XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF

ETF 11.34 Delayed

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

XRPR $11.34 —
Key stats
$11.34
52-Week Range
$8.10 – $22.26
YTD
-30.68%
IV Rank (30D)
41.9
Straddle Price
$0.00
P/C Vol Ratio
0.33
Open
$11.09
Day Range
$10.98 – $11.36
Volume
240,425
Prev Close
$10.82
About

REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
BATS
Inception
2025-09-17
Has Options
Yes
Fund profile
holdings as of May 31, 2026SEC filingthrough May 2026flows, SEC filings
Crypto XRP#1 of 8 by assets REX-Osprey US Actively managed
Expense ratio
0.75%
prospectus, filed Oct 23, 2025
Assets
$52M
SEC filing, May 31, 2026
Trailing yield
—
Average daily volume
$362K
30 sessions
Holdings
4
top 10 are 98.2%
Listed
Sep 17, 2025
Cboe BZX
Closure risk, 12 months
9.9%
low: volatility, trading volume, trailing return · model
FrenzyCap ETF score
35
how it is built
Cost59
Liquidity19
Scale14
Diversificationn/a

Moves with. Bitcoin (71% of its variance, beta 1.39). These factors explain 74% of its daily moves over the last year.

Stated objective. REX-Osprey TM XRP ETF (the Fund) seeks investment results of the performance, before fees and expenses, of XRP (XRP or the Reference Asset). (from the fund's prospectus)

All 4 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll XRP ETFs

Fund flows
through May 2026SEC filings
May 2026
$0
latest reported month
Latest 3 months
−$5.4M
−10.3% of assets
Latest 12 months
—
Sep 2025: +$78M+$78MSepOct 2025: +$55MNov 2025: +$15MNovDec 2025: −$7.7M−$7.7MJan 2026: −$7.0MJanFeb 2026: −$2.9MMar 2026: −$2.9MMarApr 2026: −$2.4MMay 2026: $0May
View as a table
Net flows of XRPR by month, Sep 2025 to May 2026
MonthNet flow
May 2026$0
Apr 2026−$2.4M
Mar 2026−$2.9M
Feb 2026−$2.9M
Jan 2026−$7.0M
Dec 2025−$7.7M
Nov 2025+$15M
Oct 2025+$55M
Sep 2025+$78M

Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 9 months ago

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
XXXCYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF—0.95%$493K—compare
GXRPGrayscale XRP Trust ETF————compare
TOXR21Shares XRP ETF————compare
XRPBitwise XRP ETF————compare
XRPCCanary XRP ETF————compare

The largest other funds in the XRP category.

Under the hood
fiscal year to Feb 28, 2026SEC census
Authorized participants
4 active
of 4 with agreements; top 3 did 94%
Created · redeemed
$157M · $28M
over the fiscal year
Redemptions in kind
0%
creations 0% in kind
Creation unit
25,000
shares
Securities lending
not authorized
Diversification status
Non-diversified
may concentrate in fewer issuers

From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.

ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-05-31
Holdings
4
AUM
$-38,474,753
Provider
Nport
Inception
2025-09-17
Exchange
BATS
Data As Of
2026-05-31
Expense Ratio
0.75%
Dividend Yield
—
Distribution
—
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 4 of 4 holdings
Symbol Name Weight % Asset Class Country
— XRP 58.72% Equity (common) US
— Coinshares Jersey Ltd 39.46% Equity (common) JE
— First American Government Obli 0.14% Short-term investment US
— Marex Repo 06.03.2026 4.21% -171.94% Repurchase agreement US
Geographic Breakdown
Chart
Seasonality
Month'25'26Avg
Jan---12.96%-12.96%
Feb---16.11%-16.11%
Mar---3.75%-3.75%
Apr--1.26%1.26%
May---5.47%-5.47%
Jun---19.13%-19.13%
Jul--0.12%0.12%
Aug--28.38%28.38%
Sep-8.12%9.76%0.82%
Oct-14.03%-7.95%*-10.99%
Nov-4.90%---4.90%
Dec-10.03%---10.03%
Total-32.42%-29.35%-30.88%
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $11.59
SMA 50: $11.12
SMA 200: $11.24
Current: $11.34
EMA 12: $11.15
EMA 26: $11.29
MACD: -0.1320 | Signal: -0.1205
BEARISH
ADX (14): 24.70
WEAK TREND
+DI: 23.93
−DI: 30.18

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 50.70
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 23.84
Stoch %D: 17.10
Williams %R: -57.85

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $12.96
BB Lower: $10.23
NEUTRAL
OBV: -5,264,973
Vol SMA 20: 32,650
Vol ROC: 1144.03%
ATR: $0.52
True Range: $0.54
HV 20: 48.0%
HV 30: 70.0%
HV 60: 71.7%

Data Summary

Data Points: 275
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-09-18T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: XRPR

Executive Summary

Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10.

Key drivers: Strong technical momentum, but high volatility and mixed news sentiment create uncertainty.

Primary risks: High volatility, potential overbought condition, and mixed news headlines.

Investment thesis: XRPR's recent uptrend is supported by strong technical signals, but the stock's high volatility and mixed news sentiment suggest caution.

Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral to positive, with a focus on XRP ecosystem expansion and ETF debuts, which could support further price increases.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish, Medium-term (1-3 months): Bearish, Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral

Support/Resistance Levels: Key levels include the SMA 20 ($10.48) and the Bollinger Band Middle Line ($10.48). The upper band at $13.49 may provide resistance.

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: Overbought (62.80), indicating potential sell signals.
  • MACD signal: Bullish, with a histogram reading of 0.64, suggesting ongoing momentum.
  • Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, as the price is touching the middle band.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: The past 10 news articles highlight positive developments in the XRP ecosystem and ETF debuts, but also mention concerns about volatility and potential price drops.

Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is NEUTRAL to POSITIVE, with a focus on recent XRP ecosystem expansion and ETF debuts.

Catalyst Identification: Earnings data are not available, but upcoming events such as the debut of ETFs and product launches could impact the stock's price.

Market Narrative: The news headlines align with technical signals, suggesting ongoing momentum. However, high volatility creates uncertainty and may lead to a potential pullback.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: Beta is 2.59 (high), indicating that XRPR is more volatile than the market.

Volatility Regime: The current volatility level is HIGH, with an HV20 reading of 86.4% and an IV Premium vs HV30 reading of 76.5%.

Options Market Signals:

  • IV Rank: Medium (41.5%), indicating historically high volatility.
  • Current IV: 129.4%, pricing in a $2.17 move by expiration.
  • Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.00, suggesting bullish sentiment.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: XRPR is outperforming the sector, with a relative strength index of 74.50.

Institutional Activity: The options market shows institutional interest, with an IV Rank of 41.5% and put-call volume ratios favoring calls.

Correlation Analysis: XRPR has a high correlation (0.45) with SPY, indicating that it tends to move in tandem with the broader market.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels: The SMA 20 ($10.48) and Bollinger Band Middle Line ($10.48) provide support, while the upper band at $13.49 may offer resistance.

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A breakout above $13.49 could trigger a further price increase, while a breakdown below $10.48 could lead to a pullback.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings data are not available, but upcoming events such as ETF debuts and product launches may impact the stock's price.

Risk Management: Consider using stop-loss levels at $11.20 (EMA 12) or $10.50 (EMA 26) to manage risk. Position sizing should be adjusted based on market conditions and volatility.

Generated

XRPR Options Activity & IV Rank

XRPR IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →

Volatility Metrics

Current IV: 100.7%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $0.00
7-DTE Move: $0.00
Days to Exp: 30 (2026-11-20)

Options Flow

Call Volume: 3
Put Volume: 1
P/C Volume: 0.333
BULLISH
Call OI: 3
Put OI: 1
P/C OI: 0.333
Total OI: 4

ATM Options Pricing

ATM Call: $0.00
ATM Put: $0.00
Call %: 0.0%
Put %: 0.0%

Chain Summary

Chain Volume: 544
Chain OI: 926
Last Updated: 10/21/2026
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ

Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 27th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.

Gamma percentile
27%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+1.00
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.51
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.69
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.51: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.69: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.

Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.

Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.

Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.

This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.

· 3 ATM contracts, 1k total OI
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · No data
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · ATM 101.4% / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)41.9MediumOct 21
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$0.00Oct 21
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 2.7039
Alpha: -72.20%
Correlation: 0.4549
R-Squared: 20.7%
Stock Volatility: 75.5%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

XRPR Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

26 filers637,483 shares$5.84M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian 215,639 $1.85M 31.66% — 2026-06-30
2 Realta Investment Advisors 85,419 $1.04M 17.76% — 2026-09-30
3 Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian 110,000 $943.80K 16.15% — 2026-06-30
4 MUSTICO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 65,675 $582.84K 9.97% — 2026-06-30
5 Inscription Capital, LLC 39,409 $338.13K 5.79% — 2026-06-30
6 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian 25,123 $215.56K 3.69% — 2026-06-30
7 Visionary Wealth Advisors 20,080 $172.29K 2.95% — 2026-06-30
8 Walser Wealth Management Company, A Ltd Liability Co 12,439 $151.13K 2.59% — 2026-09-30
9 Foundations Investment Advisors, LLC 12,587 $108.00K 1.85% — 2026-06-30
10 HRT FINANCIAL LP 11,452 $98.00K 1.68% — 2026-06-30
11 Mayfair Advisory Group, LLC 11,000 $97.97K 1.68% — 2026-06-30
12 Jain Global LLC 11,272 $96.71K 1.65% — 2026-06-30
13 LANARK FINANCIAL, INC. 6,883 $59.06K 1.01% — 2026-06-30
14 Beaird Harris Wealth Management, LLC 4,004 $34.35K 0.59% — 2026-06-30
15 PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Custodian 1,750 $15.02K 0.26% — 2026-06-30
16 UBS Group AG Custodian 1,531 $13.14K 0.22% — 2026-06-30
17 Trifecta Capital Advisors, LLC 750 $6.43K 0.11% — 2026-06-30
18 Farther Finance Advisors, LLC Custodian 494 $6.00K 0.10% — 2026-09-30
19 Allworth Financial LP Custodian 484 $4.15K 0.07% — 2026-06-30
20 Bank of Montreal Custodian 323 $2.77K 0.05% — 2026-06-30
21 Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian 320 $2.75K 0.05% — 2026-06-30
22 GILPIN WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC 214 $2.60K 0.04% — 2026-09-30
23 AE Wealth Management LLC Custodian 275 $2.36K 0.04% — 2026-06-30
24 Morgan Stanley Custodian 255 $2.19K 0.04% — 2026-06-30
25 Creative Capital Management Investments LLC 90 $772 0.01% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Short Interest & Float

Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.

Metric definitions
  • Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
  • SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
  • Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
  • Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
  • Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
  • Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
  • SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
  • 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
  • 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
  • >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
  • Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
  • Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
  • A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.

Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.

Short Interest
41.28K
SI % of Float
—
Days to Cover
1.88
Short Vol Ratio
82.1%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month