MHF Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund, Inc

XNYS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

MHF — —
Key stats
About
Exchange
XNYS
Market Cap
$0.1B
List Date
1988-11-18
CIK
0000830487
Homepage
https://www.franklintempleton.com

Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund Inc is a diversified closed-end management investment company. The company's objective is to seek high current income exempt from federal income taxes. It invests predominantly in intermediate and long-term municipal debt securities issued by state and local governments.

Fund profile
Expense ratio
—
Assets
$148M
shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
Trailing yield
—
Average daily volume
$785K
30 sessions
Holdings
—
Listed
Nov 18, 1988
NYSE
FrenzyCap ETF score
36
how it is built
Costn/a
Liquidity30
Scale43
Diversificationn/a

Moves with. US large-cap stocks (7% of its variance, beta 0.25); Long Treasuries (7% of its variance, beta 0.27). These factors explain 18% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.

Overlap toolAll High Yield Muni ETFs

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
HYDVanEck High Yield Muni ETF—0.32%$4.4B−4.5%compare
HYMBState Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF—0.35%$3.8B−6.5%compare
HIMUiShares High Yield Muni Active ETF—0.39%$2.6B−6.2%compare
BMOPBNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF—0.54%$1.8B—compare
FMHIFirst Trust Municipal High Income ETF—0.70%$1.0B−5.9%compare

The largest other funds in the High Yield Muni category.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Month'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan4.67%-7.13%4.17%1.70%2.75%0.29%1.07%
Feb-3.30%-3.85%-5.29%0.61%7.62%0.72%-0.58%
Mar3.72%-3.56%3.57%2.72%0.82%-1.00%1.05%
Apr-0.26%-4.01%-2.86%0.15%-2.70%-1.30%-1.83%
May4.36%3.90%-1.40%-2.95%-4.52%0.58%-0.00%
Jun3.94%-4.78%2.99%2.11%-0.14%1.60%0.95%
Jul-5.97%3.33%-0.76%2.63%-3.69%-3.21%-1.28%
Aug-0.85%-2.34%-3.83%1.28%1.76%-0.29%-0.71%
Sep-3.05%-6.63%-3.33%0.98%4.03%-10.63%-3.10%
Oct6.57%0.00%-2.12%-4.11%-2.56%9.97%*1.29%
Nov-1.53%9.52%4.29%4.03%-0.57%--3.15%
Dec-2.43%-3.63%0.78%-6.08%0.15%---2.24%
Total5.11%-18.67%-4.33%2.58%2.32%-4.33%-2.89%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $6.26
SMA 50: $6.50
SMA 200: $6.82
Current: $6.63
EMA 12: $6.42
EMA 26: $6.39
MACD: 0.0324 | Signal: 0.0711
BEARISH
ADX (14): 30.66
TREND
+DI: 23.97
−DI: 14.89

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 63.17
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 94.99
Stoch %D: 92.65
Williams %R: -6.45

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $6.64
BB Lower: $5.88
NEUTRAL
OBV: 949,535
Vol SMA 20: 140,474
Vol ROC: -82.92%
ATR: $0.15
True Range: $0.11
HV 20: 25.0%
HV 30: 24.0%
HV 60: 18.0%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: MHF

Executive Summary

Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10

Key drivers:

  • Technical signals are mixed, with a bearish MACD indicating potential short-term weakness
  • Low volatility suggests the stock is less reactive to market movements
  • No recent news headlines available to inform sentiment

Primary risks:

  • Potential for further price decline if technical indicators continue to deteriorate
  • Low trading volume and limited institutional interest may lead to increased price volatility in the future

Investment thesis: MHF appears to be stuck in a trading range, with neither technical nor fundamental drivers providing clear direction. A neutral assessment is warranted due to the mixed signals.

Recent news sentiment impact: As there are no recent news headlines available, this section will remain blank for now.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Short-term: BEARISH (1-4 weeks), Medium-term: NEUTRAL (1-3 months), Long-term: NEUTRAL (3-12 months)

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • SMA 20: $6.94
  • SMA 50: $6.98
  • SMA 200: $7.07

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: Neutral (45.14)
  • MACD signal: Bearish (-0.03 / Signal: -0.01 / Histogram: -0.03)
  • Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (signal line at the middle band)

Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: 62044.05, On-Balance Volume (OBV): 453682.00, Volume Rate of Change: 25.57%

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: None available

Sentiment Assessment: N/A

Catalyst Identification: N/A

Market Narrative: As there are no recent news headlines available, the market narrative remains unclear.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta 0.21 vs SPY)

Volatility Regime: Low volatility - stock moves less than market (stock volatility: 0.17)

Options Market Signals: N/A

Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20, SMA 50, and SMA 200.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: N/A

Institutional Activity: Low trading volume and limited institutional interest suggest cautious sentiment.

Correlation Analysis: MHF moves less than the market (R-squared: 0.23), indicating a low-correlated asset.

Relative Valuation: Position within a trading range, with no clear direction.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • Support at SMA 20 ($6.94)
  • Resistance at SMA 50 ($6.98)

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: N/A

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No imminent catalysts available

Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set below the support level at SMA 20, and position sizing considerations should prioritize risk management.

Overall, MHF appears to be stuck in a trading range, with mixed technical signals and no recent news headlines to inform sentiment. A neutral assessment is warranted due to the lack of clear direction.

Generated

MHF Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.3088
Alpha: -11.17%
Correlation: 0.3054
R-Squared: 9.3%
Stock Volatility: 12.9%
Market Volatility: 12.8%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own MHF
2 of 37 tracked investors
InvestorValueShare of their portfolioRankQ/Q sharesSource
Rockefeller Capital Management Family office
Rockefeller family
$724K
0.00%
#1888 of 4729-2.4%13F
Citadel Hedge fund
Ken Griffin
$147K
0.00%
#5618 of 6285new13F

Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions

MHF Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

49 filers5,392,350 shares$36.79M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Raymond James Financial, Inc. Custodian 1,003,312 $7.02M 19.09% — 2026-06-30
2 Bank of America Corp Custodian 586,427 $4.10M 11.16% — 2026-06-30
3 GUGGENHEIM CAPITAL LLC 465,604 $3.26M 8.86% — 2026-06-30
4 LPL Financial LLC Custodian 462,064 $3.23M 8.79% — 2026-06-30
5 Morgan Stanley Custodian 410,965 $2.88M 7.82% — 2026-06-30
6 TITLEIST ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC 454,670 $2.73M 7.43% — 2026-09-30
7 Hennion & Walsh Asset Management, Inc. 350,491 $2.11M 5.73% — 2026-09-30
8 Fiera Capital Corp 141,560 $990.92K 2.69% — 2026-06-30
9 Jones Financial Companies LLLP Custodian 137,750 $949.10K 2.58% — 2026-06-30
10 Van Eck Associates Corp 128,925 $902.48K 2.45% — 2026-06-30
11 Rockefeller Capital Management L.P. Custodian 103,500 $724.50K 1.97% — 2026-06-30
12 Ascentis Wealth Management, LLC Custodian 91,561 $640.94K 1.74% — 2026-06-30
13 Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc. 83,821 $587.00K 1.60% — 2026-06-30
14 Janney Montgomery Scott LLC 63,521 $445.00K 1.21% — 2026-06-30
15 MELFA WEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC. 63,214 $442.50K 1.20% — 2026-06-30
16 Summit Trail Advisors, LLC 61,146 $428.02K 1.16% — 2026-06-30
17 Royal Bank of Canada Custodian 50,424 $353.00K 0.96% — 2026-06-30
18 HighTower Advisors, LLC 47,540 $332.78K 0.90% — 2026-06-30
19 Stratos Wealth Partners, LTD. 46,300 $324.10K 0.88% — 2026-06-30
20 Quad-Cities Investment Group, LLC 45,451 $273.16K 0.74% — 2026-09-30
21 UBS Group AG Custodian 38,779 $271.45K 0.74% — 2026-06-30
22 Steward Partners Investment Advisory, LLC 36,795 $257.57K 0.70% — 2026-06-30
23 ALONGSIDE, LLC 36,365 $254.56K 0.69% — 2026-06-30
24 49 WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC 36,365 $254.56K 0.69% — 2026-06-30
25 Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Co 34,505 $241.53K 0.66% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

MHF Insider Trading (Form 4)

Latest: 2025-05-28
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2025-05-28 Anthony Grillo Director Buy (P) +1,500 $7.10 $10.7K EDGAR
2019-10-01 Paolo M Cucchi Director Sell (S) −3,000 $7.54 -$22.6K EDGAR
2010-11-19 William R Hutchinson Director Buy (P) +5,000 $7.31 $36.6K EDGAR
2010-02-19 William R Hutchinson Director Buy (P) +4,000 $7.56 $30.2K EDGAR
2008-11-25 William R Hutchinson Director Buy (P) +4,000 $6.07 $24.3K EDGAR
2008-07-18 William R Hutchinson Director Buy (P) +1,500 $7.89 $11.8K EDGAR
2008-07-16 William R Hutchinson Director Buy (P) +2,000 $7.71 $15.4K EDGAR
2007-03-26 Daniel P Cronin Director Buy (P) +2,300 $8.02 $18.4K EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.

MHF Insider Holdings

1 insider · @ $6.63
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 Anthony Grillo Director 1,500 $9.9K $10.7K 1 2025-05-28
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
1 ETF hold MHF
1 shown · $857.27K total exposure · 0.43% AUM-weighted avg weight
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
1 XMPT VanEck CEF Muni Income ETF VanEck 0.43% $857,270 $198.9M 2026-10-20
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.