ORMP Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc.
XNAS
4.21
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
ORMP
$4.21
—
Key stats
$4.21
- 52-Week Range
- $2.09 – $5.47
- YTD
- +44.50%
- Straddle Price
- $2.52
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.16
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- Open
- $4.09
- Day Range
- $4.09 – $4.21
- Volume
- 9,628
- Prev Close
- $4.14
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.29 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.25% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 12.27% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +178.2pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 16.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 54.8% |
| Book / Price | 135.6% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $4.63 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $4.38 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 501.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: CMC, CNO, HOMB, NSIT, PBF, PRGO, UMBF
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
Blended Fair Value
$27.31
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $2.78 | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $31.07 | 83% | median 11.6× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 8.2× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $8.53 | 17% | median 1.5× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 0.8× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $4.63 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-22 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS (2834) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- Employees
- 13
- List Date
- 2004-04-19
- CIK
- 0001176309
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.43 (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.oramed.com
Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc is a pharmaceutical company that is engaged in the research and development of pharmaceutical solutions with a technology platform that allows for the oral delivery of therapeutic proteins. The company has developed an oral dosage form intended to withstand the harsh environment of the gastrointestinal tract and effectively deliver active insulin or other proteins. Its product pipeline includes ORMD-0801 for Diabetes, ORMD-0801 for NASH, and ORMD 0901.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 66.90% | -35.49% | -83.95% | 22.24% | -7.05% | 15.81% | -3.59% |
| Feb | 3.24% | -2.28% | 1.94% | 16.25% | -3.24% | 0.44% | 2.73% |
| Mar | 12.39% | -12.63% | -0.91% | -14.62% | 7.00% | 1.80% | -1.16% |
| Apr | 4.51% | -40.58% | 2.71% | -18.02% | 8.92% | 14.45% | -4.67% |
| May | 4.16% | -17.76% | 64.90% | -6.84% | 3.08% | -0.25% | 7.88% |
| Jun | 14.65% | 4.57% | -13.53% | 16.29% | -5.46% | 23.65% | 6.70% |
| Jul | 6.61% | 90.87% | -4.24% | -0.39% | 2.38% | -11.71% | 13.92% |
| Aug | 31.73% | 2.39% | -0.91% | 0.84% | 3.77% | 14.35% | 8.70% |
| Sep | 8.87% | -21.93% | -24.13% | 1.24% | 22.79% | -3.71% | -2.81% |
| Oct | 11.85% | 9.22% | -28.79% | -0.83% | -6.27% | -6.14%* | -3.49% |
| Nov | -23.37% | 24.91% | 29.82% | 2.16% | 20.76% | -- | 10.86% |
| Dec | -19.28% | 44.24% | 8.45% | -1.83% | 3.64% | -- | 7.04% |
| Total | 155.67% | -15.50% | -82.86% | 8.99% | 56.32% | 52.52% | 29.19% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $4.35
SMA 50: $4.63
SMA 200: $4.01
Current: $4.17
EMA 12: $4.22
EMA 26: $4.36
MACD: -0.1464 | Signal: -0.0116
BEARISH
ADX (14): 30.81
TREND
+DI: 12.74
−DI: 26.39
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 38.49
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 36.69
Stoch %D: 29.21
Williams %R: -59.12
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $4.80
BB Lower: $3.90
NEUTRAL
OBV: 6,613,620
Vol SMA 20: 140,954
Vol ROC: -95.95%
ATR: $0.16
True Range: $0.08
HV 20: 31.4%
HV 30: 28.2%
HV 60: 40.0%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: ORMP
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Recent positive news headlines and partnership announcements have boosted sentiment
- Technical indicators point to a short-term uptrend, with some signs of near-term consolidation
- High volatility and beta indicate higher risk, but options market shows relatively low IV
Primary Risks:
- Negative earnings surprises or regulatory issues could impact stock performance
- Increased competition in the biotechnology sector could lead to decreased market share
- Fluctuations in investor sentiment could cause price swings
Recent News Sentiment Impact: POSITIVE (Headlines 1-3)
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) - UPTREND, Medium-term (1-3 months) - NEUTRAL, Long-term (3-12 months) - BEARISH
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels include:
- Resistance: $5.43 (Upper Bollinger Band), $5.10 (EMA 26)
- Support: $4.79 (SMA 20), $4.46 (SMA 50)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral zone (30-70) - no clear buy or sell signal
- MACD signal: Bullish crossover above the signal line
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze above the middle band, indicating potential breakout
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines dominate recent coverage.
Sentiment Assessment: POSITIVE (Aggregate sentiment from headlines 1-3)
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming earnings reports and regulatory updates could impact stock performance
- Product launches and clinical trial results may influence investor sentiment
Market Narrative: News headlines generally align with the short-term uptrend, but near-term consolidation is possible.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Interpretation: High risk due to high volatility and beta (1.12)
Volatility Regime: Above-average volatility (0.55) - stock moves with market amplification
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: 3.7% (Low) - shows historically low volatility
- Current IV: 78.6%
- Expected Move: $3.75 (42 DTE), 7-DTE: $1.32
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: ORMP is outperforming the sector and market in the short term.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest, but no clear trend can be identified.
Correlation Analysis: Stock moves with market amplification (0.26 correlation).
Relative Valuation: ORMP is positioned within a trading range, but some room for upside potential exists.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Resistance: $5.43, $5.10
- Support: $4.79, $4.46
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Above $5.43 - potential breakout
- Below $4.79 - potential breakdown
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Earnings reports and regulatory updates within the next quarter
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels: below $4.14 or above $5.50
- Position sizing considerations: adjust according to market conditions and risk tolerance
Generated
News
All ORMP news →
Earnings History
1 of 2 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
58.56%
Avg Actual Move
10.57%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-10 | After-Close | 9.88% | 14.74% | 1.49x | Exceeded |
| 2025-11-17 | After-Close | 107.25% | 6.41% | 0.06x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
ORMP Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $2.52
7-DTE Move: $2.52
Days to Exp: 29 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 19
Put Volume: 22
P/C Volume: 1.158
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 460
Put OI: 17
P/C OI: 0.037
Total OI: 477
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.38
ATM Put: $2.15
Call %: 8.9%
Put %: 51.1%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 120
Chain OI: 833
Last Updated: 10/22/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
HIGH γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 100th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
100%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+1.00
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+1.00
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-1.00
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +1.00: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -1.00: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 3 ATM contracts, 3k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM 337.5% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$2.52Oct 22
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.1588
Alpha: 57.71%
Correlation: 0.2780
R-Squared: 7.7%
Stock Volatility: 53.0%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own ORMP
3 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $884K | #2369 of 3138 | +24.4% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $200K | #5499 of 6285 | -57.9% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $105K | #3607 of 3716 | +36.5% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
ORMP Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 42,443,189 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
3 filers$255.89K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $120.73K | 47.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $120.25K | 46.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $14.91K | 5.83% | 2026-06-30 |
1 filers$481 notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $481 | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
ORMP Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-02Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | Joshua Hexter | COO & CBO | Sell (S) | −30,000 | $4.51 | -$135.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Avraham Gabay | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −20,000 | $4.51 | -$90.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-25 | Avraham Gabay | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +209,291 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-25 | Joshua Hexter | COO & CBO | Award (A) | +284,746 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-25 | Miriam Kidron | Chief Scientific Officer | Award (A) | +417,416 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-25 | Nadav Kidron | President and CEO | Award (A) | +718,262 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-02 | Avraham Gabay | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −73,360 | $4.51 | -$330.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Joshua Hexter | COO & CBO | Mixed | −87,000 | $4.26 | -$426.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-18 | Joshua Hexter | COO & CBO | Award (A) | +95,889 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-18 | Avraham Gabay | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +95,889 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-18 | Nadav Kidron | President and CEO | Award (A) | +167,005 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-18 | Miriam Kidron | Chief Scientific Officer | Award (A) | +119,558 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-16 | Nadav Kidron | President and CEO | Gift (G) | −100,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-29 | Miriam Kidron | Chief Scientific Officer | Exer (M) | +19,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-29 | Avraham Gabay | Chief Financial Officer | Exer (M) | +19,000 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
ORMP Insider Holdings
9 insiders · @ $4.17
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nadav Kidron | President and CEO | 3,897,740 | $16.25M | -$8.57M | 35 | 2026-09-25 |
| 2 | Benjamin Shapiro | Director | 2,019,720 | $8.42M | $0 | 4 | 2026-01-05 |
| 3 | Miriam Kidron | Chief Scientific Officer | 1,550,554 | $6.47M | -$2.09M | 29 | 2026-09-25 |
| 4 | Joshua Hexter | COO & CBO | 1,328,130 | $5.54M | -$746.8K | 21 | 2026-10-02 |
| 5 | Avraham Gabay | Chief Financial Officer | 861,076 | $3.59M | -$420.9K | 13 | 2026-10-02 |
| 6 | Leonard Sank | Director | 266,910 | $1.11M | $273.0K | 17 | 2025-06-09 |
| 7 | Arie Mayer | Director | 168,009 | $700.6K | -$57.3K | 10 | 2026-01-05 |
| 8 | Daniel Aghion | Director | 107,191 | $447.0K | $0 | 4 | 2026-01-02 |
| 9 | Yehuda Reznick | Director | 105,180 | $438.6K | $0 | 4 | 2026-01-05 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ORMP Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 2, 2026Directors 7
- Nadav Kidron · since Feb 3, 2006
- Miriam Kidron · since Mar 29, 2006
- Leonard Sank · since Oct 23, 2007
- Arie Mayer · since Dec 5, 2019
- Benjamin Shapiro · since May 1, 2023
- Daniel Aghion · since Jan 1, 2024
- Yehuda Reznick · since Apr 1, 2024
Officers 4
- Nadav Kidron · President and CEO · listed since Aug 2007
- Avraham Gabay · Chief Financial Officer · listed since Jun 2024
- Joshua Hexter · COO & Cbo · listed since Jan 2022
- Miriam Kidron · Chief Scientific Officer · listed since Apr 2017
Changes in the last 10 years (24)
| Jun 21, 2024 | Avraham Gabay listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously CFO, Treasurer and Secretary) in SEC filings |
| May 10, 2024 | The company announced the departure of David Silberman as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 1, 2024 | Yehuda Reznick became a director |
| Jan 17, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Yadin Rozov from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 1, 2024 | Daniel Aghion became a director |
| May 1, 2023 | Benjamin Shapiro became a director |
| Apr 1, 2022 | Yadin Rozov became a director |
| Jan 9, 2022 | Netanel Derovan became Chief Legal Officer |
| Jan 5, 2022 | Joshua Hexter listed as COO & Cbo (previously Chf. Op. & Bus. Officer) in SEC filings |
| Dec 30, 2021 | Nadav Kidron no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Dec 7, 2021 | Nadav Kidron first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Sep 2, 2021 | Nadav Kidron no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Aug 6, 2021 | Michael Rabinowitz first on file as Chief Commercial Officer |
| Aug 1, 2021 | Michael Rabinowitz became Chief Commercial Officer |
| Jul 5, 2021 | David Silberman became Chief Financial Officer |
| Dec 5, 2019 | Arie Mayer became a director |
| Sep 16, 2019 | Joshua Hexter listed as Chf. Op. & Bus. Officer (previously Chief Operating Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jul 1, 2019 | Gao Xiaoming became a director |
| Jun 1, 2019 | Avraham Gabay became CFO, Treasurer and Secretary |
| Nov 15, 2018 | Mark Daniel Hasleton became VP Business Development |
| Aug 1, 2017 | Hilla Eisenberg became CFO, Treasurer and Secretary |
| Apr 19, 2017 | Miriam Kidron listed as Chief Scientific Officer (previously Chief Technology Officer) in SEC filings |
| Mar 20, 2017 | Ronald Edward Law became Chief Strategy Officer |
| Feb 16, 2017 | David Mark Slager no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
Not reported recently (12)
- Netanel Derovan · Last reported as Chief Legal Officer in an SEC filing dated May 31, 2023
- Michael Rabinowitz · Last reported as Chief Commercial Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 4, 2023
- Kevin Rakin · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 22, 2022
- Aviad Friedman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 5, 2022
- Michael Rabinowitz · Last reported as Chief Commercial Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 5, 2022
- Gao Xiaoming · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 14, 2020
- David Mark Slager · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 16, 2019
- Hilla Eisenberg · Last reported as CFO, Treasurer and Secretary in an SEC filing dated Feb 28, 2019
- Mark Daniel Hasleton · Last reported as VP Business Development in an SEC filing dated Feb 28, 2019
- Xiaopeng Li · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 3, 2017
- Yifat Hen Zommer · Last reported as CFO, Treasurer and Secretary in an SEC filing dated Jul 5, 2017
- Ronald Edward Law · Last reported as Chief Strategy Officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 21, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ORMP Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-10-01
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
2 filings
· $234K notice value
· Last 90d:
2 filings
· $234K notice value
· 2 unique filers
· 100% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Joshua Hexter (1, $140K) · Avi Gabay (1, $93K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | Avi Gabay | Officer | 20,000 | $93.4K | 2026-10-01 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-01 | Joshua Hexter | Officer | 30,000 | $140.1K | 2026-10-01 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | Hexter Joshua | Officer | 137,000 | $659.0K | 2026-07-01 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | Gabay Avraham | Officer | 93,360 | $449.1K | 2026-07-01 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
22 ETFs hold ORMP
22 shown · $7.50M total exposure · 0.00% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $3.4M | $75.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 2 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $1.3M | $13.7B | 2026-10-20 |
| 3 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $946,063 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $436,547 | $1.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 5 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $253,627 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 6 | GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.02% | $249,872 | $1.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 7 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $248,523 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 8 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.01% | $230,835 | $3.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $154,068 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.01% | $68,728 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 11 | DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $43,928 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 12 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $31,764 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 13 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $17,704 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 14 | AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $17,231 | $14.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 15 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $16,252 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 16 | DFUS Dimensional US Equity Market ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $14,239 | $21.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 17 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $8,367 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 18 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $6,516 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 19 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $4,223 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 20 | FSEV Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Value ETF | Fidelity | 0.05% | $3,801 | $7.8M | 2026-10-20 |
| 21 | HDG ProShares Hedge Replication ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $174 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF | ProShares | 0.01% | $62 | — | 2026-10-21 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
1.62
TTM Diluted EPS
$2.59
TTM Revenue
$0.00
TTM Net Income
$109.19M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-8.54M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | — | $38.31M | $0.91 | $-2.92M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $0.00 | $9.20M | $0.24 | $-466.00K |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | — | $48.40M | $1.13 | $-1.62M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | — | $13.29M | $0.31 | $-3.54M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $2.00M | $-7.64M | $-0.19 | $-3.52M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | $-10.19M | $-0.26 | $-1.91M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | — | $-19.62M | $-0.48 | $-7.10M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | — | $9.21M | $0.22 | $2.08M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | — | $1.54M | $0.04 | $-1.48M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $0.00 | $13.34M | $0.33 | $-1.42M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | — | $-3.22M | $-0.08 | $-694.00K |
| Q2 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $674.00K | $-1.19M | $-0.03 | $-2.63M |
Q1 2026 • period ending 2026-03-31 • filed 2026-05-19
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
1.62
P/B
0.75
P/S
—
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
—
ROE
45.8%
ROA
40.6%
Div Yield
6.05%
FCF Yield
-4.79%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$178.47M
as of 2026-10-22
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
1.43M
SI % of Float
4.31%
Days to Cover
7.33
Short Vol Ratio
67.0%
Free Float
33.27M
Float %
80.0%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21 • Float 2026-08-07