CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust

ETF

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

CEF — —
Key stats
About

Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) ETF

Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust is a closed end mutual fund trust. The trust invests and holds all of its assets in physical gold and silver bullion and seeks to provide a secure, convenient and exchange-traded investment alternative for investors interested in holding physical bullion without the inconvenience that is typical of direct investment. Its objective is to invest in long-term holdings of unencumbered, fully allocated, physical gold and silver bullion and does not speculate with regard to short-term changes in bullion prices.

AUM
$7.1B
Exchange
ARCX
Inception
1965-06-14
Has Options
No
Homepage
https://www.sprott.com
Fund profile
Expense ratio
—
Assets
$6.9B
shares × price, Oct 20, 2026
Trailing yield
—
Average daily volume
$21M
30 sessions
Holdings
—
Listed
Jun 14, 1965
NYSE Arca
Closure risk, 12 months
0.3%
low · model
FrenzyCap ETF score
87
how it is built
Costn/a
Liquidity77
Scale100
Diversificationn/a

Moves with. Gold (81% of its variance, beta 1.24); US large-cap stocks (4% of its variance, beta 0.28). These factors explain 87% of its daily moves over the last year.

Overlap toolAll Precious Metals ETFs

Fund flows

This product is not a registered investment company, so it does not file the monthly flow reports that funds file with the SEC.

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
GLTRabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF——$2.5B+0.0%compare
PPLTabrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF——$2.0B+2.3%compare
PALLabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF——$577M−24.8%compare
SPPPSprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust——$473M−11.7%compare
DBPInvesco DB Precious Metals Fund——$244M−3.1%compare

The largest other funds in the Precious Metals category.

ETF Profile
Chart
Seasonality
Month'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan-4.53%-1.20%2.56%-2.31%6.60%7.56%1.45%
Feb-7.43%6.82%-9.04%-1.27%0.39%17.48%1.16%
Mar-4.30%1.47%10.78%7.05%7.86%-14.77%1.35%
Apr2.71%-4.66%1.05%2.78%2.73%-1.70%0.48%
May8.04%-3.28%-2.46%5.27%2.11%-0.50%1.53%
Jun-7.20%-4.43%-4.50%-2.26%0.03%-14.29%-5.44%
Jul-0.11%0.30%3.37%2.80%-0.46%-1.40%0.75%
Aug-3.39%-6.80%0.60%2.43%5.09%13.56%1.92%
Sep-4.46%0.78%-5.92%6.99%11.22%-5.46%0.53%
Oct5.06%-4.86%8.91%3.92%0.92%-2.85%*1.85%
Nov-3.17%9.75%4.49%-3.68%11.34%--3.75%
Dec3.08%1.87%-2.20%-2.62%9.26%--1.88%
Total-15.79%-5.43%5.92%19.90%73.00%-7.15%11.74%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $41.27
SMA 50: $43.51
SMA 200: $46.43
Current: $40.55
EMA 12: $40.84
EMA 26: $41.68
MACD: -0.8405 | Signal: -0.0053
BEARISH
ADX (14): 25.44
TREND
+DI: 20.25
−DI: 34.25

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 41.05
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 37.20
Stoch %D: 37.25
Williams %R: -57.68

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $43.06
BB Lower: $39.49
NEUTRAL
OBV: 43,716,593
Vol SMA 20: 546,924
Vol ROC: -33.58%
ATR: $0.79
True Range: $0.47
HV 20: 27.1%
HV 30: 26.5%
HV 60: 30.5%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10) with primary risks.

Key Drivers:

  • Strong momentum signals from MACD and RSI
  • Weak trend indicators from SMAs and EMAs
  • Neutral news sentiment and no recent catalysts

Primary Risks:

  • High volatility and potential for sharp price movements
  • Conflicting technical signals and uncertain trend direction

Investment Thesis: CEF is a neutral stock with strong momentum but weak trend indicators. The recent news headlines are generally neutral, which aligns with the overall assessment.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: The neutral sentiment of recent headlines does not significantly impact the analysis, as it aligns with the overall assessment.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Short-term: NEUTRAL (no clear trend) Medium-term: WEAK DOWNTREND Long-term: NEUTRAL (unclear)

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • Upper Bollinger Band: $47.88
  • Middle Band: $45.55
  • Lower Band: $43.21

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI: 53.11 (neutral)
  • MACD: Bullish with a strong signal line crossover
  • Bollinger Bands: Neutral, indicating a squeeze

Volume Analysis: Volume is declining, suggesting decreased institutional interest and potential for further price movements.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral news headlines from various sources, focusing on market commentary and routine announcements.

Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL

Catalyst Identification: No recent catalysts or earnings information available.

Market Narrative: The neutral news sentiment aligns with the overall assessment of a neutral stock with strong momentum but weak trend indicators.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta = 1.22).

Volatility Regime: High volatility, indicating potential for sharp price movements.

Options Market Signals: No options data available.

Downside Protection: Support levels at $43.21 and $42.59 may provide some protection in case of a price decline.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: CEF is trading within its sector's performance range.

Institutional Activity: Volume is declining, suggesting decreased institutional interest and potential for further price movements.

Correlation Analysis: R-squared = 0.38, indicating moderate correlation with the market.

Relative Valuation: CEF is trading within its relative valuation range.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • Support at $43.21
  • Resistance at $47.88
  • Middle Band at $45.55

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear levels available due to weak trend indicators and high volatility.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming catalysts or earnings information available.

Risk Management: Stop-loss levels may be set at $42.59 to protect against potential price declines.

Note: This analysis is based on the provided data and is subject to change as new information becomes available.

Generated

CEF Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 1.3246
Alpha: -4.53%
Correlation: 0.4112
R-Squared: 16.9%
Stock Volatility: 40.9%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

CEF Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

470 filers57,172,706 shares$2.31B value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 CENTRAL TRUST Co 4,506,959 $181.31M 7.84% — 2026-06-30
2 Bleakley Financial Group, LLC 4,208,130 $169.29M 7.32% — 2026-06-30
3 Morgan Stanley Custodian 4,154,969 $167.15M 7.23% — 2026-06-30
4 JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD 3,657,084 $147.71M 6.39% — 2026-06-30
5 Royal Bank of Canada Custodian 3,329,872 $133.96M 5.79% — 2026-06-30
6 Weiss Asset Management LP 3,099,716 $124.70M 5.39% — 2026-06-30
7 IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian 1,779,571 $71.59M 3.10% — 2026-06-30
8 Evelyn Partners Group Ltd 1,168,036 $46.99M 2.03% — 2026-06-30
9 MANAGED ASSET PORTFOLIOS, LLC 955,967 $38.46M 1.66% — 2026-06-30
10 Evelyn Partners Investment Management LLP 797,590 $38.06M 1.65% — 2026-03-31
11 Raymond James Financial, Inc. Custodian 903,921 $36.36M 1.57% — 2026-06-30
12 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian 897,561 $36.11M 1.56% — 2026-06-30
13 LPL Financial LLC Custodian 847,803 $34.11M 1.47% — 2026-06-30
14 Baird Financial Group, Inc. 841,648 $33.86M 1.46% — 2026-06-30
15 Wells Fargo & Company Custodian 747,266 $30.06M 1.30% — 2026-06-30
16 Bank of America Corp Custodian 642,326 $25.84M 1.12% — 2026-06-30
17 SPROTT INC. 636,665 $25.61M 1.11% — 2026-06-30
18 Cheviot Value Management, LLC 567,160 $22.82M 0.99% — 2026-06-30
19 Beaumont Financial Advisors, LLC 563,859 $22.68M 0.98% — 2026-06-30
20 Marshall Financial Group, LLC 544,511 $21.91M 0.95% — 2026-06-30
21 Ameriprise Financial, Inc. Custodian 525,803 $21.15M 0.91% — 2026-06-30
22 JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian 504,984 $20.14M 0.87% — 2026-06-30
23 CIBC WORLD MARKET INC. 483,429 $19.45M 0.84% — 2026-06-30
24 Cannell & Spears LLC 483,025 $19.43M 0.84% — 2026-06-30
25 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 444,749 $17.89M 0.77% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month