Relay Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock(RLAY)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
RLAY
$19.71
—
Snapshot
$19.71
After hours
$19.30
+0.00%
- 52-Week Range
- $3.02 – $20.79
- YTD
- +140.94%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 8.15
- Straddle Price
- $4.75
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 4.98
- Market Cap
- $4.2B
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.57% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.07% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.12% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +73.8pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -42.5% |
| Book / Price | 19.3% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 100.0% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -1998.5% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $15.88 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $18.94 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 100.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.2B |
| Market Cap | $3B |
Peers used for multiples: BBIO, CELC, CGON, COGT, IDYA, KYMR, LLY, RVMD
Model Conviction
99%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Aug 19, 2026
$23.26
α +20.3%
rank 88%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Sep 17, 2026
$24.49
α +26.7%
rank 75%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Oct 16, 2026
$25.25
α +30.6%
rank 71%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | $40.61 | 16% | median 11.0× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | $1.86 | 16% | median 27.5× · 5 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $15.88 | 67% | stability 80% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-07-21 · updated
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS, (NO DIAGNOSTIC SUBSTANCES) (2836)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $4.2B
Relay Therapeutics Inc is a clinical-stage precision medicine company transforming the drug discovery process and bringing life-changing therapies to patients. The Dynamo platform of the company integrates an array of leading-edge computational and experimental approaches designed to drug-protein targets that have previously been intractable or inadequately addressed. The company is advancing a pipeline of medicine candidates to address targets in precision oncology and genetic disease, including product candidates, RLY-8186, RLY-2608, RLY-4008 and others.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -2.44% | 6 |
| Feb | -2.55% | 6 |
| Mar | +0.77% | 6 |
| Apr | -1.07% | 6 |
| May | -6.76% | 6 |
| Jun | +10.98% | 6 |
| Jul | +8.26% | 6 |
| Aug | -1.72% | 5 |
| Sep | +2.08% | 5 |
| Oct | +1.82% | 5 |
| Nov | -6.62% | 5 |
| Dec | +9.35% | 5 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $19.05
SMA 50: $16.02
SMA 200: $10.84
Current: $19.47
EMA 12: $19.23
EMA 26: $18.23
MACD: 0.9994 | Signal: -0.1603
BULLISH
ADX (14): 36.09
TREND
+DI: 23.89
−DI: 10.65
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 58.74
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 59.16
Stoch %D: 59.91
Williams %R: -42.44
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $20.70
BB Lower: $17.41
NEUTRAL
OBV: 69,528,178
Vol SMA 20: 4,046,913
Vol ROC: -80.64%
ATR: $1.21
True Range: $0.76
HV 20: 59.9%
HV 30: 58.6%
HV 60: 65.7%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-07-22T00:00:00 – 2026-07-20T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
This precision oncology innovator, up nearly 500% in a year, just reported significant insider selling amid ongoing drug development efforts.
Earnings History
8 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Pre-Market | 32.09% | 3.39% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2024-11-06 | After-Close | 36.74% | 5.61% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2025-02-26 | After-Close | 72.67% | 12.28% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2025-05-05 | After-Close | 30.17% | 4.07% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2025-08-07 | After-Close | 64.67% | 1.58% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2025-11-06 | Pre-Market | 57.25% | 1.53% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2026-02-26 | Pre-Market | 23.98% | 0.87% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2026-05-05 | After-Close | 16.95% | 0.44% | 0.03x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 8.15
- IV Rank (7D)
- 8.15
- Avg IV
- 112.7%
- Straddle (30D)
- $4.75
- Straddle (7D)
- $4.75
- P/C Volume
- 4.98
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.73
- Correlation (SPY)
- 30.9%
- R²
- 0.10
- Ann. Volatility
- 71.0%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.7%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 173,772,381 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
5 filers$12.54M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caption Management, LLC | $10.55M | 84.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | Squadron Capital Management LLC | $1.49M | 11.90% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $259.69K | 2.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $165.17K | 1.32% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $72.64K | 0.58% | 2026-03-31 |
4 filers$841.77K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caption Management, LLC | $597.00K | 70.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $146.26K | 17.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $81.59K | 9.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $16.91K | 2.01% | 2026-03-31 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-07-08
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-08 | Sanjiv Patel | President and CEO | Mixed | −45,143 | $18.83 | -$922.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-08 | Thomas Catinazzo | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −17,717 | $18.69 | -$331.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-08 | Donald A Bergstrom | President, R&D | Sell (S) | −8,660 | $18.71 | -$162.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Peter Rahmer | See remarks | Mixed | −46,944 | $18.39 | -$933.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Donald A Bergstrom | President, R&D | Mixed | — | $10.53 | -$1.20M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Thomas Catinazzo | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | −17,717 | $11.25 | -$2.34M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-10 | Claire Mazumdar | Director | Grant (A) | +32,947 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | DOUGLAS S INGRAM | Director | Grant (A) | +32,947 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | LONNEL COATS | Director | Grant (A) | +32,947 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | LINDA A HILL | Director | Grant (A) | +32,947 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Habib J Dable | Director | Grant (A) | +32,947 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Alexis Borisy | Director | Grant (A) | +32,947 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-10 | Mark Murcko | Director | Grant (A) | +32,947 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-14 | Thomas Catinazzo | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −17,717 | $12.86 | -$227.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-09 | Thomas Catinazzo | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | −17,717 | $12.52 | -$248.1K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
17 insiders · @ $19.47
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SVF Pauling (Cayman) Ltd | 10%+ Owner | 27,904,963 | $543.31M | $0 | 1 | 2020-07-21 |
| 2 | TRV GP III, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 13,362,312 | $260.16M | $0 | 1 | 2021-01-14 |
| 3 | Third Rock Ventures GP III, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 12,799,078 | $249.20M | $0 | 1 | 2020-07-21 |
| 4 | Third Rock Ventures IV, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 9,767,382 | $190.17M | -$2.04B | 1 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5 | DAVID E SHAW | 10%+ Owner | 3,281,253 | $63.89M | $0 | 1 | 2020-07-21 |
| 6 | Sanjiv Patel | President and CEO | 1,303,253 | $25.37M | -$13.04M | 27 | 2026-07-08 |
| 7 | Mark Murcko | Director | 996,952 | $19.41M | -$248.8K | 8 | 2026-06-10 |
| 8 | Alexandria Venture Investments, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 968,365 | $18.85M | $0 | 1 | 2020-07-20 |
| 9 | Donald A Bergstrom | President, R&D | 409,897 | $7.98M | -$11.90M | 57 | 2026-07-08 |
| 10 | Brian Adams | Chief Legal Officer | 389,748 | $7.59M | -$1.82M | 45 | 2025-07-30 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-07-20
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
5 filings
· $10.0M notice value
· Last 90d:
6 filings
· $10.5M notice value
· 5 unique filers
· 83% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
THOMAS CATINAZZO (2, $3.7M) · SANJIV PATEL (1, $2.7M) · DONALD BERGSTROM (1, $1.8M) · SEKAR KATHIRESAN (1, $1.3M) · PETER RAHMER (1, $987K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-20 | SEKAR KATHIRESAN | Director | 66,055 | $1.29M | 2026-07-20 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | SANJIV PATEL | Director, Officer | 144,597 | $2.73M | 2026-07-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-30 | PETER RAHMER | Officer | 50,000 | $987.0K | 2026-06-30 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-22 | DONALD BERGSTROM | Officer | 110,646 | $1.76M | 2026-06-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-22 | THOMAS CATINAZZO | Officer | 204,880 | $3.25M | 2026-06-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-14 | THOMAS CATINAZZO | Officer | 37,234 | $492.2K | 2026-05-14 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-09 | THOMAS CATINAZZO | Officer | 53,151 | $525.7K | 2026-03-09 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-29 | Peter J Rahmer | Officer | 21,394 | $160.4K | 2025-10-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-29 | THOMAS J CATINAZZO | Officer | 3,558 | $11.5K | 2025-04-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-28 | THOMAS J CATINAZZO | Officer | 981 | $3.1K | 2025-04-28 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 6.8 |
| P/S Ratio | 406.4 |
| EV/EBITDA | -14.1 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.0B |
| TTM Net Income | $-0.3B |
| TTM EPS | $-1.56 |
| ROE | -42.5% |