SLDP Solid Power, Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS 1.99 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $1.91 – $8.86
- YTD
- -57.20%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 45.18
- Straddle Price
- $0.38
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.85
- Market Cap
- $0.5B
- Open
- $1.99
- Day Range
- $1.94 – $2.00
- Volume
- 1,940,231
- Prev Close
- $1.98
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.47 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 13.06% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 13.21% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +140.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -17.9% |
| Book / Price | 124.4% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -26.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -609.1% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $2.32 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $2.19 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1349.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 11.3× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 15.2× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/B | $7.53 | 20% | median 3.0× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/S | $0.09 | 20% | median 1.5× · 5 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $2.32 | 61% | stability 60% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $1.88 | 0% | 8 strikes · skew +0.37 |

- Industry (SIC)
- MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES (3690) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.5B
- Employees
- 230
- List Date
- 2021-12-09
- CIK
- 0001844862
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-03 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.11) (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Louisville, CO
- Homepage
- https://www.solidpowerbattery.com
Solid Power Inc develops solid-state battery technology and manufacturing processes. Its sulfide-based solid electrolyte material replaces the liquid or gel electrolyte used in traditional lithium-ion battery cells and enables improvement in energy density, battery life and safety performance. The company produces electrolytes on two pilot manufacturing lines using a batch manufacturing process for customer sampling and internal cell development, and manufactures solid-state cells on pre-pilot and pilot cell manufacturing lines. Its cell manufacturing processes are developed around industry-st…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -25.56% | 41.35% | 20.90% | -32.85% | -3.66% | 0.04% |
| Feb | -- | 15.72% | -1.17% | -7.87% | -10.22% | -17.29% | -4.17% |
| Mar | -- | 17.00% | 2.73% | 23.78% | -7.08% | -15.25% | 4.24% |
| Apr | -- | -8.14% | -22.53% | -14.65% | 4.81% | 17.35% | -4.63% |
| May | -- | 10.80% | 0.92% | 2.31% | 41.82% | -3.22% | 10.53% |
| Jun | -- | -36.56% | 15.45% | -4.62% | 54.23% | -24.05% | 0.89% |
| Jul | -- | 15.06% | 9.16% | 14.63% | 45.00% | -20.62% | 12.65% |
| Aug | -- | 5.79% | -25.87% | -16.37% | 39.23% | 9.39% | 2.43% |
| Sep | -- | -18.70% | -7.76% | -1.46% | -14.74% | 1.93% | -8.15% |
| Oct | -- | 4.08% | -30.16% | -6.35% | 69.27% | -15.68%* | 4.23% |
| Nov | -- | -35.39% | 6.02% | 0.00% | -19.00% | -- | -12.09% |
| Dec | -34.78% | -25.95% | -2.68% | 60.17% | -12.73% | -- | -3.19% |
| Total | -34.78% | -67.93% | -30.33% | 62.71% | 164.50% | -56.53% | 6.27% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: SLDP
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a bearish trend
- High volatility and beta indicate high risk
- Recent news headlines are mixed, but overall sentiment is negative
Primary Risks:
- Bearish momentum from MACD signal
- Overbought RSI reading
- High implied volatility (IV) indicating market expectations for significant price movement
Investment Thesis: SLDP's recent decline may continue as the stock faces resistance at its 20-day SMA. The company's mixed news sentiment and high volatility make it a high-risk, high-reward investment opportunity.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The overall sentiment is NEUTRAL with a slight bearish bias due to the negative headlines (Items 2 and 5) and lack of positive catalysts.
Technical Analysis Trend Direction:
- Short-term: BEARISH
- Medium-term: BEARISH
- Long-term: NEUTRAL
Support/Resistance Levels: The stock has resistance at its 20-day SMA ($2.30) and potential support at the 50-day SMA ($2.37).
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 52.70 (NEUTRAL)
- MACD signal: -0.02 (BEARISH)
- Bollinger Bands position: NEUTRAL
Volume Analysis: The stock has low volume and a declining trend, indicating institutional disinterest.
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary: Items 1-4 have mixed sentiment, while Items 2 and 5 have negative sentiment. The overall news sentiment is NEUTRAL with a slight bearish bias.
Sentiment Assessment: The sentiment is generally NEUTRAL, but the recent decline in price has shifted the trend to BEARISH.
Catalyst Identification: No significant upcoming catalysts are identified.
Market Narrative: The technical signals and news headlines align, suggesting a continuation of the downward trend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment Risk Metric:
- Beta: 3.12 (HIGH)
- Alpha: -0.76
- Correlation: 0.40
Volatility Regime: The stock is experiencing HIGH volatility.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 31.9% (MEDIUM)
- Current IV: 135.4%
- Expected Move: $0.40 (22 DTE), 7-DTE: $0.40
- Volume Flow: 110 calls vs 55 puts
- Open Interest: 1,437 calls vs 219 puts
Downside Protection: The stock has support at its 50-day SMA ($2.37) and may find resistance at the 20-day SMA ($2.30).
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance: SLDP is underperforming the sector.
Institutional Activity: Low volume and declining trend indicate institutional disinterest.
Correlation Analysis: The stock has a high correlation with the market (R-squared interpretation: 0.80).
Relative Valuation: The stock is trading at the lower end of its trading range, indicating potential support.
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $2.37 (50-day SMA)
- Resistance: $2.30 (20-day SMA)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above $2.49
- Breakdown below $2.11
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None identified.
Risk Management: Use stop-loss levels at $2.25 and consider position sizing to manage risk.
Conclusion: The analysis suggests a BEARISH trend for SLDP, driven by technical indicators, high volatility, and negative news sentiment. The stock faces resistance at its 20-day SMA and has support at its 50-day SMA. Consider using stop-loss levels at $2.25 and position sizing to manage risk.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-22 | After-Close | 20.62% | 8.87% | 0.43x | Within |
| 2022-05-10 | After-Close | 21.67% | 5.78% | 0.27x | Within |
| 2022-08-09 | After-Close | 17.91% | 12.09% | 0.68x | Within |
| 2022-11-08 | After-Close | 15.37% | 3.04% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2023-02-28 | After-Close | 29.59% | 13.31% | 0.45x | Within |
| 2023-05-08 | After-Close | 20.63% | 7.17% | 0.35x | Within |
| 2023-08-08 | After-Close | 12.45% | 6.83% | 0.55x | Within |
| 2023-11-07 | After-Close | 76.55% | 6.21% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2024-02-27 | After-Close | 21.97% | 3.47% | 0.16x | Within |
| 2024-05-07 | After-Close | 20.11% | 2.79% | 0.14x | Within |
| 2024-08-06 | After-Close | 17.35% | 19.24% | 1.11x | Exceeded |
| 2024-11-07 | After-Close | 25.42% | 1.69% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2025-02-27 | After-Close | 28.69% | 0.82% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2025-05-06 | After-Close | 37.61% | 6.19% | 0.16x | Within |
| 2025-08-06 | Pre-Market | 31.08% | 5.25% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2025-11-04 | Pre-Market | 24.92% | 12.54% | 0.50x | Within |
| 2026-02-24 | After-Close | 24.72% | 3.95% | 0.16x | Within |
| 2026-05-05 | After-Close | 17.81% | 4.70% | 0.26x | Within |
| 2026-08-04 | After-Close | 21.74% | 6.96% | 0.32x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
SLDP Options Activity & IV Rank
SLDP IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 9th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $6.8M | #1862 of 6285 | +59.3% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $1.3M | #1412 of 1945 | -13.4% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $627K | #3092 of 3716 | -83.4% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $53K | #3345 of 4729 | +7.6% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
SLDP Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $910.38K | 54.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $402.23K | 24.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $209.94K | 12.67% | 2025-09-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $133.90K | 8.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $888.11K | 67.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $339.03K | 25.58% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $98.16K | 7.41% | 2026-06-30 |
SLDP Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-01| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | John C. Van Scoter | President & CEO | Tax (F) | −154,512 | $2.27 | -$350.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-01 | Joshua Buettner-Garrett | Chief Technology Officer | Tax (F) | −33,824 | $2.27 | -$76.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-01 | Linda C. Heller | CFO, Treasurer, & Secretary | Tax (F) | −72,310 | $2.27 | -$164.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | Linda C. Heller | CFO, Treasurer, & Secretary | Tax (F) | −72,310 | $2.60 | -$188.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | Joshua Buettner-Garrett | Chief Technology Officer | Tax (F) | −33,824 | $2.60 | -$87.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | John C. Van Scoter | President & CEO | Tax (F) | −154,512 | $2.60 | -$401.7K | EDGAR |
SLDP Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $1.99| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John C. Van Scoter | President & CEO | 4,563,127 | $9.08M | $0 | 2 | 2026-10-01 |
| 2 | Linda C. Heller | CFO, Treasurer, & Secretary | 1,876,534 | $3.73M | $0 | 2 | 2026-10-01 |
| 3 | Joshua Buettner-Garrett | Chief Technology Officer | 1,332,194 | $2.65M | $0 | 2 | 2026-10-01 |
SLDP Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 1, 2026Directors 10
- Erik J Anderson · since Mar 23, 2021
- John Joseph Stephens · since Dec 8, 2021
- Steven H Goldberg · since Dec 8, 2021
- Lesa B Roe · since Jan 17, 2022
- Aleksandra A Miziolek · since Feb 10, 2022
- MaryAnn Wright · since Jul 18, 2022
- Kaled Awada · since Jul 5, 2023
- Susan M Kreh · since Jul 5, 2023
- John C. Van Scoter · listed since Jan 2025
- Uwe Michael Breitweg · since Jul 1, 2026
Officers 3
- John C. Van Scoter · President & CEO · since Jun 14, 2023
- Linda C. Heller · CFO, Treasurer, & Secretary · listed since Jun 2025
- Joshua Buettner-Garrett · Chief Technology Officer · since Dec 8, 2021
Changes in the last 10 years (61)
| Jul 1, 2026 | Uwe Michael Breitweg became a director |
| Jun 18, 2025 | Linda C. Heller listed as CFO, Treasurer, & Secretary (previously CFO & Treasurer) in SEC filings |
| May 21, 2025 | James Liebscher reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Legal Officer & Sec |
| Jan 13, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Derek Colby Johnson as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 2, 2025 | John C. Van Scoter first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 2, 2024 | John C. Van Scoter no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Jun 17, 2024 | Linda C. Heller became CFO & Treasurer |
| Aug 4, 2023 | The company announced the departure of David B Jansen from the board in an SEC filing |
| Aug 4, 2023 | The company announced the departure of David B Jansen as President; Interim CEO in an SEC filing |
| Jul 5, 2023 | Susan M Kreh became a director |
| Jul 5, 2023 | Kaled Awada became a director |
| Jun 14, 2023 | John C. Van Scoter became a director |
| Jun 14, 2023 | John C. Van Scoter became President & CEO |
| Mar 3, 2023 | David B Jansen listed as President; Interim CEO (previously President) in SEC filings |
| Feb 8, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Jon Eric Jacobs as Chief Marketing Officer in an SEC filing |
| Feb 7, 2023 | Erik J Anderson no longer listed as Chief Executive Officer in SEC filings |
| Jan 26, 2023 | Pierre F Lapeyre Jr reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jan 26, 2023 | David M Leuschen reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 28, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Douglas M Campbell from the board in an SEC filing |
| Nov 28, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Douglas M Campbell as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jul 18, 2022 | MaryAnn Wright became a director |
| Jun 28, 2022 | Volta Energy Technologies, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 17, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Robert M. Tichio from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 14, 2022 | Pierre F Lapeyre Jr first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Feb 14, 2022 | David M Leuschen first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Feb 10, 2022 | Aleksandra A Miziolek became a director |
| Jan 17, 2022 | Lesa B Roe became a director |
| Dec 10, 2021 | Riverstone Holdings LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 10, 2021 | Pierre F Lapeyre Jr reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 10, 2021 | Jennifer Aaker reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Dec 10, 2021 | Jeffrey Tepper reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Dec 10, 2021 | Jane Kearns reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Dec 10, 2021 | James AC McDermott reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Dec 10, 2021 | Decarbonization Plus Acquisition Sponsor III LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 10, 2021 | David M Leuschen reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 9, 2021 | Volta Energy Technologies, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Dec 8, 2021 | Steven H Goldberg became a director |
| Dec 8, 2021 | Rainer Feurer became a director |
| Dec 8, 2021 | Kevin A. Paprzycki became CFO & Treasurer |
| Dec 8, 2021 | Joshua Buettner-Garrett became Chief Technology Officer |
| Dec 8, 2021 | Jon Eric Jacobs became Chief Marketing Officer |
| Dec 8, 2021 | John Joseph Stephens became a director |
| Dec 8, 2021 | James Liebscher became Chief Legal Officer & Sec |
| Dec 8, 2021 | Douglas M Campbell became a director |
| Dec 8, 2021 | Douglas M Campbell became Chief Executive Officer |
| Dec 8, 2021 | Derek Colby Johnson became Chief Operating Officer |
| Dec 8, 2021 | David B Jansen became a director |
| Dec 8, 2021 | David B Jansen became President |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Robert M. Tichio became a director |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Riverstone Holdings LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Pierre F Lapeyre Jr became a 10% owner |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Peter Haskopoulos became an officer |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Michael J. Warren became a director |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Jennifer Aaker became a director |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Jeffrey Tepper became a director |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Jane Kearns became a director |
| Mar 23, 2021 | James AC McDermott became a director |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Erik J Anderson became a director |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Erik J Anderson became Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 23, 2021 | Decarbonization Plus Acquisition Sponsor III LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 23, 2021 | David M Leuschen became a 10% owner |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (4)
- Rainer Feurer · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 22, 2024
- Kevin A. Paprzycki · Last reported as CFO & Treasurer in an SEC filing dated May 13, 2024
- Michael J. Warren · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 23, 2021
- Peter Haskopoulos · Last reported as an officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 23, 2021
SLDP Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-05-20What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | Roe Lesa B | Director | 39,207 | $104.3K | 2026-05-20 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-22 | Liebscher James | Former Officer | 249,916 | $949.7K | 2025-07-22 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-11 | Liebscher James | Former Officer | 93,961 | $177.6K | 2025-06-11 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-11 | Liebscher James | Former Officer | 271,796 | $519.2K | 2025-06-11 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-29 | Roe Lesa B | Director | 29,000 | $49.0K | 2025-05-29 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-27 | Liebscher James | Former Officer | 50,000 | $80.1K | 2025-05-27 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-27 | Goldberg Steven H | Director | 82,365 | $127.7K | 2025-05-27 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-23 | Liebscher James | Former Officer | 75,000 | $116.6K | 2025-05-23 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-06 | Buettner-Garrett Joshua | Officer | 187,500 | $210.0K | 2025-03-06 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-10 | Buettner-Garrett Joshua | Officer | 187,500 | $249.4K | 2025-02-10 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $14.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $10.5M | $74.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 3 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $5.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | Invesco | 1.40% | $4.0M | — | 2026-10-24 |
| 5 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $2.9M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 6 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $2.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | KOMP State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.11% | $2.7M | $2.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 8 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $2.2M | $13.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 9 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $1.7M | $13.9B | 2026-10-23 |
| 10 | VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $1.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $1.2M | $1.2B | 2026-10-23 |
| 12 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $1.2M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 13 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $1.1M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 14 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.02% | $694,651 | $3.2B | 2026-10-23 |
| 15 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $523,177 | $96.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 16 | SEIS SEI Select Small Cap ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $393,499 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | PRFZ Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $364,729 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 18 | FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.02% | $340,976 | $1.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 19 | SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $330,043 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 20 | IDRV iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.27% | $319,829 | $119.0M | 2026-10-23 |
| 21 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $316,552 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 22 | GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.03% | $276,331 | $1.0B | 2026-10-23 |
| 23 | DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $215,010 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 24 | HAIL State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 1.27% | $201,919 | $15.9M | 2026-10-23 |
| 25 | CARZ First Trust S-Network Future Vehicles & Technology ETF | First Trust | 0.45% | $197,258 | $43.7M | 2026-10-23 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $-268.00K | $-23.82M | $-0.11 | $-8.42M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $2.10M | $-13.03M | $-0.06 | $-18.75M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $6.41M | $-27.05M | $-0.14 | $-18.39M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $3.73M | $-25.87M | $-0.14 | $-14.27M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $7.54M | $-25.34M | $-0.14 | $-14.44M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $5.12M | $-15.15M | $-0.08 | $-26.29M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $4.46M | $-30.62M | $-0.17 | $-13.87M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $4.65M | $-22.42M | $-0.13 | $-9.85M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $5.08M | $-22.29M | $-0.13 | $-11.11M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $5.95M | $-21.21M | $-0.12 | $-29.07M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $2.35M | $-19.04M | $-0.11 | $-6.61M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $6.37M | $-15.14M | $-0.08 | $-15.35M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.