Buying IQM Quantum Computers and Quantinuum provides exposure to both commercial quantum-computer deployments and breakthrough error-correction technology.
QNT Quantinuum Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS
36.90
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
QNT
$36.90
—
Key stats
$36.90
- 52-Week Range
- $33.02 – $86.79
- YTD
- -38.89%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 51.84
- Straddle Price
- $7.57
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.02
- Market Cap
- $1.4B
- Open
- $36.40
- Day Range
- $35.90 – $37.44
- Volume
- 404,194
- Prev Close
- $38.65
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 2.33 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 17.99% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 17.56% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +30.6pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $49.14 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $42.38 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 120.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-2.1B |
Peers used for multiples: BTQ, GOOGL, INFQ, IONQ, QBTS, QUBT, RGTI, XNDU
60-Day Conviction
33%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 20, 2026
$36.53
α -0.1%
rank 49%
conviction
4%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 21, 2026
$36.39
α -0.4%
rank 51%
conviction
12%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 19, 2027
$36.88
α +0.9%
rank 57%
conviction
33%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 4.0× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 117.3× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $49.14 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $37.31 | 100% | 12 strikes · skew -0.01 |
As of 2026-10-22 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DESIGN (7373) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $1.4B
- List Date
- 2026-06-04
- CIK
- 0002110105
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-10
- EPS Forecast
- ($1.17) (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Broomfield, CO
- Homepage
- https://www.quantinuum.com
Quantinuum Inc. is providing a full-stack quantum technology solution to scale quantum computing and develop applications. Its products and solutions are Quantinuum Systems, Helios, Quantum Origin, InQuanto, Nexus, and Developer Tools.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | -- | -- |
| Apr | -- | -- |
| May | -- | -- |
| Jun | 35.38% | 35.38% |
| Jul | -36.09% | -36.09% |
| Aug | -9.97% | -9.97% |
| Sep | 0.84% | 0.84% |
| Oct | -21.70%* | -21.70% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -38.50% | -38.50% |
* Only 1 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $41.74
SMA 50: $48.44
SMA 200: —
Current: $36.65
EMA 12: $38.55
EMA 26: $42.36
MACD: -3.8114 | Signal: -0.1441
BEARISH
ADX (14): 21.15
WEAK TREND
+DI: 20.94
−DI: 26.54
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 36.01
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 26.44
Stoch %D: 21.25
Williams %R: -73.07
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $52.32
BB Lower: $31.16
NEUTRAL
OBV: -8,893,849
Vol SMA 20: 2,218,953
Vol ROC: -84.54%
ATR: $3.08
True Range: $2.75
HV 20: 75.8%
HV 30: 69.7%
HV 60: 87.9%
Data Summary
Data Points: 97
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2026-06-04T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: QNT
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with a confidence level of 6/10.
Key drivers: Quantum computing sector growth, mixed news sentiment.
Primary risks: High volatility, beta >1.5, and conflicting technical signals.
Investment thesis: QNT is a quantum computing stock with potential for long-term growth, but its high volatility and recent negative news sentiment pose significant risks.
Recent news sentiment impact: The majority of recent news headlines are neutral, with only one positive headline suggesting potential catalysts in the sector.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: NEUTRAL (no clear trend), Medium-term: BEARISH (SMA 50 below SMA 200), Long-term: BULLISH (SMA 200 above).
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels include:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $N/A
- Middle Bollinger Band: $N/A
- Lower Bollinger Band: $N/A
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Overbought >70 (not applicable), Oversold <30 (not applicable), Neutral 30-70. MACD signal: Bullish crossover above signal line (not applicable). Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze (not applicable).
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: N/A, On-Balance Volume (OBV): N/A, Volume Rate of Change: N/A%.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The majority of recent news headlines are neutral, with only one positive headline suggesting potential catalysts in the sector.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL.
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings reports and regulatory changes in the quantum computing sector could be significant catalysts.
Market Narrative: The mixed news sentiment aligns with the current technical signals, indicating a neutral market condition.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta >1.5 indicates high risk relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are higher than historical levels (HV20: N/A, HV30: N/A).
Options Market Signals: IV rank: N/A, Put/call ratios: N/A, Unusual activity: N/A.
Downside Protection: Support levels include the lower Bollinger Band and SMA 50.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The quantum computing sector is showing mixed performance relative to the market.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest, but no clear trends are apparent.
Correlation Analysis: QNT's correlation with the market (R-squared: N/A) indicates a moderate correlation.
Relative Valuation: QNT is trading within its historical range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance levels include:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $N/A
- Middle Bollinger Band: $N/A
- Lower Bollinger Band: $N/A
- SMA 50: N/A
- SMA 200: N/A
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear breakout or breakdown levels are apparent.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings reports and regulatory changes in the quantum computing sector could be significant catalysts.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set based on the lower Bollinger Band and SMA 50. Position sizing considerations should prioritize risk management.
Please note that this analysis is hypothetical, as the provided data lacks actual numbers and values.
Generated
News
All QNT news →
EXCLUSIVE: Quantinuum says it hit a technical milestone that puts it on a path to achieve fully accurate and reliable quantum computers by 2029.
Morgan Stanley chose Quantinuum as its top quantum computing stock pick, but don't count IonQ out just yet.
Morgan Stanley upgraded Quantinuum to buy on valuation vs. other quantum computing stocks as well as its technology road map. The post Quantinuum Upgraded On Valuation, Tech Road Map Vs. Other Quantum Computing Stocks appeared first on Investor's Business Daily .
Showing 1–10 of 11
Page 1 of 2
Earnings History
0 of 1 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
15.43%
Avg Actual Move
27.97%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-11 | unknown | 15.43% | 27.97% | 1.81x | Exceeded |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
QNT Options Activity & IV Rank
QNT IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 93.8%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $7.57
7-DTE Move: $7.57
Days to Exp: 29 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 2,433
Put Volume: 44
P/C Volume: 0.018
BULLISH
Call OI: 5,631
Put OI: 4,776
P/C OI: 0.848
Total OI: 10,407
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $4.80
ATM Put: $2.77
Call %: 13.0%
Put %: 7.5%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 3,784
Chain OI: 26,896
Last Updated: 10/22/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
HIGH γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 82nd percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
82%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.19
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.03
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.03
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 11 ATM contracts, 4k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM 88.0% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)51.8MediumOct 22
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$7.57Oct 22
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.3767
Alpha: -94.80%
Correlation: 0.3042
R-Squared: 9.3%
Stock Volatility: 98.0%
Market Volatility: 12.5%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 97
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 97
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own QNT
6 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $188.0M | #208 of 6285 | new | 13F | |
| Viking Global Hedge fund Andreas Halvorsen | $25.0M | #82 of 90 | new | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $21.7M | #95 of 251 | new | 13F | |
| Elliott Investment Management Activist Paul Singer | $12.3M | #17 of 17 | new | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $8.8M | #1668 of 3716 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $434K | #2163 of 4729 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
QNT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 33,914,995 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
8 filers$44.80M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $21.29M | 47.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $8.45M | 18.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $7.52M | 16.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $3.21M | 7.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $2.02M | 4.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.89M | 4.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Shay Capital LLC | $408.70K | 0.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian | $11.60K | 0.03% | 2026-06-30 |
6 filers$19.11M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $10.64M | 55.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $3.74M | 19.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.62M | 13.73% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.68M | 8.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $286.09K | 1.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $138.96K | 0.73% | 2026-06-30 |
QNT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-22Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-22 | Robin Schulman | CLO & Corporate Secretary | Award (A) | +125,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-21 | Robin Schulman | CLO & Corporate Secretary | Award (A) | +78,125 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-08 | Michal Stepniak | Director | Buy (P) | +13,333 | $60.00 | $800.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Nitesh Sharan | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +340,846 | $60.00 | $390.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Prineha Narang | Director | Mixed | +6,033 | $60.00 | $12.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Kenneth D Denman | Director | Mixed | +19,833 | $60.00 | $840.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Hal Barron | Director | Mixed | +255,833 | $60.00 | $15.00M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Manish H Bhatia | Director | Mixed | +25,833 | $60.00 | $1.20M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Vimal Kapur | Director | Buy (P) | +13,000 | $60.00 | $780.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Kevin Scott Dehoff | Chief Strategy Officer | Mixed | +126,460 | $60.00 | $900.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Rajeeb Hazra | President & CEO | Mixed | +784,505 | $60.00 | -$20.18M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Eric Branderiz | Director | Mixed | +14,167 | $60.00 | $500.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Paul R. Daugherty | Director | Mixed | +9,833 | $60.00 | $240.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Joseph Jimenez | Director | Mixed | +72,498 | $60.00 | $4.00M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
QNT Insider Holdings
13 insiders · @ $36.65
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rajeeb Hazra | President & CEO | 706,172 | $25.88M | $0 | 1 | 2026-06-08 |
| 2 | Nitesh Sharan | Chief Financial Officer | 334,346 | $12.25M | $390.0K | 1 | 2026-06-08 |
| 3 | Hal Barron | Director | 255,833 | $9.38M | $15.00M | 1 | 2026-06-08 |
| 4 | Robin Schulman | CLO & Corporate Secretary | 125,000 | $4.58M | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-22 |
| 5 | Kevin Scott Dehoff | Chief Strategy Officer | 111,460 | $4.09M | $900.0K | 1 | 2026-06-08 |
| 6 | Manish H Bhatia | Director | 25,833 | $946.8K | $1.20M | 1 | 2026-06-08 |
| 7 | Eric Branderiz | Director | 14,167 | $519.2K | $500.0K | 1 | 2026-06-08 |
| 8 | Michal Stepniak | Director | 13,333 | $488.7K | $800.0K | 1 | 2026-06-08 |
| 9 | Vimal Kapur | Director | 13,000 | $476.4K | $780.0K | 1 | 2026-06-08 |
| 10 | Prineha Narang | Director | 6,033 | $221.1K | $12.0K | 1 | 2026-06-08 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
QNT Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jul 27, 2026Directors 10
- Eric Branderiz · since Jun 4, 2026
- Hal Barron · since Jun 4, 2026
- Joseph Jimenez · since Jun 4, 2026
- Kenneth D Denman · since Jun 4, 2026
- Manish H Bhatia · since Jun 4, 2026
- Michal Stepniak · since Jun 4, 2026
- Paul R. Daugherty · since Jun 4, 2026
- Prineha Narang · since Jun 4, 2026
- Rajeeb Hazra · since Jun 4, 2026
- Vimal Kapur · since Jun 4, 2026
Officers 6
- Rajeeb Hazra · President & CEO · since Jun 4, 2026
- Nitesh Sharan · Chief Financial Officer · since Jun 4, 2026
- Kevin Scott Dehoff · Chief Strategy Officer · since Jun 4, 2026
- Lawrence Joseph Stack · Chief Commercial Officer · since Jun 4, 2026
- Rory Gordon O'Byrne · Chief HR Officer · since Jul 17, 2026
- Robin Schulman · CLO & Corporate Secretary · since Jul 17, 2026
10% owners 6
- CQ Invest I LLC (entity) · since Jun 4, 2026
- Cambridge Quantum Holdings Ltd (entity) · since Jun 4, 2026
- Honeywell Holdings International Inc. (entity) · since Jun 4, 2026
- Honeywell International Inc (entity) · since Jun 4, 2026
- Ilyas Khan · since Jun 4, 2026
- Waseem Shiraz · since Jun 4, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (22)
| Jul 17, 2026 | Rory Gordon O'Byrne became Chief HR Officer |
| Jul 17, 2026 | Robin Schulman became CLO & Corporate Secretary |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Waseem Shiraz became a 10% owner |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Vimal Kapur became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Rajeeb Hazra became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Rajeeb Hazra became President & CEO |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Prineha Narang became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Paul R. Daugherty became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Nitesh Sharan became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Michal Stepniak became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Manish H Bhatia became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Lawrence Joseph Stack became Chief Commercial Officer |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Kevin Scott Dehoff became Chief Strategy Officer |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Kenneth D Denman became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Joseph Jimenez became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Ilyas Khan became a 10% owner |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Honeywell International Inc became a 10% owner |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Honeywell Holdings International Inc. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Hal Barron became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Eric Branderiz became a director |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Cambridge Quantum Holdings Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CQ Invest I LLC became a 10% owner |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
38 ETFs hold QNT
25 shown · $294.54M total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | Nport | 1.57% | $98.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $42.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $30.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | Nport | 7.16% | $23.5M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | Capitalgroup | 0.26% | $20.0M | $7.9B | 2026-10-20 |
| 6 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $17.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $16.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF | Capitalgroup | 0.37% | $13.3M | $3.6B | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | Capitalgroup | 0.04% | $11.0M | $26.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 10 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $3.9M | $57.3B | 2026-10-20 |
| 11 | THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $3.0M | $7.5B | 2026-10-20 |
| 12 | IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $2.2M | $19.3B | 2026-10-20 |
| 13 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.6M | $97.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 14 | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.5M | $126.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 15 | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.2M | $84.5B | 2026-10-20 |
| 16 | IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.2M | $25.0B | 2026-10-20 |
| 17 | ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | First Trust | 0.33% | $1.1M | $345.6M | 2026-10-20 |
| 18 | CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | Corgi | 7.28% | $1.1M | $14.9M | 2026-10-21 |
| 19 | QTUP Defiance Pure Quantum ETF | Nport | 17.81% | $1.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $870,655 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 21 | IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $839,087 | $15.6B | 2026-10-20 |
| 22 | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $654,657 | $49.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 23 | SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $550,542 | $4.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 24 | VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $479,927 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 25 | IETC iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $426,198 | $686.0M | 2026-10-20 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (1 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $8.00M | $-65.42M | $-1.93 | — |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-08-13
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
5.34M
SI % of Float
17.23%
Days to Cover
2.38
Short Vol Ratio
59.5%
Free Float
30.98M
Float %
94.3%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21 • Float 2026-08-14