PURR Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock
XNAS
9.62
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $3.01 – $14.76
- YTD
- +179.65%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 26.31
- Straddle Price
- $2.02
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.29
- Market Cap
- $1.8B
- Open
- $9.50
- Day Range
- $9.22 – $9.85
- Volume
- 10,382,284
- Prev Close
- $9.15
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.25 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.01% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 11.60% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +49.5pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $11.12 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $11.17 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 466.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 75.0× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 4.5× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 15.3× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $11.12 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $9.31 | 100% | 34 strikes · skew +0.32 |
- Industry (SIC)
- FINANCE SERVICES (6199) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $1.8B
- List Date
- 2025-12-03
- CIK
- 0002078856
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.hypestrat.xyz
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc is a digital asset treasury company whose primary focus is to maximize shareholder value through accumulating HYPE, the native token of Hyperliquid, a high-performance blockchain custom-built to house all of finance. HSI aims to provide capital-efficient and productive access to the HYPE token for U.S. and institutional investors, generating compounding shareholder returns that individual holders may not be able to replicate through staking, yield optimization, and active ecosystem engagement. HSI is positioned to become the HYPE-focused digital asset treasury vehicl…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 31.98% | 31.98% |
| Feb | -- | -23.74% | -23.74% |
| Mar | -- | 4.73% | 4.73% |
| Apr | -- | 17.35% | 17.35% |
| May | -- | 59.33% | 59.33% |
| Jun | -- | -27.60% | -27.60% |
| Jul | -- | -24.45% | -24.45% |
| Aug | -- | 86.17% | 86.17% |
| Sep | -- | 8.06% | 8.06% |
| Oct | -- | -20.03%* | -20.03% |
| Nov | -- | -- | -- |
| Dec | -8.72% | -- | -8.72% |
| Total | -8.72% | 73.43% | 32.36% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- High volatility and beta indicate a high-risk stock
- Recent news headlines show mixed sentiment, but overall trend is negative
- Options market signals bearish sentiment with a put/call volume ratio of 2.88
Investment Thesis: PURR's recent price action has been driven by high volatility, which may be unsustainable in the long term. The options market is pricing a move of $2.45 by expiration, but this may not materialize due to the bearish sentiment.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have had a mixed impact on PURR's price action. While some articles have been positive, others have been negative, resulting in a net neutral sentiment. However, the options market is pricing in more bearish sentiment than bullish, which may be an important consideration for investors.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH
- Medium-term (1-3 months): NEUTRAL
- Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels: The stock is currently trading above its middle Bollinger Band, indicating overbought conditions. Support levels are at the lower band ($7.22) and the 200-day SMA ($N/A). Resistance lies at the upper band ($14.39).
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: NEUTRAL (58.83)
- MACD signal: BULLISH (1.06 / -0.09 / 1.15)
- Bollinger Bands position: OVERBOUGHT
Volume Analysis: The stock has shown a decline in volume, with the OBV showing a similar trend. The volume rate of change is negative, indicating selling pressure.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been mixed, with some articles highlighting positive developments and others focusing on negative trends. However, overall sentiment is bearish due to the options market pricing in a move by expiration.
Sentiment Assessment: NEGATIVE The aggregate news sentiment is negative, with more articles highlighting negative trends than positive ones.
Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts are identified at this time, but the options market is pricing in a potential move by expiration.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: The stock has a high beta (3.44) compared to SPY, indicating high volatility and risk.
Volatility Regime: HIGH The stock is currently experiencing high volatility, with a true range of $1.53 and an ATR of $1.10.
Options Market Signals: The IV rank is 29.5%, indicating medium volatility. The current IV is 135.6%, and the expected move by expiration is $2.45. The put/call volume ratio is 2.88, indicating bearish sentiment.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: PURR is trading within its sector's range.
Institutional Activity: Institutional investors are buying Hyperliquid Strategies, which may be a positive sign for the stock.
Correlation Analysis: PURR has a low correlation (0.42) with SPY, indicating it may not move in tandem with the broader market.
Relative Valuation: The stock is trading within its expected range based on historical volatility and IV.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: The lower Bollinger Band ($7.22) and the 200-day SMA ($N/A) serve as support levels. Resistance lies at the upper band ($14.39).
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A breakout above $14.39 or a breakdown below $7.22 could trigger significant moves.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific catalysts are identified at this time, but the options market is pricing in a potential move by expiration.
Risk Management: A stop-loss level could be set around $10.80 to limit potential losses. Position sizing considerations include the high volatility and beta of the stock.
By analyzing PURR's technical indicators, news sentiment, risk metrics, and market context, we can conclude that the stock is at risk due to its high volatility and bearish options market signals. The recent price action has been driven by mixed news headlines, but overall sentiment is negative.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-27 | After-Close | 5.85% | 9.51% | 1.63x | Exceeded |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
PURR Options Activity & IV Rank
PURR IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 87th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 221
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
PURR Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $18.30M | 16.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $13.75M | 12.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Caption Management, LLC | $12.84M | 11.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $9.93M | 8.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $8.14M | 7.13% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $7.87M | 6.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $7.05M | 6.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $5.90M | 5.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $5.86M | 5.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Arrington Capital Management, LLC | $5.27M | 4.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $4.69M | 4.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Galaxy Digital Capital Management GP LLC | $3.90M | 3.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Concentric Capital Strategies, LP | $2.61M | 2.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Walleye Trading LLC | $2.27M | 1.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Hudson Bay Capital Management LP | $1.45M | 1.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $1.22M | 1.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | SUMMIT SECURITIES GROUP LLC | $881.44K | 0.77% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian | $780.93K | 0.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | MYDA Advisors LLC | $393.50K | 0.34% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | J. Goldman & Co LP | $393.50K | 0.34% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | PEAK6 LLC | $345.49K | 0.30% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Walleye Capital LLC | $295.12K | 0.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Mirae Asset Global Investments Co., Ltd. | $78.70K | 0.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | RFG Advisory, LLC | $31.48K | 0.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Sanctuary Advisors, LLC | $20.46K | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $29.74M | 38.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $9.54M | 12.19% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Caption Management, LLC | $8.66M | 11.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $6.75M | 8.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $6.25M | 7.98% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $6.11M | 7.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $3.59M | 4.58% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $2.48M | 3.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Trading LLC | $1.99M | 2.54% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $1.22M | 1.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | SUMMIT SECURITIES GROUP LLC | $881.44K | 1.13% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Walleye Capital LLC | $466.69K | 0.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | J. Goldman & Co LP | $393.50K | 0.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | REX Advisers, LLC | $111.45K | 0.14% | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | PEAK6 LLC | $78.70K | 0.10% | 2026-06-30 |
PURR Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-15| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-15 | Eric S Rosengren | Director | Award (A) | +3,056 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-15 | Thomas C. King | Director | Award (A) | +3,056 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-15 | Lawrence E Leibowitz | Director | Award (A) | +1,358 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-15 | Nailesh Bhatt | Director | Award (A) | +2,037 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-30 | Jeroen Nieuwkoop | Chief Operating Officer | Award (A) | +82,781 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-30 | David Ira Schamis | CEO | Award (A) | +248,344 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-30 | Brett Douglas Beldner | CFO | Award (A) | +82,781 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-18 | David Ira Schamis | CEO | Other (J) | +416,013 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-18 | Robert E. Diamond Jr. | Director | Other (J) | +832,750 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-18 | Jeffrey Tuder | Director | Other (J) | +231,692 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-02 | Jeffrey Tuder | Director | Other (J) | +817,734 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-02 | Robert E. Diamond Jr. | Director | Other (J) | +3,761,580 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-02 | David Ira Schamis | CEO | Other (J) | +1,612,755 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Eric S Rosengren | Director | Award (A) | +4,764 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-06 | Lawrence E Leibowitz | Director | Award (A) | +2,117 | — | EDGAR |
PURR Insider Holdings
10 insiders · @ $9.62| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert E. Diamond Jr. | Director | 1,510,339 | $14.53M | $0 | 4 | 2026-09-18 |
| 2 | David Ira Schamis | CEO | 800,666 | $7.70M | $0 | 5 | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | Jeroen Nieuwkoop | Chief Operating Officer | 536,244 | $5.16M | $0 | 3 | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | Brett Douglas Beldner | CFO | 536,244 | $5.16M | $0 | 3 | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | Jeffrey Tuder | Director | 280,669 | $2.70M | $0 | 4 | 2026-09-18 |
| 6 | Lawrence E Leibowitz | Director | 87,338 | $840.2K | $0 | 5 | 2026-10-15 |
| 7 | Thomas C. King | Director | 79,856 | $768.2K | $0 | 5 | 2026-10-15 |
| 8 | Eric S Rosengren | Director | 79,856 | $768.2K | $0 | 5 | 2026-10-15 |
| 9 | Nailesh Bhatt | Director | 48,951 | $470.9K | $0 | 5 | 2026-10-15 |
| 10 | Albert D. Dyrness | Director | 41,671 | $400.9K | $0 | 2 | 2026-02-11 |
PURR Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 15, 2026Directors 8
- Albert D. Dyrness · since Dec 2, 2025
- Eric S Rosengren · since Dec 2, 2025
- Jeffrey Tuder · since Dec 2, 2025
- Lawrence E Leibowitz · since Dec 2, 2025
- Nailesh Bhatt · since Dec 2, 2025
- Robert E. Diamond Jr. · since Dec 2, 2025
- Thomas C. King · since Dec 2, 2025
- David Ira Schamis · listed since Dec 2025
Officers 3
- David Ira Schamis · CEO · since Dec 2, 2025
- Brett Douglas Beldner · Chief Financial Officer · since Dec 2, 2025
- Jeroen Nieuwkoop · Chief Operating Officer · since Dec 2, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (11)
| Dec 12, 2025 | David Ira Schamis first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Thomas C. King became a director |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Robert E. Diamond Jr. became a director |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Nailesh Bhatt became a director |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Lawrence E Leibowitz became a director |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Jeroen Nieuwkoop became Chief Operating Officer |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Jeffrey Tuder became a director |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Eric S Rosengren became a director |
| Dec 2, 2025 | David Ira Schamis became CEO |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Brett Douglas Beldner became Chief Financial Officer |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Albert D. Dyrness became a director |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XBI State Street® SPDR® S&P® Biotech ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.55% | $57.2M | $10.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $44.8M | $75.1B | 2026-10-20 |
| 3 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $27.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.12% | $16.3M | $13.7B | 2026-10-20 |
| 5 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.08% | $13.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | Amplify | 0.60% | $5.7M | $944.9M | 2026-10-20 |
| 7 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.43% | $5.3M | $1.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 8 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $2.5M | $97.4B | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF | Direxion | 0.36% | $2.3M | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 10 | VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.16% | $2.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | HECO State Street® Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 2.84% | $1.9M | $65.8M | 2026-10-20 |
| 12 | AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.01% | $1.8M | $14.8B | 2026-10-20 |
| 13 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.06% | $888,792 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 14 | FINX Global X FinTech ETF | Global X | 0.32% | $515,603 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 15 | DECO State Street® Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 2.91% | $496,479 | $17.0M | 2026-10-20 |
| 16 | IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $474,363 | $20.6B | 2026-10-20 |
| 17 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.00% | $442,439 | $10.9B | 2026-10-20 |
| 18 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $198,381 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 19 | GINN Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.08% | $137,058 | $177.9M | 2026-10-20 |
| 20 | SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | Invesco | 1.63% | $117,010 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 21 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.06% | $106,599 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 22 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.03% | $83,021 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 23 | RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF | Innovator | 0.07% | $67,696 | $94.3M | 2026-10-21 |
| 24 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.03% | $53,728 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 25 | ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $33,633 | — | 2026-07-31 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.