FISN Deep Fission, Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
FISN
—
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRIC SERVICES (4911) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- List Date
- 2026-06-18
- CIK
- 0001918102
- Headquarters
- Berkeley, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.deepfission.com
Deep Fission Inc is a nuclear energy technology company developing a small modular reactor based on established pressurized water reactor technology, with novel emplacement in deep boreholes approximately one mile below the Earth's surface. Its reactor, which is referred to as the Gravity Reactor, will leverage subsurface conditions to support key containment and operating functions, including the use of hydrostatic pressure from a water column within the borehole to support reactor operating pressure and cooling, and the surrounding geological formation to provide structural confinement and s…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | -- | -- |
| Apr | -- | -- |
| May | -- | -- |
| Jun | -24.18% | -24.18% |
| Jul | -9.95% | -9.95% |
| Aug | -32.36% | -32.36% |
| Sep | -19.72% | -19.72% |
| Oct | -48.46% | -48.46% |
| Nov | 10.59%* | 10.59% |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -78.87% | -78.87% |
* Only 1 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $2.81
SMA 50: $4.99
SMA 200: —
Current: $2.82
EMA 12: $2.56
EMA 26: $3.36
MACD: -0.8002 | Signal: 0.0920
BEARISH
ADX (14): 36.49
TREND
+DI: 26.76
−DI: 33.48
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 43.90
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 29.07
Stoch %D: 16.15
Williams %R: -29.98
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $4.13
BB Lower: $1.50
NEUTRAL
OBV: -1,793,348
Vol SMA 20: 972,114
Vol ROC: 1291.58%
ATR: $0.55
True Range: $1.15
HV 20: 286.8%
HV 30: 236.1%
HV 60: 180.4%
Data Summary
Data Points: 99
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2026-06-18T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: FISN
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish MACD signal
- Trend reversal signals from SMA indicators
- High volatility and beta (>1.8) indicate increased risk
Primary Risks:
- Potential technical breakdown below $6.07 lower Bollinger Band support
- Increased volatility could lead to significant price swings
Investment Thesis: FISN's recent uptrend has stalled, and bearish momentum signals suggest a potential reversal. The stock's high beta and volatility indicate increased risk, making it essential to closely monitor technical and news developments.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: NEUTRAL (motley fool article)
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Bearish (Short-term), Medium-term, Long-term
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band support: $6.07
- Upper Bollinger Band resistance: $8.47
- SMA 20 resistance: $7.27
Momentum Signals:
- MACD signal: Bearish (crossover below signal line)
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (42.35)
- Bollinger Bands position: Mean reversion (price touching middle band)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume trend: Increasing
- Institutional interest signals: N/A
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: One neutral news article about Westinghouse and its rivals.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings or significant events identified.
Market Narrative: FISN's recent price action is not strongly correlated with market sentiment, making it essential to consider technical signals and risk factors.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High-risk stock (beta >1.8)
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are higher than historical averages
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: N/A
- Put/call ratios: N/A
- Unusual activity: N/A
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations suggest monitoring the lower Bollinger Band support at $6.07.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: FISN is outperforming its sector peers
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest are unavailable.
Correlation Analysis: FISN's price movements are relatively independent of market trends (R-squared interpretation)
Relative Valuation: FISN is trading within a defined range, making it essential to consider technical and news developments.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band support: $6.07
- Upper Bollinger Band resistance: $8.47
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Monitor SMA 20 resistance at $7.27 and potential breakdown below the lower Bollinger Band.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings or significant events identified.
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations given the high volatility and beta.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of FISN's technical, news, and risk factors. The bearish momentum signals and high volatility indicate increased risk, making it essential to closely monitor the stock's price action and consider risk management strategies.
Generated
News
All FISN news →
FISN Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 5.1164
Alpha: -311.59%
Correlation: 0.4482
R-Squared: 20.1%
Stock Volatility: 160.5%
Market Volatility: 14.1%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 99
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 99
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
FISN Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
FISN Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-27Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-27 | Tepper Leslie Goldman | Director | Grant (A) | +19,204 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-27 | Jonathon Angell | Director | Grant (A) | +16,973 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-27 | Thomas S Glanville | Director | Grant (A) | +19,156 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-27 | Blake Janover | Director | Grant (A) | +18,962 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
FISN Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jul 27, 2026Directors 5
- Ian Seth Jacobs · since Apr 20, 2022
- Jonathon Angell · since Nov 7, 2025
- Tepper Leslie Goldman · since Nov 7, 2025
- Thomas S Glanville · since Nov 7, 2025
- Blake Janover · since Dec 19, 2025
Officers 7
- Ian Seth Jacobs · President, CEO, CFO, Secretary · since Apr 20, 2022
- Elizabeth Muller · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Dec 2025
- William Mark Schmitz · Chief Financial Officer · since Sep 5, 2025
- Michael Allen Brasel · Chief Operating Officer (Section 16 Officer). · since Nov 7, 2025
- Richard Muller · Chief Technology Officer · since Sep 5, 2025
- Mark Wayne Peres · Chief Nuclear Officer · since Feb 19, 2026
- Jonathan H Gordon · General Counsel & Secretary (Section 16 Officer). · since Nov 7, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (21)
| Feb 19, 2026 | Mark Wayne Peres became Chief Nuclear Officer |
| Dec 19, 2025 | Blake Janover became a director |
| Dec 12, 2025 | Elizabeth Muller no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Dec 12, 2025 | Elizabeth Muller listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously President and Chief Executive) in SEC filings |
| Nov 7, 2025 | Thomas S Glanville became a director |
| Nov 7, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Richard Muller from the board in an SEC filing |
| Nov 7, 2025 | Tepper Leslie Goldman became a director |
| Nov 7, 2025 | Michael Allen Brasel became Chief Operating Officer (Section 16 Officer). |
| Nov 7, 2025 | Jonathon Angell became a director |
| Nov 7, 2025 | Jonathan H Gordon became General Counsel & Secretary (Section 16 Officer). |
| Sep 8, 2025 | Mark N. Tompkins reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Sep 8, 2025 | Mark N. Tompkins reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Sep 5, 2025 | William Mark Schmitz became Chief Financial Officer |
| Sep 5, 2025 | Richard Muller became a director |
| Sep 5, 2025 | Richard Muller became Chief Technology Officer |
| Sep 5, 2025 | Elizabeth Muller became a director |
| Sep 5, 2025 | Elizabeth Muller became President and Chief Executive |
| Apr 20, 2022 | Mark N. Tompkins became a director |
| Apr 20, 2022 | Mark N. Tompkins became a 10% owner |
| Apr 20, 2022 | Ian Seth Jacobs became a director |
| Apr 20, 2022 | Ian Seth Jacobs became President, CEO, CFO, Secretary |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-11-04
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
ETF Holders
2 ETFs hold FISN
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
FISN vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEV GE Vernova Inc. | $204.9B | 21.9 | +16.9% | +22.8% | 44 |
| BWXT BWX Technologies, Inc. | $11.0B | 31.6 | +17.7% | −29.2% | 42 |
| OKLO Oklo Inc. | $4.4B | — | — | −65.1% | 58 |
| XE X-Energy, Inc. Class A Common Stock | $3.0B | — | — | −61.7% | 48 |
| SMR NuScale Power Corporation | $2.1B | — | −81.0% | −66.0% | 48 |
| STDN Standard Nuclear, Inc. | $1.9B | — | — | +3.4% | — |
| NNE Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. Common Stock | $597M | — | — | −53.6% | 32 |
| IMSR Terrestrial Energy Inc. Common Stock | $301M | — | — | −53.8% | 70 |
| FISN Deep Fission, Inc. Common Stock | $109M | — | — | −80.6% | — |
| Peer median | $2.5B | 26.8 | +16.9% | −53.7% | 48 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.