TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- BATS
- Inception
- 2018-05-30
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.24% prospectus, filed Nov 26, 2025
- Assets
- $160M shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 4.85% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $2.5M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 136 top 10 are 14.3%
- Listed
- May 30, 2018 Cboe BZX
- Last fee change
- -5 bp filed Nov 27, 2024
Stated objective. The Fund seeks to provide capital preservation and current income. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 136 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Bank Loans & CLOs ETFs
- Jul 2026
- +$5.8M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$9.7M +8.8% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$2.0M +1.8% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | +$5.8M |
| Jun 2026 | +$3.9M |
| May 2026 | $0 |
| Apr 2026 | −$1.9M |
| Mar 2026 | −$1.9M |
| Feb 2026 | −$3.9M |
| Jan 2026 | +$1.9M |
| Dec 2025 | +$1.9M |
| Nov 2025 | −$1.9M |
| Oct 2025 | −$3.9M |
| Sep 2025 | +$2.0M |
| Aug 2025 | $0 |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 84 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | — | 0.20% | $32.6B | −0.0% | compare |
| PAAAPGIM AAA CLO ETF | — | 0.19% | $10.2B | +0.1% | compare |
| BKLNInvesco Senior Loan ETF | — | 0.65% | $6.2B | −2.2% | compare |
| SRLNState Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | — | 0.70% | $5.4B | −3.3% | compare |
| CLOABlackRock ETF Trust II iShares AAA CLO Active ETF | — | 0.20% | $2.8B | +0.1% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Bank Loans & CLOs category.
- Authorized participants
- 4 active of 14 with agreements; top 3 did 95%
- Created · redeemed
- $31M · $5.8M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 0% creations 0% in kind
- Creation unit
- 50,000 shares
- Securities lending
- authorized, none lent
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | 2026-10-01 | $0.1360 | CD |
| 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-01 | $0.1535 | CD |
| 2026-07-30 | 2026-08-03 | $0.1515 | CD |
| 2026-06-29 | 2026-07-01 | $0.1570 | CD |
| 2026-05-28 | 2026-06-01 | $0.1494 | CD |
| 2026-04-29 | 2026-05-01 | $0.1538 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ARES CLO Ltd | 3.39% | Other | KY |
| — | KKR Financial CLO Ltd | 1.81% | Other | KY |
| — | AGL CLO 3 Ltd. | 1.80% | Other | KY |
| — | Bain Capital Credit CLO, Limited | 1.22% | Other | JE |
| — | Benefit Street Partners CLO Ltd | 1.08% | Other | KY |
| — | Sixth Street CLO LTD. | 1.02% | Other | KY |
| — | CIFC Funding Ltd | 1.00% | Other | KY |
| — | Regatta XXIV Funding Ltd. | 0.99% | Other | KY |
| — | Elmwood CLO 20 Ltd | 0.99% | Other | KY |
| — | RR Ltd | 0.99% | Other | KY |
| — | Carlyle Global Market Strategies | 0.99% | Other | KY |
| — | Kings Park CLO Ltd | 0.97% | Other | KY |
| — | Babson CLO Ltd | 0.95% | Other | KY |
| — | Symetra CLO Ltd | 0.94% | Other | KY |
| — | Madison Park Funding Ltd | 0.92% | Other | KY |
| — | Sixth Street CLO LTD. | 0.91% | Other | JE |
| — | CTM CLO Ltd | 0.91% | Other | KY |
| — | GoldenTree Loan Management US CLO, LTD | 0.91% | Other | JE |
| — | Elmwood CLO X Ltd | 0.91% | Other | KY |
| — | Magnetite CLO Ltd | 0.91% | Other | KY |
| — | OHA Loan Funding Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Apidos CLO | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Elmwood CLO 14 Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Dryden Senior Loan Fund | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Carlyle Global Market Strategies | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | OCP CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Magnetite CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Palmer Square CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Oak Hill Credit | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | CIFC Funding Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Texas Debt Capital CLO, Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Aimco | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Regatta 30 Funding Ltd. | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Benefit Street Partners CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Kennedy Lewis CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Babson CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Elmwood CLO 19 Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Oak Hill Credit | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Flatiron CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | CIFC Funding Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Rad CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Danby Park CLO, Ltd | 0.90% | Other | JE |
| — | Neuberger Berman CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Elmwood CLO II Ltd. | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Ballyrock Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Apidos CLO | 0.90% | Other | JE |
| — | Flatiron CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | JE |
| — | Magnetite CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Ballyrock Ltd | 0.90% | Other | KY |
| — | Rad CLO Ltd | 0.90% | Other | BM |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBO/CDO (Corporate) | 97.01% | $107.4M | 135 |
| Repurchase agreement | 0.53% | $588456 | 1 |
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -0.26% | -0.26% |
| Feb | -- | -0.18% | -0.18% |
| Mar | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% |
| Apr | 0.32% | 0.16% | 0.24% |
| May | 0.25% | 0.12% | 0.18% |
| Jun | -0.03% | -0.08% | -0.06% |
| Jul | 0.17% | 0.09% | 0.13% |
| Aug | 0.15% | -0.07% | 0.04% |
| Sep | -0.26% | -0.08% | -0.17% |
| Oct | -0.15% | 0.28%* | 0.07% |
| Nov | 0.06% | -- | 0.06% |
| Dec | 0.04% | -- | 0.04% |
| Total | 0.55% | -0.45% | 0.05% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: TRPA
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a neutral trend, with no clear uptrend or downtrend.
- Low volatility indicates the stock moves less than the market.
Primary Risks:
- No recent news available to inform the analysis.
- Earnings information and options activity data are also unavailable.
Investment Thesis: TRPA appears to be stuck in a consolidation phase, with no clear trend emerging. The low volatility suggests that the stock is unlikely to make significant moves in the short term. However, the absence of recent news and earnings information makes it challenging to determine the catalysts for potential price movements.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: N/A (No recent news available)
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: NEUTRAL
- Medium-term: NEUTRAL
- Long-term: NEUTRAL
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $38.99
- Middle Bollinger Band: $38.90
- Lower Bollinger Band: $38.81
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 41.87 (neutral)
- MACD: 0.01 / Signal: -0.00 / Histogram: 0.02 (bullish)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 9124.25
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 179255.25
- Volume Rate of Change: -76.01%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: N/A (No recent news available)
Sentiment Assessment: N/A (No recent news available)
Catalyst Identification: N/A (No recent news or earnings information available)
Market Narrative: The absence of recent news and earnings information makes it challenging to determine the market narrative.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation:
- Beta: 0.03 (vs SPY) - low volatility, stock moves less than the market
Volatility Regime:
- Current vs historical volatility levels: Low volatility regime, with the stock moving less than the market
Options Market Signals:
- IV Premium vs HV30: N/A (positive = implied richer than realized)
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: Lower Bollinger Band ($38.81), Volume SMA 20 (9124.25)
- Risk management considerations: Monitor for potential breakdowns below support levels.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: N/A (No sector information available)
Institutional Activity: N/A (No institutional activity data available)
Correlation Analysis:
- Correlation: 0.14 - low correlation with the market
Relative Valuation:
- Position within trading range: Consolidation phase, no clear trend emerging.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: Lower Bollinger Band ($38.81), Volume SMA 20 (9124.25)
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($38.99)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: N/A (No breakout/breakdown levels available)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: N/A (No time-sensitive catalysts available)
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels: Monitor for potential breakdowns below support levels
- Position sizing considerations: Adjust based on volatility and risk appetite.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of TRPA, focusing on the stock's technical indicators, news sentiment, and market context. The lack of recent news and earnings information hinders a more detailed assessment, but the report highlights key trends, risks, and potential levels to monitor.
TRPA Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
TRPA Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|