Lands' End, Inc. Common Stock(LE)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $9.56 – $20.04
- YTD
- -19.05%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 4.68
- Straddle Price
- $2.20
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.27
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.58% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.08% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.66% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +32.7pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 68.7% |
| Book / Price | 136.9% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 47.9% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -2.5% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $11.48 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $11.45 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 162.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $110.76 | 35% | median 10.1× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $7.15 | 35% | median 5.5× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $35.47 | 7% | median 2.2× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $28.36 | 23% | median 0.7× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $11.48 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- RETAIL-FAMILY CLOTHING STORES (5651)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
Lands' End Inc is a United States-based digital retailer of solution-based apparel, swimwear, outerwear, accessories, footwear, home products, and uniforms. It offers products online at the website (www.landsend.com), through third-party distribution channels, its own company-operated stores, and third-party license agreements. Lands' End also offers products to businesses and schools, for their employees and students, through the Outfitters distribution channel. The company's operating segments consist of: U.S. eCommerce, Europe eCommerce, Outfitters, Third Party, Licensing, and Retail. The m…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.66% | 6 |
| Feb | -5.63% | 6 |
| Mar | +0.51% | 6 |
| Apr | -9.12% | 6 |
| May | -4.52% | 6 |
| Jun | +7.17% | 6 |
| Jul | +15.09% | 6 |
| Aug | -3.44% | 5 |
| Sep | -11.34% | 5 |
| Oct | +6.63% | 5 |
| Nov | -0.08% | 5 |
| Dec | +0.20% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-05 | After-Close | 9.14% | 7.31% | 0.80x | Within |
| 2025-03-20 | After-Close | 3.99% | 3.85% | 0.96x | Within |
| 2025-06-05 | After-Close | 15.10% | 10.63% | 0.70x | Within |
| 2025-09-09 | After-Close | 17.19% | 3.33% | 0.19x | Within |
| 2025-12-09 | After-Close | 8.78% | 1.17% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2026-03-19 | After-Close | 9.99% | 10.60% | 1.06x | Exceeded |
| 2026-06-09 | Pre-Market | 19.47% | 8.87% | 0.46x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 4.68
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 110.2%
- Straddle (30D)
- $2.20
- Straddle (7D)
- $1.40
- P/C Volume
- 0.27
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.50
- Correlation (SPY)
- 28.1%
- R²
- 0.08
- Ann. Volatility
- 67.4%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.6%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.49M | 33.73% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $1.46M | 32.94% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | Walleye Trading LLC | $463.09K | 10.46% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $420.38K | 9.49% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $356.31K | 8.05% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $157.36K | 3.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | CSS LLC/IL | $78.68K | 1.78% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $3.92M | 56.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $1.24M | 17.89% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | Jain Global LLC | $1.02M | 14.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $411.38K | 5.95% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $232.67K | 3.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | CSS LLC/IL | $82.05K | 1.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $11.24K | 0.16% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-15 | Charlie Cole | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +275,379 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-16 | Kym Maas | President, LE Consumer & CCO | Mixed | +7,221 | $12.41 | -$48.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | PETER L GRAY | PRES LE Licensing, CAO & GC | Mixed | +11,032 | $12.41 | -$132.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | BERNARD LOUIS III McCRACKEN | CFO and Treasurer | Mixed | +2,460 | $12.41 | -$27.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | Andrew J. McLean | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +39,098 | $12.41 | -$430.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | Alicia Uhlman Parker | Director | Award (A) | +707 | $11.40 | $8.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | Robert Galvin | Director | Award (A) | +1,343 | $11.40 | $15.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | Alicia Uhlman Parker | Director | Sell (S) | −288 | $45.00 | -$13.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | JOHN MCCLAIN | Director | Sell (S) | −840 | $45.00 | -$37.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | Josephine Linden | Director | Sell (S) | −3,482 | $45.00 | -$156.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | Gordon Hartogensis | Director | Sell (S) | −752 | $45.00 | -$33.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | Martin D. Christopher | EVP, Chief Technology Officer | Mixed | +11,884 | $14.34 | -$91.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | Robert Galvin | Director | Sell (S) | −2,966 | $45.00 | -$133.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | ELIZABETH LEYKUM | Director | Sell (S) | −935 | $45.00 | -$42.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | PETER L GRAY | PRES LE Licensing, CAO & GC | Mixed | +710 | $28.03 | -$651.8K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SPE I Partners, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 21,744,355 | $252.23M | $144.63M | 13 | 2017-10-03 |
| 2 | ESL PARTNERS, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 19,891,979 | $230.75M | $267.66M | 14 | 2021-02-16 |
| 3 | EDWARD S LAMPERT | 10%+ Owner | 17,938,248 | $208.08M | $10.15M | 9 | 2026-04-06 |
| 4 | RBS PARTNERS, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 17,805,807 | $206.55M | -$15.18M | 5 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5 | ESL INVESTMENTS, INC. | 10%+ Owner | 17,117,343 | $198.56M | $108.38M | 12 | 2021-11-03 |
| 6 | CRK PARTNERS LLC | 10%+ Owner | 15,648,629 | $181.52M | $162.01M | 2 | 2015-09-25 |
| 7 | SPE Master I, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 14,719,717 | $170.75M | $88.98M | 4 | 2017-08-14 |
| 8 | ESL INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 8,079,073 | $93.72M | $0 | 1 | 2015-07-07 |
| 9 | Jerome Griffith | Chief Executive Officer | 451,663 | $5.24M | -$829.9K | 27 | 2023-03-21 |
| 10 | Andrew J. McLean | Chief Executive Officer | 271,200 | $3.15M | -$761.3K | 16 | 2026-06-16 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 1.1 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.7 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8 |
| TTM Revenue | $1.3B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.3B |
| TTM EPS | $11.01 |
| ROE | 68.7% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.06 |