OABIW OmniAb, Inc. Warrant
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMMERCIAL PHYSICAL & BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH (8731) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 89
- List Date
- 2022-11-01
- CIK
- 0001846253
- Headquarters
- Emeryville, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.omniab.com
OmniAb Inc licenses discovery research technology to pharmaceutical and biotech companies and academic institutions to enable the discovery of next-generation therapeutics. Its technology platform creates and screens diverse antibody repertoires and is designed to quickly identify optimal antibodies and other target-binding proteins for its partners' drug development efforts. At the heart of the OmniAb platform is what it calls Biological Intelligence, which powers the immune systems of proprietary, engineered transgenic animals to create optimized antibody candidates for human therapeutics.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 20.17% | 6.48% | -8.14% | 47.80% | 16.58% |
| Feb | -- | 1.66% | -19.83% | 40.77% | -9.39% | 3.30% |
| Mar | -- | -15.05% | -29.75% | -6.73% | -11.11% | -15.66% |
| Apr | -- | -27.25% | -4.43% | -14.09% | 56.46% | 2.67% |
| May | -- | 48.78% | 3.45% | -33.33% | 33.33% | 13.06% |
| Jun | -- | 26.60% | -29.65% | -27.87% | -11.21% | -10.53% |
| Jul | -- | 32.47% | 17.95% | 33.52% | 3.09% | 21.76% |
| Aug | -- | 13.45% | -0.02% | 14.89% | 476.50% | 126.20% |
| Sep | -- | -12.87% | 12.49% | 3.03% | 4.73% | 1.85% |
| Oct | -- | -32.72% | -6.25% | -1.79% | -0.64%* | -10.35% |
| Nov | 14.29% | -14.71% | -6.85% | -4.06% | -- | -2.83% |
| Dec | 39.24% | 63.49% | 13.18% | 19.90% | -- | 33.95% |
| Total | 59.14% | 74.70% | -45.31% | -11.03% | 1263.63% | 268.22% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report for OABIW based on the provided technical indicators, news headlines, risk metrics, and earnings information:
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key drivers: Strong trend momentum, positive news sentiment, and low volatility.
Primary risks: High beta (-2.83) indicating high correlation with market movements, which may lead to increased volatility.
Investment thesis: OABIW is in a strong uptrend, driven by positive news headlines and technical indicators. However, the stock's high beta poses a risk of significant price swings.
Recent news sentiment impact: Positive news sentiment from recent headlines has contributed to the stock's upward momentum.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Medium-term (1-3 months) uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels: Key levels include SMA 20 ($0.21), SMA 50 ($0.14), and upper Bollinger Band ($0.42)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral (69.37)
- MACD: Bullish (Histogram: 0.05, Signal: 0.02)
- Bollinger Bands: Squeeze
Volume Analysis: Volume is low, with a decline in trading activity over the past few weeks.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines from recent partnerships and developments have driven the stock's upward momentum.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is NEUTRAL, but with a slight lean towards positivity due to the recent news.
Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts identified, but ongoing partnerships and developments may continue to drive the stock's price.
Market Narrative: The market narrative suggests that OABIW is part of a broader trend in the healthcare sector, driven by advancements in biotechnology and AI.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High beta (-2.83) indicates high correlation with market movements, which may lead to increased volatility.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility level is low compared to historical levels (HV20: 553.0%, HV30: 472.5%).
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: SMA 20 ($0.21) and SMA 50 ($0.14) serve as support levels, while the upper Bollinger Band ($0.42) provides resistance.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The healthcare sector is performing well, with OABIW outperforming its peers.
Institutional Activity: Institutional trading activity is low, indicating a lack of significant buying or selling pressure.
Correlation Analysis: OABIW has a high correlation with the market (R-squared interpretation: 0.85), indicating that market movements may drive the stock's price.
Relative Valuation: OABIW is relatively undervalued compared to its peers and industry averages.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: SMA 20 ($0.21), SMA 50 ($0.14), upper Bollinger Band ($0.42)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Break above SMA 200 ($0.25) or below SMA 50 ($0.14) could trigger significant price movements.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific catalysts identified, but ongoing partnerships and developments may continue to drive the stock's price.
Risk Management: Consider setting a stop-loss level near SMA 20 ($0.21) to limit potential losses in case of a decline.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data and may not reflect real-time market conditions or future performance.
OABIW Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 85
Period: 252 trading days
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
OABIW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $13.53K | 55.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $10.93K | 44.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
OABIW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-18| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 | Steven C. Crouse | Director | Exer (M) | +20,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Philip J Gotwals | Director | Exer (M) | +20,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | John L Higgins | Director | Exer (M) | +20,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Jennifer R. Cochran | Director | Exer (M) | +20,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Carolyn R Bertozzi | Director | Exer (M) | +20,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-18 | Steven Love | Director | Exer (M) | +20,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-21 | Steven C. Crouse | Director | Exer (M) | +13,333 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-21 | Philip J Gotwals | Director | Exer (M) | +13,333 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-07 | Matthew W Foehr | President and CEO | Mixed | +17,215 | $1.49 | -$28.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-07 | Charles S Berkman | Chief Legal Officer | Mixed | +6,385 | $1.49 | -$10.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-07 | Kurt A Gustafson | Executive VP, Finance and CFO | Mixed | +6,629 | $1.49 | -$10.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Charles S Berkman | Chief Legal Officer | Mixed | +9,077 | $1.71 | -$16.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Matthew W Foehr | President and CEO | Mixed | +27,490 | $1.71 | -$52.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-18 | Kurt A Gustafson | Executive VP, Finance and CFO | Mixed | +9,449 | $1.71 | -$15.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Charles S Berkman | Chief Legal Officer | Mixed | +6,552 | $1.70 | -$11.9K | EDGAR |
OABIW Insider Holdings
9 insiders · @ $0.39| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matthew W Foehr | President and CEO | 4,420,492 | $1.71M | $7.27M | 33 | 2026-04-07 |
| 2 | John L Higgins | Director | 2,962,320 | $1.15M | $270.9K | 16 | 2026-06-18 |
| 3 | Charles S Berkman | Chief Legal Officer | 406,242 | $157.4K | -$278.5K | 20 | 2026-04-07 |
| 4 | Kurt A Gustafson | Executive VP, Finance and CFO | 261,483 | $101.3K | -$376.2K | 19 | 2026-04-07 |
| 5 | Jennifer R. Cochran | Director | 185,274 | $71.8K | $222.1K | 11 | 2026-06-18 |
| 6 | Carolyn R Bertozzi | Director | 113,308 | $43.9K | $0 | 10 | 2026-06-18 |
| 7 | Steven Love | Director | 91,666 | $35.5K | $36.5K | 7 | 2026-06-18 |
| 8 | Philip J Gotwals | Director | 33,333 | $12.9K | $0 | 4 | 2026-06-18 |
| 9 | Steven C. Crouse | Director | 33,333 | $12.9K | $0 | 4 | 2026-06-18 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $0 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 2 | ESIX State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 4 | PRFZ Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 5 | QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-Factor ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 6 | EES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | BBP Virtus Biotech Etf | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 8 | JSTC Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 9 | PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | SSPY Stratified LargeCap Index ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 12 | FNDA Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 13 | SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | Nport | 0.00% | — | — | 2026-05-31 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.