Zacks Investment ResearchT3·22d ago
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
ETF 92.37 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
IGPT
$92.37
—
Key stats
$92.37
Pre-market
$91.16
-1.31%
- 52-Week Range
- $53.27 – $109.32
- YTD
- +51.40%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 28.08
- Straddle Price
- $7.60
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.25
- Open
- $92.37
- Day Range
- $91.23 – $92.79
- Volume
- 175,341
- Prev Close
- $91.19
About
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2005-06-23
- Has Options
- Yes
Fund profile
holdings as of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingthrough Jul 2026flows, SEC filings
Thematic
AI & Robotics#8 of 69 by assets
Invesco
Software & CloudInternet & Innovation
US
Index-tracking
- Expense ratio
- 0.56% prospectus, filed Aug 27, 2025
- Assets
- $1.4B shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- — paid quarterly
- Average daily volume
- $15M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 103 top 10 are 60.1%
- Listed
- Jun 23, 2005 NYSE Arca
- Last fee change
- -2 bp filed Aug 27, 2025
- Tracking difference
- -0.01 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2026
Cost48
Liquidity73
Scale79
Diversification48
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (34% of its variance, beta 1.32); Emerging markets over US (33% of its variance, beta 1.04); Value over growth (21% of its variance, beta -0.68). These factors explain 87% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 103 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll AI & Robotics ETFs
Fund flows
through Jul 2026SEC filings- Jul 2026
- −$4.8M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$149M +13.4% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$226M +20.4% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | −$4.8M |
| Jun 2026 | +$72M |
| May 2026 | +$81M |
| Apr 2026 | +$5.8M |
| Mar 2026 | +$3.7M |
| Feb 2026 | +$7.9M |
| Jan 2026 | +$5.3M |
| Dec 2025 | +$5.8M |
| Nov 2025 | +$2.9M |
| Oct 2025 | +$24M |
| Sep 2025 | +$7.9M |
| Aug 2025 | +$14M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 84 months ago
Similar funds
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPXGlobal X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 44% | 0.50% | $258M | +65.6% | compare |
| TRFKPacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 43% | 0.49% | $614M | +28.7% | compare |
| FAIFirst Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 43% | 0.65% | $258M | +33.0% | compare |
| FEPIREX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 42% | 0.65% | $647M | −13.5% | compare |
| GPTYYieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 42% | 1.06% | $102M | −16.0% | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
Look-through: what the holdings say
weights as of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing- Holdings vs fair value
- +3.0% 20% under, 26% over · 84% covered
- Price / earnings
- 31.1 9% loss-making · 84% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 8.1 · 8.3 revenue growth +21.5%
- Above 200-day average
- 75% 39% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 3.2% of float, weighted · 2.3 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 5% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 69% net selling
- 13F holders
- +2.1% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 28.2% of weight in 7 days; 44.5% in 14
Holdings reporting in the next 14 days · weighted implied move this week 2.23%
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
What changed in the portfolio
Jan 31, 2026 → Apr 30, 2026| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decrease | METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 8.03% | 4.76% | −22.4% |
| Decrease | MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 11.02% | 8.10% | −34.0% |
| Increase | NVDANVIDIA Corp. | 4.77% | 6.92% | +55.4% |
| New position | KYCCFKeyence Corp. | — | 2.05% | — |
| Exit | Keyence Corp. | 1.82% | — | — |
| Decrease | AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 7.82% | 6.40% | −38.8% |
| Increase | Kioxia Holdings Corp. | 0.48% | 1.14% | +51.5% |
| Exit | Dassault Systemes | 0.48% | — | — |
| Exit | Hexagon AB | 0.47% | — | — |
| New position | HXGBYHexagon AB | — | 0.45% | — |
Under the hood
fiscal year to Apr 30, 2026SEC census- Authorized participants
- 4 active of 40 with agreements; top 3 did 98%
- Created · redeemed
- $105M · $0 over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 0% creations 91% in kind
- Creation unit
- 10,000 shares
- Securities lending
- 4.14% of assets on loan on average; earned 0.9 bp
- Return vs index
- -0.01 pts after fees; +1.10 before; daily s.d. 5.37
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-07-31
Holdings
103
AUM
$1.1B
Provider
Nport
Inception
2005-06-23
Exchange
ARCX
Data As Of
2026-07-31
Expense Ratio
0.56%
Dividend Yield
—
Distribution
Quarterly
Recent distributions
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-22 | 2025-09-26 | $0.0096 | CD |
| 2025-06-23 | 2025-06-27 | $0.0168 | CD |
| 2022-12-19 | 2022-12-23 | $0.5042 | CD |
| 2022-09-19 | 2022-09-23 | $0.7787 | CD |
| 2021-12-20 | 2021-12-31 | $7.7555 | CD |
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 50 of 103 holdings
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc. | 8.90% | Equity (common) | US |
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp. | 8.76% | Equity (common) | US |
| META | Meta Platforms, Inc. | 8.76% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 8.72% | Equity (common) | US |
| MU | Micron Technology, Inc. | 7.39% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | SK hynix Inc. | 4.16% | Equity (common) | KR |
| INTC | Intel Corp. | 3.88% | Equity (common) | US |
| STX | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 3.28% | Equity (common) | IE |
| WDC | Western Digital Corp. | 3.21% | Equity (common) | US |
| SNDK | Sandisk Corp. | 3.07% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | MediaTek Inc. | 2.92% | Equity (common) | TW |
| MRVL | Marvell Technology, Inc. | 2.80% | Equity (common) | US |
| ISRG | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | 2.14% | Equity (common) | US |
| QCOM | QUALCOMM Inc. | 2.08% | Equity (common) | US |
| KYCCF | Keyence Corp. | 1.77% | Equity (common) | JP |
| SNOW | Snowflake Inc. | 1.74% | Equity (common) | US |
| ADBE | Adobe Inc. | 1.73% | Equity (common) | US |
| EQIX | Equinix, Inc. | 1.72% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Kioxia Holdings Corp. | 1.69% | Equity (common) | JP |
| — | Invesco Private Prime Fund | 1.47% | Short-term investment | US |
| CDNS | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 1.38% | Equity (common) | US |
| DELL | Dell Technologies Inc. | 1.15% | Equity (common) | US |
| DLR | Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 1.08% | Equity (common) | US |
| SNPS | Synopsys, Inc. | 0.93% | Equity (common) | US |
| ALAB | Astera Labs, Inc. | 0.91% | Equity (common) | US |
| ADSK | Autodesk, Inc. | 0.84% | Equity (common) | US |
| EMR | Emerson Electric Co. | 0.78% | Equity (common) | US |
| HPE | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. | 0.73% | Equity (common) | US |
| AME | AMETEK, Inc. | 0.67% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRDO | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. | 0.63% | Equity (common) | KY |
| NTAP | NetApp, Inc. | 0.57% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Invesco Private Government Fund | 0.57% | Short-term investment | US |
| ARM | ARM Holdings PLC | 0.57% | Equity (common) | GB |
| EA | Electronic Arts Inc. | 0.55% | Equity (common) | US |
| MSTR | Strategy Inc. | 0.53% | Equity (common) | US |
| MCHP | Microchip Technology Inc. | 0.51% | Equity (common) | US |
| GRMN | Garmin Ltd. | 0.49% | Equity (common) | CH |
| CRWV | CoreWeave, Inc. | 0.49% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Baidu, Inc. | 0.41% | Equity (common) | KY |
| NBIS | Nebius Group N.V. | 0.40% | Equity (common) | NL |
| RDDT | Reddit, Inc. | 0.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Wiwynn Corp. | 0.34% | Equity (common) | TW |
| — | Renesas Electronics Corp. | 0.33% | Equity (common) | JP |
| HXGBY | Hexagon AB | 0.32% | Equity (common) | SE |
| — | Nanya Technology Corp. | 0.31% | Equity (common) | TW |
| DASTF | Dassault Systemes | 0.29% | Equity (common) | FR |
| LSCC | Lattice Semiconductor Corp. | 0.29% | Equity (common) | US |
| ROKU | Roku, Inc. | 0.28% | Equity (common) | US |
| SMCI | Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 0.25% | Equity (common) | US |
| P | Everpure Inc. | 0.23% | Equity (common) | US |
Geographic Breakdown
Non-Equity Breakdown
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF ·
NPORT-P period 2026-07-31
(filed 2026-09-28)
Net assets:
$1.11B
· 103 total positions
· equity 100.90%
· non-equity 2.07%
Non-equity holdings
— 3 positions,
2.07% of NAV
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term investment | 2.07% | $22.9M | 3 |
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 7.93% | 3.77% | 6.08% | 5.93% |
| Feb | -- | 7.55% | -4.76% | -2.67% | 0.04% |
| Mar | -- | 0.40% | -7.20% | -8.45% | -5.08% |
| Apr | -- | -8.07% | -0.61% | 30.85% | 7.39% |
| May | -- | 7.96% | 9.29% | 25.82% | 14.36% |
| Jun | -- | 5.18% | 8.51% | 2.19% | 5.29% |
| Jul | -- | -5.51% | 4.69% | -13.90% | -4.91% |
| Aug | 4.16% | 2.56% | 2.62% | 2.82% | 3.04% |
| Sep | -5.67% | 7.36% | 7.22% | 12.10% | 5.25% |
| Oct | -3.73% | 0.74% | 10.81% | -10.12%* | -0.57% |
| Nov | 12.08% | 4.18% | -5.98% | -- | 3.43% |
| Dec | 6.89% | -5.71% | 2.91% | -- | 1.36% |
| Total | 13.32% | 25.26% | 33.51% | 41.85% | 28.48% |
* Only 4 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $98.68
SMA 50: $96.16
SMA 200: $82.47
Current: $92.37
EMA 12: $94.91
EMA 26: $96.53
MACD: -1.6216 | Signal: -1.3557
BEARISH
ADX (14): 27.40
TREND
+DI: 14.52
−DI: 39.30
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 38.68
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 17.85
Stoch %D: 14.46
Williams %R: -76.58
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $108.30
BB Lower: $89.06
NEUTRAL
OBV: 6,463,295
Vol SMA 20: 158,109
Vol ROC: 102.01%
ATR: $2.51
True Range: $1.60
HV 20: 27.5%
HV 30: 32.4%
HV 60: 34.0%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Recent news sentiment is neutral, with mixed headlines from AI ETFs and industry developments
- Technical indicators show a range-bound trend with a bearish MACD signal
- High volatility and beta indicate high risk, but options market pricing suggests a contained move
Primary Risks:
- Earnings misses or guidance disappointments could exacerbate the recent decline
- Regulatory changes or industry shifts could impact AI ETFs' performance
Investment Thesis:
IGPT is a high-risk, high-reward play in the AI ETF space. While recent news sentiment is neutral, technical indicators suggest a range-bound trend with potential for a contained move. Investors should consider position sizing and risk management strategies to mitigate potential losses.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
- Mixed headlines from AI ETFs and industry developments have not significantly impacted IGPT's price
- Neutral sentiment aligns with the current technical signal
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Range-bound
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bearish momentum
- Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral, range-bound
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower band: $87.49
- Middle band: $92.02
- Upper band: $96.54
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: 52.54 (neutral)
- MACD signal: Bearish (-0.06 / Signal: 0.10 / Histogram: -0.16)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, range-bound
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
1-5 recent headlines are neutral, with no significant impact on IGPT's price
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL
Catalyst Identification:
- None imminent; focus on technical signals and risk management strategies
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High-risk stock (beta 2.31 vs SPY)
Volatility Regime: High volatility - stock moves more than market
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: Low (14.9%)
- Current IV: 54.3%
- Expected Move: $5.97 (22 DTE)
- Volume Flow: Bullish (63 calls vs 26 puts)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: AI ETFs have been performing well recently, but IGPT's price has not reflected this
Institutional Activity: No significant institutional activity detected
Correlation Analysis: IGPT is highly correlated with the market (R-squared interpretation: 0.78)
Relative Valuation: IGPT is positioned within a trading range; no clear value or growth opportunities
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels:
- Lower band: $87.49
- Middle band: $92.02
- Upper band: $96.54
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Technical signals suggest a contained move; focus on risk management strategies
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- None imminent; focus on technical signals and risk management strategies
- Risk Management:
- Consider position sizing and stop-loss levels to mitigate potential losses
Please note that this analysis is based solely on the provided data and does not take into account any external factors or personal opinions.
Generated
News
All IGPT news →
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·22d ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·1mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·1mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·1mo ago
BenzingaT3·6mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·6mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·21mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·21mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·28mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 48
Page 1 of 5
IGPT Options Activity & IV Rank
IGPT IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 35.8%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $7.60
7-DTE Move: $7.60
Days to Exp: 30 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 8
Put Volume: 2
P/C Volume: 0.25
BULLISH
Call OI: 4
Put OI: 2
P/C OI: 0.5
Total OI: 6
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $3.98
ATM Put: $3.62
Call %: 4.3%
Put %: 3.9%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 197
Chain OI: 328
Last Updated: 10/21/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 36th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
36%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+1.00
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+1.00
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-1.00
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +1.00: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -1.00: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 7 ATM contracts, 0k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · ATM 35.9% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)28.1MediumOct 21
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$7.60Oct 21
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.3637
Alpha: 19.03%
Correlation: 0.7778
R-Squared: 60.5%
Stock Volatility: 38.6%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
IGPT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
3 filers$1.35M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $582.96K | 43.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $530.91K | 39.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $239.43K | 17.69% | 2026-06-30 |
1 filers$20.82K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $20.82K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
130.80K
SI % of Float
0.89%
Days to Cover
1.00
Short Vol Ratio
45.9%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21
Constituent Performance
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
Constituents
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|