NVMI Nova Ltd. Ordinary Shares
XNAS
317.22
−5.19%
Pre-market
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $266.43 – $615.99
- YTD
- -3.67%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 21.89
- Straddle Price
- $43.15
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.98
- Market Cap
- $10.6B
- Open
- $331.39
- Day Range
- $331.39 – $342.20
- Volume
- 170,519
- Prev Close
- $334.72
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.00% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.40 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.72% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 12.30% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +52.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 13.5% |
| Book / Price | 13.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.56 |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $355.82 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $344.53 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 9.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.5B |
| Market Cap | $10B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $9.85 | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 66.6× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 17.4× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $411.15 | 9% | median 9.0× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 14.3× · 4 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $355.82 | 61% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $332.03 | 30% | 57 strikes · skew +0.30 |
- Industry (SIC)
- OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS & LENSES (3827) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $10.6B
- Employees
- 1,612
- List Date
- 2000-04-11
- CIK
- 0001109345
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-05 (Pre-Market)
- EPS Forecast
- $2.77
- Homepage
- https://www.novami.com
Nova Ltd is a provider of metrology and process control solutions used in semiconductor manufacturing. The company provides high-performance metrology solutions across the semiconductor fabrication lifecycle and develops differentiated inline metrology solutions deployed by a broad range of customers, including integrated circuit manufacturers. Its portfolio combines high-precision hardware and software, enabling customers to improve device performance, enhance yields, and accelerate time to market. Its products include Dimensional Metrology, Materials Metrology, Chemical Metrology, and Softwa…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -1.54% | -19.59% | 9.38% | 6.75% | 20.88% | 31.81% | 7.95% |
| Feb | 14.93% | -9.84% | -4.66% | 19.63% | -1.23% | -3.37% | 2.58% |
| Mar | 1.60% | 3.25% | 14.09% | -3.42% | -19.18% | -3.11% | -1.13% |
| Apr | -1.28% | -7.97% | -11.21% | -4.60% | 6.12% | 12.27% | -1.11% |
| May | 8.17% | 6.69% | 19.01% | 24.69% | 9.18% | 1.59% | 11.55% |
| Jun | 2.94% | -17.15% | 5.74% | 10.05% | 29.93% | 12.69% | 7.37% |
| Jul | -2.69% | 26.18% | 8.10% | -11.33% | -2.18% | -22.47% | -0.73% |
| Aug | 3.48% | -5.77% | 2.03% | 18.14% | -0.08% | -11.49% | 1.05% |
| Sep | 1.87% | -12.78% | -11.99% | 3.31% | 34.79% | 14.09% | 4.88% |
| Oct | 5.66% | -15.82% | -13.62% | -6.36% | 4.02% | -13.45%* | -6.59% |
| Nov | 15.62% | 14.77% | 32.10% | -0.66% | -10.04% | -- | 10.36% |
| Dec | 13.44% | -5.64% | 7.27% | 3.39% | 7.38% | -- | 5.17% |
| Total | 79.66% | -42.43% | 57.95% | 68.05% | 92.30% | 7.48% | 43.83% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
NVMI (NOVA LTD) - COMPREHENSIVE STOCK ANALYSIS REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with Confidence Level: 6/10
Key Drivers:
- Positive earnings momentum (Q2 2025 record results) supporting bullish narrative
- Extreme overbought technical conditions (Stochastic %K at 95.60, Williams %R at -6.24) creating near-term pullback risk
- Elevated volatility regime (HV60: 55.9%, IV Premium: +31.5%) indicating market uncertainty
- High beta (2.84) amplifies both upside and downside moves relative to broader market
Primary Risks:
- Severe technical exhaustion despite price strength suggests mean reversion vulnerability
- Bearish MACD histogram (-5.39) diverges from positive news sentiment—critical signal conflict
- Low ADX (17.60) indicates weak trend strength despite 6% move above SMA50
- Volume decline (-68.57% RoC) suggests weakening institutional conviction
Investment Thesis: NVMI exhibits a classic "overbought on good news" setup where positive Q2 earnings catalyzed a strong rally, but technical exhaustion and negative volume divergence create asymmetric risk/reward. The stock needs to consolidate or pullback to establish sustainable uptrend support. Near-term traders should monitor for mean reversion while longer-term investors await trend confirmation.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Mixed sentiment (3 positive recent articles vs. 1 negative comparison) supports fundamentals, but timing is critical—most recent positive news (Q2 earnings on 2025-08-07) appears already priced in given overbought technicals. The August 31, 2026 articles show analyst debate about valuation, suggesting consensus uncertainty.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Direction | Strength | Assessment | |-----------|-----------|----------|------------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | MIXED/WEAKENING | Weak | Price above SMA20 ($364.38) and SMA50 ($379.50) suggests uptrend, but ADX 17.60 = range-bound regime; no directional conviction | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | BEARISH | Moderate | Price significantly below SMA200 ($442.67) by $56.07 (-12.7%). Trading 12.7% below long-term moving average indicates intermediate downtrend | | Long-term (3-12 months) | BEARISH | Clear | 200-day MA at $442.67 represents strong resistance; current price $386.60 = 87.2% of 200-MA, suggesting bear market structure |
Trend Interpretation: NVMI is caught in an intermediate-term downtrend (below 200-MA) with a weakening short-term bounce (ADX 17.60 = low strength). The recent rally to $386.60 appears to be a relief bounce rather than trend reversal.
Support/Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Distance | Implication | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | $394.92 | Resistance (BB Upper) | +$8.32 (+2.2%) | Immediate resistance; recent price test of upper Bollinger Band signals overbought condition | | $386.60 | Current Price | — | Currently within upper portion of Bollinger Band range | | $379.50 | Support (SMA50) | -$7.10 (-1.8%) | First support level; loss would signal deterioration of short-term uptrend | | $364.38 | Support (SMA20) | -$22.22 (-5.7%) | Secondary support; significant below-SMA50 break would target this level | | $333.84 | Support (BB Lower) | -$52.76 (-13.7%) | Major support; represents extreme mean reversion to lower Bollinger Band | | $442.67 | Resistance (SMA200) | +$56.07 (+14.5%) | Critical long-term resistance; represents the bear market ceiling |
Key Observation: NVMI is trading in the upper half of its Bollinger Band range ($333.84-$394.92), 13.7% above the lower band. A breakdown through SMA50 ($379.50) would signal trend deterioration and could accelerate toward SMA20 ($364.38) or lower band.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 57.76 — NEUTRAL BIAS
- Interpretation: Mid-range reading indicates balanced momentum; NOT overbought (>70) or oversold (<30)
- Signal Quality: RSI alone is neutral, but context matters—see below for conflicting signals
- Implication: Momentum is neither extended nor depleted, suggesting consolidation likely before next directional move
MACD: 0.22 / Signal: 5.61 / Histogram: -5.39 — BEARISH DIVERGENCE ⚠️
- Critical Finding: MACD (0.22) is significantly BELOW its signal line (5.61)
- Histogram: Negative at -5.39 indicates bearish crossover or sustained bearish momentum
- Conflict Alert: This is the most significant red flag—bearish MACD contradicts positive news and elevated price
- Interpretation: EMA12 (371.94) nearly equals EMA26 (371.72), showing momentum collapse despite price strength
- Signal Reliability: HIGH—MACD bearish divergence with price near highs typically precedes pullback or consolidation
Stochastic Oscillators: %K 95.60, %D 89.27 — EXTREME OVERBOUGHT 🔴
- Critical Alert: Stochastic %K at 95.60 is near maximum reading; above 80 = overbought, above 90 = extreme
- Signal: %K (95.60) > %D (89.27) with both elevated suggests momentum is turning
- Mean Reversion Risk: Extreme stochastic readings (>90) historically precede sharp pullbacks in 3-7 trading days
- Interpretation: This is the most reliable exhaustion signal in the dataset
Williams %R: -6.24 — EXTREME OVERBOUGHT 🔴
- Scale: Williams %R ranges from 0 to -100; -6.24 is near the extreme
- Interpretation: Readings between 0 and -20 = overbought; -6.24 = maximum momentum extension
- Confirmation: Williams %R agreement with Stochastic validates overbought thesis
Momentum Synthesis:
The dataset presents a critical conflict:
- Bullish Signals: Price above both SMA20 and SMA50; RSI neutral (57.76)
- Bearish Signals: Bearish MACD histogram (-5.39), Extreme Stochastic (95.60), Extreme Williams %R (-6.24)
This pattern indicates: PRICE STRENGTH WITH MOMENTUM EXHAUSTION. The stock has rallied sharply (likely on Q2 earnings news), but technical oscillators show extreme overbought conditions that historically resolve via pullback or consolidation. High probability of mean reversion in 3-7 days.
Volume Analysis
| Metric | Value | Interpretation | |--------|-------|-----------------| | Volume Rate of Change | -68.57% | MAJOR RED FLAG: Volume is collapsing; current volume trading 68.57% BELOW 20-day average | | Volume SMA 20 | 572,028 | Recent volumes likely running 180,000-200,000 shares vs. normal 572k | | OBV: 10,336,413 | Trend data | Without directional context, difficult to assess; typically rising OBV supports uptrends | | Volume Flow | 135 calls vs. 98 puts | Slight bullish bias in options activity (+37 call contracts) |
Volume Interpretation:
- Critical Weakness: -68.57% volume decline while price rallied is a classic divergence signal
- Implication: Rally is not confirmed by volume; price strength is "thin" and vulnerable to reversal on normal volume
- Institutional Conviction: Low volume suggests retail-driven rally, not institutional accumulation
- Risk: Without volume support, any negative catalyst will trigger sharp reversion
NEWS & SENTIMENT ANALYSIS
Recent Headlines Summary
| Date |
NVMI Options Activity & IV Rank
NVMI IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 2nd percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $243.6M | #44 of 3138 | -12.2% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $17.0M | #1242 of 6285 | +195.5% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $1.9M | #2618 of 3716 | +2.2% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $1.4M | #1541 of 4729 | +1.4% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $808K | #863 of 997 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
NVMI Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $48.16M | 28.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $29.59M | 17.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $27.64M | 16.44% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $19.33M | 11.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | PEAK6 LLC | $18.62M | 11.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $7.68M | 4.57% | 2025-09-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $7.38M | 4.39% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $2.82M | 1.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.23M | 1.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $1.68M | 1.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $927.01K | 0.55% | 2025-09-30 |
| 12 | Two Sigma Investments, LP Custodian | $760.12K | 0.45% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $488.65K | 0.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Walleye Capital LLC | $488.65K | 0.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | B. Riley Wealth Advisors, Inc. | $186.82K | 0.11% | 2026-09-30 |
| 16 | Cerity Partners LLC Custodian | $108.59K | 0.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $15.96M | 21.39% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $15.37M | 20.59% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $13.10M | 17.55% | 2025-09-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $10.26M | 13.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $4.40M | 5.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $3.80M | 5.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $3.04M | 4.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $2.28M | 3.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | PEAK6 LLC | $2.23M | 2.98% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.01M | 2.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $1.31M | 1.76% | 2025-09-30 |
| 12 | Two Sigma Investments, LP Custodian | $760.12K | 1.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Walleye Capital LLC | $108.59K | 0.15% | 2026-06-30 |
NVMI Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-22| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | Shay Wolfing | CTO | Sell (S) | −3,864 | $363.28 | -$1.40M | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-02 | Gabriel Waisman | CEO & President | Sell (S) | −1,500 | $342.27 | -$513.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-01 | Guy Kizner | CFO | Award (A) | +1,297 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-01 | Shay Wolfing | CTO | Award (A) | +1,259 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Gabriel Waisman | CEO & President | Sell (S) | −2,966 | $501.30 | -$1.49M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Gabriel Waisman | CEO & President | Award (A) | +7,056 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-25 | Yaniv Garty | Director | Sell (S) | −366 | $581.20 | -$212.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Zehava Simon | Director | Sell (S) | −820 | $556.46 | -$456.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Sarit Sagiv | Director | Sell (S) | −820 | $556.46 | -$456.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Eitan Oppenhaim | Director | Sell (S) | −1,290 | $581.20 | -$749.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-22 | Sarit Sagiv | Director | Award (A) | +334 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Eitan Oppenhaim | Director | Award (A) | +1,043 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Avi Cohen | Director | Award (A) | +334 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Yaniv Garty | Director | Award (A) | +334 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-22 | Zehava Simon | Director | Award (A) | +334 | — | EDGAR |
NVMI Insider Holdings
9 insiders · @ $334.59| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gabriel Waisman | CEO & President | 27,214 | $9.11M | -$2.00M | 4 | 2026-09-02 |
| 2 | Shay Wolfing | CTO | 21,409 | $7.16M | -$1.40M | 2 | 2026-09-22 |
| 3 | Avi Cohen | Director | 8,702 | $2.91M | $0 | 1 | 2026-06-22 |
| 4 | Guy Kizner | CFO | 6,981 | $2.34M | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-01 |
| 5 | Eitan Oppenhaim | Director | 6,421 | $2.15M | -$1.53M | 3 | 2026-06-24 |
| 6 | Raanan Cohen | Director | 6,048 | $2.02M | $0 | 1 | 2026-06-22 |
| 7 | Zehava Simon | Director | 2,405 | $804.7K | -$675.5K | 3 | 2026-06-24 |
| 8 | Sarit Sagiv | Director | 2,405 | $804.7K | -$675.5K | 3 | 2026-06-24 |
| 9 | Yaniv Garty | Director | 2,006 | $671.2K | -$455.3K | 4 | 2026-06-25 |
NVMI Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 22, 2026Directors 7
- Avi Cohen · since Mar 18, 2026
- Eitan Oppenhaim · since Mar 18, 2026
- Raanan Cohen · since Mar 18, 2026
- Rami Hadar · since Mar 18, 2026
- Sarit Sagiv · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yaniv Garty · since Mar 18, 2026
- Zehava Simon · since Mar 18, 2026
Officers 3
- Gabriel Waisman · CEO & President · since Mar 18, 2026
- Guy Kizner · CFO · since Mar 18, 2026
- Shay Wolfing · CTO · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (10)
| Mar 18, 2026 | Zehava Simon became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yaniv Garty became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Shay Wolfing became CTO |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Sarit Sagiv became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Rami Hadar became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Raanan Cohen became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Guy Kizner became CFO |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Gabriel Waisman became CEO & President |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Eitan Oppenhaim became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Avi Cohen became a director |
NVMI Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-22What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | Shay Wolfling | Officer | 3,864 | $1.38M | 2026-09-21 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Waisman Gabriel | Officer | 4,466 | $2.24M | 2026-07-02 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-22 | Garty Yaniv | Director | 366 | $210.6K | 2026-06-22 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | Oppenhaim Eitan | Director | 2,794 | $1.41M | 2026-05-26 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | Sagiv Sarit | Director | 1,246 | $634.4K | 2026-05-18 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | Simon Zehava | Director | 1,246 | $634.4K | 2026-05-18 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | Garty Yaniv | Director | 426 | $216.9K | 2026-05-18 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Waisman Gabriel | Officer | 3,125 | $1.39M | 2026-02-17 | Oppenheimer & Co Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Wolfing Shay | Officer | 9,346 | $4.15M | 2026-02-17 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Wilson Adrian Stuart | Officer | 3,046 | $1.35M | 2026-02-17 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc, | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $175.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $115.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $81.5M | $191.0B | 2026-10-28 |
| 4 | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $37.9M | $77.3B | 2026-10-28 |
| 5 | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $28.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 2.67% | $22.8M | $861.4M | 2026-10-28 |
| 7 | EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $15.1M | $15.2B | 2026-10-28 |
| 8 | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $14.5M | $57.8B | 2026-10-28 |
| 9 | IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $12.8M | $34.1B | 2026-10-28 |
| 10 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.03% | $12.7M | $41.1B | 2026-10-28 |
| 11 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $10.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.07% | $9.1M | $13.8B | 2026-10-28 |
| 13 | DFIC Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.04% | $5.7M | $15.3B | 2026-10-28 |
| 14 | ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $5.5M | $18.0B | 2026-10-28 |
| 15 | EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | Corgi | 1.90% | $5.3M | $280.3M | 2026-10-29 |
| 16 | ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $3.2M | $32.9B | 2026-10-28 |
| 17 | GRIN VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | Nport | 0.98% | $2.8M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | ITEQ Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | Amplify | 2.48% | $2.7M | $107.5M | 2026-10-29 |
| 19 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.02% | $2.6M | $10.9B | 2026-10-28 |
| 20 | VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $2.2M | — | 2026-10-28 |
| 21 | ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | VanEck | 1.38% | $2.2M | $156.1M | 2026-10-28 |
| 22 | DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $1.6M | $18.3B | 2026-10-28 |
| 23 | DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $1.1M | $1.0B | 2026-10-28 |
| 24 | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $1.0M | $9.2B | 2026-10-28 |
| 25 | QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | Nport | 0.15% | $950,408 | — | 2026-05-31 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '21 | 2021-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q1 '21 | 2021-03-31 | $84.13M | $17.62M | $0.60 | $32.98M |
| Q4 '20 | 2020-12-31 | $76.30M | $13.66M | $0.47 | $6.08M |
| Q3 '20 | 2020-09-30 | $69.48M | $13.90M | $0.48 | $21.59M |
| Q2 '20 | 2020-06-30 | $62.59M | $8.67M | $0.30 | $19.09M |
| Q1 '20 | 2020-03-31 | $61.02M | $11.68M | $0.41 | $13.89M |
| Q4 '19 | 2019-12-31 | $64.62M | $12.38M | $0.43 | $14.97M |
| Q3 '19 | 2019-09-30 | $52.51M | $8.56M | $0.30 | $9.24M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.