AppFolio, Inc. Class A(APPF)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $142.56 – $285.61
- YTD
- -10.68%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 39.3
- Straddle Price
- $25.25
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.59
- Market Cap
- $7.3B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.80% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.94 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.49% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.70% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +25.2pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +12.7% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 29.9% |
| Book / Price | 7.1% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 63.5% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 25.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 5/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +12.4% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $195.18 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $217.17 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 9.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.2B |
| Market Cap | $7B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $209.82 | 23% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $133.48 | 10% | median 27.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $198.58 | 10% | median 29.3× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $118.35 | 2% | median 8.1× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $179.87 | 7% | median 5.7× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $195.18 | 47% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $7.3B
AppFolio Inc provides cloud-based software solutions for the real estate industry. Its property management software offers property managers an end-to-end solution to their business needs. The group's products include cloud-based property management software (Appfolio Property Manager). Its solutions are AppFolio Property Manager Core, AppFolio Property Manager Plus, and AppFolio Property Manager Max. It also offers value-added services, such as screening, risk mitigation, and electronic payment services. Its markets are Single-Family, Multifamily, Student Housing, Affordable Housing, Communit…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.78% | 11 |
| Feb | +1.05% | 11 |
| Mar | -0.29% | 11 |
| Apr | +3.15% | 11 |
| May | +6.79% | 11 |
| Jun | +6.20% | 12 |
| Jul | +4.57% | 12 |
| Aug | +9.24% | 12 |
| Sep | -0.74% | 12 |
| Oct | -0.69% | 11 |
| Nov | +2.78% | 11 |
| Dec | -2.16% | 11 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | After-Close | 11.99% | 9.49% | 0.79x | Within |
| 2025-01-30 | After-Close | 13.19% | 3.19% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2025-04-24 | After-Close | 12.23% | 17.75% | 1.45x | Exceeded |
| 2025-07-31 | After-Close | 10.62% | 18.56% | 1.75x | Exceeded |
| 2025-10-30 | After-Close | 14.32% | 10.40% | 0.73x | Within |
| 2026-01-29 | After-Close | 13.09% | 9.41% | 0.72x | Within |
| 2026-04-23 | After-Close | 15.59% | 11.16% | 0.72x | Within |
| 2026-07-23 | After-Close | 16.22% | 0.67% | 0.04x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 39.3
- IV Rank (7D)
- 67.56
- Avg IV
- 73.9%
- Straddle (30D)
- $25.25
- Straddle (7D)
- $13.40
- P/C Volume
- 0.59
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.54
- Correlation (SPY)
- 15.8%
- R²
- 0.02
- Ann. Volatility
- 43.9%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.8%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $12.19M | 30.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $8.50M | 21.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $8.31M | 20.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $3.43M | 8.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $2.49M | 6.16% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $2.07M | 5.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.76M | 4.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $962.10K | 2.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | LPL Financial LLC Custodian | $609.33K | 1.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Walleye Trading LLC | $64.14K | 0.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $16.04K | 0.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $12.99M | 38.93% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $9.08M | 27.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $4.91M | 14.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $2.77M | 8.30% | 2025-09-30 |
| 5 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.76M | 5.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $962.10K | 2.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $705.54K | 2.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $160.35K | 0.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $32.07K | 0.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-24 | MAURICE J DUCA | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −9,856 | $218.87 | -$2.16M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-20 | Timothy Mathias Eaton | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −373 | $202.61 | -$75.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-20 | MAURICE J DUCA | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −7,001 | $213.52 | -$1.49M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-20 | MAURICE J DUCA | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −8,056 | $203.53 | -$1.64M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-18 | Michael MiQi Yang | Director | Award (A) | +2,217 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-18 | MAURICE J DUCA | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −5,600 | $195.89 | -$1.10M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-18 | MAURICE J DUCA | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −15,800 | $200.11 | -$3.16M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-18 | Diya Jolly | Director | Award (A) | +2,217 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-17 | William Shane Trigg | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −2,057 | $205.00 | -$421.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | MAURICE J DUCA | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −6,693 | $198.93 | -$1.33M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | MAURICE J DUCA | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −14,707 | $197.28 | -$2.90M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | MAURICE J DUCA | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −5,442 | $201.13 | -$1.09M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | MAURICE J DUCA | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −15,958 | $199.22 | -$3.18M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | Timothy Mathias Eaton | Chief Financial Officer | Tax (F) | −949 | $199.54 | -$189.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | Evan Pickering | General Counsel | Mixed | −727 | $200.25 | -$145.6K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dragoneer Apartment, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 1,803,826 | $371.16M | -$47.12M | 4 | 2017-07-25 |
| 2 | DRAGONEER GLOBAL FUND II, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 1,607,181 | $330.69M | $12.14M | 13 | 2017-08-03 |
| 3 | MARC STAD | 10%+ Owner | 1,549,880 | $318.90M | -$103.64M | 16 | 2017-08-11 |
| 4 | Charles J Keenan IV | 10%+ Owner | 1,294,587 | $266.37M | $5.33M | 4 | 2016-11-28 |
| 5 | Keenan Capital GP, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 1,242,489 | $255.65M | $3.99M | 4 | 2017-03-10 |
| 6 | Keenan Capital, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 1,038,857 | $213.76M | -$17.89M | 6 | 2017-03-15 |
| 7 | Brian Donahoo | Chief Executive Officer | 996,149 | $204.97M | -$1.83M | 3 | 2017-08-11 |
| 8 | Oberndorf Investments, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 970,271 | $199.64M | $475.2K | 2 | 2015-07-09 |
| 9 | Jonathan Walker | Founder | 632,795 | $130.20M | -$27.22M | 30 | 2022-11-14 |
| 10 | Klaus Schauser | 10%+ Owner | 505,000 | $103.91M | -$20.65M | 18 | 2025-11-19 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-19 | TIMOTHY EATON | Officer | 373 | $76.1K | 2026-08-19 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-14 | WILLIAM SHANE TRIGG | Director, Officer | 2,057 | $419.6K | 2026-08-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-12 | EVAN PICKERING | Officer | 322 | $65.4K | 2026-08-12 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-11 | EVAN PICKERING | Officer | 141 | $28.1K | 2026-08-11 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-10 | DON RIGLER | Officer | 300 | $59.6K | 2026-08-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-05 | EVAN PICKERING | Officer | 661 | $131.9K | 2026-08-05 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | Maurice Duca, Trustee IGSB Money Purchase Pension Trust FBO Suzanne Duca | 10% Stockholder | 122,000 | $21.48M | 2026-07-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | Maurice J. Duca Family Trust Dated 3/25/1981 | 10% Stockholder | 36,000 | $6.34M | 2026-07-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | Maurice Duca J. Roth IRA | 10% Stockholder | 65,000 | $11.44M | 2026-07-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-30 | KERR JANET | Director | 3,500 | $536.7K | 2026-06-30 | Wells Fargo Clearing Services | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-23 | 0001433195-26-000021 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-10 | 0001433195-26-000016 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-29 | 0001433195-26-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-15 | 0001433195-26-000003 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-03 | 0001433195-25-000147 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-18 | 0001433195-25-000145 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0001433195-25-000140 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-03 | 0001433195-25-000134 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-07 | 0001433195-25-000114 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0001433195-25-000103 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-05 | 0001433195-26-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-06 | 0001433195-25-000013 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-01 | 0001433195-24-000023 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-09 | 0001433195-23-000021 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-28 | 0001433195-22-000023 | EDGAR |
| 2021-03-01 | 0001433195-21-000024 | EDGAR |
| 2020-03-02 | 0001433195-20-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-28 | 0001433195-19-000016 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-26 | 0001433195-18-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2017-02-27 | 0001433195-17-000010 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-23 | 0001433195-26-000023 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0001433195-25-000142 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0001433195-25-000105 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-24 | 0001433195-25-000055 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-25 | 0001433195-24-000127 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-26 | 0001433195-24-000106 | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-26 | 0001433195-24-000054 | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-27 | 0001433195-23-000126 | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-28 | 0001433195-23-000099 | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-28 | 0001433195-23-000053 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 47.0 |
| P/B Ratio | 13.8 |
| P/S Ratio | 7.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 32.9 |
| TTM Revenue | $1.0B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.2B |
| TTM EPS | $4.38 |
| ROE | 29.9% |