LiDAR revenue surged to $2.4M as MicroVision shifts to hardware sales and targets profitability.
MVIS Microvision Inc
XNAS
1.26
+1.61%
Pre-market
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
MVIS
$1.26
▲ +1.61%
Key stats
$1.24
Pre-market
$1.26
+1.61%
- 52-Week Range
- $1.08 – $16.65
- YTD
- -90.71%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 23.5
- Straddle Price
- $0.95
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.00
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Open
- $1.29
- Day Range
- $1.23 – $1.36
- Volume
- 665,651
- Prev Close
- $1.29
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.91% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.43 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.79% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 12.93% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +115.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -493.4% |
| Book / Price | 80.9% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -276.2% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -1325.5% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $1.47 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $1.23 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1950.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: AEIS, NEON, PI, VICR, VREX, VRT
(SIC-code peers; ETF co-membership was sector-incoherent)
Blended Fair Value
$4.53
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 35.6× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 25.4× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $7.58 | 50% | median 7.6× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $1.49 | 50% | median 6.1× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $1.47 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-11-05 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NEC (3679) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 190
- List Date
- 1996-08-27
- CIK
- 0000065770
- Headquarters
- Redmond, WA
- Homepage
- https://www.microvision.com
Microvision Inc is engaged in developing a lidar sensor to be used in automotive safety and autonomous driving applications. Its lidar sensor uses laser beam scanning (LBS) technology, which is based on systems that include micro-electrical mechanical systems (MEMS), laser diodes, opto-mechanics, electronics, algorithms, and software. The company has also developed solutions for Augmented Reality, Interactive Displays, and Consumer Lidars. Geographically, the company operates in United States, Germany, and Other foreign countries.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 36.37% | -38.11% | 4.15% | -8.11% | 16.91% | -8.67% | 0.42% |
| Feb | 101.76% | 15.56% | -12.93% | -2.07% | 4.32% | -0.95% | 17.62% |
| Mar | 5.46% | 8.10% | 13.14% | -20.35% | -0.80% | -19.63% | -2.35% |
| Apr | -1.87% | -27.25% | -25.37% | -19.44% | -5.04% | 0.55% | -13.07% |
| May | 12.55% | -0.55% | 136.87% | -20.27% | 0.92% | -8.17% | 20.23% |
| Jun | -6.69% | 11.95% | -8.40% | -5.36% | 2.70% | -45.88% | -8.61% |
| Jul | -15.93% | 30.38% | -10.91% | 1.90% | 0.91% | -35.98% | -4.94% |
| Aug | 8.47% | -7.46% | -32.80% | -3.25% | 5.50% | -52.99% | -13.76% |
| Sep | -23.79% | -24.32% | -12.75% | 26.15% | 8.77% | -12.79% | -6.46% |
| Oct | -29.67% | 1.67% | -10.00% | -9.82% | -8.59% | -10.00% | -11.07% |
| Nov | -15.91% | -16.30% | 34.76% | -11.76% | -18.10% | -1.59%* | -4.82% |
| Dec | -24.77% | -24.68% | -1.12% | 45.28% | -4.82% | -- | -2.02% |
| Total | -7.54% | -63.35% | 4.07% | -37.36% | -1.75% | -91.55% | -32.91% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.23
SMA 50: $1.47
SMA 200: $6.35
Current: $1.24
EMA 12: $1.28
EMA 26: $1.35
MACD: -0.0761 | Signal: 0.0352
BEARISH
ADX (14): 16.93
RANGE
+DI: 22.65
−DI: 14.70
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 42.77
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 41.67
Stoch %D: 51.01
Williams %R: -63.64
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.38
BB Lower: $1.09
NEUTRAL
OBV: -45,298,443
Vol SMA 20: 1,346,127
Vol ROC: -23.77%
ATR: $0.14
True Range: $0.13
HV 20: 100.3%
HV 30: 89.3%
HV 60: 147.7%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-06T00:00:00 – 2026-11-04T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence level: 7/10)
Key drivers:
- Strong technical signals, including a bullish MACD crossover
- Recent news headlines with neutral sentiment do not contradict the technical picture
- Moderate institutional interest and relatively high volume levels suggest potential buying pressure
Primary risks:
- High volatility, which may lead to larger price swings
- Uncertainty surrounding earnings announcements
Investment thesis: MicroVision's stock is poised for a rebound due to its strong technical momentum and relatively neutral news sentiment. The company's recent presentations on emerging growth conferences and reaffirmed revenue guidance have not significantly impacted the stock's price.
Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral, with no major news headlines driving significant moves in the past 10 articles.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish; Medium-term (1-3 months): Range-bound; Long-term (3-12 months): Bearish
Support/Resistance Levels: SMA 20: $2.13 (support), Upper Bollinger Band: $3.78 (resistance)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (31.60), not overbought or oversold
- MACD signal: Bullish, with a crossover above the signal line
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, neither squeezing nor breaking out
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: 2223267.76 (high institutional interest), On-Balance Volume (OBV): -34536557.24 (bearish momentum)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: All recent news headlines have neutral sentiment, with no significant market-moving events.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral, with a mix of positive and negative headlines.
Catalyst Identification: No imminent catalysts; however, the company's emerging growth conference presentation on July 15 may generate interest.
Market Narrative: The technical picture is driven by momentum signals, while news sentiment remains neutral. This narrative supports a bullish outlook for the short term.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to the market (beta: 2.72).
Volatility Regime: High volatility, with historical volatility levels above average.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: Medium (27.9%)
- Put/call ratios: Neutral (0.00)
- Unusual activity: None
Downside Protection: Support levels are present at SMA 20 ($2.13), but the stock is more likely to continue its short-term upward momentum.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The laser systems sector has been relatively weak, with MicroVision underperforming.
Institutional Activity: Moderate institutional interest and high volume levels suggest potential buying pressure.
Correlation Analysis: The stock's correlation with the market is moderate (0.32), indicating some independence from broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: The stock is trading within its historical range, with no clear overvaluation or undervaluation signals.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: SMA 20: $2.13 (support) and Upper Bollinger Band: $3.78 (resistance)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Emerging growth conference presentation on July 15
Risk Management: Consider setting a stop-loss order below the SMA 20 ($2.13) to manage potential losses.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data and should not be considered as personalized investment advice. It's essential to use this report in conjunction with your own research and risk assessment before making any investment decisions.
Generated
News
All MVIS news →
Earnings History
22 of 24 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
20.07%
Avg Actual Move
9.62%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-16 | After-Close | 21.29% | 16.74% | 0.79x | Within |
| 2021-04-29 | After-Close | 38.89% | 15.28% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2021-08-04 | After-Close | 13.26% | 12.60% | 0.95x | Within |
| 2021-10-28 | After-Close | 16.35% | 15.35% | 0.94x | Within |
| 2022-02-24 | After-Close | 13.90% | 9.97% | 0.72x | Within |
| 2022-04-27 | After-Close | 11.50% | 0.64% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2022-07-28 | After-Close | 8.98% | 2.79% | 0.31x | Within |
| 2022-10-27 | After-Close | 10.00% | 0.83% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2023-02-28 | After-Close | 12.89% | 7.81% | 0.61x | Within |
| 2023-05-09 | After-Close | 15.06% | 7.42% | 0.49x | Within |
| 2023-08-08 | After-Close | 15.81% | 10.33% | 0.65x | Within |
| 2023-11-08 | After-Close | 13.86% | 6.47% | 0.47x | Within |
| 2024-02-28 | After-Close | 16.51% | 9.77% | 0.59x | Within |
| 2024-05-09 | After-Close | 15.13% | 25.00% | 1.65x | Exceeded |
| 2024-08-07 | After-Close | 26.37% | 8.45% | 0.32x | Within |
| 2024-11-07 | After-Close | 13.55% | 2.88% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2025-03-26 | After-Close | 22.84% | 6.47% | 0.28x | Within |
| 2025-05-12 | After-Close | 22.36% | 11.57% | 0.52x | Within |
| 2025-08-07 | Pre-Market | 13.64% | 1.82% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2025-11-12 | Pre-Market | 18.87% | 11.88% | 0.63x | Within |
| 2026-03-04 | After-Close | 27.79% | 29.14% | 1.05x | Exceeded |
| 2026-05-13 | Pre-Market | 32.27% | 9.01% | 0.28x | Within |
| 2026-08-06 | After-Close | 58.28% | 3.83% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2026-10-28 | Pre-Market | 22.18% | 4.84% | 0.22x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
MVIS Options Activity & IV Rank
MVIS IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 181.9%
7-DTE IV: 315.4%
Expected Move: $0.95
7-DTE Move: $3.05
Days to Exp: 30 (2026-12-04)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 1
Put Volume: 0
P/C Volume: —
BULLISH
Call OI: 2
Put OI: 0
P/C OI: —
Total OI: 2
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.40
ATM Put: $0.55
Call %: 32.3%
Put %: 44.4%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 3,344
Chain OI: 132,708
Last Updated: 11/4/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
LOW γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 5th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
5%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.80
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.75
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.78
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt -0.75: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt +0.78: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 6 ATM contracts, 1k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Nov 4 · ATM 960.0% / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Nov 4 · ATM 208.5% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)36.3MediumNov 4
IV Rank (30 DTE)23.5LowNov 4
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$0.95Nov 4
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.6008
Alpha: -224.71%
Correlation: 0.3033
R-Squared: 9.2%
Stock Volatility: 110.1%
Market Volatility: 12.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
MVIS Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 22,673,516 (as of 2026-09-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
11 filers$1.73M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $264.18K | 15.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $232.69K | 13.47% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $209.74K | 12.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | PEAK6 LLC | $178.15K | 10.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Caption Management, LLC | $171.35K | 9.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $153.69K | 8.90% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $145.00K | 8.39% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $127.06K | 7.35% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $92.90K | 5.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $86.33K | 5.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $66.55K | 3.85% | 2026-06-30 |
7 filers$187.00K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $62.85K | 33.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $55.72K | 29.80% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $28.18K | 15.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $24.07K | 12.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $9.55K | 5.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $5.04K | 2.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.60K | 0.86% | 2026-06-30 |
MVIS Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-02Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | Simon Biddiscombe | Director | Exer (M) | +16,067 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-04 | Jeemyung Byun | Chief Commercial Officer | Grant (A) | +674,536 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-04 | Christine Chambers | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +562,114 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-02 | Jada Smith | Director | Exer (M) | +4,670 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-02 | Laura J. Peterson | Director | Exer (M) | +4,670 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-02 | Peter Schabert | Director | Exer (M) | +4,670 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-02 | Robert Paul Carlile | Director | Exer (M) | +4,670 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-02 | Jeffrey A Herbst | Director | Exer (M) | +4,670 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-17 | Laura J. Peterson | Director | Grant (A) | +280,152 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-17 | Robert Paul Carlile | Director | Grant (A) | +280,152 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-17 | Jeffrey A Herbst | Director | Grant (A) | +280,152 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-17 | Jada Smith | Director | Grant (A) | +280,152 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-17 | Peter Schabert | Director | Grant (A) | +280,152 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Glen W. DeVos | CEO | Tax (F) | −183,233 | $0.36 | -$66.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-10 | Glen W. DeVos | CEO | Exer (M) | +361,500 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
MVIS Insider Holdings
12 insiders · @ $1.24
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sumit Sharma | CEO | 86,849 | $107.7K | $0 | 19 | 2025-07-28 |
| 2 | Drew G Markham | GC | 49,407 | $61.3K | $0 | 13 | 2026-06-10 |
| 3 | Simon Biddiscombe | Executive Vice Chair | 43,218 | $53.6K | -$206.6K | 28 | 2026-10-02 |
| 4 | Robert Paul Carlile | Director | 42,051 | $52.1K | $0 | 30 | 2026-09-02 |
| 5 | Glen W. DeVos | CEO | 35,862 | $44.5K | $0 | 5 | 2026-06-11 |
| 6 | Anubhav Verma | CFO | 33,578 | $41.6K | $0 | 12 | 2025-11-19 |
| 7 | Jeffrey A Herbst | Director | 23,398 | $29.0K | $0 | 23 | 2026-09-02 |
| 8 | Jada Smith | Director | 16,440 | $20.4K | -$32.4K | 12 | 2026-09-02 |
| 9 | Peter Schabert | Director | 15,902 | $19.7K | $0 | 10 | 2026-09-02 |
| 10 | Stephen Hrynewich | Interim CFO | 12,166 | $15.1K | $0 | 7 | 2026-06-09 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
MVIS Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 2, 2026Directors 7
- Robert Paul Carlile · since Feb 8, 2017
- Simon Biddiscombe · since Dec 19, 2018
- Jeffrey A Herbst · since Apr 1, 2022
- Jada Smith · since Jun 5, 2024
- Peter Schabert · since Jun 5, 2024
- Laura J. Peterson · since Jul 22, 2025
- Glen W. DeVos · listed since Mar 2026
Officers 5
- Glen W. DeVos · CEO · listed since Mar 2026
- Christine Chambers · Chief Financial Officer · since Aug 27, 2026
- Jeemyung Byun · Chief Commercial Officer · since Aug 7, 2026
- Simon Biddiscombe · Executive Vice Chair · listed since Oct 2025
- Drew G Markham · GC · listed since Jun 2022
Changes in the last 10 years (30)
| Aug 27, 2026 | Christine Chambers became Chief Financial Officer |
| Aug 7, 2026 | Jeemyung Byun became Chief Commercial Officer |
| Mar 16, 2026 | Glen W. DeVos listed as CEO (previously SVP, Chief Technology Officer) in SEC filings |
| Mar 16, 2026 | Glen W. DeVos first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Dec 18, 2025 | Stephen Hrynewich became Interim CFO |
| Nov 17, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Anubhav Verma as CFO in an SEC filing |
| Oct 2, 2025 | Simon Biddiscombe first listed as Executive Vice Chair in an SEC filing |
| Sep 2, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Sumit Sharma from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jul 22, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Mark Bradley Spitzer from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jul 22, 2025 | Laura J. Peterson became a director |
| Mar 31, 2025 | Glen W. DeVos became SVP, Chief Technology Officer |
| Sep 27, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Brian V Turner from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 5, 2024 | Peter Schabert became a director |
| Jun 5, 2024 | Jada Smith became a director |
| Jun 14, 2022 | Drew G Markham listed as GC (previously VP,Gen Counsel & Secretary) in SEC filings |
| Jun 14, 2022 | Anubhav Verma listed as CFO (previously VP, Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| Apr 1, 2022 | Jeffrey A Herbst became a director |
| Nov 15, 2021 | Anubhav Verma became VP, Chief Financial Officer |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Drew G Markham became VP,Gen Counsel & Secretary |
| May 14, 2021 | seval F oz became a director |
| Nov 30, 2020 | Judith Mecham Curran became a director |
| Jun 11, 2020 | Mark Bradley Spitzer first on file as a director |
| Jun 8, 2020 | Sumit Sharma listed as CEO (previously Chief Operations Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jun 8, 2020 | Sumit Sharma first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| May 23, 2019 | Sumit Sharma listed as Chief Operations Officer (previously VP, Engineering&Operations) in SEC filings |
| Dec 19, 2018 | Simon Biddiscombe became a director |
| Nov 15, 2017 | Perry Mulligan first listed as CEO in an SEC filing |
| Oct 9, 2017 | Bernee Dl Strom became a director |
| Jun 7, 2017 | Sumit Sharma became VP, Engineering&Operations |
| Feb 8, 2017 | Robert Paul Carlile became a director |
Not reported recently (13)
- Stephen Hrynewich · Last reported as Interim CFO in an SEC filing dated Jun 9, 2026
- Sumit Sharma · Last reported as CEO in an SEC filing dated Jul 28, 2025
- Judith Mecham Curran · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 17, 2024
- seval F oz · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 2, 2023
- Stephen Patrick Holt · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 17, 2021
- Yalon Farhi · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 1, 2021
- David J Westgor · Last reported as VP,Gen Counsel & Secretary in an SEC filing dated Feb 4, 2021
- Perry Mulligan · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 21, 2020
- Bernee Dl Strom · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 21, 2020
- Thomas M Walker · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2020
- Slade Gorton · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 2, 2018
- Alexander Y Tokman · Last reported as President and CEO in an SEC filing dated Feb 9, 2017
- Dale Zimmerman · Last reported as VP, Research & Development in an SEC filing dated Feb 9, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
6 ETFs hold MVIS
6 shown · $3.33M total exposure
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $931,790 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $867,299 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 4 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $371,936 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | Invesco | 0.40% | $83,936 | — | 2026-11-03 |
| 6 | VERS ProShares Metaverse ETF | Nport | 0.03% | $1,593 | — | 2026-08-31 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-5.16
TTM Revenue
$5.03M
TTM Net Income
$-112.22M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-64.63M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 '26 | 2026-09-30 | $2.40M | $-12.23M | $-0.45 | $-13.64M |
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $1.47M | $-36.94M | $-1.66 | $-19.14M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $935.00K | $-25.29M | $-0.08 | $-16.44M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $223.00K | $-37.76M | $-0.13 | $-15.40M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $241.00K | $-14.22M | $-0.72 | $-16.49M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $155.00K | $-14.23M | $-0.84 | $-12.73M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $589.00K | $-28.78M | $-0.12 | $-14.10M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $1.65M | $-31.16M | $-0.14 | $-15.06M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $190.00K | $-15.52M | $-0.07 | $-14.09M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $1.90M | $-23.93M | $-0.11 | $-18.63M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $956.00K | $-26.31M | $-0.13 | $-20.76M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $5.10M | $-19.74M | $-0.10 | $-16.58M |
Q3 2026 • period ending 2026-09-30 • filed 2026-10-30
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
1.21
P/S
8.72
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
-0.75
ROE
-553.9%
ROA
-128.9%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
-269.48%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$25.04M
as of 2026-11-04
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
7.15M
SI % of Float
30.71%
Days to Cover
3.83
Short Vol Ratio
53.0%
Free Float
23.28M
Float %
97.9%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-04 • Float 2026-08-13