SMID Smith-Midland Corporation
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves- Nov 12 Reports earnings
- Industry (SIC)
- CONCRETE PRODUCTS, EXCEPT BLOCK & BRICK (3272) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 188
- CIK
- 0000924719
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12
- Headquarters
- Midland, VA
- Homepage
- https://www.smithmidland.com
Smith-Midland Corp through its subsidiaries invents, develops, manufactures, markets, sells, and installs precast concrete products for primary use in the construction, highway, utilities, and farming industries. The firm's customers are general contractors and federal, state, and local transportation authorities. Its products include Slenderwall, JJhooks, Softsound, Sierra Wall and Easi set. A substantial portion of the company's business is derived from local, state, and federal building projects. The company generates revenues predominantly from the sale, leasing, licensing, shipping, and i…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 18.40% | -30.95% | 7.64% | -1.31% | -9.06% | -6.27% | -3.59% |
| Feb | 11.47% | -10.32% | -8.72% | 15.06% | -8.47% | 5.61% | 0.77% |
| Mar | -4.77% | -18.17% | -2.44% | 6.12% | -3.03% | -18.31% | -6.77% |
| Apr | -0.08% | -7.05% | -12.93% | -24.11% | -10.07% | 16.60% | -6.27% |
| May | 40.87% | -17.00% | 0.29% | 1.68% | 2.45% | -8.32% | 3.33% |
| Jun | 24.41% | -5.02% | 38.35% | -24.84% | 18.63% | -10.58% | 6.83% |
| Jul | -23.87% | 42.95% | -2.01% | 29.46% | 1.70% | -11.11% | 6.19% |
| Aug | 6.56% | 18.26% | -20.37% | 2.84% | 21.91% | -4.61% | 4.10% |
| Sep | -23.71% | 20.55% | -0.37% | 2.58% | -10.13% | -11.08% | -3.69% |
| Oct | 28.70% | -16.75% | 6.43% | 7.35% | -0.84% | -1.10% | 3.96% |
| Nov | 82.36% | -3.23% | 52.19% | 43.69% | -4.97% | 9.73%* | 29.96% |
| Dec | 31.36% | -7.16% | 20.72% | -11.13% | 8.93% | -- | 8.54% |
| Total | 319.95% | -43.40% | 76.04% | 30.84% | 0.90% | -36.75% | 57.93% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: SMID
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Recent revenue growth, with a 33% increase in Q2
- Neutral analyst recommendation from Zacks
- Mixed news sentiment, with some positive and neutral headlines
Primary Risks:
- High volatility, with a beta of 1.47 vs SPY
- Technical signals indicate a bearish momentum, with MACD below the signal line
Investment Thesis: SMID is a high-risk stock with mixed fundamentals and technical signals. While recent revenue growth is encouraging, the high volatility and bearish momentum create uncertainty. As such, I recommend a cautious approach, focusing on risk management and potential trading opportunities.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The news sentiment has been largely neutral, with no significant positive or negative headlines driving price movements. However, the positive revenue growth headline from The Motley Fool may have contributed to some short-term upward momentum.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term bearish (1-4 weeks), Medium-term range-bound (1-3 months)
Support/Resistance Levels: Key levels include:
- SMA 20: $30.63
- Lower Bollinger Band: $28.44
- Previous low: $27.91
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral, with a reading of 53.73%
- MACD signal: Bearish, with the histogram below the signal line
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, indicating potential volatility expansion
Volume Analysis: Volume trends indicate:
- Increasing volume over the past week
- Institutional interest is moderate to high, based on average daily trading volume and market hours considerations
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- Smith-Midland Revenue Jumps 33% in Q2 (The Motley Fool)
- Zacks Initiates Coverage of Smith-Midland With Neutral Recommendation
- The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights Abbott Laboratories, BP, Gilead Sciences, Smith-Midland and Crimson Wine
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming earnings release (no date available)
Market Narrative: The mixed news sentiment and technical signals indicate a range-bound market with some volatility expansion potential. The absence of significant positive or negative headlines creates uncertainty, making it essential to focus on risk management and trading opportunities.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Assessment: High (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Beta Interpretation: The beta of 1.47 indicates high volatility, with SMID moving more than the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels, based on average true range and historical volatility metrics.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: N/A (positive = implied richer than realized)
- Put/call ratios: N/A
- Unusual activity: N/A
Downside Protection: Support levels include the SMA 20 ($30.63) and lower Bollinger Band ($28.44). Risk management considerations include stop-loss levels and position sizing.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
- Smith-Midland operates in the Materials sector, which is performing relatively weakly compared to other sectors.
Institutional Activity: Moderate institutional interest is present, based on average daily trading volume and market hours considerations.
Correlation Analysis: SMID has a low correlation coefficient of 0.33 with SPY, indicating some independence from the broader market.
Relative Valuation: The stock is currently trading within its historical range, making it difficult to determine if it's undervalued or overvalued.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $30.63
- Lower Bollinger Band: $28.44
- Previous low: $27.91
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $32.82 (breakout target)
- Resistance level: $34.96 (SMA 200)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Earnings release (no date available)
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations should be implemented to manage potential losses.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data, and actual market conditions may differ. The report aims to provide a comprehensive overview of SMID's technical and fundamental analysis, highlighting key drivers, risks, and market context.
SMID Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
SMID Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 18 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
SMID Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-04| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-04 | Ashley B Smith | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +2,000 | $26.87 | $53.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-04 | Matthew I Smith | Director | Buy (P) | +2,000 | $27.15 | $54.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-04 | Ashley B Smith | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +1,275 | $7.69 | $9.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-03 | Ashley B Smith | Award (A) | +2,000 | $26.87 | $53.7K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Matthew I Smith | Director | Award (A) | +2,000 | $27.15 | $54.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-02 | Ashley B Smith | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +1,275 | $7.69 | $9.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-07 | Dominic L Hunter | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +408 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-05 | James Russell Bruner | Director | Award (A) | +414 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-30 | Water Read Van de | Director | Award (A) | +414 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-23 | Richard Gerhardt | Director | Award (A) | +414 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-25 | Richard Gerhardt | Director | Sell (S) | −666 | $33.26 | -$22.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-25 | Rodney I Smith | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −13,656 | $41.36 | -$564.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-21 | James Russell Bruner | Director | Sell (S) | −6,000 | $39.06 | -$234.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-21 | Rodney I Smith | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −1,344 | $40.11 | -$53.9K | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-12 | Ashley B Smith | Chief Executive Officer | Gift (G) | −10,000 | — | EDGAR |
SMID Insider Holdings
7 insiders · @ $26.16| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rodney I Smith | Director | 534,499 | $13.98M | -$1.52M | 14 | 2025-08-25 |
| 2 | Ashley B Smith | Chief Executive Officer | 173,042 | $4.53M | $92.9K | 12 | 2026-09-04 |
| 3 | Matthew I Smith | Director | 12,205 | $319.3K | $54.3K | 3 | 2026-09-04 |
| 4 | Richard Gerhardt | Director | 7,206 | $188.5K | -$70.8K | 10 | 2025-12-23 |
| 5 | James Russell Bruner | Director | 7,008 | $183.3K | -$234.4K | 6 | 2026-01-05 |
| 6 | Water Read Van de | Director | 414 | $10.8K | $0 | 1 | 2025-12-30 |
| 7 | Dominic L Hunter | Chief Financial Officer | 408 | $10.7K | $0 | 1 | 2026-01-07 |
SMID Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 4, 2026Directors 5
- Ashley B Smith · on file since May 2006
- Richard Gerhardt · since May 23, 2016
- James Russell Bruner · since Dec 5, 2018
- Water Read Van de · since Dec 21, 2023
- Matthew I Smith · since Dec 28, 2023
Officers 2
- Ashley B Smith · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Dec 2018
- Dominic L Hunter · Chief Financial Officer · since Apr 17, 2025
10% owners 1
- Rodney I Smith · listed since Jan 2017
Changes in the last 10 years (15)
| Apr 17, 2025 | Dominic L Hunter became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jun 27, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Stephanie Poe as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Dec 28, 2023 | Matthew I Smith became a director |
| Dec 21, 2023 | Water Read Van de became a director |
| Dec 21, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Wesley A Taylor from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 1, 2023 | Stephanie Poe became Chief Financial Officer |
| Dec 12, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Adam Jay Krick as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 17, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Rodney I Smith from the board in an SEC filing |
| Dec 10, 2020 | Rodney I Smith no longer listed as Chairman, CEO and President in SEC filings |
| Dec 11, 2018 | Ashley B Smith listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously President) in SEC filings |
| Dec 5, 2018 | James Russell Bruner became a director |
| Jan 1, 2018 | Adam Jay Krick became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jul 12, 2017 | Rodney I Smith listed as Chairman, CEO and President (previously Chief Executive Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jan 5, 2017 | Wesley A Taylor no longer listed as Vice President in SEC filings |
| Jan 5, 2017 | Rodney I Smith first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
Not reported recently (2)
- William A Kenter · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 5, 2017
- Gerhard E Borst · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 16, 2016
SMID Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-09-02What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-02 144/A | SMITH RODNEY I | 10% Stockholder | 15,000 | $628.4K | 2025-08-19 | Raymond James & Associates | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-19 | Bruner James Russell | Director | 6,000 | $255.4K | 2025-08-19 | FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-06-08 | TAYLOR WESLEY A | Officer, Director | 3,700 | $64.4K | 2023-06-08 | Wells Fargo Advisors | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $1.9M | $76.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 3 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $754,266 | $13.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 5 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $719,991 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 6 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $370,044 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $226,426 | $1.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 8 | EES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund | Nport | 0.02% | $142,825 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.01% | $73,946 | $1.0B | 2026-11-05 |
| 10 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $67,853 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $55,567 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 12 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.00% | $35,327 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 13 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $27,910 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 14 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $7,319 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $5,374 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 16 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $4,125 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 17 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $3,212 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 18 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $2,167 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 19 | HDG ProShares Hedge Replication ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $78 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 20 | EBI Longview Advantage ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $53 | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 21 | RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $26 | — | 2026-11-06 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
SMID vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHX James Hardie Industries plc | $16.2B | — | — | +43.9% | 20 |
| RMIX Suncrete, Inc. Class A Common Stock | $664M | — | — | −18.1% | — |
| SMID Smith-Midland Corporation Common Stock | $139M | — | — | −30.2% | — |
| Peer median | $8.4B | — | — | +12.9% | 20 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.