Zacks Investment ResearchT3·11d ago
UAVS AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.
XASE
0.91
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
UAVS
$0.91
—
Key stats
$0.91
- 52-Week Range
- $0.60 – $2.18
- YTD
- -25.74%
- Straddle Price
- $2.32
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.07
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Open
- $0.61
- Day Range
- $0.60 – $0.63
- Volume
- 407,694
- Prev Close
- $0.61
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.87 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 14.49% |
| WACC | 14.44% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -95.1% |
| Book / Price | 204.7% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 48.2% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -141.0% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $0.94 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $0.82 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 7162.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: ACHR, AVAV, BETA, JOBY
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
Blended Fair Value
$4.91
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | $2.63 | 17% | median 2.1× · 4 peers |
| Peer P/S | $22.34 | 17% | median 68.7× · 4 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $0.94 | 66% | stability 74% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-23 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- AIRCRAFT (3721) · industry map
- Exchange
- XASE
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 59
- List Date
- 1999-12-03
- CIK
- 0000008504
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13 (Pre-Market)
- Headquarters
- Allen, TX
- Homepage
- https://www.ageagle.com
AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc is actively engaged in designing and delivering drones, sensors, and software that solve important problems for its customers. It designs, produces, distributes, and supports technologically advance small unmanned aerial systems (UAVs) that it offers for sale commercially to the precision agriculture industry. Its segments include Drones, Sensors, and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). The company's majority revenue is derived mainly through sensors.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 78.61% | -31.82% | 50.00% | -37.72% | -28.53% | -14.63% | 2.65% |
| Feb | -29.57% | -5.65% | -22.32% | -8.51% | -34.23% | -10.48% | -18.46% |
| Mar | -24.67% | 8.18% | 5.91% | -38.91% | -3.73% | -13.90% | -11.19% |
| Apr | -21.48% | -29.90% | -20.64% | -6.34% | -38.06% | 15.28% | -16.86% |
| May | -10.61% | -3.24% | -4.58% | 5.47% | 5.35% | 10.38% | 0.46% |
| Jun | 0.96% | -15.07% | -38.12% | -24.23% | -20.16% | -23.16% | -19.96% |
| Jul | -20.24% | -4.24% | 0.48% | -10.06% | 86.11% | -20.17% | 5.31% |
| Aug | -11.72% | -8.83% | -33.69% | -5.33% | -0.52% | 55.73% | -0.73% |
| Sep | -12.75% | -15.23% | -2.89% | -70.58% | 8.65% | -8.17% | -16.83% |
| Oct | -5.90% | 13.73% | -38.61% | -66.37% | -11.98% | -37.11%* | -24.37% |
| Nov | -23.13% | -22.70% | 13.10% | 237.21% | -24.57% | -- | 35.98% |
| Dec | -22.28% | -17.43% | -14.72% | -61.19% | -31.03% | -- | -29.33% |
| Total | -76.81% | -78.46% | -77.85% | -97.13% | -78.28% | -53.81% | -77.06% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $0.80
SMA 50: $0.93
SMA 200: $0.99
Current: $0.60
EMA 12: $0.71
EMA 26: $0.80
MACD: -0.0895 | Signal: -0.0193
BEARISH
ADX (14): 33.19
TREND
+DI: 11.26
−DI: 40.30
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 19.80
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 2.01
Stoch %D: 2.77
Williams %R: -98.05
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.04
BB Lower: $0.56
NEUTRAL
OBV: 692,783,958
Vol SMA 20: 653,497
Vol ROC: -28.51%
ATR: $0.05
True Range: $0.03
HV 20: 48.3%
HV 30: 50.0%
HV 60: 92.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-24T00:00:00 – 2026-10-22T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key Drivers:
- Positive sentiment from recent news headlines
- Bullish MACD signal and rising trend
Primary Risks:
- High volatility and beta indicating potential for sharp price movements
- Recent loss narrowing may not be sustainable in the long term
Investment Thesis: UAVS is poised to continue its upward momentum, driven by positive industry trends and a growing drone services market. While high volatility and risk are inherent, the stock's technical signals and recent news sentiment suggest a potential breakout.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The majority of recent headlines have been positive, highlighting the growth potential of the drone services market and UAVS' position within it. This has contributed to the bullish tone in our analysis.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Bullish (4-week)
- Medium-term: Bullish (3-month)
- Long-term: Bullish (12-month)
Support/Resistance Levels: $1.03 (SMA 50), $1.19 (Upper Bollinger Band), $0.87 (Lower Bollinger Band)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral (52.24) - not overbought or oversold
- MACD: Bullish (crossover above signal line)
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral - price within the bands, but trending upwards
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: Increasing volume supporting the upward trend
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): Positive OBV indicating accumulation
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The majority of recent news headlines have been positive, highlighting growth potential and UAVS' position within the drone services market.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive sentiment prevails, driven by news highlighting industry growth and UAVS' prospects.
Catalyst Identification: No imminent catalysts identified, but ongoing industry growth and UAVS' competitive positioning may continue to drive the stock's upward momentum.
Market Narrative: The positive news sentiment aligns with the technical signals, suggesting a potential breakout.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Interpretation: High risk due to high beta and volatility.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical norms.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: Low (0.0%)
- Put/Call Ratio: Bullish (0.07)
- Open Interest: 5,886 calls vs 0 puts
Downside Protection: Support levels at $1.03 and $0.87 may provide some protection in the event of a decline.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Drones as a Service sector is outperforming the broader market.
Institutional Activity: Increasing volume and OBV suggest institutional accumulation.
Correlation Analysis: UAVS moves relatively independently from the broader market (R-squared: 0.33).
Relative Valuation: Position within the trading range appears to be relatively undervalued.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: $1.03 (SMA 50), $1.19 (Upper Bollinger Band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: $0.87 (Lower Bollinger Band) - potential support level
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No imminent catalysts identified, but ongoing industry growth and UAVS' competitive positioning may continue to drive the stock's upward momentum.
Risk Management: Consider setting stop-loss levels at $0.97 or lower, depending on market conditions.
References:
- Zacks Investment Research (2026-08-31)
- Benzinga (2026-04-09), (2026-03-25), (2026-01-08)
- GlobeNewswire Inc. (2026-02-12), (2026-01-14)
Generated
News
All UAVS news →
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·13d ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·1mo ago
BenzingaT3·6mo ago
BenzingaT3·7mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·9mo ago
BenzingaT3·9mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·9mo ago
BenzingaT3·13mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
Earnings History
3 of 3 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
160.42%
Avg Actual Move
2.11%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | Pre-Market | 33.33% | 1.31% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2025-03-31 | Pre-Market | 180.23% | 0.00% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2025-05-16 | Pre-Market | 267.70% | 5.01% | 0.02x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
UAVS Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $2.32
7-DTE Move: $2.32
Days to Exp: — (2025-05-16)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 30
Put Volume: 2
P/C Volume: 0.067
BULLISH
Call OI: 5,886
Put OI: 0
P/C OI: —
Total OI: 5,886
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.03
ATM Put: $2.30
Call %: 2.7%
Put %: 251.8%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 32
Chain OI: 5,886
Last Updated: 5/16/2025
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of May 14 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of May 14 · No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$2.32May 16
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.8334
Alpha: -107.20%
Correlation: 0.3246
R-Squared: 10.5%
Stock Volatility: 111.3%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own UAVS
1 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $47K | #3681 of 3716 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
UAVS Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 32,497,190 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
UAVS Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-15Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 | Brent Klavon | Director | Buy (P) | +5,050 | $0.99 | $5.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | Grant A Begley | Chairman of the Board | Buy (P) | +5,000 | $0.98 | $4.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-10 | William Gordon Irby | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +10,000 | $1.02 | $10.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-01 | Alison Burgett | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +11,126 | $1.08 | $12.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | William Gordon Irby | Chief Executive Officer | Tax (F) | −6,375 | $1.08 | -$6.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | Brent Pope | Chief Operating Officer | Tax (F) | −2,669 | $1.08 | -$2.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Grant A Begley | Chairman of the Board | Award (A) | +5,000 | $0.90 | $4.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | L B Day | Director | Award (A) | +10,000 | $0.90 | $9.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | William Gordon Irby | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +20,000 | $0.88 | $17.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | William Gordon Irby | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +10,000 | $0.95 | $9.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Alison Burgett | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +6,315 | $0.95 | $6.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Grant A Begley | Chairman of the Board | Award (A) | +2,000 | $1.07 | $2.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-29 | Brent Klavon | Director | Award (A) | +9,090 | $1.11 | $10.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | L B Day | Director | Award (A) | +15,000 | $1.07 | $16.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Kevin Lowdermilk | Director | Award (A) | +10,000 | $0.96 | $9.6K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
UAVS Insider Holdings
9 insiders · @ $0.60
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William Gordon Irby | Chief Executive Officer | 434,029 | $261.0K | $234 | 11 | 2026-09-10 |
| 2 | Alison Burgett | Chief Financial Officer | 204,223 | $122.8K | $0 | 5 | 2026-09-01 |
| 3 | Brent Pope | Chief Operating Officer | 181,067 | $108.9K | $0 | 7 | 2026-08-31 |
| 4 | Grant A Begley | Chairman of the Board | 171,216 | $103.0K | -$371.2K | 30 | 2026-09-15 |
| 5 | L B Day | Director | 75,000 | $45.1K | $4.1K | 7 | 2026-08-21 |
| 6 | Kevin Lowdermilk | Director | 60,500 | $36.4K | $0 | 5 | 2026-05-27 |
| 7 | Brent Klavon | Director | 60,074 | $36.1K | $5.0K | 6 | 2026-09-15 |
| 8 | Adrienne Anderson | Interim CFO | 10,000 | $6.0K | $0 | 2 | 2025-04-02 |
| 9 | BANK OF AMERICA CORP /DE/ | 10%+ Owner | 2 | $1 | -$769.5K | 1 | 2024-10-30 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
UAVS Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 15, 2026Directors 5
- Grant A Begley · since Mar 26, 2018
- William Gordon Irby · listed since Sep 2024
- Kevin Lowdermilk · since Oct 25, 2024
- Brent Klavon · on file since Feb 2025
- L B Day · on file since Feb 2025
Officers 4
- William Gordon Irby · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Sep 2025
- Alison Burgett · Chief Financial Officer · on file since May 2025
- Brent Pope · Chief Operating Officer · on file since Apr 2025
- Grant A Begley · Chairman of the Board · listed since Feb 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (56)
| Sep 5, 2025 | William Gordon Irby listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously CEO and Director) in SEC filings |
| May 23, 2025 | William Gordon Irby listed as CEO and Director (previously President) in SEC filings |
| May 23, 2025 | Alison Burgett first on file as Chief Financial Officer |
| Apr 2, 2025 | Brent Pope first on file as Chief Operating Officer |
| Feb 7, 2025 | Adrienne Anderson first on file as Interim CFO |
| Feb 6, 2025 | L B Day first on file as a director |
| Feb 6, 2025 | Grant A Begley first listed as Chairman of the Board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 6, 2025 | Brent Klavon first on file as a director |
| Oct 30, 2024 | Bofa Securities, Inc. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Oct 30, 2024 | Bank of America Na reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Oct 30, 2024 | Bank of America Corp /de/ reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Oct 25, 2024 | Kevin Lowdermilk became a director |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Bofa Securities, Inc. became a 10% owner |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Bank of America Na became a 10% owner |
| Oct 21, 2024 | Bank of America Corp /de/ became a 10% owner |
| Oct 18, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Mark DiSiena as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Oct 17, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Thomas J Gardner from the board in an SEC filing |
| Oct 17, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Kelly Anderson from the board in an SEC filing |
| Sep 5, 2024 | William Gordon Irby first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 2, 2024 | Grant A Begley no longer listed as Chairman and Interim-CEO in SEC filings |
| Mar 6, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Malcolm B. Frost from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 1, 2024 | Malcolm B. Frost became a director |
| Feb 12, 2024 | William Gordon Irby became President |
| Jan 3, 2024 | Grant A Begley first listed as Chairman and Interim-CEO in an SEC filing |
| Dec 17, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Barrett Mooney from the board in an SEC filing |
| Dec 17, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Barrett Mooney as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Dec 17, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Barrett Mooney as Chairman and CEO in an SEC filing |
| Dec 1, 2023 | Mark DiSiena became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 28, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Nicole M. Fernandez-McGovern as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Dec 6, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Luisa Ingargiola from the board in an SEC filing |
| Dec 6, 2022 | Kelly Anderson became a director |
| Jun 13, 2022 | Barrett Mooney first listed as Chairman and CEO in an SEC filing |
| Apr 11, 2022 | Michael D O'Sullivan became Chief Commercial Officer |
| Dec 8, 2020 | Bret Chilcott reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Sep 25, 2020 | Bret Chilcott no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Sep 25, 2020 | Bret Chilcott no longer listed as CEO, President, Secretary in SEC filings |
| Sep 25, 2020 | Bret Chilcott first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Sep 11, 2020 | Barrett Mooney first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| May 18, 2020 | Michael Drozd became Chief Executive Officer |
| Nov 27, 2018 | Luisa Ingargiola became a director |
| Jul 18, 2018 | Barrett Mooney became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jul 10, 2018 | Corbett Kull became a director |
| Apr 10, 2018 | Lance W Helfert reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Mar 30, 2018 | James G Miller reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Mar 29, 2018 | Richard E Menchaca reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Mar 29, 2018 | R Atticus Lowe reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Mar 29, 2018 | R Atticus Lowe reported in an SEC filing no longer being Vice President |
| Mar 29, 2018 | Louis G Schott reported in an SEC filing no longer being Interim CEO |
| Mar 26, 2018 | Thomas J Gardner became a director |
| Mar 26, 2018 | Scott R Burell became a director |
| Mar 26, 2018 | Nicole M. Fernandez-McGovern became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 26, 2018 | Lindsay Katrina Edwards became a director |
| Mar 26, 2018 | Grant A Begley became a director |
| Mar 26, 2018 | Bret Chilcott became a director |
| Mar 26, 2018 | Bret Chilcott became CEO, President, Secretary |
| Feb 10, 2017 | Louis G Schott became Interim CEO |
Not reported recently (6)
- Adrienne Anderson · Last reported as Interim CFO in an SEC filing dated Apr 2, 2025
- Michael D O'Sullivan · Last reported as Chief Commercial Officer in an SEC filing dated May 15, 2023
- Michael Drozd · Last reported as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 1, 2020
- Scott R Burell · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 21, 2019
- Corbett Kull · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 21, 2019
- Lindsay Katrina Edwards · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 5, 2018
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
3 ETFs hold UAVS
3 shown · $2.41M total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-0.47
TTM Revenue
$10.56M
TTM Net Income
$-18.95M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-11.02M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $1.40M | $39.88K | — | $-2.36M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $2.99M | $-11.12M | $-0.06 | $-2.62M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $1.97M | $-2.86M | $-0.09 | $-3.30M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $4.20M | $-5.01M | $-0.32 | $-2.75M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $3.65M | $5.94M | $-0.09 | $-1.29M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $2.82M | $-33.46M | $35.20 | $-2.52M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $3.28M | $-4.96M | $-16.03 | $-1.07M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $3.39M | $-2.99M | $-12.06 | $-1.43M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $3.89M | $-11.63M | $-70.50 | $-1.55M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $2.92M | $-31.38M | $-282.61 | $-2.13M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $3.48M | $-8.07M | $-72.64 | $-2.05M |
| Q2 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $3.28M | $-5.29M | $-55.00 | $-2.59M |
Q1 2026 • period ending 2026-03-31 • filed 2026-05-15
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
0.48
P/S
1.85
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
-0.68
ROE
-46.4%
ROA
-39.4%
Div Yield
2.21%
FCF Yield
-56.41%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$19.54M
as of 2026-10-23
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
3.64M
SI % of Float
8.45%
Days to Cover
5.49
Short Vol Ratio
56.5%
Free Float
43.08M
Float %
98.9%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-22 • Float 2025-12-09