Acadia Realty Trust(AKR)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $18.14 – $22.90
- YTD
- +6.54%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 35.98
- Straddle Price
- $5.00
- Market Cap
- $3.0B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.60% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.10% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.61% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +38.9pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +2.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.02 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 1.8% |
| Book / Price | 90.5% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 82.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 10.1% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.61 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $21.69 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $21.64 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 42.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $1.6B |
| Market Cap | $3B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $-6.83 | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $10.62 | 38% | |
| Peer P/E | $13.40 | 11% | median 43.6× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $44.19 | 14% | median 30.3× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/B | $63.82 | 18% | median 3.2× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/S | $41.30 | 18% | median 12.9× · 4 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $21.69 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (6798)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $3.0B
Acadia Realty Trust is a real estate investment trust that specializes in the operation, management, leasing, renovation, and acquisition of shopping centers and mixed-use properties with retail components. The company operates through three segments: REIT Portfolio segment consists of high-quality retail properties located in high-barrier-to-entry, densely-populated metropolitan areas with a long-term investment horizon; Investment Management segment holds the retail real estate in which the company co-invests with high-quality institutional investors; and Structured Financing segment consist…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -1.99% | 6 |
| Feb | +5.75% | 6 |
| Mar | -3.63% | 6 |
| Apr | +1.74% | 6 |
| May | -1.40% | 6 |
| Jun | -3.10% | 6 |
| Jul | +6.26% | 6 |
| Aug | -1.23% | 5 |
| Sep | -5.23% | 5 |
| Oct | +4.20% | 5 |
| Nov | +3.71% | 5 |
| Dec | +1.68% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | After-Close | 12.91% | 1.60% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2024-10-28 | Pre-Market | 6.35% | 2.46% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2025-02-11 | After-Close | 10.84% | 1.39% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2025-04-29 | After-Close | 25.65% | 2.50% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2025-08-05 | After-Close | 8.25% | 0.73% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-10-28 | Pre-Market | 20.16% | 3.63% | 0.18x | Within |
| 2026-02-10 | After-Close | 22.88% | 3.60% | 0.16x | Within |
| 2026-04-28 | Pre-Market | 21.95% | 0.06% | 0.00x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 35.98
- IV Rank (7D)
- 35.98
- Avg IV
- 72.5%
- Straddle (30D)
- $5.00
- Straddle (7D)
- $5.00
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.33
- Correlation (SPY)
- 19.2%
- R²
- 0.04
- Ann. Volatility
- 22.0%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.7%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $292.75K | 100.00% | 2025-09-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | Kenneth A Jr McIntyre | Director | Grant (A) | +5,592 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-13 | William T. Spitz | Director | Award (A) | +5,592 | $21.46 | $120.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-13 | David C Zoba | Director | Grant (A) | +5,592 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-13 | Lee S Wielansky | Director | Grant (A) | +6,990 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-13 | Lynn C Thurber | Director | Award (A) | +10,770 | $21.46 | $231.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-13 | Hope B Woodhouse | Director | Award (A) | +5,592 | $21.46 | $120.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-13 | Mark A Denien | Director | Grant (A) | +11,028 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-07 | Reginald Livingston | EVP and CIO | Mixed | — | $22.12 | -$553.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-20 | John J. Gottfried | Executive VP and CFO | Grant (A) | +64,480 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-20 | KENNETH F BERNSTEIN | President and CEO | Grant (A) | +223,146 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-20 | Joseph Napolitano | Sr. VP | Grant (A) | +44,910 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-20 | Reginald Livingston | EVP and CIO | Grant (A) | +41,111 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-20 | Jason Blacksberg | EVP and Chief Legal Officer | Grant (A) | +53,921 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | John J. Gottfried | Executive VP and CFO | Grant (A) | +55,810 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | KENNETH F BERNSTEIN | President and CEO | Grant (A) | +210,112 RSU | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UNIVERSITY YALE | Director | 2,153,747 | $47.36M | -$794.4K | 27 | 2008-03-04 |
| 2 | JOEL L BRAUN | Executive Vice President | 396,362 | $8.72M | -$6.38M | 39 | 2019-01-02 |
| 3 | KENNETH F BERNSTEIN | President and CEO | 345,006 | $7.59M | -$12.69M | 71 | 2026-02-20 |
| 4 | William T. Spitz | Director | 113,248 | $2.49M | -$271.3K | 28 | 2026-05-13 |
| 5 | Lynn C Thurber | Director | 111,573 | $2.45M | $0 | 10 | 2026-05-13 |
| 6 | DOUGLAS II CROCKER | Director | 84,147 | $1.85M | -$383.7K | 31 | 2023-12-07 |
| 7 | Lee S Wielansky | Director | 60,611 | $1.33M | -$415.7K | 37 | 2026-05-13 |
| 8 | LORRENCE T KELLAR | Director | 47,861 | $1.05M | -$536.1K | 25 | 2022-05-05 |
| 9 | JOSEPH W HOGAN | Sr. Vice President | 40,023 | $880.1K | $22.1K | 15 | 2010-03-03 |
| 10 | WENDY W LUSCOMBE | Director | 37,614 | $827.1K | -$850.3K | 41 | 2022-12-01 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | Livingston Reginald | Officer | 25,000 | $553.0K | 2026-05-06 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-11 | Livingston Reginald | Officer | 20,000 | $400.7K | 2025-06-11 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-10 | NAPOLITANO JOSEPH | Officer | 46,567 | $1.04M | 2025-03-10 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-06 | Blacksberg Jason | Officer | 30,000 | $684.4K | 2025-03-06 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-19 | Gottfried John J. | Officer | 12,000 | $283.3K | 2025-02-19 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-03 | Hartmann Richard | Officer | 25,000 | $426.9K | 2024-05-03 | NewEdge Wealth | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-03 | Gottfried John J. | Officer | 12,500 | $211.1K | 2024-05-03 | RBC WEALTH MANAGEMENT | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-04 | NAPOLITANO JOSEPH | Officer | 49,525 | $830.6K | 2024-03-04 | RBC WEALTH MANAGEMENT | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-06 144/A | CROCKER DOUGLAS II | Director | 28,250 | $465.1K | 2023-12-05 | Northern Trust Securities inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-05 | CROCKER DOUGLAS II | Director | 28,250 | $447.8K | 2023-12-05 | Northern Trust Securities Inc | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 73.3 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.3 |
| P/S Ratio | 7.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.2 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.4B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.0B |
| TTM EPS | $0.3 |
| ROE | 1.8% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.52% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.71 |