WIT Wipro Limited
XNYS
2.17
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
WIT
$2.17
—
Key stats
$2.17
- 52-Week Range
- $1.59 – $3.09
- YTD
- -25.68%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 14.99
- Straddle Price
- $0.30
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.08
- Market Cap
- $21.3B
- Open
- $2.14
- Day Range
- $2.14 – $2.19
- Volume
- 9,299,882
- Prev Close
- $2.15
Fair Value
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.90 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.64% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.68% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +214.4pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $1.79 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $1.77 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1888.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
Peers used for multiples: ADI, AMD, HPE, INFY, MU, NVDA, SWKS, TSM
Blended Fair Value
—
Deviation
—
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $1.35 | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 37.2× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 24.6× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 6.5× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 10.7× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $1.79 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-22 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES (7371) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $21.3B
- Employees
- 230,000
- List Date
- 2000-10-19
- CIK
- 0001123799
- Homepage
- https://www.wipro.com
Wipro is a multinational IT services provider based in Bengaluru, India. The company pivoted into information technology in the 1980s and grew into one of the largest Indian IT consulting companies during the dot-com boom. Now, Wipro leverages its offshore outsourcing model to derive a significant portion of its revenue from North America and Europe.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 7.33% | -21.13% | 3.82% | 3.47% | 2.80% | -13.70% | -2.90% |
| Feb | -3.77% | -5.57% | -5.08% | 8.60% | -11.14% | -17.47% | -5.74% |
| Mar | -0.78% | 8.44% | -4.06% | -7.41% | -5.85% | -1.85% | -1.92% |
| Apr | 10.15% | -18.38% | 4.44% | -4.77% | -6.54% | -3.32% | -3.07% |
| May | 10.14% | -7.00% | 2.95% | -4.28% | 0.70% | 16.26% | 3.13% |
| Jun | -2.50% | -11.94% | -4.26% | 15.75% | 5.23% | -6.64% | -0.73% |
| Jul | 8.04% | -2.03% | 2.09% | -0.48% | -11.11% | 4.76% | 0.21% |
| Aug | 11.19% | -6.53% | -0.81% | 5.41% | 2.99% | -9.76% | 0.41% |
| Sep | -5.46% | -7.28% | -3.97% | 2.21% | -4.71% | -9.84% | -4.84% |
| Oct | 0.22% | -1.88% | -5.99% | -1.52% | 0.00% | 23.58%* | 2.40% |
| Nov | -4.79% | 8.25% | 6.83% | 7.54% | 4.21% | -- | 4.41% |
| Dec | 15.78% | -9.51% | 14.14% | 0.28% | 4.41% | -- | 5.02% |
| Total | 52.09% | -55.95% | 8.49% | 25.00% | -19.15% | -22.73% | -2.04% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.79
SMA 50: $1.79
SMA 200: $2.09
Current: $2.17
EMA 12: $1.93
EMA 26: $1.84
MACD: 0.0901 | Signal: 0.0552
BULLISH
ADX (14): 30.31
TREND
+DI: 51.03
−DI: 13.29
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 79.93
OVERBOUGHT
Stoch %K: 96.84
Stoch %D: 93.97
Williams %R: -3.39
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $2.13
BB Lower: $1.45
OVERBOUGHT
OBV: -206,905,985
Vol SMA 20: 10,904,227
Vol ROC: 2.06%
ATR: $0.07
True Range: $0.05
HV 20: 44.7%
HV 30: 44.4%
HV 60: 38.0%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6/10)
Key drivers:
- Strong technical indicators support, with SMA 50 and EMA 12 indicating a near-term uptrend
- Bullish news sentiment from recent headlines suggests potential for further gains
- Low volatility regime and low beta indicate reduced risk
Primary risks:
- Bearish MACD signal and oversold RSI pose short-term selling pressure
- Options market pricing a $0.62 move by expiration, which may not align with technical signals
- Historical volatility levels are relatively high, indicating potential for increased price swings
Investment thesis: WIT's recent performance suggests a potential reversal of its downtrend, driven by positive news sentiment and low volatility regime. However, the bearish MACD signal and oversold RSI indicate caution in the near term.
Recent news sentiment impact: The overall positive sentiment from recent headlines contributes to a bullish bias, but the negative Earnings Volatility Watch article creates some uncertainty.
Technical Analysis
Trend direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL
- Medium-term (1-3 months): BULLISH
- Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
Support/resistance levels:
- Lower: $1.66 (Bollinger Bands lower band)
- Middle: $1.81 (SMA 50)
- Upper: $1.97 (Bollinger Bands upper band)
Momentum signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (<30), indicating potential for a short-term bounce
- MACD signal: Bearish, suggesting caution in the near term
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, indicating reduced volatility
Volume analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: Increasing volume supports uptrend
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): Negative OBV suggests decreasing buying pressure
- Volume Rate of Change: Decreasing volume rate indicates a slowdown in trading activity
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent headlines summary: Positive news sentiment from recent articles, highlighting growth opportunities and market potential.
Sentiment assessment: POSITIVE overall sentiment with 4/5 articles having positive tone.
Catalyst identification: No specific catalysts identified, but the positive news sentiment suggests a potential boost in near-term performance.
Market narrative: The bullish news sentiment aligns with the technical signals, indicating a potential reversal of the downtrend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk assessment:
- Beta: 0.45 (low volatility relative to market)
- Volatility regime: Low
- Options market signals:
- IV Rank: 61.4% (medium)
- Current IV: 260.7%
- Expected Move: $0.62 (31 DTE)
Downside protection:
- Support levels: Lower band ($1.66) and middle band ($1.81)
- Risk management considerations: Stop-loss levels can be set at the lower band or middle band
Market Context & Positioning
Sector performance: WIT's sector, Insurtech, has been performing relatively well.
Institutional activity:
- Volume patterns suggest institutional interest and buying pressure
- No specific institutional activity identified
Correlation analysis: WIT is inversely correlated with the market (R-squared = 0.13), indicating a potential hedge against broad market movements.
Relative valuation: WIT is positioned within its trading range, suggesting some value relative to historical levels.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical price levels:
- Lower band ($1.66) and middle band ($1.81)
Breakout/breakdown levels:
- Upper band ($1.97) as a potential resistance level
- Support/resistance at SMA 20 ($1.81) and EMA 12 ($1.77)
Time-sensitive catalysts: No specific earnings dates or product launches identified
Risk management: Stop-loss levels can be set at the lower band or middle band, considering the bearish MACD signal and oversold RSI.
Note: This report provides a comprehensive analysis of WIT's technical, news, and sentiment factors. However, please consult other sources and consider your own risk tolerance before making any investment decisions.
Generated
News
All WIT news →
Strategic investments in AI and emerging markets are pressuring near-term margins, but operational discipline is keeping them resilient.
Flat revenue growth masks strong APMEA momentum and AI-driven deal pipeline expansion.
Showing 1–10 of 14
Page 1 of 2
WIT Options Activity & IV Rank
WIT IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 93.4%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $0.30
7-DTE Move: $0.30
Days to Exp: 29 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 25
Put Volume: 2
P/C Volume: 0.08
BULLISH
Call OI: 186
Put OI: 115
P/C OI: 0.618
Total OI: 301
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.15
ATM Put: $0.15
Call %: 6.9%
Put %: 6.9%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 920
Chain OI: 6,926
Last Updated: 10/22/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 34th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
34%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.10
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.51
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.14
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt -0.51: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
? What is this?
· 3 ATM contracts, 3k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM 95.8% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)15.0LowOct 22
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$0.30Oct 22
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.4056
Alpha: -17.55%
Correlation: 0.1117
R-Squared: 1.2%
Stock Volatility: 46.3%
Market Volatility: 12.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own WIT
3 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $4.3M | #2140 of 3716 | +73.6% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $3.4M | #1665 of 3138 | -33.1% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $339K | #2290 of 4729 | +39.8% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
WIT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
2 filers$350.77K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $206.10K | 58.76% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $144.68K | 41.24% | 2026-06-30 |
2 filers$915.08K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $563.17K | 61.54% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $351.90K | 38.46% | 2026-06-30 |
WIT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-05-20Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | Aparna Chandrasekhar Iyer | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −45,000 | $2.00 | -$90.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | Srinivas Pallia | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +343,435 | $0.69 | -$777.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Aparna Chandrasekhar Iyer | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −75,000 | $2.12 | -$159.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-08 | Aparna Chandrasekhar Iyer | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −75,000 | $201.58 | -$15.12M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
WIT Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $2.17
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Srinivas Pallia | Chief Executive Officer | 893,805 | $1.94M | -$800.5K | 1 | 2026-05-20 |
| 2 | Aparna Chandrasekhar Iyer | Chief Financial Officer | 3,678 | $8.0K | -$15.37M | 3 | 2026-05-20 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
32 ETFs hold WIT
25 shown · $138.67M total exposure · 0.04% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | Nport | 1.14% | $71.3M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $14.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | SPEM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.08% | $13.8M | $16.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 4 | VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $9.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.03% | $8.7M | $27.5B | 2026-10-20 |
| 6 | NXTG First Trust Indxx NextG ETF | First Trust | 1.31% | $7.1M | $544.2M | 2026-10-20 |
| 7 | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $4.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | GLIN VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF | VanEck | 2.58% | $2.2M | $86.3M | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $2.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | Nport | 5.29% | $1.6M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 11 | GMF State Street® SPDR® S&P® Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.15% | $605,609 | $392.0M | 2026-10-20 |
| 12 | APIE ActivePassive International Equity ETF | Nport | 0.05% | $520,130 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 13 | SPGM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.03% | $518,312 | $1.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 14 | DSTX Distillate International Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | Nport | 0.77% | $361,917 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | DFEM Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $320,042 | $9.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 16 | AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.05% | $242,074 | $446.4M | 2026-10-20 |
| 17 | RISE Pictet Emerging Markets Rising Economies ETF | Nport | 1.00% | $210,254 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | DFAE Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $209,108 | $9.6B | 2026-10-20 |
| 19 | IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | Invesco | 0.11% | $195,705 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 20 | DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $187,813 | $2.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 21 | SPWO SP Funds S&P World (ex-US) ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $137,877 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 22 | ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | Nport | 0.13% | $136,699 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 23 | DFSE Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $112,340 | $615.4M | 2026-10-20 |
| 24 | DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF | Dimensional | 0.03% | $80,182 | $288.6M | 2026-10-20 |
| 25 | DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $75,581 | $12.3B | 2026-10-20 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
102.75M
SI % of Float
1.04%
Days to Cover
14.18
Short Vol Ratio
55.3%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21