GLO Clough Global Opportunities Fund
XASEStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Exchange
- XASE
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- List Date
- 1992-03-17
- CIK
- 0001350869
- Homepage
- https://www.cloughcefs.com
Clough Global Opportunities Fund is a closed-end management investment company based in the United States. Its investment objective is to provide a high level of total return by investing in equity securities of companies of any market capitalization and equity-related securities, including equity swaps and call options, as well as fixed-income securities, including both corporate and sovereign debt, in both U.S. and non-U.S. markets.
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $231M shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $602K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Mar 17, 1992 NYSE American
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (66% of its variance, beta 1.06). These factors explain 59% of its daily moves over the last year.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTVanguard Total World Stock ETF | — | 0.06% | $82.2B | +13.7% | compare |
| ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF | — | 0.32% | $33.0B | +14.0% | compare |
| CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | — | 0.47% | $11.9B | +10.7% | compare |
| IOOiShares Global 100 ETF | — | 0.40% | $9.3B | +19.5% | compare |
| URTHiShares MSCI World ETF | — | 0.24% | $8.9B | +13.8% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Global category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 5.59% | -8.82% | -2.72% | 2.37% | 3.34% | 3.86% | 0.60% |
| Feb | 2.18% | -6.01% | -3.55% | 2.69% | -2.20% | 0.83% | -1.01% |
| Mar | -2.89% | 2.17% | -0.41% | 1.20% | -3.17% | -8.09% | -1.86% |
| Apr | 5.08% | -11.85% | -2.24% | -3.37% | 1.12% | 4.67% | -1.10% |
| May | -7.19% | -5.27% | -2.90% | 3.89% | 4.95% | 2.56% | -0.66% |
| Jun | -1.47% | -7.08% | 6.14% | 5.91% | 3.63% | 0.82% | 1.32% |
| Jul | 1.30% | 2.97% | 0.59% | 1.88% | -0.37% | -4.58% | 0.30% |
| Aug | 2.61% | -7.70% | -4.52% | 0.95% | 3.54% | -2.54% | -1.28% |
| Sep | -6.16% | -19.65% | -8.28% | 3.42% | 3.07% | -6.32% | -5.65% |
| Oct | 5.06% | -0.35% | -4.98% | -3.51% | 2.11% | -0.28%* | -0.33% |
| Nov | -8.94% | -2.90% | 7.71% | 1.24% | -0.52% | -- | -0.68% |
| Dec | -8.35% | -12.44% | 0.43% | -3.94% | -1.22% | -- | -5.10% |
| Total | -13.90% | -56.04% | -14.76% | 12.90% | 14.82% | -9.50% | -11.08% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for GLO:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6-7)
Key drivers: Technical indicators, news sentiment, and market context
Primary risks: Volatility, sector performance, and news impact
Investment thesis: GLO's recent price action appears to be consolidating within a range, driven by neutral news sentiment and moderate volatility. The stock is not yet trending in any direction, making it challenging to make a strong bullish or bearish call.
Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral headlines from the last 10 days have had minimal impact on the stock's price, indicating that market participants are not heavily influenced by recent developments.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Consolidation (neutral)
Support/Resistance Levels: SMA 20 at $5.91 provides support; Bollinger Bands suggest a potential breakout above $6.08.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral, currently around 51.68
- MACD signal: Bullish, with a histogram of 0.03 indicating momentum
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, with price touching the middle band
Volume Analysis: Volume is moderate, with a volume rate of change (VROC) at 58.78%. On-Balance Volume (OBV) suggests an uptrend.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral headlines from Global Atomic regarding public offerings and no significant news impacting the stock's price.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL, with no strong positive or negative trends observed.
Catalyst Identification: No imminent catalysts are identified in recent news.
Market Narrative: The market narrative suggests a consolidation phase, with GLO's price action mirroring this trend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta of 0.91 indicates moderate volatility, which is relatively low compared to the broader market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is within historical norms, indicating a stable trading range.
Options Market Signals: No options data available for analysis.
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20 and Bollinger Bands provide some protection against potential price declines.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: GLO's sector (Energy) has performed relatively well, with a R-squared correlation coefficient of 0.73 indicating a strong relationship with the broader market.
Institutional Activity: Moderate institutional interest is inferred from volume patterns.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation with SPY is 0.73, suggesting GLO's price action follows the broader market's trends.
Relative Valuation: GLO appears fairly valued within its trading range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: SMA 20 at $5.91 provides support; Bollinger Bands suggest a potential breakout above $6.08.
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A break above or below these levels could signal the beginning of a trend.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No imminent catalysts are identified in recent news.
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at SMA 20 and Bollinger Bands for risk management considerations.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data and may not reflect actual market conditions or future performance.
GLO Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $155K | #2737 of 4729 | +1.8% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
GLO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
GLO Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-01-15| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-15 | Clifford John Weber | Buy (P) | +1,000 | $6.00 | $6.0K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-15 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +35,000 | $6.01 | $210.3K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-14 | Karen Ann DiGravio | Buy (P) | +213 | $5.98 | $1.3K | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-05 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +8,800 | $5.62 | $49.5K | EDGAR | |
| 2025-08-13 | Clifford John Weber | Buy (P) | +2,300 | $5.53 | $12.7K | EDGAR | |
| 2024-05-06 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +50,000 | $4.94 | $247.0K | EDGAR | |
| 2024-03-20 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +20,000 | $5.01 | $100.2K | EDGAR | |
| 2024-02-13 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +20,000 | $5.04 | $100.8K | EDGAR | |
| 2023-08-09 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +15,000 | $5.04 | $75.6K | EDGAR | |
| 2023-06-16 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +20,000 | $4.94 | $98.8K | EDGAR | |
| 2023-05-11 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +10,000 | $4.75 | $47.5K | EDGAR | |
| 2023-05-10 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +10,000 | $4.81 | $48.1K | EDGAR | |
| 2023-05-09 | Charles Clough JR | Buy (P) | +5,000 | $4.78 | $23.9K | EDGAR | |
| 2023-02-09 | Clough Capital Partners, L.P. | Buy (P) | +43,000 | $5.05 | $217.1K | EDGAR | |
| 2023-02-07 | Kevin Joseph McNally | Buy (P) | +1,000 | $5.00 | $5.0K | EDGAR |
GLO Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $5.38| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles Clough JR | 418,244 | $2.25M | $2.51M | 23 | 2026-01-15 | |
| 2 | Clifford John Weber | 3,300 | $17.7K | $18.7K | 2 | 2026-01-15 | |
| 3 | Karen Ann DiGravio | 2,000 | $10.8K | $13.2K | 3 | 2026-01-14 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $11.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $10.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF | Amplify | 0.69% | $4.6M | $657.2M | 2026-10-20 |
| 4 | VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $2.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | Nport | 0.48% | $2.0M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 6 | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | Nport | 3.28% | $1.3M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $997,258 | $12.9B | 2026-10-20 |
| 9 | VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World EX-US Small-Cap Index Fund | Vanguard | 0.01% | $844,051 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $765,751 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | VGK Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $585,877 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $464,642 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 13 | GWX State Street® SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.05% | $463,231 | $899.5M | 2026-10-20 |
| 14 | VSGX Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $146,847 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 15 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.00% | $43,738 | $40.9B | 2026-10-20 |
| 16 | IEUS iShares MSCI Europe Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $34,110 | $166.1M | 2026-10-20 |
| 17 | VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $25,659 | — | 2026-10-20 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.