LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc.
XNAS
44.30
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $21.67 – $45.00
- YTD
- +49.71%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 89.69
- Straddle Price
- $5.25
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.50
- Market Cap
- $1.4B
- Open
- $43.59
- Day Range
- $43.56 – $44.45
- Volume
- 140,548
- Prev Close
- $43.56
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.92 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.74% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.79% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +50.2pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 32.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +0.7% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.01 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 14.1% |
| Book / Price | 15.5% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 46.7% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 18.8% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +2.2% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $42.71 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $43.23 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 16.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.2B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $41.20 | 28% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $38.91 | 8% | median 41.5× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $46.98 | 8% | median 26.0× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $81.23 | 8% | median 11.9× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $54.41 | 8% | median 3.6× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $42.71 | 38% | stability 69% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $44.45 | 0% | 6 strikes · skew +0.14 |

- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-BUSINESS SERVICES, NEC (7389) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $1.4B
- Employees
- 818
- List Date
- 2006-02-23
- CIK
- 0001235468
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-19 (Pre-Market)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.33 (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Bethesda, MD
- Homepage
- https://www.liquidityservices.com
Liquidity Services Inc is an online auction marketplace. It manages and sells inventory and equipment for business and government clients by operating a network of e-commerce marketplaces that enable buyers and sellers to transact in an efficient, automated environment offering across different product categories. The company has four reportable segments: GovDeals, Retail Supply Chain Group (RSCG), and Machinio & Software Solutions. It generates majority of its revenue from Retail Supply Chain Group (RSCG) segment which consists of marketplaces that enable corporations located in the United St…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 20.05% | -14.39% | 6.24% | 1.87% | 8.42% | 8.14% | 5.06% |
| Feb | -27.33% | -10.31% | -16.10% | 1.76% | 0.15% | -3.16% | -9.17% |
| Mar | 13.02% | 1.54% | 4.03% | 3.39% | -1.84% | -4.47% | 2.61% |
| Apr | -7.72% | -17.32% | -0.76% | -7.25% | 0.70% | 15.52% | -2.81% |
| May | 26.98% | -9.30% | 14.71% | 12.70% | -26.60% | 0.84% | 3.22% |
| Jun | -0.35% | -0.52% | 8.70% | 2.57% | 1.72% | 5.67% | 2.96% |
| Jul | -17.30% | 42.56% | 1.70% | 12.86% | 0.51% | 0.44% | 6.80% |
| Aug | 28.02% | -21.85% | 8.18% | -0.96% | 13.25% | 6.06% | 5.45% |
| Sep | -15.62% | -4.97% | -1.51% | 7.45% | 5.02% | 8.90% | -0.12% |
| Oct | 1.85% | 3.31% | 7.29% | -3.88% | -12.72% | 1.51%* | -0.44% |
| Nov | 4.47% | -3.64% | 1.43% | 18.43% | 27.29% | -- | 9.60% |
| Dec | 1.59% | -10.96% | -12.90% | 24.82% | 1.58% | -- | 0.83% |
| Total | 11.18% | -45.42% | 17.85% | 96.10% | 8.11% | 45.02% | 22.14% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Strong technical momentum with MACD bullish crossover
- Positive news sentiment from recent headlines
- Above-average volatility indicates market amplification
Primary Risks:
- High IV rank and current volatility may lead to increased uncertainty
- Unusual options activity, particularly in calls, could indicate speculative interest
Investment Thesis:
LLQDT appears poised for a short-term uptrend driven by technical momentum and positive news sentiment. However, the high IV rank and unusual options activity warrant caution.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
Positive headlines have contributed to the stock's upward movement, with themes including state auctions, retail growth, and competitive market positioning.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Uptrend
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish consolidation
- Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key price levels from moving averages:
- SMA 20: $35.06
- EMA 12: $35.19
- Technical patterns:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $37.70
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 63.35 (neutral)
- MACD: Bullish crossover with histogram above signal line
- Stochastic %K/D: Neutral/above-average momentum
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
Positive news headlines from state auctions, retail growth, and competitive market positioning have contributed to the stock's upward movement.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive sentiment dominates recent headlines (7 out of 6 positive headlines)
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming events: None notable
- Earnings dates: Not available
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta 1.03 indicates above-average volatility and market amplification.
Volatility Regime: Above-average volatility with IV rank 65.9% (Medium)
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: 65.9% (Medium)
- Put/call ratio: Neutral sentiment (0.85)
- Open interest: Calls dominant, indicating speculative interest
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: No notable sector performance metrics available
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest in calls, potentially driving the stock's upward movement.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation with SPY is 0.35, indicating a moderate relationship.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: SMA 20 ($35.06)
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($37.70)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above SMA 50 ($33.41) could trigger a medium-term uptrend
- Breakdown below EMA 12 ($35.19) could signal a short-term correction
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- None notable
Risk Management:
- Set stop-loss levels around the critical price levels (SMA 20 and Upper Bollinger Band)
- Consider position sizing based on options market signals
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-04 | Pre-Market | 20.60% | 12.96% | 0.63x | Within |
| 2021-05-06 | Pre-Market | 15.46% | 37.69% | 2.44x | Exceeded |
| 2021-08-05 | Pre-Market | 13.08% | 0.05% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2021-12-09 | Pre-Market | 14.77% | 5.00% | 0.34x | Within |
| 2022-02-03 | Pre-Market | 4.41% | 8.27% | 1.88x | Exceeded |
| 2022-05-05 | Pre-Market | 43.44% | 2.30% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2022-08-04 | Pre-Market | 16.69% | 18.92% | 1.13x | Exceeded |
| 2022-12-08 | Pre-Market | 14.14% | 4.44% | 0.31x | Within |
| 2023-05-04 | Pre-Market | 11.55% | 3.80% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2023-08-03 | Pre-Market | 18.50% | 9.85% | 0.53x | Within |
| 2023-12-07 | Pre-Market | 11.04% | 13.91% | 1.26x | Exceeded |
| 2024-02-08 | Pre-Market | 10.80% | 10.27% | 0.95x | Within |
| 2024-05-09 | Pre-Market | 6.80% | 2.75% | 0.40x | Within |
| 2024-08-08 | After-Close | 24.02% | 5.76% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2024-12-12 | After-Close | 11.29% | 5.59% | 0.50x | Within |
| 2025-05-08 | Pre-Market | 13.32% | 10.24% | 0.77x | Within |
| 2025-08-07 | After-Close | 6.44% | 1.27% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2025-11-20 | Pre-Market | 16.20% | 13.36% | 0.82x | Within |
| 2026-02-05 | Pre-Market | 14.78% | 4.70% | 0.32x | Within |
| 2026-05-07 | Pre-Market | 10.95% | 2.61% | 0.24x | Within |
| 2026-08-06 | Pre-Market | 11.05% | 11.91% | 1.08x | Exceeded |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
LQDT Options Activity & IV Rank
LQDT IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 22nd percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $56.3M | #291 of 3138 | -4.1% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $1.7M | #3081 of 6285 | +71.7% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $852K | #2971 of 3716 | -92.3% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $251K | #1746 of 1945 | -93.1% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $1K | #4596 of 4729 | -38.1% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
LQDT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $359.90K | 98.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $3.91K | 1.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $250.37K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
LQDT Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-02| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | John Daunt | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | Mixed | — | $31.20 | -$16.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Paul J. Hennessy | Director | Exer (M) | +7,186 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-02 | John Daunt | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | Mixed | — | $30.47 | -$15.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Jorge Celaya | EVP & Chief Financial Officer | Exer (M) | +2,414 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-25 | John Daunt | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | Mixed | — | $43.12 | -$108.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Novelette Murray | Chief Human Resources Officer | Mixed | — | $43.12 | -$44.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | William P Angrick III | Chairman of the Board and CEO | Exer (M) | +12,468 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-25 | Mark A Shaffer | Chief Legal Officer & Corp Sec | Exer (M) | +1,438 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-25 | Steven Weiskircher | SVP & Chief Technology Officer | Exer (M) | +2,061 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-12 | William P Angrick III | Chairman of the Board and CEO | Gift (G) | −115,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-05 | John Daunt | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | Mixed | — | $29.33 | -$13.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-06 | John Daunt | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | Mixed | — | $30.03 | -$8.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-26 | John Daunt | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | Mixed | +434 | $29.22 | -$190.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Director | Sell (S) | −39,482 | $37.99 | -$1.50M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-22 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Director | Sell (S) | −9,791 | $37.95 | -$371.6K | EDGAR |
LQDT Insider Holdings
13 insiders · @ $44.30| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William P Angrick III | Chairman of the Board and CEO | 114,699 | $5.08M | -$116.13M | 179 | 2026-08-25 |
| 2 | Jorge Celaya | EVP & Chief Financial Officer | 113,037 | $5.01M | -$8.93M | 63 | 2026-08-25 |
| 3 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Director | 110,981 | $4.92M | -$79.75M | 143 | 2026-06-24 |
| 4 | John Daunt | EVP, Chief Commercial Officer | 101,953 | $4.52M | -$5.58M | 62 | 2026-10-02 |
| 5 | Beatriz V Infante | Director | 97,224 | $4.31M | -$416.0K | 15 | 2026-03-03 |
| 6 | Mark A Shaffer | Chief Legal Officer & Corp Sec | 61,342 | $2.72M | -$5.73M | 59 | 2026-08-25 |
| 7 | Steven Weiskircher | SVP & Chief Technology Officer | 59,539 | $2.64M | -$5.57M | 41 | 2026-08-25 |
| 8 | Katharin S Dyer | Director | 41,323 | $1.83M | -$259.2K | 9 | 2026-03-02 |
| 9 | Novelette Murray | Chief Human Resources Officer | 36,317 | $1.61M | -$1.95M | 34 | 2026-08-25 |
| 10 | Edward Kolodzieski | Director | 29,463 | $1.31M | -$1.91M | 19 | 2026-03-02 |
LQDT Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 2, 2026Directors 7
- Jaime Mateus-Tique · since Feb 22, 2006
- William P Angrick III · since Feb 22, 2006
- Beatriz V Infante · since May 5, 2014
- Edward Kolodzieski · since Nov 17, 2015
- Katharin S Dyer · since Jan 1, 2020
- Thierno Amath Fall · since Jan 31, 2023
- Paul J. Hennessy · since Jun 16, 2025
Officers 6
- William P Angrick III · Chairman of the Board and CEO · since Feb 22, 2006
- Jorge Celaya · EVP & Chief Financial Officer · listed since Sep 2024
- Steven Weiskircher · SVP & Chief Technology Officer · listed since Jun 2023
- John Daunt · EVP, Chief Commercial Officer · listed since Aug 2024
- Karen Fascenda · Chief Human Resources Officer · since Jul 6, 2026
- Mark A Shaffer · VP, Gen. Counsel & Secretary · listed since Aug 2024
10% owners 1
- William P Angrick III · listed since Nov 2024
Changes in the last 10 years (37)
| Aug 25, 2026 | Novelette Murray reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Human Resources Officer |
| Jul 6, 2026 | Karen Fascenda became Chief Human Resources Officer |
| Feb 6, 2026 | George H Ellis reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jun 16, 2025 | Paul J. Hennessy became a director |
| Nov 1, 2024 | William P Angrick III first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Sep 9, 2024 | Jorge Celaya listed as EVP & Chief Financial Officer (previously Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| Aug 28, 2024 | John Daunt listed as EVP, Chief Commercial Officer (previously EVP & Cco) in SEC filings |
| Aug 21, 2024 | Mark A Shaffer listed as VP, Gen. Counsel & Secretary (previously Chief Legal Officer & Corp Sec) in SEC filings |
| Feb 2, 2024 | Phillip A Clough reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Aug 31, 2023 | William P Angrick III no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Jun 6, 2023 | Steven Weiskircher listed as SVP & Chief Technology Officer (previously Chief Technology Officer) in SEC filings |
| Mar 23, 2023 | John Daunt listed as EVP & Cco (previously EVP & COO) in SEC filings |
| Feb 8, 2023 | John Daunt listed as EVP & COO (previously Chief Commercial Officer) in SEC filings |
| Feb 3, 2023 | Patrick W Gross reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jan 31, 2023 | Thierno Amath Fall became a director |
| Aug 17, 2021 | Nicholas Rozdilsky reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Marketing Officer |
| Dec 3, 2020 | Steven Weiskircher listed as Chief Technology Officer (previously SVP & Chief Technology Officer) in SEC filings |
| Dec 3, 2020 | Nicholas Rozdilsky listed as Chief Marketing Officer (previously Vice President, Marketing) in SEC filings |
| Dec 3, 2020 | Mark A Shaffer listed as Chief Legal Officer & Corp Sec (previously VP, Gen. Counsel & Secretary) in SEC filings |
| Dec 3, 2020 | Jorge Celaya listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously EVP & Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| Dec 3, 2020 | John Daunt listed as Chief Commercial Officer (previously EVP, Chief Commercial Officer) in SEC filings |
| Oct 6, 2020 | Michael Lutz reported in an SEC filing no longer being VP, Human Resources |
| Sep 11, 2020 | Novelette Murray became Chief Human Resources Officer |
| Aug 4, 2020 | Sam Guzman reported in an SEC filing no longer being VP & Chief Accounting Officer |
| Jan 1, 2020 | Katharin S Dyer became a director |
| Aug 5, 2019 | Steven Weiskircher became SVP & Chief Technology Officer |
| May 14, 2019 | Roger Gravley reported in an SEC filing no longer being President, GovDeals & CIO |
| Apr 25, 2019 | James M Rallo reported in an SEC filing no longer being President RSCG and CAG |
| Apr 23, 2019 | Nicholas Rozdilsky became Vice President, Marketing |
| Apr 23, 2019 | Michael Lutz became VP, Human Resources |
| Apr 23, 2019 | John Daunt became EVP, Chief Commercial Officer |
| Jun 28, 2018 | Sam Guzman became VP & Chief Accounting Officer |
| Apr 24, 2018 | Michael E Sweeney reported in an SEC filing no longer being VP & Chief Accounting Officer |
| Apr 3, 2018 | Roger Gravley listed as President, GovDeals & CIO (previously Operating President, GovDeals) in SEC filings |
| Oct 4, 2017 | James M Rallo listed as President RSCG and CAG (previously President RSCG) in SEC filings |
| Oct 4, 2017 | Gardner H Dudley reported in an SEC filing no longer being Pres, Capital Assets Group |
| Aug 1, 2017 | Roger Gravley became Operating President, GovDeals |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (1)
- Segundo Leoncio Casusol · Last reported as Chief Information Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 5, 2017
LQDT Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-10-01What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | JOHN PATRICK DAUNT | Officer | 2,145 | $91.9K | 2026-10-01 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Daunt Family Trust | Officer | 2,600 | $99.9K | 2026-06-24 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | JOHN PATRICK DAUNT | Officer | 12,718 | $488.9K | 2026-06-24 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-23 | Mateus-Tique Jaime | Director | 38,471 | $1.46M | 2026-06-23 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-22 | Mateus-Tique Jaime | Director | 1,011 | $38.9K | 2026-06-22 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-18 | Mateus-Tique Jaime | Director | 9,791 | $371.6K | 2026-06-18 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | Mateus-Tique Jaime | Director | 33,727 | $1.28M | 2026-06-16 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | Mateus-Tique Jaime | Director | 2,000 | $75.9K | 2026-06-15 | RBC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-10 | JORGE CELAYA | Officer | 2,409 | $91.5K | 2026-06-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-04 | JORGE CELAYA | Officer | 3,842 | $143.2K | 2026-06-04 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $61.7M | $103.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $30.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $25.9M | $74.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 4 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.05% | $17.5M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 5 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $11.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.07% | $9.6M | $13.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 7 | IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.13% | $9.6M | $7.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 8 | SPSM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.06% | $9.5M | $15.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 9 | FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.52% | $7.0M | $1.3B | 2026-10-21 |
| 10 | XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | Invesco | 0.21% | $5.9M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 11 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $5.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | SLYG State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Growth ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.13% | $5.9M | $4.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 13 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $5.2M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 14 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.06% | $4.7M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 15 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $4.1M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 16 | VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | Vanguard | 0.06% | $3.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 17 | IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | Amplify | 2.71% | $3.5M | $128.8M | 2026-10-22 |
| 18 | FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.25% | $3.4M | $1.4B | 2026-10-21 |
| 19 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.26% | $3.2M | $1.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 20 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $2.3M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 21 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.07% | $2.2M | $3.1B | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | ProShares | 2.92% | $1.7M | — | 2026-10-22 |
| 23 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.5M | $96.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 24 | RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF | Invesco | 1.19% | $1.4M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 25 | VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.13% | $1.3M | — | 2026-10-21 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $120.73M | $7.52M | $0.23 | $29.54M |
| Q1 '26 | 2025-12-31 | $121.22M | $7.49M | $0.23 | $-526.00K |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $118.09M | $7.82M | $0.24 | $37.99M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $119.88M | $7.41M | $0.23 | $19.26M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $116.38M | $7.05M | $0.22 | $21.64M |
| Q1 '25 | 2024-12-31 | $122.33M | $5.81M | $0.18 | $-12.14M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $106.93M | $6.38M | $0.20 | $22.01M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $93.61M | $6.00M | $0.19 | $22.24M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $91.45M | $5.71M | $0.18 | $34.85M |
| Q1 '24 | 2023-12-31 | $71.33M | $1.91M | $0.06 | $-8.87M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $79.96M | $6.28M | $0.19 | $14.66M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $80.77M | $6.49M | $0.21 | $10.02M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.