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $3.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $378,530 | $1.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | QCLN First Trust NASDAQ® Clean Edge® Green Energy Index Fund | First Trust | 0.06% | $255,798 | $454.1M | 2026-11-06 |
| 5 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $6,734 | $3.2B | 2026-11-06 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-0.33
TTM Revenue
$18.07M
TTM Net Income
$-11.46M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-9.08M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $2.02M | $-3.03M | $-0.08 | $-3.58M |
| Q2 '26 | 2025-12-31 | $4.65M | $-5.54M | $-0.16 | $-2.08M |
| Q1 '26 | 2025-09-30 | $6.65M | $-1.24M | $-0.04 | $-2.49M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $4.75M | $-1.65M | $-0.05 | $-924.24K |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $2.01M | $-1.45M | $-0.04 | $-2.05M |
| Q2 '25 | 2024-12-31 | $1.07M | $-971.14K | $-0.03 | $-858.30K |
| Q1 '25 | 2024-09-30 | $590.24K | $-964.49K | $-0.03 | $-593.03K |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $579.21K | $-729.08K | $-0.02 | $-27.54K |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $283.90K | $-589.47K | $-0.02 | $-485.33K |
| Q2 '24 | 2023-12-31 | $1.02M | $-556.04K | $-0.02 | $-324.41K |
| Q1 '24 | 2023-09-30 | $764.13K | $-428.71K | $-0.01 | $-179.09K |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $721.86K | $-320.91K | $-0.01 | $-1.46M |
Q3 2026 • period ending 2026-03-31 • filed 2026-05-15
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
4.92
P/S
6.03
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
5.40
ROE
-51.7%
ROA
-44.7%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
-8.33%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$109.02M
as of 2026-11-11
NEOV vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA Tesla, Inc. Common Stock | $1.49T | 430.0 | +8.3% | −10.7% | 38 |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | $67.7B | 78.3 | +40.5% | +52.4% | 36 |
| BE Bloom Energy Corporation | $57.3B | 125.6 | +110.6% | +107.5% | 11 |
| ON ON Semiconductor Corp | $26.9B | 41.7 | +2.9% | +26.5% | 24 |
| FSLR First Solar, Inc. | $20.6B | 10.5 | −0.7% | −33.8% | 18 |
| RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. Class A Common S | $20.4B | — | +11.1% | −29.4% | 44 |
| NXT Nextpower Inc. Common Stock | $15.8B | 24.7 | +13.7% | +5.9% | 48 |
| AYI Acuity Inc. | $10.0B | 19.6 | +6.8% | −10.4% | 42 |
| NEOV NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock | $169M | — | +324.7% | −7.1% | 23 |
| Peer median | $23.7B | 41.7 | +9.7% | −2.2% | 37 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
7.69M
SI % of Float
14.69%
Days to Cover
6.13
Short Vol Ratio
56.6%
Free Float
52.37M
Float %
88.6%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-10 • Float 2026-10-30