PPLI People Incorporated Common Stock
XNAS
38.72
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $35.38 – $48.32
- YTD
- -11.09%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 77.57
- Straddle Price
- $4.25
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 14.26
- Market Cap
- $2.9B
- Open
- $39.34
- Day Range
- $38.66 – $39.56
- Volume
- 158,073
- Prev Close
- $39.58
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.02 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.71% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.68% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +14.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 6.6% |
| Book / Price | 165.6% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 65.7% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 3.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.27 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +17.8% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $39.11 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $40.37 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 23.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.3B |
| Market Cap | $3B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $14.49 | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $39.28 | 19% | median 23.9× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $168.43 | 19% | median 2.6× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/S | $78.77 | 19% | median 2.9× · 3 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $39.11 | 42% | stability 32% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $37.78 | 0% | 6 strikes · skew -0.50 |
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC. (7370) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $2.9B
- Employees
- 5,156
- List Date
- 2020-07-01
- CIK
- 0001800227
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-02 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.23) (3 est.)
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.people.inc
People Inc is a media and publishing business that operates a portfolio of brands, including PEOPLE, Food & Wine, Travel + Leisure, InStyle, Better Homes & Gardens, and Southern Living. The company also holds a minority equity stake in MGM Resorts International.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | -- | -- |
| Apr | -- | -- |
| May | -- | -- |
| Jun | 5.99% | 5.99% |
| Jul | -10.67% | -10.67% |
| Aug | -8.99% | -8.99% |
| Sep | 8.90% | 8.90% |
| Oct | -5.56%* | -5.56% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -11.38% | -11.38% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
PPLI Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with Confidence Level: 5/10
PPLI presents a mixed technical and sentiment picture with conflicting signals that warrant caution. While the options market and recent news sentiment lean bullish, momentum indicators show deteriorating conditions with a bearish MACD crossover and elevated Stochastic readings suggesting overbought conditions. The stock trades 4.2% above its 20-day SMA but faces momentum headwinds despite positive news backdrop.
Key Drivers:
- Positive sector sentiment from recent media coverage highlighting industry opportunities
- Strong options positioning with bullish put/call ratios (0.60 volume, 0.02 OI)
- Elevated Stochastic readings (%K: 88.61, %D: 91.05) indicating overbought territory
Primary Risks:
- Bearish MACD histogram (-0.25) with signal line crossover suggesting momentum loss
- Historically elevated volatility (HV20: 49.2%) creating elevated risk environment
- Weak volume trend (-17.50% rate of change) conflicting with price strength
- Data quality concerns: Missing SMA 200 and earnings information limits analysis depth
Investment Thesis: PPLI is trading in a neutral technical regime with weakening momentum despite positive sentiment backdrop. The overbought Stochastic readings combined with bearish MACD divergence suggest near-term consolidation or pullback risk, while the options market's modest $2.98 expected move (7-DTE) implies low volatility expectations that may underestimate technical risk.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL-TO-BEARISH
- Price at $41.28 sits above SMA 20 ($38.40, +4.2%) but below upper Bollinger Band
- ADX of 19.35 confirms range-bound market conditions (ADX <20 = weak trend)
- EMA 12 ($39.51) above EMA 26 ($39.13) provides minor bullish signal, but separation is minimal ($0.38)
- Recent momentum loss evidenced by MACD bearish crossover
Medium-term (1-3 months): NEUTRAL
- SMA 50 at $39.64 provides soft support; price 3.9% above this level
- Trading within established Bollinger Band width of 18.71 (18.71% band width suggests moderate volatility regime)
- No clear trend structure; consolidation pattern likely continuing
Long-term (3-12 months): DATA INSUFFICIENT
- Critical Data Flag: SMA 200 marked as N/A prevents assessment of long-term trend structure
- Cannot evaluate position relative to major moving average support
- Limits confidence in longer-term directional bias
Support/Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Distance from Current | Significance | |-------|------|----------------------|--------------| | $42.00 | Resistance (Upper BB) | +1.75% | Immediate overhead resistance | | $40.00 | Psychological | -3.1% | Round number support | | $39.64 | Support (SMA 50) | -3.9% | Medium-term moving average | | $38.40 | Support (SMA 20) | -7.0% | Short-term trend line | | $34.81 | Support (Lower BB) | -15.6% | Extreme oversold level |
Key Observation: Support levels are well-defined and relatively evenly-spaced, suggesting orderly market structure. The $40.00 psychological level appears critical—breakdown below this would signal weakness toward $38.40 SMA 20.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 60.16 — NEUTRAL
- Reading sits in neutral zone (30-70) but trending toward overbought
- Not yet in overbought territory (>70), but trajectory concerning
- Suggests room for further upside before extreme conditions, but momentum weakening
MACD: BEARISH CROSSOVER
- MACD line (0.38) below signal line (0.63)
- Histogram negative (-0.25) with magnitude increasing
- Momentum Deterioration Signal: Classic bearish crossover pattern indicating momentum loss despite price strength
- This represents a red flag—price rising into falling momentum (divergence)
Williams %R: -13.11 — OVERBOUGHT
- Extreme reading in overbought zone (-20 to 0 range indicates strong overbought)
- Particularly concerning when combined with Stochastic readings
Bollinger Bands Position: NEUTRAL-OVERBOUGHT
- Price at $41.28 sits in upper half of bands but not touching upper band ($42.00)
- Band width of 18.71 is moderate; not indicating squeeze or extreme compression
- Position suggests room to upper band but proximity raises profit-taking risk
Stochastic Oscillators: SEVERELY OVERBOUGHT
- %K: 88.61 (extreme overbought, >80 territory)
- %D: 91.05 (extremely elevated, approaching 100)
- Critical Signal: This is the most concerning technical reading—suggests potential mean reversion or pullback imminent
- Historically, readings this extreme often precede 2-5% pullbacks before resuming trends
Volume Analysis
Volume Trends: DETERIORATING
- Volume Rate of Change: -17.50% (declining volume on higher prices)
- Red Flag: This divergence between price strength and volume weakness is concerning
- SMA 20 Volume: 1,395,440.80 (baseline reference for normal trading)
- OBV: 1,917,334.22 (cumulative indicator showing net buying pressure historically)
Interpretation: While OBV appears elevated in absolute terms, the negative volume rate of change suggests recent volume is declining. This typically indicates:
- Weakening institutional interest at higher prices
- Potential exhaustion of buying momentum
- Higher risk of pullback without fresh volume support
Institutional Activity Assessment:
- Moderate activity signals; no extreme volume spikes indicating major accumulation
- Declining volume on rally suggests institutions may be taking profits rather than accumulating
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
The three most recent headlines (2026-09-30 to 2026-10-01) show:
- Sector Rotation Positive: Central Garden & Pet (CENT) outpacing consumer discretionary peers
- Industry Spotlight: Zacks Industry Outlook highlighting media sector stocks (Disney, MSG Entertainment, People, Reservoir Media)
- Media Sector Watchlist: Four media stocks worth monitoring in challenging industry
Critical Data Quality Flag:
- News Relevance Concern: Headlines reference CENT (Central Garden & Pet), Disney, MSG Entertainment, and other media companies—NOT PPLI specifically
- While these appear in PPLI's news feed, the direct relevance is unclear
- Analysis Impact: Cannot definitively link recent price movement to PPLI-specific catalysts; headlines may reflect sector trends rather than company-specific catalysts
- No earnings announcements, product launches, or company-specific news provided
Sentiment Assessment
Aggregate News Sentiment: POSITIVE (but with caveat)
- All three headlines tagged as POSITIVE sentiment
- General sector tone supportive of entertainment/media/consumer discretionary
- However, lacks PPLI-specific positive catalysts in the provided headlines
Sentiment Strength Assessment: MODERATE
- General positive backdrop provides support, but lack of company-specific news limits catalyst strength
- Sector tailwinds can provide psychological support but are non-binding for individual stock performance
Catalyst Identification
Immediate Catalysts (1-7 days): NONE IDENTIFIED
- No earnings dates provided
- No product launches or regulatory events listed
- Recent news is sector-level, not company-specific
Near-term Catalysts (1-4 weeks): DATA INSUFFICIENT
- Critical Data Gap: No earnings information available
- Cannot identify upcoming earnings date—this is a significant limitation
- Typically earnings within 2-4 weeks would be major catalyst
Medium-term Catalysts (1-3 months): UNKNOWN
- Lack of forward guidance from headline data
Market Narrative
Technical vs. News Signal Conflict:
- News Narrative: Positive sector sentiment, media/entertainment industry highlighted as opportunity
- Technical Reality: Deteriorating momentum (MACD bearish), declining volume on higher prices, overbought Stochastic readings
- Divergence Interpretation: Market may have run ahead of fundamentals; positive sentiment has likely already been priced in during recent rally
Assessment: The positive news backdrop appears to
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-03 | After-Close | 10.82% | 10.39% | 0.96x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
PPLI Options Activity & IV Rank
PPLI IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 38th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 98
Period: 252 trading days
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $26.5M | #999 of 6285 | new | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $20.5M | #687 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $494K | #3174 of 3716 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $13K | #3908 of 4729 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
PPLI Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.37M | 33.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.07M | 25.90% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $950.90K | 22.97% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $687.78K | 16.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $58.05K | 1.40% | 2025-09-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $3.62M | 40.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Centiva Capital, LP | $3.36M | 37.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.75M | 19.59% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $207.38K | 2.32% | 2025-09-30 |
PPLI Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-02| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | Chelsea Clinton | Director | Award (A) | +148 | $41.96 | $6.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Bryan Lourd | Director | Award (A) | +387 | $41.96 | $16.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Maria Seferian | Director | Award (A) | +297 | $41.96 | $12.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Michael D Eisner | Director | Award (A) | +342 | $41.96 | $14.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-20 | Chelsea Clinton | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-20 | Michael D Eisner | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-20 | Alan G Spoon | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-20 | Richard F Zannino | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-20 | David S Rosenblatt | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-20 | Bonnie S Hammer | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-20 | Bryan Lourd | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-20 | Tor Braham | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-20 | Alexander Von Furstenberg | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-20 | Maria Seferian | Director | Grant (A) | +5,490 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-01 | Bryan Lourd | Director | Award (A) | +352 | $46.16 | $16.2K | EDGAR |
PPLI Insider Holdings
10 insiders · @ $38.69| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alan G Spoon | Director | 292,411 | $11.31M | $0 | 4 | 2026-07-20 |
| 2 | Michael D Eisner | Director | 219,661 | $8.50M | $0 | 6 | 2026-10-02 |
| 3 | Bryan Lourd | Director | 204,637 | $7.92M | $0 | 6 | 2026-10-02 |
| 4 | Alexander Von Furstenberg | Director | 113,382 | $4.39M | $0 | 4 | 2026-07-20 |
| 5 | David S Rosenblatt | Director | 97,261 | $3.76M | $0 | 4 | 2026-07-20 |
| 6 | Chelsea Clinton | Director | 93,484 | $3.62M | $0 | 6 | 2026-10-02 |
| 7 | Richard F Zannino | Director | 64,435 | $2.49M | $0 | 4 | 2026-07-20 |
| 8 | Bonnie S Hammer | Director | 40,669 | $1.57M | $0 | 4 | 2026-07-20 |
| 9 | Tor Braham | Director | 17,263 | $667.9K | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-20 |
| 10 | Maria Seferian | Director | 12,431 | $481.0K | $0 | 5 | 2026-10-02 |
PPLI Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 2, 2026Directors 12
- Alan G Spoon · since Jun 30, 2020
- Alexander Von Furstenberg · since Jun 30, 2020
- Bonnie S Hammer · since Jun 30, 2020
- Bryan Lourd · since Jun 30, 2020
- Chelsea Clinton · since Jun 30, 2020
- David S Rosenblatt · since Jun 30, 2020
- Michael D Eisner · since Jun 30, 2020
- Richard F Zannino · since Jun 30, 2020
- Barry Diller · listed since Jul 2020
- Victor Kaufman · listed since Jul 2020
- Maria Seferian · since Dec 12, 2023
- Tor Braham · since Jun 18, 2025
Officers 8
- Neil Vogel · Chief Executive Officer · since Aug 5, 2026
- Christopher Halpin · EVP, CFO & COO · listed since Feb 2023
- Timothy Edward Quinn · Chief Financial Officer · since Aug 5, 2026
- Kendall Handler · EVP & Chief Legal Officer · listed since Feb 2022
- Barry Diller · Chairman & Senior Executive · since Jun 30, 2020
- Victor Kaufman · Vice Chairman · since Jun 30, 2020
- Michael H Schwerdtman · SVP and CAO · listed since Mar 2026
- Christopher Currier · since Jun 16, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (42)
| Aug 5, 2026 | Timothy Edward Quinn became Chief Financial Officer |
| Aug 5, 2026 | Neil Vogel became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jun 16, 2026 | Christopher Currier became an officer |
| Mar 4, 2026 | Michael H Schwerdtman listed as SVP and CAO (previously SVP and Controller (PAO)) in SEC filings |
| Jun 18, 2025 | Tor Braham became a director |
| Jan 13, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Joseph Levin from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 13, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Joseph Levin as CEO in an SEC filing |
| Dec 4, 2024 | Michael H Schwerdtman listed as SVP and Controller (PAO) (previously SVP and Controller (CAO)) in SEC filings |
| Jun 7, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Erik Bradbury as SVP and Controller (CAO) in an SEC filing |
| Dec 12, 2023 | Maria Seferian became a director |
| Sep 13, 2023 | Erik Bradbury became SVP and Controller (CAO) |
| Feb 10, 2023 | Christopher Halpin listed as EVP, CFO & COO (previously EVP & CFO) in SEC filings |
| Nov 9, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Westley Moore from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 3, 2022 | Kendall Handler listed as EVP & Chief Legal Officer (previously SVP & General Counsel) in SEC filings |
| Jan 26, 2022 | Christopher Halpin became EVP & CFO |
| Jan 1, 2021 | Kendall Handler became SVP & General Counsel |
| Jul 25, 2020 | Westley Moore became a director |
| Jul 9, 2020 | Barry Diller no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Jul 2, 2020 | Victor Kaufman first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 2, 2020 | Joseph Levin first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 2, 2020 | Gregg Winiarski no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jul 2, 2020 | Glenn Schiffman no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jul 2, 2020 | Barry Diller first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 2, 2020 | Barry Diller first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Victor Kaufman became Vice Chairman |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Richard F Zannino became a director |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Michael H Schwerdtman became SVP and Controller (CAO) |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Michael D Eisner became a director |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Match Group, Inc. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Mark J Stein became EVP & Cso |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Joseph Levin became CEO |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Gregg Winiarski became a director |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Gregg Winiarski became EVP and GC |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Glenn Schiffman became a director |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Glenn Schiffman became EVP & CFO |
| Jun 30, 2020 | David S Rosenblatt became a director |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Chelsea Clinton became a director |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Bryan Lourd became a director |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Bonnie S Hammer became a director |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Barry Diller became Chairman & Senior Executive |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Alexander Von Furstenberg became a director |
| Jun 30, 2020 | Alan G Spoon became a director |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (4)
- Mark J Stein · Last reported as EVP & Cso in an SEC filing dated Oct 12, 2021
- Glenn Schiffman · Last reported as EVP & CFO in an SEC filing dated May 27, 2021
- Gregg Winiarski · Last reported as EVP and GC in an SEC filing dated Jul 17, 2020
- Match Group, Inc. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 2, 2020
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.14% | $144.8M | $103.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $83.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $58.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 1.40% | $39.0M | $2.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 5 | VBR Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.06% | $38.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $29.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | SPSM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.14% | $22.2M | $15.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 8 | IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.27% | $20.2M | $7.7B | 2026-10-21 |
| 9 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.06% | $14.0M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 10 | SLYV State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.27% | $12.7M | $4.7B | 2026-10-21 |
| 11 | FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | Nport | 0.14% | $12.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 12 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $10.2M | $57.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 13 | VOX Vanguard Communication Services ETF | Vanguard | 0.15% | $9.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | Vanguard | 0.15% | $9.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | Nport | 0.41% | $7.2M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $5.5M | $84.8B | 2026-10-21 |
| 17 | VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.29% | $5.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 18 | XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | Invesco | 0.90% | $5.2M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 19 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.16% | $4.9M | $3.1B | 2026-10-21 |
| 20 | FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.29% | $3.9M | $1.4B | 2026-10-21 |
| 21 | IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $3.7M | $15.7B | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $3.6M | $96.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 23 | IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $3.0M | $24.2B | 2026-10-21 |
| 24 | RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | Invesco | 0.14% | $2.8M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 25 | FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.14% | $2.4M | $1.6B | 2026-10-21 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (1 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $436.74M | $506.85M | $6.68 | $35.04M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.