CRML Critical Metals Corp.
XNAS
6.02
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
CRML
$6.02
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
$6.02
- 52-Week Range
- $5.12 – $21.86
- YTD
- -25.86%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 21.88
- Straddle Price
- $1.35
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.57
- Market Cap
- $1.1B
- Open
- $5.91
- Day Range
- $5.71 – $6.19
- Volume
- 5,210,219
- Prev Close
- $5.88
Fair Value
MODEL: NEUTRAL
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.87 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 15.20% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 14.89% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +29.7pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Book / Price | 32.2% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $7.03 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $6.70 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 38.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.1B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
Peers used for multiples: ABAT, ALB, FCX, LAC, LAR, RIO, SGML, SQM
60-Day Conviction
17%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$6.14
α +1.4%
rank 44%
conviction
80%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$6.15
α +1.6%
rank 35%
conviction
55%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 4, 2027
$6.08
α +0.6%
rank 20%
conviction
17%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | $2.32 | 24% | median 1.2× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 3.2× · 3 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $7.03 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $5.76 | 76% | 19 strikes · skew +0.33 |
As of 2026-11-09 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- METAL MINING (1000) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $1.1B
- Employees
- 5
- List Date
- 2024-02-28
- CIK
- 0001951089
- Homepage
- https://www.criticalmetalscorp.com
Critical Metals Corp operates as a mining exploration and development company focused on critical metals and minerals. Its key activities center on lithium and rare earth element deposits, with projects such as the Wolfsberg Lithium Project in Austria and the Tanbreez rare earth deposit in Greenland. Its operations are based prominently in Germany, Austria, and Greenland.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 17.86% | 62.19% | 40.02% |
| Feb | -20.13% | -75.32% | -19.38% | -38.28% |
| Mar | 10.00% | -16.77% | -26.62% | -11.13% |
| Apr | -11.76% | 13.38% | 53.19% | 18.27% |
| May | 37.64% | -10.97% | -9.97% | 5.57% |
| Jun | -0.09% | 152.11% | -15.78% | 45.41% |
| Jul | -2.98% | 15.29% | -44.80% | -10.83% |
| Aug | -13.61% | 62.60% | 13.01% | 20.67% |
| Sep | -7.58% | 6.96% | 4.91% | 1.43% |
| Oct | -10.69% | 82.51% | -0.56% | 23.75% |
| Nov | 8.10% | -24.74% | -10.77%* | -9.14% |
| Dec | 2.41% | -7.03% | -- | -2.31% |
| Total | -18.35% | 57.75% | -35.28% | 1.37% |
* Only 3 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $6.66
SMA 50: $7.00
SMA 200: $8.93
Current: $6.05
EMA 12: $6.47
EMA 26: $6.72
MACD: -0.2477 | Signal: -0.1159
BEARISH
ADX (14): 18.80
RANGE
+DI: 18.99
−DI: 30.20
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 43.28
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 16.95
Stoch %D: 15.34
Williams %R: -75.93
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $7.97
BB Lower: $5.35
NEUTRAL
OBV: 444,263,981
Vol SMA 20: 6,589,033
Vol ROC: 31.89%
ATR: $0.65
True Range: $0.48
HV 20: 130.4%
HV 30: 109.1%
HV 60: 129.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-11T00:00:00 – 2026-11-09T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a short-term downtrend, while medium-term momentum signals are neutral.
- Recent news sentiment is mixed, with positive headlines overshadowed by negative options market signals.
Primary Risks:
- High volatility and beta indicate increased risk relative to the market.
- Unusual options activity and low IV rank may indicate a potential price reversal or consolidation.
Investment Thesis: CRML's recent performance has been driven by mixed news sentiment and technical indicators. The stock is trading near its 200-day SMA, which could provide support in case of a short-term pullback. However, the bearish MACD signal and high volatility suggest that caution is warranted.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The positive headline regarding CRML's agreement to acquire Tanbreez has been somewhat offset by negative options market signals and mixed news sentiment.
Technical Analysis Trend Direction: Short-term downtrend (1-4 weeks)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $10.08
- SMA 50: $12.06
- Upper Bollinger Band: $11.68
Momentum Signals:
- MACD signal line: -0.02 (bearish)
- RSI (14): 38.37 (neutral)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume Rate of Change: 21.09% (increasing volume)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 396581199.02 (strong buying pressure)
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary:
- Positive news: Critical Metals Corp Amends Agreement to Acquire a Controlling Interest in Tanbreez
- Negative news: EUR sells a further 5m CRML Shares for approximately $A124m, and Options Activity
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL (positive headlines outweighed by negative options market signals)
Catalyst Identification:
- Critical Metals Corp's acquisition of Tanbreez (medium-term catalyst)
- Upcoming earnings report (potential medium-term catalyst)
Market Narrative: The news sentiment has been mixed, with positive headlines from CRML's agreement to acquire Tanbreez offset by negative options market signals and mixed news sentiment.
Risk & Volatility Assessment Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to the market (beta = 1.16)
Volatility Regime: Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: 0.6% (low)
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 10.56 (bearish sentiment)
Downside Protection: Support levels to monitor: SMA 20 ($10.08) and SMA 50 ($12.06). Risk management considerations include a stop-loss level at $8.48.
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance:
- Relative strength vs sector/market: Neutral
Institutional Activity:
- Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: Increasing volume and strong buying pressure (OBV)
Correlation Analysis:
- How stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation): 0.13 - below average correlation, indicating increased volatility.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: Neutral, as the stock is trading near its 200-day SMA.
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels:
- Support/resistance levels to monitor: SMA 20 ($10.08) and SMA 50 ($12.06)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: Upper Bollinger Band ($11.68), SMA 200 ($8.20)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings report (medium-term catalyst)
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss level at $8.48
- Position sizing considerations: Consider reducing position size due to high volatility and bearish MACD signal.
Overall, CRML's recent performance has been driven by mixed news sentiment and technical indicators. The stock is trading near its 200-day SMA, which could provide support in case of a short-term pullback. However, the bearish MACD signal and high volatility suggest that caution is warranted.
Generated
News
All CRML news →
CRML Options Activity & IV Rank
CRML IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 97.1%
7-DTE IV: 101.9%
Expected Move: $1.35
7-DTE Move: $0.55
Days to Exp: 32 (2026-12-11)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 6,249
Put Volume: 3,562
P/C Volume: 0.57
BULLISH
Call OI: 248,377
Put OI: 131,855
P/C OI: 0.531
Total OI: 380,232
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.68
ATM Put: $0.68
Call %: 11.2%
Put %: 11.2%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 9,811
Chain OI: 380,232
Last Updated: 11/9/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 69th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
69%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.38
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.62
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.41
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.62: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.41: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 31 ATM contracts, 18k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
100%
+56.8
pts
EXTREME
ATM 99.0% / Wing 155.7%
30 DTE / 10d
100%
+31.7
pts
EXTREME
ATM 95.8% / Wing 127.4%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)26.6MediumNov 9
IV Rank (30 DTE)21.9LowNov 9
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$1.35Nov 9
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 4.2504
Alpha: -25.99%
Correlation: 0.4324
R-Squared: 18.7%
Stock Volatility: 135.2%
Market Volatility: 13.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own CRML
5 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $30.7M | #912 of 6285 | +1257.3% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $9.3M | #1627 of 3716 | +1222.6% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $7.2M | #1241 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $4.4M | #505 of 997 | -18.3% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $369K | #2248 of 4729 | -14.3% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
CRML Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 77 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 92,906,029 (as of 2025-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
9 filers$105.04M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $71.43M | 68.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $13.02M | 12.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $12.41M | 11.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Walleye Trading LLC | $3.47M | 3.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Daiwa Securities Group Inc. | $3.21M | 3.06% | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | NATIXIS | $1.45M | 1.38% | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | Skaana Management L.P. | $32.80K | 0.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Cetera Investment Advisers Custodian | $1.47K | <0.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $726 | <0.01% | 2026-09-30 |
13 filers$40.89M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $11.93M | 29.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $7.94M | 19.42% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $6.46M | 15.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | LMR Partners LLP | $4.90M | 11.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Daiwa Securities Group Inc. | $3.56M | 8.71% | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $3.22M | 7.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Greenland Capital Management LP | $1.02M | 2.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $768.75K | 1.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Warberg Asset Management LLC | $582.25K | 1.42% | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | Tidal Investments LLC | $152.72K | 0.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $145.20K | 0.36% | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $128.12K | 0.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Caption Management, LLC | $70.72K | 0.17% | 2026-06-30 |
CRML Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-11-04Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | Sergey Savchenko | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −66,667 | $6.81 | -$453.7K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
CRML Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $6.05
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sergey Savchenko | Chief Financial Officer | 93,333 | $564.7K | -$453.7K | 1 | 2026-11-04 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
CRML Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 4, 2026Directors 5
- Antony William Paul Sage · since Mar 18, 2026
- Malcolm Raymond Day · since Mar 18, 2026
- Michael C. Ryan · since Mar 18, 2026
- Michael J. Hanson · since Mar 18, 2026
- Mykhailo Zhernov · since Mar 18, 2026
Officers 5
- Antony William Paul Sage · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Sergey Savchenko · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- John Harper Thomas · General Counsel · since Mar 18, 2026
- Dietrich Wanke · Pres. Of Euro. Ops. · since Mar 18, 2026
- Thomas M. McNamara · Director of Corp. Dev. & IR · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (10)
| Mar 18, 2026 | Thomas M. McNamara became Director of Corp. Dev. & IR |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Sergey Savchenko became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Mykhailo Zhernov became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Michael J. Hanson became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Michael C. Ryan became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Malcolm Raymond Day became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | John Harper Thomas became General Counsel |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Dietrich Wanke became Pres. Of Euro. Ops. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Antony William Paul Sage became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Antony William Paul Sage became Chief Executive Officer |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
CRML Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-11-02
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
1 filing
· $452K notice value
· Last 90d:
1 filing
· $452K notice value
· 1 unique filer
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Savchenko Sergey (1, $452K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | Savchenko Sergey | Officer | 66,667 | $452.0K | 2026-11-02 | Oppenheimer & Co, Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-23 | Zhernov Mykhailo | Director | 50,000 | $403.5K | 2026-03-23 | Oppenheimer & Co, Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-14 | European Lithium Ltd. | 10% Shareholder | 5,000,000 | $73.80M | 2026-01-14 | BMO Capital Markets Corp. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-31 | Zhernov Mykhailo | Director | 50,000 | $628.3K | 2025-10-31 | Oppenheimer & Co, Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-22 | Wanke Dietrich | Director | 120,000 | $1.80M | 2025-10-22 | Oppenheimer & Co Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-10 | Hanson Michael J. | Officer | 50,000 | $813.5K | 2025-10-10 | Oppenheimer & Co Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-10 | Savchenko Sergey | Officer | 50,000 | $883.0K | 2025-10-10 | Oppenheimer & Co Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-10 | Thomas John Harper | Officer | 50,000 | $885.0K | 2025-10-10 | Oppenheimer & Co Inc | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
18 ETFs hold CRML
18 shown · $43.69M total exposure · 0.02% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $21.4M | $76.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 2 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $7.9M | $13.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 3 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $3.7M | $41.0B | 2026-11-05 |
| 4 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $3.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.21% | $2.5M | $1.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 6 | SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF | Nport | 0.28% | $1.6M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | LIT Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF | Global X | 0.14% | $1.6M | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 8 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.04% | $600,787 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 9 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.03% | $398,740 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 10 | ILIT iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 2.86% | $298,328 | $10.5M | 2026-11-06 |
| 11 | GWX State Street® SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.03% | $238,209 | $896.1M | 2026-11-05 |
| 12 | IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $120,270 | $19.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 13 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $48,649 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.03% | $47,193 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 15 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.01% | $36,603 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 16 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.01% | $24,884 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 17 | HDG ProShares Hedge Replication ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $1,041 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 18 | RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF | ProShares | 0.02% | $282 | — | 2026-11-06 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (2 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-06-30 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-06-30 | — | — | — | — |
Q4 2025 • period ending 2025-06-30 • filed 2025-10-06
CRML vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIO Rio Tinto plc | $136.2B | — | — | +6.1% | 40 |
| FCX Freeport-McMoran Inc. | $85.3B | 30.7 | +0.2% | +20.0% | 46 |
| SQM Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA | $16.4B | — | — | −18.7% | 0 |
| ALB Albemarle Corporation | $11.7B | 23.9 | +24.4% | −31.1% | 35 |
| CRML Critical Metals Corp. Ordinary Shares | $1.1B | — | — | −25.5% | 22 |
| LAC Lithium Americas Corp. | $701M | — | — | −57.7% | 30 |
| LAR Lithium Argentina AG | $697M | — | — | −25.8% | 41 |
| SGML Sigma Lithium Corporation Common Shares | $655M | — | — | −58.1% | 57 |
| ABAT American Battery Technology Company Comm | $190M | — | +406.8% | −61.6% | 43 |
| Peer median | $6.2B | 27.3 | +24.4% | −28.4% | 40 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
30.93M
SI % of Float
38.29%
Days to Cover
5.46
Short Vol Ratio
55.8%
Free Float
80.77M
Float %
55.0%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-09 • Float 2026-09-22