SMTK SmartKem, Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES (3674) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 28
- List Date
- 2021-07-07
- CIK
- 0001817760
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12
- Headquarters
- Delaware, DE
- Homepage
- https://www.smartkem.com
SmartKem Inc focuses on the design, development, industrialization, and technology transfer of low-temperature, solution-deposited organic semiconductors for transistor backplanes. The company's semiconductor platform can be used in several applications, including mini-LED displays, AMOLED displays, fingerprint sensors, and logic circuits. The company derives revenue from the sale of TRUFLEX inks and demonstration products.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 20.00% | 3.45% | -0.76% | -32.48% | -2.45% |
| Feb | 40.00% | -36.36% | 7.27% | -28.48% | -63.72% | -16.26% |
| Mar | 0.00% | -48.78% | 55.17% | 16.22% | -7.52% | 3.02% |
| Apr | -- | -14.29% | -33.87% | -21.38% | -17.52% | -21.77% |
| May | -30.00% | -40.00% | -4.09% | -44.30% | 28.09% | -18.06% |
| Jun | -20.00% | 144.44% | -28.31% | -29.37% | -21.47% | 9.06% |
| Jul | 0.00% | -9.09% | 17.92% | -9.02% | -9.01% | -1.84% |
| Aug | -20.00% | -16.01% | -15.67% | -7.40% | -70.34% | -25.88% |
| Sep | 14.29% | -2.63% | -16.47% | 15.86% | -42.91% | -6.37% |
| Oct | -13.33% | 12.05% | -38.58% | 21.26% | -83.07%* | -20.33% |
| Nov | -6.25% | 19.05% | 131.37% | -29.00% | -- | 28.79% |
| Dec | -20.00% | 38.69% | -41.06% | -29.00% | -- | -12.84% |
| Total | -53.40% | -32.37% | -45.53% | -84.78% | -99.51% | -63.12% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is the comprehensive stock analysis report for SMTK:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BEARISH with confidence level (6/10)
Key drivers and primary risks:
- Bearish trend signals from MACD and ADX
- Oversold RSI and recent price action below SMA 20 and EMA 12
- Positive news sentiment may be conflicting with bearish technical signals
Investment thesis: SMTK's recent decline is likely to continue due to the bearish trend signals and oversold conditions.
Recent news sentiment impact: The positive news headlines have been overshadowed by the bearish technical signals, which suggests that the news has not yet had a significant impact on the stock price.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) - BEARISH
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $1.30
- Middle Bollinger Band: $4.32
- Upper Bollinger Band: $7.34
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (<30)
- MACD signal: Bearish (below signal line)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze (price touching lower band)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 583211.29
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 13237044.30
- Volume Rate of Change: -67.83%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been overwhelmingly positive, highlighting acquisitions, partnerships, and product launches.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive
Catalyst Identification:
- None recently (since news sentiment has not had a significant impact on the stock price)
Market Narrative: The market narrative suggests that SMTK's recent decline is likely to continue due to the bearish trend signals and oversold conditions.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta >1.5)
Volatility Regime: Current volatility level is higher than historical levels
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: N/A
- Put/call ratios: N/A
- Unusual activity: None recently
Downside Protection: Lower Bollinger Band ($1.30) and recent price action below SMA 20 and EMA 12 provide support.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market is weak (SMTK has been underperforming)
Institutional Activity:
- Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest are not evident
Correlation Analysis: SMTK's price moves relatively strongly against the market (R-squared interpretation: 0.09)
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range is lower than historical levels.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band ($1.30)
- Middle Bollinger Band ($4.32)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band ($7.34) - potential breakout level
- Recent price action below SMA 20 and EMA 12 - potential breakdown level
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None recently (since news sentiment has not had a significant impact on the stock price)
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels at $1.50 and $2.00
- Position sizing considerations suggest reducing exposure or hedging.
Please let me know if you would like me to revise anything!
SMTK Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $42K | #6042 of 6285 | +674.2% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $0K | #4645 of 4729 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
SMTK Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
SMTK Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2025-09-25| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-25 | Joseph Christopher Lizzio | 10%+ Owner | Gift (G) | −150,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-12 | Steven Denbaars | Director | Grant (A) | +22,466 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-05 | Barbra Keck | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +71,077 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-05 | Sriram Krishnamurthy Peruvemba | Director | Grant (A) | +22,466 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-05 | Ian Jenks | Chairman & CEO | Grant (A) | +160,005 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-05 | Melisa Denis | Director | Grant (A) | +22,466 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-05 | Klaas de Boer | Director | Grant (A) | +22,466 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Klaas de Boer | Director | Grant (A) | +23,915 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Sriram Krishnamurthy Peruvemba | Director | Grant (A) | +23,915 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Beverley Brown | Chief Scientist | Grant (A) | +33,741 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Barbra Keck | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +75,660 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Ian Jenks | Chairman & CEO | Grant (A) | +170,320 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Melisa Denis | Director | Grant (A) | +23,915 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Jonathan Watkins | Chief Operating Officer | Grant (A) | +131,745 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Steven Denbaars | Director | Grant (A) | +23,915 opt | — | EDGAR |
SMTK Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $0.28| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joseph Christopher Lizzio | 10%+ Owner | 8,380 | $2.3K | $0 | 1 | 2025-09-25 |
| 2 | Klaas de Boer | Director | 231 | $64 | $0 | 4 | 2025-09-05 |
SMTK Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 25, 2025Directors 6
- Ian Jenks · since Feb 23, 2021
- Klaas de Boer · since Feb 23, 2021
- Simon P. King · since Feb 23, 2021
- Steven Denbaars · since Jun 30, 2022
- Sriram Krishnamurthy Peruvemba · since Jul 13, 2023
- Melisa Denis · since Nov 21, 2023
Officers 4
- Ian Jenks · Chairman & CEO · since Feb 23, 2021
- Barbra Keck · Chief Financial Officer · listed since Dec 2022
- Jonathan Watkins · Chief Operating Officer · since Mar 10, 2025
- Nigel Prue · Chief Accounting Officer · since Sep 7, 2022
10% owners 4
- Entrepreneurs Fund General Partner Ltd (entity) · since Feb 23, 2021
- Entrepreneurs Fund LP (entity) · since Feb 23, 2021
- Octopus Investments Ltd. (entity) · since Feb 23, 2021
- Octopus Titan VCT Plc (entity) · since Feb 23, 2021
Changes in the last 10 years (34)
| Apr 10, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Simon Ogier as Chief Technology Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 9, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Beverley Brown as Chief Scientist in an SEC filing |
| Sep 25, 2025 | Joseph Christopher Lizzio reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Sep 8, 2025 | Joseph Christopher Lizzio became a 10% owner |
| Mar 10, 2025 | Jonathan Watkins became Chief Operating Officer |
| Nov 21, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Barbra Keck from the board in an SEC filing |
| Nov 21, 2023 | Melisa Denis became a director |
| Jul 13, 2023 | Sriram Krishnamurthy Peruvemba became a director |
| Dec 20, 2022 | Barbra Keck first listed as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Sep 19, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Robert Bahns from the board in an SEC filing |
| Sep 19, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Robert Bahns as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Sep 7, 2022 | Nigel Prue became Chief Accounting Officer |
| Jun 30, 2022 | Steven Denbaars became a director |
| Feb 25, 2021 | Mark N. Tompkins reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Feb 25, 2021 | Mark N. Tompkins reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 25, 2021 | Ian Seth Jacobs reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Feb 25, 2021 | Ian Seth Jacobs reported in an SEC filing no longer being President, Secretary, CEO, CFO |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Simon P. King became a director |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Simon Ogier became Chief Technology Officer |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Robert Bahns became a director |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Robert Bahns became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Octopus Titan VCT Plc became a 10% owner |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Octopus Investments Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Klaas de Boer became a director |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Ian Jenks became a director |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Ian Jenks became Chairman & CEO |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Entrepreneurs Fund LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Entrepreneurs Fund General Partner Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Beverley Brown became Chief Scientist |
| Feb 23, 2021 | Barbra Keck became a director |
| Aug 17, 2020 | Mark N. Tompkins became a director |
| Aug 17, 2020 | Mark N. Tompkins became a 10% owner |
| Aug 17, 2020 | Ian Seth Jacobs became a director |
| Aug 17, 2020 | Ian Seth Jacobs became President, Secretary, CEO, CFO |
- Prev
- 1
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.