PEO Adams Natural Resources Fund, Inc.
XNYS
26.97
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $20.96 – $30.30
- YTD
- +22.39%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 50.89
- Straddle Price
- $0.00
- Market Cap
- $0.8B
- Open
- $30.19
- Day Range
- $29.89 – $30.30
- Volume
- 54,527
- Prev Close
- $30.14

- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.8B
- List Date
- 1972-01-03
- CIK
- 0000216851
- Homepage
- https://www.adamsfunds.com
Adams Natural Resources Fund Inc is a non-diversified U.S. equity fund that invests in liquid energy and other natural resources stocks. The Fund's investment objectives are preservation of capital, reasonable income, and opportunity for capital gain. A majority of its assets are invested in the petroleum or natural resources industries or industries connected to them. It has broad flexibility to invest in stocks of varying capitalizations and predominantly invests in stocks found in the S&P 500 Energy and S&P 500 Materials sectors.
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $795M shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $1.6M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Jan 3, 1972 NYSE
Moves with. Value over growth (15% of its variance, beta 0.67); High yield over Treasuries (3% of its variance, beta 0.88). These factors explain 21% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUNRNorthern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF | — | 0.46% | $7.1B | +23.3% | compare |
| GNRState Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | — | 0.40% | $5.4B | +28.7% | compare |
| PHOInvesco Water Resources ETF | — | 0.59% | $2.0B | −4.4% | compare |
| FIWFirst Trust Water ETF | — | 0.50% | $1.8B | −5.8% | compare |
| MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF | — | 0.56% | $1.1B | +10.8% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Natural Resources & Agriculture category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 3.77% | 11.53% | 6.81% | -2.24% | -1.14% | 11.12% | 4.97% |
| Feb | 16.76% | 0.31% | -4.57% | 3.51% | 1.59% | 8.18% | 4.30% |
| Mar | 2.15% | 6.08% | -4.86% | 7.16% | 4.63% | 4.63% | 3.30% |
| Apr | 0.94% | -0.38% | -1.96% | -0.73% | -12.84% | 1.88% | -2.18% |
| May | 1.41% | 8.19% | -6.60% | 3.37% | 0.50% | -5.17% | 0.28% |
| Jun | -0.37% | -16.94% | 5.42% | 1.85% | 5.69% | -3.74% | -1.35% |
| Jul | -8.32% | 7.90% | 8.31% | 3.74% | -0.70% | 9.20% | 3.35% |
| Aug | -1.91% | 3.70% | 1.46% | -2.05% | 5.29% | 7.15% | 2.27% |
| Sep | 6.52% | -8.21% | -1.45% | 2.29% | -1.96% | -5.36% | -1.36% |
| Oct | 5.52% | 15.66% | -5.15% | -0.84% | -0.88% | 9.17%* | 3.91% |
| Nov | -6.69% | -4.71% | -5.13% | 4.61% | 1.45% | -- | -2.09% |
| Dec | 3.83% | -4.13% | 0.58% | -7.17% | -0.18% | -- | -1.41% |
| Total | 23.61% | 15.29% | -8.24% | 13.43% | 0.10% | 41.41% | 14.27% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: PEO
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10)
Key drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a range-bound market with moderate volatility
- Recent news headlines are neutral, highlighting no significant catalysts or changes
Primary risks:
- Market sentiment remains uncertain, with the beta indicating a negative correlation with the broader market
- High IV rank and current IV premium may indicate overvaluation
Investment thesis: PEO appears to be trading within a range, awaiting a catalyst to break out. The stock's moderate volatility and neutral news sentiment suggest a cautious approach. However, the negative beta may create opportunities for contrarian investors.
Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral news headlines have not significantly impacted the stock price.
Technical Analysis
Trend direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Consolidation
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Range-bound
- Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend
Support/resistance levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $25.80
- Middle Bollinger Band: $24.97
- Lower Bollinger Band: $24.14
Momentum signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (60.31), indicating no clear buy or sell signal
- MACD signal: Bearish, suggesting a potential short-term correction
- Bollinger Bands position: Overbought, indicating caution is warranted
Volume analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 72642.70
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 4970969.85
- Volume Rate of Change: -29.21%, suggesting a decrease in buying pressure
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent headlines summary:
- Neutral news highlights Adams Natural Resources Fund's initiatives and distribution announcements
Sentiment assessment:
- Neutral sentiment dominates, with no significant catalysts or changes
Catalyst identification:
- No immediate catalysts are apparent, but the company's initiatives and performance may drive future movements
Market narrative:
- Technical signals suggest caution, while news sentiment is neutral. This combination creates a range-bound market with moderate volatility.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk interpretation:
- Beta: -0.08 (negative correlation with the broader market), indicating high risk
- IV rank and current IV premium suggest overvaluation
Volatility regime:
- Current vs historical volatility levels: Higher than usual, but still within a reasonable range
Options market signals:
- IV Rank: 90.2% (High)
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.00 (Neutral sentiment)
Downside protection:
- Support levels: Middle and lower Bollinger Bands ($24.97 and $24.14, respectively)
- Risk management considerations: Caution is warranted due to overvaluation and negative beta
Market Context & Positioning
Sector performance:
- Relative strength vs sector/market: Neutral
Institutional activity:
- Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: None notable
Correlation analysis:
- Stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation): Negative correlation (-0.06)
Relative valuation:
- Position within trading range: Neutral, with no clear buy or sell signal
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical price levels:
- Support/resistance levels from Bollinger Bands and technical indicators: $25.80, $24.97, and $24.14
Breakout/breakdown levels:
- Technical signals suggest caution, but no immediate catalysts are apparent. Monitor the stock's movement within its trading range.
Time-sensitive catalysts:
- No earnings dates or product launches announced, focusing on company initiatives and distribution announcements.
Risk management:
- Stop-loss levels: Set at $24.14 to limit potential losses
- Position sizing considerations: Adjust positions based on risk tolerance and market conditions
This comprehensive analysis provides an objective assessment of PEO's technical and fundamental factors. The stock appears to be trading within a range, awaiting a catalyst to break out. Caution is warranted due to overvaluation and negative beta. Monitor the stock's movement and adjust positions accordingly.
PEO Options Activity & IV Rank
PEO IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $461K | #3207 of 3716 | -51.5% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $208K | #5450 of 6285 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $0K | #4636 of 4729 | 0.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
PEO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $229.90K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
PEO Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2025-11-03| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-03 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −11,388 | $21.52 | -$245.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-04 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −33,522 | $21.24 | -$711.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −5,402 | $21.61 | -$116.7K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-28 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −147,220 | $22.02 | -$3.24M | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-24 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −61,734 | $21.80 | -$1.35M | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-22 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −28,928 | $21.65 | -$626.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-21 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −57,952 | $21.73 | -$1.26M | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-17 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −29,466 | $21.80 | -$642.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-07 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −15,806 | $21.70 | -$343.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-30 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −918 | $21.54 | -$19.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-26 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −12,796 | $21.45 | -$274.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-24 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −4,792 | $22.11 | -$106.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-23 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −4,802 | $22.06 | -$105.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-23 | Gregory W. Buckley | E.V.P. | Mixed | +2,550 | $23.30 | $33.8K | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-21 | Gregory W. Buckley | E.V.P. | Buy (P) | +1,000 | $23.98 | $24.0K | EDGAR |
PEO Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $30.25| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boaz Weinstein | 10%+ Owner | 2,720,413 | $82.29M | -$379.1K | 9 | 2025-07-28 |
| 2 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 2,675,936 | $80.95M | $6.83M | 26 | 2025-11-03 |
| 3 | Gregory W. Buckley | E.V.P. | 17,604 | $532.5K | $151.1K | 4 | 2025-01-23 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $190.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.09% | $138.6M | $153.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 3 | VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $125.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | EPOL iShares MSCI Poland ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 6.92% | $69.9M | $1.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 5 | EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.13% | $33.7M | $25.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 6 | VGK Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF | Vanguard | 0.08% | $30.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $30.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $30.3M | $29.6B | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | SPEM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.17% | $28.2M | $16.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 10 | DVYE iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 1.66% | $20.1M | $1.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 11 | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $15.7M | $58.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 12 | VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $15.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 13 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $10.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $6.0M | $17.7B | 2026-10-20 |
| 15 | ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $4.6M | $33.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 16 | VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $2.5M | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 17 | FCEF First Trust Income Opportunities ETF | First Trust | 1.77% | $1.4M | $79.6M | 2026-10-20 |
| 18 | CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | Nport | 0.30% | $1.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 19 | CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF | Nport | 3.48% | $1.2M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 20 | EMGF iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $663,507 | $1.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 21 | SPEU State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Europe ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.07% | $514,264 | $700.5M | 2026-10-20 |
| 22 | EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.22% | $356,403 | $163.9M | 2026-10-20 |
| 23 | CWI State Street® SPDR® MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $331,140 | $2.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 24 | SPGM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $193,090 | $1.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 25 | EEMX State Street® SPDR® MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.11% | $187,767 | $173.5M | 2026-10-20 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.