RWM ProShares Short Russell2000
ETF 14.55 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $13.16 – $17.80
- YTD
- -10.27%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 3.44
- Straddle Price
- $0.82
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.62
- Open
- $14.60
- Day Range
- $14.47 – $14.62
- Volume
- 67,444,750
- Prev Close
- $14.51
ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2007-01-23
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- 0.95% prospectus, filed Apr 7, 2025
- Assets
- $165M shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 3.29% paid quarterly
- Average daily volume
- $621M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 11 top 10 are 5.5%
- Listed
- Jan 23, 2007 NYSE Arca
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (56% of its variance, beta -0.98); Small caps over large (42% of its variance, beta -0.99). These factors explain 99% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. ProShares Short Russell2000 (the Fund) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index (the Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 11 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Inverse Equity ETFs
- May 2026
- −$18M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$9.1M +7.7% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- −$4.5M −3.7% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | −$18M |
| Apr 2026 | −$13M |
| Mar 2026 | +$40M |
| Feb 2026 | +$24M |
| Jan 2026 | −$24M |
| Dec 2025 | −$23M |
| Nov 2025 | +$25M |
| Oct 2025 | −$19M |
| Sep 2025 | +$36M |
| Aug 2025 | +$2.7M |
| Jul 2025 | −$13M |
| Jun 2025 | −$23M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 81 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOXSDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X ETF | — | — | $3.1B | −94.3% | compare |
| SQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | — | 0.95% | $2.0B | −49.1% | compare |
| SHProShares Short S&P500 | — | 0.89% | $950M | −12.8% | compare |
| PSQProShares Short QQQ | — | 0.95% | $636M | −16.9% | compare |
| SPXUProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500 | — | 0.89% | $436M | −36.5% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Inverse Equity category.
- Authorized participants
- 8 active of 39 with agreements; top 3 did 93%
- Created · redeemed
- $998M · $1.0B over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 0% creations 0% in kind
- Creation unit
- 50,000 shares
- Securities lending
- authorized, none lent
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-29 | $0.0944 | CD |
| 2026-06-24 | 2026-06-30 | $0.1395 | CD |
| 2026-03-25 | 2026-03-31 | $0.0642 | CD |
| 2025-12-24 | 2025-12-31 | $0.1786 | CD |
| 2025-09-24 | 2025-09-30 | $0.1322 | CD |
| 2025-06-25 | 2025-07-01 | $0.2039 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQMM | PROSHARES GENIUS MNY MKT ETF | 98.05% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| — | TREASURY BILL | 5.52% | Treasury | US |
| — | Net Other Assets (Liabilities) | -3.57% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| — | Russell 2000 Index SWAP BNP Paribas | -8.92% | Derivative | — |
| — | Russell 2000 Index SWAP Societe Generale | -10.91% | Derivative | — |
| — | Russell 2000 Index SWAP UBS AG | -11.53% | Derivative | — |
| — | Russell 2000 Index SWAP Bank of America NA | -11.96% | Derivative | — |
| — | Russell 2000 Index SWAP Citibank NA | -11.98% | Derivative | — |
| — | E-MINI RUSS 2000 EQUITY INDEX 18/DEC/2026 RTYZ6 INDEX | -13.11% | Derivative | — |
| — | Russell 2000 Index SWAP Goldman Sachs International | -14.63% | Derivative | — |
| — | Russell 2000 Index SWAP Barclays Capital | -16.96% | Derivative | — |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | 92.35% | $110.1M | 1 |
| Repurchase agreement | 11.15% | $13.3M | 4 |
| Derivative (equity) | -36.08% | $-43023529 | 8 |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -6.47% | 11.21% | -9.22% | 3.91% | -1.87% | -3.95% | -1.06% |
| Feb | -4.12% | -0.66% | 3.66% | -3.77% | 4.68% | 0.45% | 0.04% |
| Mar | 1.24% | -3.78% | 4.67% | -3.09% | 3.85% | 5.60% | 1.42% |
| Apr | -0.83% | 11.52% | 2.25% | 6.81% | 1.11% | -10.11% | 1.79% |
| May | -0.28% | -0.21% | 1.26% | -3.93% | -4.12% | -3.60% | -1.81% |
| Jun | -0.99% | 7.51% | -7.12% | -0.29% | -5.62% | -4.94% | -1.91% |
| Jul | 4.14% | -8.70% | -5.05% | -9.91% | -0.27% | 3.49% | -2.72% |
| Aug | -3.13% | 1.74% | 5.58% | -1.28% | -8.43% | 0.96% | -0.76% |
| Sep | 3.15% | 8.97% | 6.84% | -4.78% | -3.95% | 3.90% | 2.35% |
| Oct | -2.78% | -8.02% | 6.14% | 0.52% | -1.37% | 1.39%* | -0.69% |
| Nov | 6.86% | -2.16% | -7.63% | -9.38% | -1.27% | -- | -2.72% |
| Dec | -5.09% | 6.54% | -9.41% | 7.83% | -1.27% | -- | -0.28% |
| Total | -8.79% | 23.43% | -9.90% | -17.53% | -17.69% | -7.62% | -6.35% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: RWM
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: BEARISH (confidence level 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish momentum signals from MACD and Stochastic %K
- Neutral RSI reading, but overall trend strength is weak
- Negative beta indicates the stock moves opposite to market
Primary Risks:
- Market sentiment shift towards risk-off mode
- Earnings miss or guidance revision
- Regulatory issues or negative news sentiment
Investment Thesis: RWM's current price action reflects a neutral market, but with bearish momentum signals and a negative beta, the stock is more likely to move opposite to the broader market. However, without strong earnings or catalysts, the stock may struggle to break out of its current trading range.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines are mostly neutral, focusing on macroeconomic trends and market commentary. This lack of direction may contribute to RWM's consolidation around its current price level.
Technical Analysis Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) - Neutral Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $13.45 (support)
- SMA 50: $13.50 (resistance)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $13.80 (resistance)
Momentum Signals:
- MACD: Bullish momentum signal with a histogram above the zero line
- Stochastic %K: Oversold reading, but overall trend strength is weak
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 14918628.36 (neutral)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): -160115507.64 (bearish)
- Volume Rate of Change: 33.71% (bullish)
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary: The news headlines are primarily focused on macroeconomic trends and market commentary, with no clear direction or catalysts that could drive RWM's price action.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral
Catalyst Identification: None
Market Narrative: The neutral news sentiment and lack of direction may contribute to RWM's consolidation around its current price level.
Risk & Volatility Assessment Beta Interpretation:
- Beta: -1.21 (vs SPY) - negative beta indicates the stock moves opposite to market
- Risk relative to market is high
Volatility Regime:
- Current volatility is higher than historical average
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 44.8% (Medium)
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.04 (Bullish sentiment)
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: SMA 20 and Bollinger Band Lower
- Risk management considerations: stop-loss levels at $13.10 and position sizing considering the stock's volatility
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance: RWM's sector is relatively weak, with a beta of -1.21 compared to SPY.
Institutional Activity:
- Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest are neutral.
Correlation Analysis:
- Correlation with market (R-squared interpretation): 0.82
Relative Valuation:
- Position within trading range: Neutral
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $13.45
- Upper Bollinger Band: $13.80
- Lower Bollinger Band: $13.10
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above $14.00 to confirm bullish momentum
- Breakdown below $12.50 to confirm bearish momentum
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Earnings dates: None available
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels at $13.10 and position sizing considering the stock's volatility
RWM Options Activity & IV Rank
RWM IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 61st percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
RWM Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $166.12K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|