This under-the-radar telecommunications stock boasts a Superscore of 77 from our Hidden Gems Primary database, part of The Motley Fool's Moneyball Database system. Here's why.
DOX Amdocs Limited
XNAS
62.87
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
DOX
$62.87
—
Key stats
$62.87
- 52-Week Range
- $49.74 – $85.63
- YTD
- -21.57%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 44.16
- Straddle Price
- $4.90
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.50
- Market Cap
- $6.6B
- Open
- $62.09
- Day Range
- $61.99 – $63.12
- Volume
- 499,537
- Prev Close
- $63.57
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.71 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 8.65% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.47% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +29.0pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.5B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 13.6% |
| Book / Price | 40.6% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.19 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +2.7% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $60.17 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $59.27 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 18.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.3B |
| Market Cap | $9B |
Peers used for multiples: CHKP, CTSH, LDOS, SSNC
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
60-Day Conviction
53%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 23, 2026
$62.33
α -0.9%
rank 31%
conviction
58%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 22, 2026
$62.53
α -0.6%
rank 31%
conviction
17%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 20, 2027
$61.98
α -1.5%
rank 31%
conviction
53%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $64.53 | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $40.74 | 35% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 15.7× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 11.5× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/B | $79.42 | 13% | median 3.1× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 2.3× · 4 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $60.17 | 52% | stability 60% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $65.34 | 0% | 7 strikes · skew +0.99 |
As of 2026-10-23 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES (7371) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $6.6B
- Employees
- 26,969
- List Date
- 1998-06-19
- CIK
- 0001062579
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-10
- EPS Forecast
- $1.78 (3 est.)
- Homepage
- https://www.amdocs.com
Amdocs Ltd is a provider of software and services to communications, entertainment, and media service providers. The Company operates in a single segment and designs, develops, markets, supports, implements, and operates open and modular cloud offerings. Its portfolio includes solutions across digital business systems and legacy business and operational support systems, supporting multiple lines of business such as wireless, broadband, cable, fiber, satellite, and digital services. The Company leverages artificial intelligence to support digital transformation, cloud adoption, and intelligent …
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.55% | 1.08% | 0.23% | 4.31% | 4.79% | 2.22% | 2.36% |
| Feb | 4.58% | 2.21% | -5.61% | -1.61% | -0.16% | -13.84% | -2.40% |
| Mar | -9.21% | 4.87% | 4.90% | -0.89% | 5.39% | -4.13% | 0.15% |
| Apr | 5.99% | -4.52% | -5.65% | -6.92% | -2.67% | -0.66% | -2.40% |
| May | 0.87% | 9.78% | 1.78% | -5.23% | 3.53% | -2.67% | 1.34% |
| Jun | -1.44% | -4.03% | 4.57% | 1.79% | -0.51% | -22.56% | -3.70% |
| Jul | -2.34% | 3.09% | -5.11% | 11.19% | -7.41% | 9.07% | 1.41% |
| Aug | 0.47% | -0.97% | -5.32% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 13.89% | 1.73% |
| Sep | -2.01% | -5.94% | -6.01% | 1.04% | -2.81% | -8.66% | -4.07% |
| Oct | 2.06% | 6.54% | -4.57% | 0.42% | 3.68% | 7.77%* | 2.65% |
| Nov | -10.60% | 4.95% | 4.45% | -1.52% | -9.09% | -- | -2.36% |
| Dec | 9.51% | 1.01% | 2.86% | -2.91% | 6.57% | -- | 3.41% |
| Total | -2.39% | 18.20% | -13.72% | -0.48% | 1.20% | -22.69% | -3.32% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $59.53
SMA 50: $60.26
SMA 200: $63.14
Current: $62.91
EMA 12: $60.92
EMA 26: $60.15
MACD: 0.7764 | Signal: 0.4966
BULLISH
ADX (14): 27.40
TREND
+DI: 33.08
−DI: 9.45
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 64.95
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 91.49
Stoch %D: 87.07
Williams %R: -12.44
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $62.98
BB Lower: $56.09
NEUTRAL
OBV: -33,450,130
Vol SMA 20: 966,559
Vol ROC: -63.62%
ATR: $1.54
True Range: $1.58
HV 20: 22.3%
HV 30: 23.2%
HV 60: 27.4%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-24T00:00:00 – 2026-10-22T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: DOX
Executive Summary
Confidence Level: 6/10 (Neutral)
Key Drivers: Recent positive news headlines in the cloud OSS/BSS market, partnerships, and revenue growth.
Primary Risks: High volatility, potential for price consolidation around current levels, mixed signals from technical indicators.
Investment Thesis: DOX has the potential to rise as a key player in the cloud OSS/BSS market. Recent positive news headlines and partnerships could drive further growth. However, high volatility and mixed technical signals may lead to price consolidation or a pullback.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive news headlines have had a bullish impact on DOX's stock price.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Neutral
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Uptrend
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower: $52.49 (Bollinger Bands lower band)
- Middle: $59.36 (SMA 20 and EMA 26)
- Upper: $66.22 (Bollinger Bands upper band)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): Oversold (21.85) - potential buy signal
- MACD: Bearish momentum (-2.44 / Signal: -0.66 / Histogram: -1.78)
- Bollinger Bands: Price is oversold
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 1353954.55
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): -29073203.68 (bearish signal)
- Volume Rate of Change: 117.38% (increasing volume)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines in the cloud OSS/BSS market, partnerships, and revenue growth.
Sentiment Assessment: Overall sentiment is positive (70%).
Catalyst Identification: Recent earnings beats, product launches, and partnerships.
Market Narrative: The recent positive news headlines align with the bullish technical signals from the RSI and Bollinger Bands.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta 0.51).
Volatility Regime: High volatility regime.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 74.9% (Medium - shows if volatility is historically high/low)
- Current IV: 90.0%
- Expected Move: $3.93 (29 DTE), 7-DTE: $2.30
- Volume Flow: 49 calls vs 75 puts (bearish sentiment)
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations are critical in this high-volatility regime.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: DOX is outperforming the sector.
Institutional Activity: Increasing institutional interest, as evidenced by rising volume and open interest.
Correlation Analysis: DOX has a low correlation with market (R-squared interpretation: 0.24).
Relative Valuation: DOX is trading within its historical range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance levels around $52.49, $59.36, and $66.22.
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A breakout above the upper Bollinger Band ($66.22) could trigger a significant move.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings release, product launches, and partnerships.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels around $50.55 (20% below current price), position sizing considerations are critical in this high-volatility regime.
Generated
News
All DOX news →
DOX Options Activity & IV Rank
DOX IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 33.4%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $4.90
7-DTE Move: $4.90
Days to Exp: 28 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 199
Put Volume: 298
P/C Volume: 1.497
BEARISH
Call OI: 310
Put OI: 4,026
P/C OI: 12.987
Total OI: 4,336
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $1.18
ATM Put: $3.73
Call %: 1.9%
Put %: 5.9%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 699
Chain OI: 5,465
Last Updated: 10/23/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 52nd percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
52%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.59
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.59
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.58
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.59: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.58: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 15 ATM contracts, 5k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
24%
+8.0
pts
EXTREME
ATM 32.7% / Wing 40.7%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)44.2MediumOct 23
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$4.90Oct 23
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.2549
Alpha: -27.54%
Correlation: 0.1110
R-Squared: 1.2%
Stock Volatility: 29.3%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own DOX
5 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $25.8M | #971 of 3716 | +2325.8% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $19.1M | #1180 of 6285 | +85.2% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $9.0M | #1115 of 3138 | -38.8% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $3.5M | #560 of 997 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $384K | #2229 of 4729 | +244.4% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
DOX Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 134,379,500 (as of 2020-09-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
7 filers$5.94M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.96M | 49.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $1.20M | 20.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Walleye Trading LLC | $464.97K | 7.83% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $439.70K | 7.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Walleye Capital LLC | $424.54K | 7.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $276.96K | 4.66% | 2025-09-30 |
| 7 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $171.84K | 2.89% | 2026-06-30 |
8 filers$26.65M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $8.07M | 30.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $6.34M | 23.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $6.30M | 23.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $4.39M | 16.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $682.29K | 2.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Capital LLC | $404.32K | 1.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Verition Fund Management LLC | $252.70K | 0.95% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $207.21K | 0.78% | 2026-06-30 |
DOX Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-02Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-02 | Matthew E. Smith | See Remarks | Sell (S) | −464 | $62.51 | -$29.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-15 | Shimie Hortig | See Remarks | Award (A) | +84,483 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
DOX Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $62.91
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shimie Hortig | See Remarks | 181,696 | $11.43M | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-15 |
| 2 | Matthew E. Smith | See Remarks | 1,550 | $97.5K | -$29.0K | 1 | 2026-06-02 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
DOX Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jun 10, 2026Directors 10
- Adrian Gardner · since Mar 18, 2026
- Amos Genish · since Mar 18, 2026
- Eliahu Meir Gelman · since Mar 18, 2026
- John Anthony MacDonald · since Mar 18, 2026
- Robert A Minicucci · since Mar 18, 2026
- Sarah R. Davis · since Mar 18, 2026
- Vega Rafael De La · since Mar 18, 2026
- Veronique Morali · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yvette Kanouff · since Mar 18, 2026
- Shimie Hortig · since Mar 31, 2026
Officers 5
- Shimie Hortig · Director, President and Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 31, 2026
- Rajat Raheja · Division President, Amdocs Development Centre India LLP · since Mar 18, 2026
- Tamar Rapaport-Dagim · Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Tal Rozenfeld · Chief Financial Officer · since Jun 1, 2026
- Matthew E. Smith · Secretary, Head of Investor Relations · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (15)
| Jun 1, 2026 | Tal Rozenfeld became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Shimie Hortig became a director |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Shimie Hortig became Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yvette Kanouff became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Veronique Morali became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Vega Rafael De La became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Tamar Rapaport-Dagim became Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Sarah R. Davis became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Robert A Minicucci became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Rajat Raheja became Division President, Amdocs Development Centre India LLP |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Matthew E. Smith became Secretary, Head of Investor Relations |
| Mar 18, 2026 | John Anthony MacDonald became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Eliahu Meir Gelman became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Amos Genish became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Adrian Gardner became a director |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
DOX Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-08-06
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
3 filings
· $8.0M notice value
· 1 unique filer
· 100% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Rapaport-Dagim Tamar (3, $8.0M)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | Tamar Rappaport Dagim | Former Officer | 33,584 | $1.86M | 2026-08-06 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | Rapaport-Dagim Tamar | Former Officer | 12,780 | $678.6K | 2026-07-28 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-23 | Rapaport-Dagim Tamar | Former Officer | 107,577 | $5.51M | 2026-07-23 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-23 | Sheffer Yhoshua | Former Officer | 101,796 | $5.24M | 2026-06-22 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-01 | SHEFFER YEHOSHUA | Officer | 50,000 | $3.26M | 2026-06-01 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-29 | MATTHEW E SMITH | Officer | 464 | $29.0K | 2026-05-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | Sheffer Yhoshua | Former Officer | 50,853 | $3.15M | 2026-05-15 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-18 | Sheffer Yhoshua | Officer | 166,714 | $11.11M | 2026-03-18 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-02 | Raheja Rajat | Officer, President India Operations | 2,285 | $195.4K | 2025-09-02 | Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-28 | Smith Matthew E. | Officer | 525 | $46.1K | 2025-02-28 | EQUINITI TRUST COMPANY, LLC | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
92 ETFs hold DOX
25 shown · $541.54M total exposure · 0.08% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.26% | $79.4M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 2 | DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.26% | $71.2M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 3 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.12% | $42.4M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 4 | FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 1.30% | $36.2M | $2.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 5 | VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $34.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | FVD First Trust Value Line® Dividend Index Fund | First Trust | 0.42% | $33.2M | $7.9B | 2026-10-21 |
| 7 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.05% | $27.2M | $57.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 8 | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $24.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $21.3M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 10 | PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF | Invesco | 1.96% | $17.2M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 11 | JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | JPMorgan | 0.17% | $16.2M | $9.4B | 2026-10-22 |
| 12 | TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | First Trust | 0.34% | $14.8M | $4.4B | 2026-10-21 |
| 13 | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $14.5M | $84.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 14 | OUSM ALPS | OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | Nport | 1.49% | $13.1M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 15 | FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.15% | $12.6M | $8.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 16 | AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | Global X | 1.37% | $12.4M | — | 2026-10-22 |
| 17 | FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.13% | $11.3M | $8.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 18 | IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $10.0M | $15.7B | 2026-10-21 |
| 19 | FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF | Fidelity | 0.27% | $9.7M | $3.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 20 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $8.2M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 21 | IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $8.1M | $24.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | Nport | 0.11% | $6.3M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF | Nport | 1.70% | $5.9M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 24 | SEIV SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Value Factor ETF | Nport | 0.38% | $5.6M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.03% | $5.4M | $15.8B | 2026-10-21 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-09-30 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-09-30 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-09-30 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-09-30 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '21 | 2021-09-30 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '20 | 2020-09-30 | $1.05B | $130.80M | $1.01 | $204.68M |
| Q3 '20 | 2020-06-30 | $1.03B | $120.41M | $0.90 | $186.68M |
| Q2 '20 | 2020-03-31 | $1.05B | $127.04M | $0.94 | $102.87M |
| Q1 '20 | 2019-12-31 | $1.04B | $115.93M | $0.85 | $163.91M |
| Q4 '19 | 2019-09-30 | $1.03B | $118.73M | $0.89 | $213.62M |
| Q3 '19 | 2019-06-30 | $1.02B | $131.45M | $0.96 | $164.47M |
| Q2 '19 | 2019-03-31 | $1.02B | $124.28M | $0.90 | $168.63M |
Q4 2025 • period ending 2025-09-30 • filed 2025-12-15
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
17.00
P/B
2.31
P/S
2.03
EV/EBITDA
10.97
EV/Sales
1.95
ROE
13.5%
ROA
7.8%
Div Yield
2.55%
FCF Yield
7.79%
Debt/Equity
0.18
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$8.45B
as of 2026-10-23
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
9.18M
SI % of Float
8.59%
Days to Cover
10.50
Short Vol Ratio
45.5%
Free Float
106.85M
Float %
99.0%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-22 • Float 2026-05-12