TATT TAT Technologies Ltd
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
TATT
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- AIRCRAFT ENGINES & ENGINE PARTS (3724) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.5B
- Employees
- 659
- List Date
- 1987-03-31
- CIK
- 0000808439
- Homepage
- https://www.tat-technologies.com
TAT Technologies Ltd provides solutions and services to the commercial and military aerospace and ground defense industries, focused mainly on three product areas and services: Thermal Management, Power and Actuation, and Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO). Its product portfolio includes heat exchangers, cooling systems, and mechanical aircraft accessories and systems such as pumps, valves, and turbine power units. Its operating segments are MRO services for aviation components, which derive key revenue, Original equipment manufacturing (OEM) of heat transfer solutions and aviation accesso…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 20.00% | -8.46% | 12.21% | 18.80% | 17.66% | 6.94% | 11.19% |
| Feb | 2.75% | 6.04% | 2.12% | 15.83% | -7.86% | 9.58% | 4.74% |
| Mar | -11.07% | -0.08% | 7.34% | -10.56% | 1.51% | -28.19% | -6.84% |
| Apr | -2.92% | -7.17% | -2.48% | 2.62% | 4.00% | -11.50% | -2.91% |
| May | 11.18% | -3.11% | 14.05% | 23.31% | -10.89% | 18.37% | 8.82% |
| Jun | 5.30% | -5.94% | 10.05% | -5.43% | 14.21% | 13.78% | 5.33% |
| Jul | 6.50% | 8.85% | -1.48% | 0.16% | 13.93% | -20.27% | 1.28% |
| Aug | -5.97% | 2.05% | 14.67% | 21.30% | 6.02% | -7.44% | 5.10% |
| Sep | -1.02% | -8.29% | 3.24% | 10.28% | 26.56% | -4.65% | 4.35% |
| Oct | 6.28% | 8.07% | -10.48% | 5.95% | -5.13% | -8.70% | -0.67% |
| Nov | 0.15% | 1.59% | 26.50% | 23.72% | -8.00% | 2.99%* | 7.82% |
| Dec | -0.33% | -14.38% | 4.53% | 13.63% | 14.48% | -- | 3.59% |
| Total | 31.05% | -21.42% | 107.85% | 193.93% | 77.92% | -33.64% | 59.28% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $34.00
SMA 50: $35.56
SMA 200: $41.86
Current: $38.66
EMA 12: $35.81
EMA 26: $35.09
MACD: 0.7259 | Signal: 0.7529
BEARISH
ADX (14): 22.79
WEAK TREND
+DI: 27.48
−DI: 17.41
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 61.64
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 79.92
Stoch %D: 80.72
Williams %R: -2.61
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $39.01
BB Lower: $28.98
NEUTRAL
OBV: 7,096,940
Vol SMA 20: 146,903
Vol ROC: 10.10%
ATR: $1.88
True Range: $1.67
HV 20: 73.9%
HV 30: 65.5%
HV 60: 55.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
All TATT news →
Record APU revenue and margins drive profitability surge amid aerospace aftermarket strength.
TATT Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.6250
Alpha: -2.17%
Correlation: 0.3572
R-Squared: 12.8%
Stock Volatility: 62.7%
Market Volatility: 13.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own TATT
3 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $7.4M | #1219 of 3138 | -24.2% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $230K | #3435 of 3716 | -83.1% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $2K | #4441 of 4729 | 0.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
TATT Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 37 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
TATT Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jun 22, 2026Directors 3
- Amos Malka · since Mar 18, 2026
- Eitan Oppenhaim · since Mar 18, 2026
- Sagit Manor · since Mar 18, 2026
Officers 5
- Igal Zamir · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Jason Lewandowski · Chief Operating Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Brian Rea · Chief Human Resources Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Ehud Ben-Yair · Chief Finance Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Matthew David Hinkle · Chief Accounting Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (8)
| Mar 18, 2026 | Sagit Manor became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Matthew David Hinkle became Chief Accounting Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Jason Lewandowski became Chief Operating Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Igal Zamir became Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Eitan Oppenhaim became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Ehud Ben-Yair became Chief Finance Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Brian Rea became Chief Human Resources Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Amos Malka became a director |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
TATT Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-06-18
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 | Maness Paul | Officer | 5,000 | $215.1K | 2026-06-17 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | Lewandowski Jason | Officer | 3,125 | $135.3K | 2026-06-01 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Lewandowski Jason | Officer | 3,125 | $115.8K | 2026-05-26 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-23 | Topaz Liron | Officer | 7,500 | $300.6K | 2025-12-22 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-15 | Ben-Yair Ehud | Officer | 8,720 | $346.0K | 2025-12-12 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-12 | Ben-Yair Ehud | Officer | 1,280 | $49.7K | 2025-12-11 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-02 | Lewandowski Jason | Officer | 3,125 | $120.1K | 2025-12-01 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-21 | Maness Paul | Officer | 10,000 | $387.1K | 2025-11-20 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-18 | Topaz Liron | Officer | 7,706 | $299.0K | 2025-09-17 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-18 | Ben-Yair Ehud | Officer | 7,650 | $296.8K | 2025-09-17 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
18 ETFs hold TATT
18 shown · $21.80M total exposure · 0.02% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $11.3M | $76.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 2 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $4.2M | $13.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 3 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $2.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.11% | $1.3M | $1.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 5 | ITEQ Amplify BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | Amplify | 0.95% | $906,796 | $95.4M | 2026-11-06 |
| 6 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $449,668 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | GWX State Street® SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.03% | $301,861 | $896.1M | 2026-11-05 |
| 8 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.01% | $214,341 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 9 | MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF | First Trust | 0.41% | $206,312 | $49.9M | 2026-11-06 |
| 10 | IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $168,535 | $19.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 11 | AVDS Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.02% | $59,934 | $365.7M | 2026-11-05 |
| 12 | OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | Invesco | 0.02% | $38,855 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 13 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $34,970 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.01% | $25,012 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 15 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.01% | $19,462 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 16 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.01% | $13,172 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 17 | HDG ProShares Hedge Replication ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $555 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 18 | RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETF | ProShares | 0.01% | $148 | — | 2026-11-06 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
TATT vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Common Stock | $256.9B | 271.8 | +19.5% | +84.9% | 78 |
| ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | $32.0B | — | — | +21.8% | 83 |
| TSEM Tower Semiconductor Ltd | $15.6B | — | — | +25.0% | 39 |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd | $14.7B | — | — | −19.5% | 40 |
| FROG JFrog Ltd. Ordinary Shares | $12.5B | — | +25.0% | +79.2% | 23 |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | $7.6B | — | +21.1% | +61.2% | 71 |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | $5.6B | — | +15.2% | +52.8% | 1 |
| KRNT Kornit Digital Ltd. | $724M | — | — | +23.2% | 62 |
| TATT TAT Technologies Ltd | $481M | — | — | −18.7% | — |
| Peer median | $13.6B | 271.8 | +20.3% | +38.9% | 51 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.