THM International Tower Hill Mines, Ltd.
XASEStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
THM
—
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- METAL MINING (1000) · industry map
- Exchange
- XASE
- Market Cap
- $0.3B
- Employees
- 3
- List Date
- 2001-10-05
- CIK
- 0001134115
- Headquarters
- Vancouver, A1
- Homepage
- https://www.ithmines.com
International Tower Hill Mines Ltd is a mining company. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties. The company holds interests in an exploration project, namely the Livengood Gold Project. It is located in the northwest of Fairbanks, Alaska, in the Tolovana mining district within the Tintina gold belt. The project property consists of land leased from the Alaska Mental Health Trust, several smaller private mineral leases, Alaska state mining claims purchased or located by the company, and the patented ground held by the company.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -10.88% | -2.77% | 31.82% | -5.50% | -2.34% | 38.10% | 8.07% |
| Feb | -22.92% | 37.73% | -26.26% | -16.26% | 1.93% | 42.68% | 2.82% |
| Mar | -8.55% | 0.09% | 7.31% | 24.66% | 32.00% | -36.29% | 3.20% |
| Apr | -8.93% | -9.80% | -19.92% | -7.68% | 7.43% | -1.67% | -6.76% |
| May | 9.05% | -24.67% | -5.90% | -5.72% | 28.20% | 15.32% | 2.71% |
| Jun | -5.41% | -27.37% | -14.49% | -18.28% | 1.49% | -24.05% | -14.69% |
| Jul | -4.72% | 13.10% | -7.95% | -9.64% | 26.72% | -15.87% | 0.27% |
| Aug | -16.73% | -20.51% | -14.67% | 16.57% | 23.89% | 38.55% | 4.52% |
| Sep | -11.54% | 6.61% | -4.22% | 14.04% | 1.86% | 6.25% | 2.17% |
| Oct | -4.29% | -15.92% | 10.60% | 9.17% | 1.13% | -28.57% | -4.65% |
| Nov | 2.63% | 0.67% | 40.17% | -24.63% | 12.79% | -29.57%* | 0.34% |
| Dec | -0.61% | -4.26% | 6.36% | 0.22% | -4.12% | -- | -0.48% |
| Total | -59.56% | -48.62% | -16.62% | -30.50% | 221.21% | -32.64% | 5.54% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.76
SMA 50: $2.18
SMA 200: $2.37
Current: $1.31
EMA 12: $1.55
EMA 26: $1.80
MACD: -0.2528 | Signal: -0.0384
BEARISH
ADX (14): 40.32
STRONG TREND
+DI: 11.47
−DI: 42.05
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 31.79
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 24.24
Stoch %D: 29.37
Williams %R: -75.76
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $2.37
BB Lower: $1.15
NEUTRAL
OBV: 11,430,755
Vol SMA 20: 1,670,557
Vol ROC: 7.73%
ATR: $0.18
True Range: $0.09
HV 20: 172.0%
HV 30: 147.8%
HV 60: 113.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-15T00:00:00 – 2026-11-13T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: THM
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bullish momentum signals from MACD and RSI
- Strong volume and institutional interest
- Positive news sentiment
Primary Risks:
- High volatility, potentially leading to increased risk
- Unusual options activity or IV rank could indicate market manipulation
Investment Thesis: THM is a high-volatility stock with strong momentum and positive news sentiment. While there are some risks involved, the potential reward may be worth considering for aggressive investors.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The appointment of the feasibility study team and launch of drilling program have had a positive impact on THM's sentiment, contributing to the overall bullish tone.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Bullish (1-4 weeks), Medium-term: Neutral (1-3 months), Long-term: Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $1.49
- Middle Bollinger Band: $2.27
- Upper Bollinger Band: $3.05
- SMA 20: $2.27
- SMA 50: $2.18
- SMA 200: $2.29
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): Neutral (64.86)
- MACD: Bullish (0.18 / Signal: 0.06 / Histogram: 0.11)
Volume Analysis: Volume has been increasing, indicating institutional interest and potential buying pressure.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines related to feasibility studies, drilling programs, and supply chain disruptions have contributed to the overall bullish tone.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (Positive: 3/6, Negative: 0/6)
Catalyst Identification: Feasibility study results, drilling program updates, and potential supply chain disruptions could impact sentiment.
Market Narrative: The positive news headlines align with the technical signals, supporting the bullish trend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk (2.58 vs SPY)
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels
Options Market Signals: No options data available
Downside Protection: Support levels at $1.49 and $2.27 could provide protection in case of a decline.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Weak compared to the market, potentially presenting an opportunity for outperformance.
Institutional Activity: Strong volume and institutional interest suggest potential buying pressure.
Correlation Analysis: THM has a relatively low correlation with the market (0.33), indicating potential for independent price movements.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, with potential for breakout or mean reversion.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $1.49 and $2.27
- Resistance: $3.05
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above $3.05 could lead to further gains
- Breakdown below $2.18 could trigger a more significant decline
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Feasibility study results, drilling program updates, and potential supply chain disruptions
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at $1.49 and $2.27, with position sizing considerations based on risk tolerance.
By analyzing the technical indicators, news headlines, and market context, THM appears to be a high-volatility stock with strong momentum and positive news sentiment. While there are risks involved, the potential reward may be worth considering for aggressive investors.
Generated
News
All THM news →
THM Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Put vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Call vs ATM
IV(call wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsThe same measure on the upside: how the OTM call is priced against the at-the-money strike.
- Negative (typical) — calls trade below ATM for most stocks and indices, so the sign alone says little.
- Percentile vs own history: high = upside calls unusually rich for this name (squeezes, takeover talk, commodity supply scares); low = calls cheaper than usual.
Reading them together
Put or call vs ATM tells you how expensive that tail is. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d put
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Put —
30 DTE / 10d put
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Put —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.3036
Alpha: -21.28%
Correlation: 0.4662
R-Squared: 21.7%
Stock Volatility: 96.6%
Market Volatility: 13.6%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own THM
4 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paulson & Co. Family office John Paulson | $207.9M | #5 of 8 | +4.9% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $956K | #3749 of 6285 | +1313.4% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $528K | #3152 of 3716 | new | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $93K | #2987 of 3138 | -64.1% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
THM Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 20 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
THM Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-28Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-28 | David Victor Wiens | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +3,000 | $1.95 | $5.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-18 | David Victor Wiens | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +83,682 | $2.39 | $200.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Karl L Hanneman | Director | Exer (M) | +150,000 | $0.67 | $100.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | David Allen Cross | Chief Financial Officer | Exer (M) | +30,000 | $0.67 | $20.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | David Victor Wiens | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +600,365 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-30 | Shane Edward Parrow | President & COO | Award (A) | +312,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-29 | David Allen Cross | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +15,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-29 | Stuart Alan Harshaw | Director | Grant (A) | +36,135 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-29 | Edel Tully | Director | Grant (A) | +36,135 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-29 | Karl L Hanneman | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +186,135 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-29 | Anton J Drescher | Director | Grant (A) | +36,135 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-29 | Andrew Phillip Cole | Director | Grant (A) | +36,135 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-29 | Thomas S. Weng | Director | Grant (A) | +42,365 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-20 | PAULSON & CO. INC. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +4,913,665 | $2.56 | $12.58M | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-11 | Anton J Drescher | Director | Grant (A) | +11,858 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
THM Insider Holdings
9 insiders · @ $1.31
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PAULSON & CO. INC. | 10%+ Owner | 104,486,703 | $136.88M | $103.00M | 8 | 2026-04-20 |
| 2 | Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 31,918,825 | $41.81M | $7.00M | 1 | 2026-01-29 |
| 3 | Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II GP L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 28,765,672 | $37.68M | $5.35M | 3 | 2025-02-28 |
| 4 | Anton J Drescher | Director | 791,976 | $1.04M | -$64.1K | 22 | 2026-05-29 |
| 5 | Karl L Hanneman | Chief Executive Officer | 362,000 | $474.2K | $0 | 12 | 2026-08-26 |
| 6 | Shane Edward Parrow | President & COO | 312,500 | $409.4K | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-30 |
| 7 | David Victor Wiens | Chief Executive Officer | 86,682 | $113.6K | $205.8K | 3 | 2026-10-28 |
| 8 | Thomas S. Weng | Director | 85,000 | $111.3K | $0 | 16 | 2026-05-29 |
| 9 | David Allen Cross | Chief Financial Officer | 30,000 | $39.3K | $0 | 8 | 2026-08-25 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
THM Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 28, 2026Directors 8
- Anton J Drescher · since Dec 28, 2012
- Thomas S. Weng · since Mar 25, 2014
- Stuart Alan Harshaw · since Apr 1, 2018
- Karl L Hanneman · listed since Oct 2018
- Edel Tully · since Jun 18, 2023
- Andrew Phillip Cole · since Apr 1, 2026
- Shane Edward Parrow · since Jul 27, 2026
- David Victor Wiens · since Aug 17, 2026
Officers 3
- David Victor Wiens · Chief Executive Officer · since Aug 17, 2026
- Shane Edward Parrow · President & COO · since Jul 27, 2026
- David Allen Cross · Chief Financial Officer · since May 11, 2015
10% owners 7
- ESOF II GP Ltd. (entity) · since Mar 13, 2018
- Electrum Global Holdings L.p. (entity) · since Jan 27, 2026
- Electrum Group LLC (entity) · since Mar 13, 2018
- Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II GP L.P. (entity) · since Mar 13, 2018
- Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P. (entity) · since Mar 13, 2018
- Paulson & Co. Inc. (entity) · since Dec 11, 2014
- TEG Global GP Ltd. (entity) · since Jan 27, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (20)
| Aug 17, 2026 | David Victor Wiens became a director |
| Aug 17, 2026 | David Victor Wiens became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jul 27, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Karl L Hanneman as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jul 27, 2026 | Shane Edward Parrow became a director |
| Jul 27, 2026 | Shane Edward Parrow became President & COO |
| Apr 1, 2026 | Andrew Phillip Cole became a director |
| Jan 27, 2026 | TEG Global GP Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Electrum Global Holdings L.p. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 18, 2023 | Edel Tully became a director |
| Jun 1, 2020 | Christopher Papagianis became a director |
| Oct 24, 2018 | Karl L Hanneman first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Apr 12, 2018 | Anton J Drescher no longer listed as Director in SEC filings |
| Apr 1, 2018 | Stuart Alan Harshaw became a director |
| Mar 13, 2018 | Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Mar 13, 2018 | Electrum Strategic Opportunities Fund II GP L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Mar 13, 2018 | Electrum Group LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ESOF II GP Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Nov 2, 2017 | Karl L Hanneman listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously Chief Operating Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jul 17, 2017 | Thomas E Irwin no longer listed as CEO and President in SEC filings |
| Jul 17, 2017 | Thomas E Irwin first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
Not reported recently (5)
- Christopher Papagianis · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 23, 2023
- Stephen A Lang · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 25, 2022
- Thomas E Irwin · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 19, 2018
- John J. Ellis · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 19, 2018
- Mark R Hamilton · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 2, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-11-10
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Event | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-31 | Director or officer change | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
ETF Holders
4 ETFs hold THM
4 shown · $2.15M total exposure · 0.02% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | VanEck | 0.03% | $2.0M | $7.3B | 2026-11-12 |
| 2 | GWX State Street® SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $105,496 | $903.5M | 2026-11-12 |
| 3 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $68,696 | $3.3B | 2026-11-12 |
| 4 | AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | Global X | 0.04% | $2,181 | — | 2026-11-13 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
THM vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEM Newmont Corporation | $117.1B | 13.2 | +23.7% | +11.8% | 13 |
| AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. | $90.2B | — | — | +4.7% | 51 |
| B Barrick Mining Corporation | $61.6B | — | — | −14.7% | 18 |
| WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. Common Sto | $59.9B | — | — | +11.5% | 33 |
| FNV Franco-Nevada Corporation | $47.8B | — | — | +18.4% | 38 |
| AU AngloGold Ashanti plc | $44.3B | — | — | +0.8% | 32 |
| CDE Coeur Mining, Inc. | $14.6B | 15.4 | +111.7% | −20.3% | 15 |
| AGI Alamos Gold Inc. Class A Common Shares | $12.0B | — | — | −25.5% | 52 |
| THM International Tower Hill Mines, Ltd. | $338M | — | — | −30.7% | — |
| Peer median | $53.8B | 14.3 | +67.7% | +2.7% | 32 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.