XMTR Xometry, Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS
120.00
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
XMTR
$120.00
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
$120.00
- 52-Week Range
- $35.86 – $123.39
- YTD
- +91.20%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 25.18
- Straddle Price
- $21.25
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.38
- Market Cap
- $6.6B
- Open
- $118.03
- Day Range
- $118.03 – $123.39
- Volume
- 476,314
- Prev Close
- $114.95
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.52 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 13.24% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 13.11% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +31.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -2.8% |
| Book / Price | 8.8% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -2.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.40 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $98.21 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $98.96 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 34.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.2B |
| Market Cap | $7B |
Peers used for multiples: ABNB, ADSK, AMZN, OKTA, PAYC, XRAY, XYZ, ZM
60-Day Conviction
84%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$117.31
α -2.3%
rank 16%
conviction
94%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$114.52
α -4.6%
rank 16%
conviction
94%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 4, 2027
$114.80
α -4.3%
rank 16%
conviction
84%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 34.3× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 21.0× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $45.16 | 13% | median 4.4× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $82.86 | 13% | median 5.2× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $98.21 | 40% | stability 60% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $116.56 | 33% | 24 strikes · skew +0.13 |
As of 2026-11-09 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-BUSINESS SERVICES, NEC (7389) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $6.6B
- Employees
- 1,174
- List Date
- 2021-06-30
- CIK
- 0001657573
- Last Earnings
- Nov 3 before open · +16.5% vs ±22.2% expected
- Next Earnings
- ~Feb 23, 2027 (estimated)
- Headquarters
- North Bethesda, MD
- Homepage
- https://www.xometry.com
Xometry Inc is engaged in providing AI-enabled manufacturing equipment. Its buyers include engineers, product designers, procurement and supply chain personnel, inventors, and business owners. The manufacturing processes offered by the company include CNC Machining, Injection Molding, Urethane Casting, 3D Printing, and Die Casting. The company is organized into two segments referred to as the U.S. and the International. The majority of its revenue is derived from the U.S. segment.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -4.30% | 8.32% | -7.16% | -20.23% | -8.97% | -6.47% |
| Feb | -- | 11.13% | -18.25% | -44.02% | -23.13% | -30.38% | -20.93% |
| Mar | -- | -24.74% | -18.64% | -6.17% | -1.31% | -2.74% | -10.72% |
| Apr | -- | -12.46% | -6.72% | 2.94% | 2.27% | 22.70% | 1.75% |
| May | -- | -6.49% | 27.70% | -13.48% | 26.91% | 77.55% | 22.44% |
| Jun | 0.00% | 7.27% | 18.52% | -24.79% | 3.56% | 1.33% | 0.98% |
| Jul | 21.37% | 12.33% | 0.29% | 29.70% | -1.49% | -11.59% | 8.44% |
| Aug | -10.67% | 25.83% | -8.02% | 43.99% | 59.25% | 6.53% | 19.48% |
| Sep | -21.16% | 14.20% | -16.27% | -0.11% | 6.80% | 12.84% | -0.62% |
| Oct | -3.00% | 2.60% | -15.11% | 12.26% | -7.15% | -10.15% | -3.43% |
| Nov | -9.65% | -27.89% | 68.48% | 38.12% | 20.38% | 25.92%* | 19.23% |
| Dec | 7.99% | -25.94% | 40.11% | 35.69% | 7.77% | -- | 13.12% |
| Total | -19.10% | -37.84% | 57.43% | 28.21% | 64.16% | 63.61% | 26.08% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $99.57
SMA 50: $98.73
SMA 200: $77.44
Current: $120.22
EMA 12: $106.41
EMA 26: $102.34
MACD: 4.0664 | Signal: 2.5968
BULLISH
ADX (14): 21.56
WEAK TREND
+DI: 29.88
−DI: 13.55
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 66.39
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 85.15
Stoch %D: 83.08
Williams %R: -8.43
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $118.73
BB Lower: $80.42
OVERBOUGHT
OBV: 37,059,015
Vol SMA 20: 853,322
Vol ROC: 26.02%
ATR: $8.54
True Range: $8.44
HV 20: 97.5%
HV 30: 82.7%
HV 60: 71.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Written before XMTR’s Nov 3 earnings report, so it doesn’t reflect the results.
LLM Stock Analysis Report: XMTR
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key Drivers:
- High volatility, with a beta of 1.56 relative to SPY
- Recent price action has been trending downward, with the stock trading below its short-term and long-term moving averages
Primary Risks:
- Further downside risk due to high volatility and negative sentiment in options market
- Potential for sharp price movements driven by news events or technical breakouts
Investment Thesis: XMTR's recent price decline may be an opportunity to initiate a bearish position, leveraging the stock's high beta and volatility. However, caution is advised given the potential for sharp price moves.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news available, but historical data suggests that XMTR is sensitive to news events, which could impact sentiment and trading decisions.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH
- Medium-term (1-3 months): NEUTRAL
- Long-term (3-12 months): BEARISH
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $59.56 (resistance)
- SMA 50: $54.49 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $66.89 (resistance)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14) interpretation: NEUTRAL (49.38)
- MACD signal: BULLISH (0.52 / Signal: -0.64 / Histogram: 1.16)
- Bollinger Bands position: NEUTRAL (price touching middle band)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 720697.25
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 8876550.00
- Volume Rate of Change: -36.25%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL
Catalyst Identification: None
Market Narrative: XMTR's price action is driven by high volatility and negative sentiment in the options market, with no clear catalysts or events driving the current trend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: HIGH RISK (1.56)
Volatility Regime: HIGH VOLATILITY
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 100.0% (High - shows if volatility is historically high/low)
- Current IV: 203.8%
- Expected Move: $6.57 (16 DTE), 7-DTE: $6.57
- Volume Flow: 376 calls vs 70 puts
- Open Interest: 1,805 calls vs 4,562 puts
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.19 (Bullish sentiment)
- Put/Call OI Ratio: 2.53
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 50 ($54.49) and lower Bollinger Band ($52.23).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: XMTR is underperforming its sector, with a relative strength of -15% vs the broader market.
Institutional Activity: Institutions are net sellers, with a volume flow of 376 calls vs 70 puts and open interest favoring puts over calls.
Correlation Analysis: XMTR has a correlation coefficient of 0.38 with SPY, indicating a moderate positive relationship.
Relative Valuation: XMTR is trading at the lower end of its historic range, with a relative valuation of 0.82 vs its long-term average.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 50: $54.49 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $66.89 (resistance)
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- SMA 20: $59.56 (resistance)
- Lower Bollinger Band: $52.23 (support)
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Earnings date: 2025-08-05
- Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels at SMA 50 ($54.49) and lower Bollinger Band ($52.23)
This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of XMTR's technical, news, and sentiment factors. The bearish bias is driven by high volatility, negative sentiment in options market, and recent price action trending downward. However, caution is advised given the potential for sharp price movements driven by news events or technical breakouts.
Generated
News
All XMTR news →
Its Siemens Designcenter integration puts Xometry's pricing and manufacturability tools inside design workflows, with initial testing set for early 2027.
First GAAP profit arrives alongside a raised full-year outlook.
Showing 1–10 of 15
Page 1 of 2
Earnings History
20 of 22 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
16.91%
Avg Actual Move
7.18%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-12 | After-Close | 12.22% | 12.60% | 1.03x | Exceeded |
| 2021-11-10 | After-Close | 14.78% | 6.46% | 0.44x | Within |
| 2022-03-17 | After-Close | 12.24% | 0.46% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2022-05-11 | After-Close | 32.95% | 9.88% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2022-08-10 | After-Close | 10.58% | 2.01% | 0.19x | Within |
| 2022-11-10 | After-Close | 18.39% | 7.19% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2023-03-01 | After-Close | 16.85% | 0.22% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2023-05-10 | After-Close | 13.09% | 5.29% | 0.40x | Within |
| 2023-08-09 | After-Close | 13.94% | 0.60% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2023-11-09 | After-Close | 13.04% | 1.61% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2024-02-29 | After-Close | 13.29% | 7.98% | 0.60x | Within |
| 2024-05-09 | After-Close | 13.02% | 3.49% | 0.27x | Within |
| 2024-08-08 | After-Close | 11.72% | 0.25% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2024-11-05 | Pre-Market | 22.67% | 17.14% | 0.76x | Within |
| 2025-02-25 | After-Close | 22.77% | 4.98% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2025-05-06 | After-Close | 13.31% | 2.16% | 0.16x | Within |
| 2025-08-05 | After-Close | 13.55% | 0.59% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2025-11-04 | Pre-Market | 19.77% | 28.93% | 1.46x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-24 | Pre-Market | 27.03% | 22.24% | 0.82x | Within |
| 2026-05-07 | After-Close | 11.66% | 1.92% | 0.16x | Within |
| 2026-08-04 | Pre-Market | 22.81% | 5.34% | 0.23x | Within |
| 2026-11-03 | Pre-Market | 22.25% | 16.55% | 0.74x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
XMTR Options Activity & IV Rank
XMTR IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 69.9%
7-DTE IV: 80.2%
Expected Move: $21.25
7-DTE Move: $13.35
Days to Exp: 39 (2026-12-18)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 819
Put Volume: 313
P/C Volume: 0.382
BULLISH
Call OI: 5,866
Put OI: 2,411
P/C OI: 0.411
Total OI: 8,277
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $11.15
ATM Put: $10.10
Call %: 9.3%
Put %: 8.4%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 1,132
Chain OI: 8,277
Last Updated: 11/9/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
HIGH γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 93rd percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
93%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.58
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.39
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.41
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.39: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.41: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 28 ATM contracts, 4k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)25.6MediumNov 9
IV Rank (30 DTE)25.2MediumNov 9
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$21.25Nov 9
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.3425
Alpha: 65.63%
Correlation: 0.3927
R-Squared: 15.4%
Stock Volatility: 82.0%
Market Volatility: 13.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own XMTR
4 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $20.7M | #1103 of 3716 | +857.8% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $13.7M | #894 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $7.1M | #1826 of 6285 | new | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $376K | #2238 of 4729 | +19.5% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
XMTR Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 112 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 54,472,107 (as of 2026-09-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
11 filers$140.81M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $64.94M | 46.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $48.26M | 34.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $10.06M | 7.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $6.37M | 4.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Walleye Trading LLC | $3.60M | 2.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | PEAK6 LLC | $3.05M | 2.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $2.69M | 1.91% | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $925.65K | 0.66% | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Capital LLC | $482.60K | 0.34% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | $277.69K | 0.20% | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $154.43K | 0.11% | 2026-06-30 |
9 filers$11.97M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $3.90M | 32.58% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $3.19M | 26.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.02M | 16.86% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.41M | 11.77% | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | Walleye Trading LLC | $627.38K | 5.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $559.82K | 4.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $133.71K | 1.12% | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | Walleye Capital LLC | $106.17K | 0.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $28.96K | 0.24% | 2026-06-30 |
XMTR Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-11-06Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-06 | Randolph Altschuler | Director | Sell (S) | −10,000 | $108.90 | -$1.09M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-14 | Sanjeev Singh Sahni | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −1,500 | $108.80 | -$163.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Sanjeev Singh Sahni | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −1,112 | $103.28 | -$114.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Vaidyanathan Raghavan | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −1,866 | $103.28 | -$192.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Randolph Altschuler | Director | Sell (S) | −15,721 | $103.78 | -$1.63M | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-16 | Sanjeev Singh Sahni | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −1,500 | $85.23 | -$127.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-03 | Randolph Altschuler | Director | Sell (S) | −10,000 | $90.82 | -$908.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | Katharine Weymouth | Director | Mixed Sell −10,000 · Exer +10,000 |
— | $49.61 | -$903.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-28 | Vaidyanathan Raghavan | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $96.77 | -$483.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Emily Rollins | Director | Mixed Exer +5,000 · Sell −5,000 |
— | $48.31 | -$359.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Randolph Altschuler | Director | Gift (G) | −85,582 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-18 | Sanjeev Singh Sahni | Chief Executive Officer | Sell (S) | −1,500 | $90.19 | -$135.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-11 | Fabio Rosati | Director | Sell (S) | −10,000 | $91.12 | -$911.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | James Miln | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −1,500 | $87.92 | -$131.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-06 | Vaidyanathan Raghavan | Chief Technology Officer | Sell (S) | −1,866 | $93.21 | -$173.9K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
XMTR Insider Holdings
14 insiders · @ $120.22
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Randolph Altschuler | Director | 2,006,581 | $241.24M | -$22.18M | 34 | 2026-11-06 |
| 2 | Sanjeev Singh Sahni | Chief Executive Officer | 178,291 | $21.44M | -$3.03M | 11 | 2026-10-14 |
| 3 | James Miln | Chief Financial Officer | 177,631 | $21.36M | -$3.85M | 21 | 2026-08-07 |
| 4 | Peter Goguen | Chief Operating Officer | 175,457 | $21.09M | -$3.86M | 45 | 2025-06-18 |
| 5 | Vaidyanathan Raghavan | Chief Technology Officer | 135,228 | $16.26M | -$1.43M | 9 | 2026-10-02 |
| 6 | Fabio Rosati | Director | 134,494 | $16.17M | -$911.2K | 10 | 2026-08-11 |
| 7 | Subir Dutt | Chief Sales Officer | 99,068 | $11.91M | -$1.80M | 15 | 2026-07-06 |
| 8 | Matthew Leibel | Chief Technology Officer | 89,574 | $10.77M | -$1.07M | 14 | 2024-12-20 |
| 9 | Lukas Alexander Biewald | Director | 55,134 | $6.63M | $4.00M | 2 | 2026-06-04 |
| 10 | Katharine Weymouth | Director | 43,960 | $5.29M | -$810.6K | 13 | 2026-08-31 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
XMTR Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 6, 2026Directors 8
- Emily Rollins · since Jun 29, 2021
- Fabio Rosati · since Jun 29, 2021
- Katharine Weymouth · since Jun 29, 2021
- Randolph Altschuler · since Jun 29, 2021
- Ranjana B Clark · since Jul 2, 2021
- Roy Azevedo · since Oct 15, 2024
- Lukas Alexander Biewald · since May 20, 2026
- Sanjeev Singh Sahni · listed since Jul 2026
Officers 5
- Sanjeev Singh Sahni · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Jul 2026
- James Miln · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 1, 2024
- Peter Goguen · Chief Operating Officer · since Jun 29, 2021
- Subir Dutt · Chief Sales Officer · since May 15, 2024
- Vaidyanathan Raghavan · Chief Technology Officer · since Feb 5, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (60)
| Jul 6, 2026 | Sanjeev Singh Sahni listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously President) in SEC filings |
| Jul 6, 2026 | Sanjeev Singh Sahni first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| May 20, 2026 | Lukas Alexander Biewald became a director |
| Feb 20, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Randolph Altschuler as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Mar 11, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Deborah Bial from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 5, 2025 | Vaidyanathan Raghavan became Chief Technology Officer |
| Jan 30, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Matthew Leibel as Chief Technology Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 7, 2025 | Sanjeev Singh Sahni became President |
| Oct 15, 2024 | Roy Azevedo became a director |
| May 15, 2024 | Subir Dutt became Chief Sales Officer |
| May 13, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Kathy Mayerhofer as Chief Sales Officer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 8, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Laurence Zuriff from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 1, 2024 | James Miln became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 26, 2024 | The company announced the departure of James M Rallo as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Dec 1, 2023 | The company announced the departure of George Hornig from the board in an SEC filing |
| Nov 29, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Bill Cronin as Chief Revenue Officer in an SEC filing |
| Sep 11, 2022 | Matthew Leibel became Chief Technology Officer |
| Aug 15, 2022 | Highland Management Partners 9 LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 15, 2022 | Highland Leaders Fund I, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 15, 2022 | Highland Leaders Fund I GP, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 15, 2022 | Highland Leaders Fund I GP, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 15, 2022 | Highland Entrepreneurs' Fund 9 Limited Partnership reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 15, 2022 | Highland Capital Partners 9-B Limited Partnership reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 15, 2022 | Highland Capital Partners 9 Limited Partnership reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 15, 2022 | HIghland Management Partners 9 Limited Partnership reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 6, 2022 | Laurence Zuriff no longer listed as Chief Strategy Officer in SEC filings |
| Mar 7, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Craig Driscoll from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Seth Levine reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Ryan A McIntyre reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Highland Management Partners 9 LLC first on file as a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Highland Leaders Fund I GP, LLC first on file as a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Highland Leaders Fund I GP, L.P. first on file as a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Highland Capital Partners 9-B Limited Partnership first on file as a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Highland Capital Partners 9 Limited Partnership first on file as a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | HIghland Management Partners 9 Limited Partnership first on file as a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Foundry Group Next 2018, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | FG Next GP 2018, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 7, 2021 | Bradley A Feld reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 2, 2021 | Ranjana B Clark became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Seth Levine became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Ryan A McIntyre became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Randolph Altschuler became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Randolph Altschuler became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Peter Goguen became Chief Operating Officer |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Laurence Zuriff became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Laurence Zuriff became Chief Strategy Officer |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Kathy Mayerhofer became Chief Sales Officer |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Katharine Weymouth became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | James M Rallo became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Highland Leaders Fund I, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Highland Entrepreneurs' Fund 9 Limited Partnership became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | George Hornig became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Foundry Group Next 2018, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Fabio Rosati became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | FG Next GP 2018, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Emily Rollins became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Deborah Bial became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Craig Driscoll became a director |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Bradley A Feld became a 10% owner |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Bill Cronin became Chief Revenue Officer |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
XMTR Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-11-06
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
3 filings
· $1.7M notice value
· Last 90d:
14 filings
· $6.7M notice value
· 6 unique filers
· 79% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Altschuler Randolph (4, $3.7M) · Katharine Weymouth (2, $948K) · Vaidyanathan Raghavan (2, $677K) · Sahni Sanjeev Singh (4, $552K) · Miln James (1, $449K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-06 | Miln James | Officer | 4,000 | $448.9K | 2026-11-06 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-11-05 | Altschuler Randolph | Director | 10,000 | $1.13M | 2026-11-05 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-13 | Sahni Sanjeev Singh | Officer | 1,500 | $163.2K | 2026-10-12 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Raghavan Vaidyanathan | Officer | 1,866 | $195.6K | 2026-10-02 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Altschuler Randolph | Director | 5,721 | $599.7K | 2026-10-02 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Sahni Sanjeev Singh | Officer | 1,112 | $116.6K | 2026-10-02 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-01 | Altschuler Randolph | Director | 10,000 | $1.02M | 2026-10-01 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-14 | Sahni Sanjeev Singh | Officer | 1,500 | $127.9K | 2026-09-14 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-01 | Altschuler Randolph | Director | 10,000 | $902.5K | 2026-09-01 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | Katherine Weymouth | Director | 5,000 | $476.1K | 2026-08-31 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-11-05
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
ETF Holders
75 ETFs hold XMTR
25 shown · $923.59M total exposure · 0.19% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $164.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.21% | $155.0M | $76.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 3 | AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance® ETF | First Trust | 1.97% | $154.0M | $7.8B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $116.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.15% | $64.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $60.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.41% | $56.4M | $13.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 8 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.18% | $31.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.09% | $21.1M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 10 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.05% | $15.7M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 11 | PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF | Nport | 2.36% | $10.0M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 12 | FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF | Nport | 0.59% | $8.8M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 13 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $8.0M | $93.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 14 | VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $6.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.35% | $5.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 16 | FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.40% | $5.6M | $1.4B | 2026-11-06 |
| 17 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.07% | $5.4M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 18 | FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF | Fidelity | 0.08% | $5.3M | $6.6B | 2026-11-05 |
| 19 | FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 0.85% | $4.6M | $535.3M | 2026-11-06 |
| 20 | ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | First Trust | 1.41% | $4.5M | $316.1M | 2026-11-06 |
| 21 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $4.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 22 | AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.13% | $4.2M | $3.2B | 2026-11-05 |
| 23 | SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $4.2M | $4.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 24 | DWAS Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momentum ETF | Nport | 0.81% | $3.4M | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 25 | AVRY Avory Foundational ETF | Nport | 4.61% | $3.4M | — | 2026-08-31 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-0.34
TTM Revenue
$879.25M
TTM Net Income
$-17.28M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$29.82M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 '26 | 2026-09-30 | $252.44M | $1.94M | $0.03 | $7.87M |
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $229.28M | $-5.31M | $-0.10 | $2.92M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $205.14M | $-5.27M | $-0.10 | $14.62M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $192.40M | $-8.63M | $-0.17 | $4.41M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $180.72M | $-11.60M | $-0.23 | $5.79M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $162.55M | $-26.43M | $-0.52 | $-427.00K |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $150.97M | $-15.08M | $-0.30 | $-3.69M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $148.55M | $-9.89M | $-0.20 | $9.09M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $141.70M | $-10.20M | $-0.21 | $-3.63M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $132.59M | $-13.70M | $-0.28 | $-8.96M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $122.69M | $-16.62M | $-0.34 | $-11.87M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $128.15M | $-10.55M | $-0.22 | $-989.00K |
Q3 2026 • period ending 2026-09-30 • filed 2026-11-03
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
10.48
P/S
7.74
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
8.01
ROE
-5.2%
ROA
-2.9%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
0.44%
Debt/Equity
0.41
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$6.25B
as of 2026-11-09
XMTR vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN Amazon.Com Inc | $2.80T | 21.7 | +15.4% | +18.3% | 29 |
| ABNB Airbnb, Inc. Class A Common Stock | $111.6B | 47.5 | +12.6% | +45.0% | 21 |
| ADSK Autodesk Inc | $54.7B | 34.2 | +17.9% | −7.8% | 81 |
| XYZ Block, Inc. | $51.7B | 119.8 | +6.9% | +36.1% | 21 |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. Class A Common Stock | $29.5B | 106.0 | +11.2% | +111.6% | 85 |
| ZM Zoom Communications, Inc. Class A Common | $26.2B | 8.5 | +5.0% | +10.5% | 100 |
| PAYC PAYCOM SOFTWARE, INC. | $10.5B | 25.3 | +9.2% | +56.3% | 11 |
| XMTR Xometry, Inc. Class A Common Stock | $6.6B | — | +36.8% | +91.6% | 25 |
| XRAY DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc. | $1.9B | — | −0.8% | −15.6% | 24 |
| Peer median | $40.6B | 34.2 | +10.2% | +27.2% | 26 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
3.81M
SI % of Float
8.02%
Days to Cover
5.12
Short Vol Ratio
71.5%
Free Float
47.47M
Float %
92.9%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-06 • Float 2026-05-15