EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
ETF 132.07 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $112.31 – $136.07
- YTD
- +11.52%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 62.08
- Straddle Price
- $4.30
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.00
- Open
- $131.56
- Day Range
- $131.56 – $132.43
- Volume
- 15,155
- Prev Close
- $132.13
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2006-12-01
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- 0.25% prospectus, filed Aug 27, 2025
- Assets
- $2.8B shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 1.56% paid quarterly
- Average daily volume
- $14M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 102 top 10 are 11.4%
- Listed
- Dec 1, 2006 NYSE Arca
- Tracking difference
- -0.35 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2026
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (98% of its variance, beta 1.00). These factors explain 90% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 102 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll Equal Weight ETFs
- Jul 2026
- +$5.3M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$69M +2.5% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$754M +28.0% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | +$5.3M |
| Jun 2026 | +$57M |
| May 2026 | +$6.2M |
| Apr 2026 | +$40M |
| Mar 2026 | +$86M |
| Feb 2026 | +$100M |
| Jan 2026 | +$168M |
| Dec 2025 | +$79M |
| Nov 2025 | +$55M |
| Oct 2025 | +$73M |
| Sep 2025 | +$33M |
| Aug 2025 | +$50M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 84 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOEXXtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 66% | 0.15% | $230M | — | compare |
| MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF | 56% | 0.05% | $13.9B | +20.3% | compare |
| OEIOptimized Equity Income ETF | 55% | 0.75% | $46M | — | compare |
| DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 51% | 0.50% | $657M | +14.9% | compare |
| DLNWisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 51% | 0.28% | $6.3B | +14.9% | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
- Holdings vs fair value
- +4.0% 34% under, 27% over · 100% covered
- Price / earnings
- 22.2 2% loss-making · 99% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 3.8 · 2.5 revenue growth +8.1%
- Above 200-day average
- 57% 56% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 2.0% of float, weighted · 2.9 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 8% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 59% net selling
- 13F holders
- +1.9% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 30.1% of weight in 7 days; 50.2% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New position | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | — | 1.23% | — |
| New position | MUMicron Technology, Inc. | — | 1.19% | — |
| New position | LRCXLam Research Corp. | — | 1.13% | — |
| Exit | TGTTarget Corp. | 1.09% | — | — |
| New position | AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | — | 1.08% | — |
| Exit | METMetLife, Inc. | 0.97% | — | — |
| Exit | AIGAmerican International Group, Inc. | 0.90% | — | — |
| Exit | PYPLPayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.84% | — | — |
| Decrease | INTCIntel Corp. | 1.11% | 1.89% | −14.0% |
| Decrease | LMTLockheed Martin Corp. | 1.32% | 0.77% | −27.1% |
- Authorized participants
- 9 active of 40 with agreements; top 3 did 63%
- Created · redeemed
- $1.3B · $296M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 100% creations 100% in kind
- Creation unit
- 10,000 shares
- Securities lending
- 0.49% of assets on loan on average; earned 0.1 bp
- Return vs index
- -0.35 pts after fees; -0.04 before; daily s.d. 0.09
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-25 | $0.5055 | CD |
| 2026-06-22 | 2026-06-26 | $0.5148 | CD |
| 2026-03-23 | 2026-03-27 | $0.5285 | CD |
| 2025-12-22 | 2025-12-26 | $0.5166 | CD |
| 2025-09-22 | 2025-09-26 | $0.4784 | CD |
| 2025-06-23 | 2025-06-27 | $0.4431 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX | RTX Corp. | 1.18% | Equity (common) | US |
| BKNG | Booking Holdings Inc. | 1.16% | Equity (common) | US |
| TMO | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 1.16% | Equity (common) | US |
| ABT | Abbott Laboratories | 1.15% | Equity (common) | US |
| SCHW | Charles Schwab Corp. (The) | 1.14% | Equity (common) | US |
| COF | Capital One Financial Corp. | 1.14% | Equity (common) | US |
| BMY | Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 1.14% | Equity (common) | US |
| MA | Mastercard Inc. | 1.14% | Equity (common) | US |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp. | 1.13% | Equity (common) | US |
| JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.11% | Equity (common) | US |
| GEV | GE Vernova Inc. | 1.11% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMZN | Amazon.com, Inc. | 1.11% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMGN | Amgen Inc. | 1.11% | Equity (common) | US |
| BAC | Bank of America Corp. | 1.10% | Equity (common) | US |
| V | Visa Inc. | 1.10% | Equity (common) | US |
| GE | General Electric Co. | 1.10% | Equity (common) | US |
| GD | General Dynamics Corp. | 1.09% | Equity (common) | US |
| MMM | 3M Co. | 1.09% | Equity (common) | US |
| GM | General Motors Co. | 1.09% | Equity (common) | US |
| BNY | Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (The) | 1.08% | Equity (common) | US |
| ABBV | AbbVie Inc. | 1.08% | Equity (common) | US |
| INTU | Intuit Inc. | 1.08% | Equity (common) | US |
| LMT | Lockheed Martin Corp. | 1.08% | Equity (common) | US |
| USB | U.S. Bancorp | 1.08% | Equity (common) | US |
| UNP | Union Pacific Corp. | 1.06% | Equity (common) | US |
| MRK | Merck & Co., Inc. | 1.06% | Equity (common) | US |
| EMR | Emerson Electric Co. | 1.06% | Equity (common) | US |
| BLK | BlackRock, Inc. | 1.05% | Equity (common) | US |
| SPG | Simon Property Group, Inc. | 1.04% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRM | Salesforce, Inc. | 1.04% | Equity (common) | US |
| JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 1.04% | Equity (common) | US |
| AXP | American Express Co. | 1.04% | Equity (common) | US |
| ADBE | Adobe Inc. | 1.04% | Equity (common) | US |
| GILD | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 1.04% | Equity (common) | US |
| SBUX | Starbucks Corp. | 1.03% | Equity (common) | US |
| CVS | CVS Health Corp. | 1.03% | Equity (common) | US |
| MDT | Medtronic PLC | 1.03% | Equity (common) | IE |
| DHR | Danaher Corp. | 1.03% | Equity (common) | US |
| AAPL | Apple Inc. | 1.03% | Equity (common) | US |
| DE | Deere & Co. | 1.03% | Equity (common) | US |
| BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 1.03% | Equity (common) | US |
| WFC | Wells Fargo & Co. | 1.02% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 1.02% | Equity (common) | US |
| NOW | ServiceNow, Inc. | 1.02% | Equity (common) | US |
| KO | Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 1.02% | Equity (common) | US |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc. | 1.01% | Equity (common) | US |
| PM | Philip Morris International Inc. | 1.01% | Equity (common) | US |
| HD | Home Depot, Inc. (The) | 1.01% | Equity (common) | US |
| CVX | Chevron Corp. | 1.01% | Equity (common) | US |
| BA | Boeing Co. (The) | 1.00% | Equity (common) | US |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.26% | -3.16% | 5.84% | 0.85% | 4.36% | 2.01% | 1.86% |
| Feb | 3.47% | -3.92% | -3.90% | 2.48% | 1.86% | 0.54% | 0.09% |
| Mar | 3.79% | 3.58% | 1.66% | 3.04% | -3.60% | -5.64% | 0.47% |
| Apr | 3.07% | -7.95% | 0.49% | -3.35% | -1.26% | 6.69% | -0.39% |
| May | 2.03% | 1.21% | -1.97% | 3.32% | 5.24% | 4.60% | 2.40% |
| Jun | 0.65% | -7.97% | 4.82% | 1.13% | 3.63% | 0.49% | 0.46% |
| Jul | 0.83% | 6.18% | 3.25% | 4.31% | -1.03% | 0.71% | 2.38% |
| Aug | 2.70% | -3.24% | -2.09% | 3.68% | 4.25% | 2.47% | 1.30% |
| Sep | -4.02% | -10.78% | -4.98% | 2.64% | 1.94% | -3.44% | -3.11% |
| Oct | 3.96% | 8.22% | -1.67% | -0.03% | 1.16% | 2.16%* | 2.30% |
| Nov | -2.69% | 6.81% | 7.98% | 5.64% | 1.02% | -- | 3.75% |
| Dec | 5.91% | -4.82% | 4.26% | -4.68% | 1.40% | -- | 0.41% |
| Total | 22.57% | -16.67% | 13.53% | 20.17% | 20.27% | 10.48% | 11.73% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical momentum signals are mixed, with a neutral RSI and bullish MACD
- Options market sentiment is bearish, but not overly concerned about volatility
- Recent news headlines have been neutral, with no major catalysts impacting the stock price
Primary Risks:
- Low trading volume and liquidity may lead to larger price movements than expected
- Market sentiment remains cautious, which could impact the stock's ability to break out
Investment Thesis: EQWL is a large-cap equal weight ETF that tracks the S&P 100 index. The stock has exhibited low volatility and a stable trend, making it an attractive option for long-term investors seeking relatively steady returns.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have been neutral, with no major events or announcements impacting the stock price. This lack of significant news has allowed technical analysis to take center stage in driving market movements.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: NEUTRAL (range-bound trading)
- Medium-term: BULLISH ( uptrend supported by MACD and RSI)
- Long-term: NEUTRAL (stable trend, but not overly bullish or bearish)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower band: $132.42
- Middle line: $134.36
- Upper band: $136.30
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: 60.99 (neutral)
- MACD: Bullish (above signal line and histogram)
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral (price touching the middle band)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 99141.85
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 2904779.64
- Volume Rate of Change: 10.29%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been neutral, with no major events or announcements impacting the stock price.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is NEUTRAL, with no significant bias towards bullish or bearish sentiment.
Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts are identified in the recent news headlines that could impact the stock price significantly.
Market Narrative: The market narrative is neutral, with no clear trend or sentiment dominating the market.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: The beta of 0.69 indicates a relatively low level of risk compared to the broader market.
Volatility Regime: The current volatility regime is characterized as low volatility, with the stock moving less than the overall market.
Options Market Signals: IV Rank: 50.2% (Medium), Current IV: 27.5%, Expected Move: $2.60
Downside Protection: Support levels are in place at $132.42 and $134.36, providing some downside protection for investors.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: EQWL is performing relatively well within the large-cap sector, with a stable trend and low volatility.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest remains steady, but not overly enthusiastic about the stock's prospects.
Correlation Analysis: The correlation between EQWL and the broader market (SPY) is 0.83, indicating a relatively strong relationship between the two.
Relative Valuation: EQWL is positioned within a trading range, with no clear bias towards bullish or bearish sentiment.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $132.42
- Resistance: $136.30
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout level: $137.50 (above upper band)
- Breakdown level: $131.00 (below lower band)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific earnings dates or product launches are identified that could impact the stock price significantly.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at $132.42, with position sizing considerations based on market volatility and sentiment.
By analyzing the technical indicators, news headlines, and risk metrics, EQWL appears to be a stable investment opportunity for long-term investors seeking relatively steady returns. However, investors should remain cautious due to the low trading volume and potential for larger price movements than expected.
EQWL Options Activity & IV Rank
EQWL IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
EQWL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $774.12K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $3.88M | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|