XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF
ETF 52.59 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $38.33 – $61.09
- YTD
- +22.24%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 68.65
- Straddle Price
- $4.40
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.57
- Open
- $51.61
- Day Range
- $51.61 – $52.85
- Volume
- 10,779
- Prev Close
- $50.96
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2024-08-01
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- 0.35% prospectus, filed Sep 25, 2026
- Assets
- $141M shares × price, Nov 6, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 0.43% paid semi-annual
- Average daily volume
- $709K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 104 top 10 are 43.7%
- Listed
- Aug 1, 2024 Nasdaq
- Tracking difference
- -0.37 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2026
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (44% of its variance, beta 1.08); Emerging markets over US (23% of its variance, beta 0.57); Value over growth (16% of its variance, beta -0.36). These factors explain 86% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The fund seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data TM Index. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 104 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll AI & Robotics ETFs
- Aug 2026
- $0 latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$21M +12.4% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$56M +32.1% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Aug 2026 | $0 |
| Jul 2026 | +$3.2M |
| Jun 2026 | +$18M |
| May 2026 | +$3.2M |
| Apr 2026 | $0 |
| Mar 2026 | $0 |
| Feb 2026 | +$12M |
| Jan 2026 | +$8K |
| Dec 2025 | +$12M |
| Nov 2025 | $0 |
| Oct 2025 | +$2.1M |
| Sep 2025 | +$5.0M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 27 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIQGlobal X Funds Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 54% | 0.68% | $9.1B | +9.2% | compare |
| GPTYYieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 52% | 1.06% | $102M | −27.9% | compare |
| IVESDan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 52% | 0.75% | $986M | +0.9% | compare |
| TECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF | 50% | 0.30% | $466M | +14.5% | compare |
| IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 50% | 0.37% | $9.6B | +7.9% | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
- Holdings vs fair value
- +5.3% 36% under, 33% over · 86% covered
- Price / earnings
- 24.9 6% loss-making · 83% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 5.3 · 4.2 revenue growth +15.4%
- Above 200-day average
- 46% 30% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 2.2% of float, weighted · 2.8 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 8% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 68% net selling
- 13F holders
- +1.4% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 3.7% of weight in 7 days; 19.5% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decrease | MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 8.98% | 3.58% | −58.2% |
| Decrease | SK HYNIX INC | 7.65% | 3.09% | −47.0% |
| Decrease | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD | 8.27% | 3.80% | −47.2% |
| New position | WMTWALMART INC | — | 3.99% | — |
| New position | AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | — | 3.50% | — |
| Increase | MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 3.05% | 5.87% | +77.0% |
| Decrease | INTCINTEL CORP | 4.89% | 2.76% | −25.0% |
| New position | NOWSERVICENOW INC | — | 1.27% | — |
| Increase | METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.14% | 4.38% | +60.1% |
| Increase | NVDANVIDIA CORP | 3.71% | 4.75% | +27.1% |
30 new, 21 exited, 12 increased and 13 decreased between the fund's two latest holdings reports; turnover 24.9%. Full holdings and history
- Authorized participants
- 6 active of 24 with agreements; top 3 did 80%
- Created · redeemed
- $69M · $10M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 99% creations 81% in kind
- Creation unit
- 10,000 shares
- Securities lending
- 0.01% of assets on loan on average; earned 0.1 bp
- Return vs index
- -0.37 pts after fees; -0.02 before; daily s.d. 0.09
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 | 2026-06-26 | $0.0982 | CD |
| 2025-12-19 | 2025-12-29 | $0.1225 | CD |
| 2025-06-20 | 2025-06-27 | $0.1086 | CD |
| 2024-12-20 | 2024-12-30 | $0.0280 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | MICROSOFT CORP | 5.87% | Equity (common) | US |
| NVDA | NVIDIA CORP | 4.75% | Equity (common) | US |
| AAPL | APPLE INC | 4.72% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMZN | AMAZON.COM INC | 4.70% | Equity (common) | US |
| META | META PLATFORMS INC | 4.38% | Equity (common) | US |
| GOOGL | ALPHABET INC | 4.09% | Equity (common) | US |
| WMT | WALMART INC | 3.99% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD | 3.80% | Equity (common) | KR |
| PLTR | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | 3.73% | Equity (common) | US |
| CSCO | CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 3.63% | Equity (common) | US |
| BAC | BANK OF AMERICA CORP | 3.63% | Equity (common) | US |
| MU | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 3.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMD | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 3.50% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | SK HYNIX INC | 3.09% | Equity (common) | KR |
| INTC | INTEL CORP | 2.76% | Equity (common) | US |
| PANW | PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 2.60% | Equity (common) | US |
| BABA | ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD | 2.59% | Equity (common) | KY |
| DELL | DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC | 2.48% | Equity (common) | US |
| ORCL | ORACLE CORP | 2.44% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | SAP SE | 2.32% | Equity (common) | DE |
| CRWD | CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 1.97% | Equity (common) | US |
| ANET | ARISTA NETWORKS INC | 1.87% | Equity (common) | US |
| IBM | INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.83% | Equity (common) | US |
| VZ | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC | 1.74% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRM | SALESFORCE INC | 1.72% | Equity (common) | US |
| T | AT&T INC | 1.50% | Equity (common) | US |
| NOW | SERVICENOW INC | 1.27% | Equity (common) | US |
| WDC | WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 1.16% | Equity (common) | US |
| SNOW | SNOWFLAKE INC | 1.09% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | ACCENTURE PLC | 0.96% | Equity (common) | IE |
| ADBE | ADOBE INC | 0.95% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY COMPANY LTD | 0.92% | Equity (common) | TW |
| FTNT | FORTINET INC | 0.85% | Equity (common) | US |
| INTU | INTUIT INC | 0.82% | Equity (common) | US |
| HPE | HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY | 0.53% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | CAMBRICON TECHNOLOGIES CORP LTD | 0.47% | Equity (common) | CN |
| — | NEC CORP | 0.38% | Equity (common) | JP |
| — | FUJITSU LTD | 0.38% | Equity (common) | JP |
| TEAM | ATLASSIAN CORP | 0.37% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | HYGON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO LTD | 0.36% | Equity (common) | CN |
| MDB | MONGODB INC | 0.32% | Equity (common) | US |
| CIEN | CIENA CORP | 0.32% | Equity (common) | US |
| NTAP | NETAPP INC | 0.28% | Equity (common) | US |
| TWLO | TWILIO INC | 0.27% | Equity (common) | US |
| ZM | ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS INC | 0.25% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | DWS GOVERNMENT MONEY MARKET SERIES INSTITUTIONAL SHARES | 0.24% | Short-term investment | US |
| P | EVERPURE INC | 0.22% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | NAVER CORP | 0.22% | Equity (common) | KR |
| OKTA | OKTA INC | 0.22% | Equity (common) | US |
| ZS | ZSCALER INC | 0.20% | Equity (common) | US |
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 3.73% | 1.34% | 2.54% |
| Feb | -- | -2.26% | -2.96% | -2.61% |
| Mar | -- | -5.19% | -6.32% | -5.76% |
| Apr | -- | 1.29% | 16.98% | 9.13% |
| May | -- | 8.03% | 21.02% | 14.52% |
| Jun | -- | 7.84% | -5.46% | 1.19% |
| Jul | -- | 2.45% | -5.40% | -1.48% |
| Aug | 6.51% | 2.56% | 4.72% | 4.60% |
| Sep | 6.37% | 8.13% | 5.36% | 6.62% |
| Oct | 0.88% | 5.60% | -8.42% | -0.65% |
| Nov | 6.47% | -5.70% | -0.73%* | 0.01% |
| Dec | -2.51% | 2.20% | -- | -0.15% |
| Total | 18.63% | 31.15% | 17.00% | 22.26% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BULLISH (confidence level: 8/10)
Key drivers:
- Bullish MACD signal
- Increasing trend strength in ADX/DMI indicators
- Positive news sentiment from recent headlines
Primary risks:
- High volatility, indicated by beta and historical volatility metrics
- Potential overbought condition, as RSI is near neutral territory
Investment thesis: XAIX has a strong potential for short-term gains due to the confluence of positive technical signals and encouraging news sentiment. However, high volatility poses a significant risk, and investors should consider implementing risk management strategies.
Recent news sentiment impact: The overall sentiment analysis suggests a mix of negative and positive headlines, with no dominant theme. This neutral sentiment contributes to the bullish assessment, as XAIX's price action is driven more by technical factors than market narratives.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish; Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish; Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($59.13)
- Support: Lower Bollinger Band ($50.61)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: 51.00 (neutral)
- MACD signal: Bullish
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral
Volume Analysis: Volume trends suggest institutional interest, with an increase in volume over the past few trading sessions.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The news headlines indicate a mix of positive and negative sentiment, but overall, they do not strongly contradict the technical signals.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (2/3 positive, 1/3 negative)
Catalyst Identification: No immediate catalysts are identified, but the ETF's performance could be influenced by the broader market and macroeconomic trends.
Market Narrative: The news sentiment does not strongly contradict the technical signals, which suggests a relatively neutral market narrative.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk (beta: 1.66)
Volatility Regime: High volatility regime (historical volatility: 36.4%)
Options Market Signals: IV rank: Medium; Put/call ratios: Bullish sentiment
Downside Protection: Support levels: Lower Bollinger Band ($50.61); Risk management considerations: stop-loss orders and position sizing.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: XAIX is outperforming the broader market (sector relative strength).
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is increasing, as suggested by volume trends.
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation suggests a moderate correlation with the broader market.
Relative Valuation: XAIX is trading within a relatively narrow range, with no clear overvaluation or undervaluation.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support: Lower Bollinger Band ($50.61); Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($59.13)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Break above the upper Bollinger Band could trigger a significant move; break below the lower Bollinger Band would indicate a more substantial downturn.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No immediate catalysts are identified, but market trends and earnings announcements could influence the ETF's performance in the near term.
Risk Management: Implement stop-loss orders and consider position sizing to manage risk in this high-volatility environment.
XAIX Options Activity & IV Rank
XAIX IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow · All expiries
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 36th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
XAIX Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 21 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|