Rambus Inc(RMBS)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $72.45 – $174.10
- YTD
- -14.07%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 0.89
- Straddle Price
- $13.15
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.32
- Market Cap
- $9.3B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.79% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.45 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.82% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.37% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | -0.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj -15bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 18.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +16.2% |
| DCF Horizon | 15 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 16.3% |
| Book / Price | 15.7% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 79.5% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 39.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 6/6 — compounder (15y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +15.1% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $99.16 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $91.58 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 26.9% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.1B |
| Market Cap | $9B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $92.28 | 27% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $154.73 | 12% | median 64.5× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $172.01 | 12% | median 53.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $203.88 | 2% | median 15.2× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $144.55 | 8% | median 19.0× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $99.16 | 39% | stability 73% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES (3674)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $9.3B
Rambus Inc is a semiconductor company providing chips and silicon IP for data-intensive computing systems, focusing on data center and artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure. The company is at the forefront of enabling the next era of AI-driven computing, addressing challenges of signal and power integrity at increasingly extreme data rates across the data center, edge, and client markets. It offers high-performance memory subsystems, with a balanced and diverse portfolio of products, IP, and patents that maximize performance and security in computationally intensive systems. The company …
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +1.56% | 23 |
| Feb | +1.18% | 23 |
| Mar | +2.67% | 23 |
| Apr | +0.70% | 23 |
| May | +2.58% | 23 |
| Jun | -0.24% | 23 |
| Jul | -3.08% | 23 |
| Aug | -2.39% | 23 |
| Sep | +5.70% | 24 |
| Oct | +1.76% | 23 |
| Nov | +8.49% | 23 |
| Dec | +3.27% | 23 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-28 | After-Close | 15.28% | 15.60% | 1.02x | Exceeded |
| 2025-02-03 | After-Close | 12.35% | 7.98% | 0.65x | Within |
| 2025-04-28 | After-Close | 13.26% | 2.60% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2025-07-28 | After-Close | 10.97% | 13.31% | 1.21x | Exceeded |
| 2025-10-27 | After-Close | 17.21% | 8.71% | 0.51x | Within |
| 2026-02-02 | After-Close | 18.91% | 14.41% | 0.76x | Within |
| 2026-04-27 | After-Close | 19.99% | 22.15% | 1.11x | Exceeded |
| 2026-07-27 | After-Close | 23.65% | 8.99% | 0.38x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 0.89
- IV Rank (7D)
- 66.3
- Avg IV
- 65.0%
- Straddle (30D)
- $13.15
- Straddle (7D)
- $8.60
- P/C Volume
- 0.32
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 3.58
- Correlation (SPY)
- 57.2%
- R²
- 0.33
- Ann. Volatility
- 80.2%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.8%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $68.37M | 21.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | PointState Capital LP | $46.46M | 14.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $45.66M | 14.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $39.57M | 12.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $28.38M | 9.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | SUMMIT PARTNERS PUBLIC ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC | $22.57M | 7.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $18.61M | 5.95% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $14.38M | 4.60% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Trading LLC | $8.18M | 2.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $6.90M | 2.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $4.41M | 1.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | PEAK6 LLC | $2.52M | 0.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.12M | 0.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP Custodian | $1.25M | 0.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $969.00K | 0.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Walleye Capital LLC | $955.73K | 0.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $637.15K | 0.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $451.32K | 0.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $371.67K | 0.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | SUMMIT SECURITIES GROUP LLC | $66.37K | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $26.55K | <0.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $62.04M | 38.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $40.74M | 25.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $19.51M | 12.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $17.73M | 11.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $5.06M | 3.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $3.34M | 2.09% | 2025-09-30 |
| 7 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $3.17M | 1.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP Custodian | $1.55M | 0.97% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.27M | 0.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $982.28K | 0.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $969.00K | 0.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $822.99K | 0.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $822.99K | 0.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | CREDIT INDUSTRIEL ET COMMERCIAL | $663.70K | 0.42% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $521.00K | 0.33% | 2025-09-30 |
| 16 | Walleye Trading LLC | $159.29K | 0.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Walleye Capital LLC | $66.37K | 0.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-10 | CHARLES KISSNER | Director | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $100.92 | -$504.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Emiko Higashi | Director | Sell (S) | −10,000 | $160.50 | -$1.60M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Necip Sayiner | Director | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $170.15 | -$850.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | ERIC B STANG | Director | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $146.00 | -$730.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Emiko Higashi | Director | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $157.57 | -$787.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | John Shinn | SVP, General Counsel | Sell (S) | −1,000 | $143.63 | -$143.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | XIANZHI SEAN FAN | EVP, COO | Sell (S) | −37,914 | $151.69 | -$5.75M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | STEVEN LAUB | Director | Sell (S) | −1,500 | $125.52 | -$188.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | Necip Sayiner | Director | Sell (S) | −9,824 | $130.18 | -$1.28M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-04 | Sumeet Gagneja | SVP, CFO | Award (A) | +41,320 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-27 | Meera Rao | Director | Sell (S) | −2,972 | $150.30 | -$446.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-15 | Meera Rao | Director | Sell (S) | −8,538 | $118.08 | -$1.01M | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-07 | John K Allen | Chief Accounting Officer | Tax (F) | −1,131 | $92.22 | -$104.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-03 | John K Allen | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +1,626 | $89.95 | -$103.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-03 | XIANZHI SEAN FAN | EVP, COO | Mixed | +12,318 | $89.95 | -$891.9K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIKE FARMWALD | Director | 2,394,849 | $204.66M | -$8.25M | 15 | 2012-10-03 |
| 2 | RONALD D BLACK | President & CEO | 976,371 | $83.44M | -$553.9K | 15 | 2018-02-05 |
| 3 | MARK HOROWITZ | Director | 791,584 | $67.65M | -$11.81M | 34 | 2011-11-02 |
| 4 | BRUCE DUNLEVIE | Director | 567,821 | $48.53M | $0 | 9 | 2011-06-14 |
| 5 | JAMES A MITAROTONDA | Director | 544,046 | $46.49M | $0 | 2 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6 | HAROLD HUGHES | CEO | 432,114 | $36.93M | $102.4K | 15 | 2013-04-25 |
| 7 | Luc Seraphin | President and CEO | 363,754 | $31.09M | -$25.79M | 66 | 2026-04-03 |
| 8 | RAHUL MATHUR | SVP, CFO | 242,447 | $20.72M | $0 | 11 | 2021-02-04 |
| 9 | LAURA STARK | SVP, GM ESD | 239,988 | $20.51M | -$4.19M | 39 | 2018-02-12 |
| 10 | XIANZHI SEAN FAN | EVP, COO | 168,458 | $14.40M | -$20.67M | 29 | 2026-05-26 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-07 | KISSNER CHARLES | Director | 5,000 | $504.6K | 2026-08-07 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | NECIP SAYINER | Officer | 5,000 | $850.8K | 2026-06-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | EMIKO HIGASHI | Director | 10,000 | $1.60M | 2026-06-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-01 | STANG FAMILY TRUST | Affiliate | 5,000 | $730.0K | 2026-06-01 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | EMIKO HIGASHI | Director | 5,000 | $787.9K | 2026-05-26 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-26 | XIANZHI S FAN | Officer | 37,914 | $5.75M | 2026-05-26 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-22 | JOHN SHINN | Officer | 1,000 | $143.6K | 2026-05-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-08 | NECIP SAYINER | Director | 9,824 | $1.28M | 2026-05-08 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-07 | STEVEN LAUB | Director | 1,500 | $188.3K | 2026-05-07 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-24 | MEERA RAO | Director | 2,972 | $446.7K | 2026-04-24 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | 0001193125-26-192210 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-27 | 0001193125-26-182076 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-24 | 0001193125-26-177140 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | 0001193125-26-048728 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-10 | 0001193125-26-044677 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-02 | 0001193125-26-033624 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-27 | 0001193125-25-251595 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-28 | 0000950170-25-099166 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-30 | 0001193125-25-107516 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-28 | 0000917273-25-000072 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-18 | 0001193125-26-057101 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-24 | 0000917273-25-000021 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-23 | 0000917273-24-000028 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-24 | 0000917273-23-000008 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-28 | 0000917273-22-000010 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-26 | 0000917273-21-000005 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-26 | 0000917273-20-000005 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-22 | 0000917273-19-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-23 | 0000917273-18-000007 | EDGAR |
| 2017-02-17 | 0000917273-17-000007 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | 0001193125-26-186931 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-28 | 0001193125-25-253472 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-29 | 0000950170-25-099621 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-29 | 0000917273-25-000075 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-30 | 0000917273-24-000107 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-31 | 0000917273-24-000100 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-02 | 0000917273-24-000088 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-03 | 0000917273-23-000028 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-04 | 0000917273-23-000022 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-05 | 0000917273-23-000014 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 39.1 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.2 |
| P/S Ratio | 12.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.6 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.8B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.2B |
| TTM EPS | $2.18 |
| ROE | 16.3% |