C3.ai, Inc.(AI)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
AI
$8.15
—
Snapshot
$8.15
- 52-Week Range
- $7.67 – $27.90
- YTD
- -40.73%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 17.75
- Straddle Price
- $1.22
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.05
- Market Cap
- $1.3B
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.60% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.10% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 10.12% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +51.3pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -72.0% |
| Book / Price | 57.4% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 30.9% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -76.8% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $9.61 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $8.95 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 141.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.1B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
Peers used for multiples: CDNS, CRM, CRWD, MSFT, NET, NOW, ORCL, PLTR, SHOP, SNOW
(SIC-code peers; ETF co-membership was sector-incoherent)
Blended Fair Value
$25.85
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 59.9× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 48.8× · 9 peers |
| Peer P/B | $64.04 | 22% | median 13.6× · 10 peers |
| Peer P/S | $27.07 | 22% | median 15.1× · 10 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $9.61 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $10.48 | 56% | 20 strikes · skew +0.12 |
As of 2026-07-23 · updated
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $1.3B
C3.ai Inc is an enterprise artificial intelligence company. The company provides software-as-a-service applications that enable customers to rapidly develop, deploy, and operate large-scale Enterprise AI applications across any infrastructure. It provides solutions under three divisions, namely, The C3 AI Platform, which is an end-to-end application development and runtime environment for designing, developing, and deploying AI applications; C3 AI Applications, which is a portfolio of pre-built, extensible, industry-specific, and application-specific Enterprise AI applications; and C3 Generati…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +7.11% | 6 |
| Feb | -10.95% | 6 |
| Mar | +11.31% | 6 |
| Apr | -12.43% | 6 |
| May | +34.72% | 6 |
| Jun | -3.93% | 6 |
| Jul | -4.25% | 6 |
| Aug | -7.71% | 5 |
| Sep | +0.64% | 5 |
| Oct | +3.11% | 5 |
| Nov | +6.78% | 5 |
| Dec | -5.62% | 5 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $8.90
SMA 50: $9.58
SMA 200: $11.76
Current: $8.15
EMA 12: $8.73
EMA 26: $9.09
MACD: -0.3584 | Signal: -0.0694
BEARISH
ADX (14): 20.29
WEAK TREND
+DI: 13.65
−DI: 27.38
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 31.42
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 11.90
Stoch %D: 12.08
Williams %R: -86.05
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $9.53
BB Lower: $8.26
OVERSOLD
OBV: -88,592,510
Vol SMA 20: 5,442,046
Vol ROC: 52.97%
ATR: $0.51
True Range: $0.28
HV 20: 44.2%
HV 30: 46.4%
HV 60: 53.0%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-07-25T00:00:00 – 2026-07-23T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
This artificial intelligence company reported a notable insider sale amid a more than 60% decline in its share price over the past year.
C3.ai's revenue has plummeted in 2026 while BigBear.ai holds steady — and the gap between them is shrinking.
Earnings History
7 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-04 | After-Close | 23.93% | 11.28% | 0.47x | Within |
| 2024-12-09 | After-Close | 21.63% | 15.18% | 0.70x | Within |
| 2025-02-26 | After-Close | 16.86% | 1.48% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-05-28 | Pre-Market | 13.65% | 1.50% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2025-09-03 | After-Close | 11.82% | 8.27% | 0.70x | Within |
| 2025-12-03 | After-Close | 11.66% | 2.48% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2026-02-25 | After-Close | 12.48% | 18.98% | 1.52x | Exceeded |
| 2026-06-03 | After-Close | 16.34% | 1.21% | 0.07x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 17.75
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 98.9%
- Straddle (30D)
- $1.22
- Straddle (7D)
- $0.65
- P/C Volume
- 1.05
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 2.34
- Correlation (SPY)
- 45.3%
- R²
- 0.20
- Ann. Volatility
- 65.7%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.7%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 139,131,750 (as of 2026-04-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
28 filers$155.12M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA /FI/ Custodian | $32.00M | 20.63% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $21.27M | 13.71% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $21.06M | 13.58% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $15.00M | 9.67% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $10.93M | 7.04% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $9.77M | 6.30% | 2025-09-30 |
| 7 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $6.70M | 4.32% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $5.61M | 3.61% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $5.45M | 3.51% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $5.15M | 3.32% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $4.86M | 3.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $4.85M | 3.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Walleye Trading LLC | $3.72M | 2.40% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $3.21M | 2.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $2.60M | 1.68% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.60M | 1.03% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $434.47K | 0.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $312.38K | 0.20% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $210.92K | 0.14% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | PEAK6 LLC | $185.24K | 0.12% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | CSS LLC/IL | $168.40K | 0.11% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | Marathon Trading Investment Management LLC | $22.31K | 0.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | Raiffeisen Bank International AG | $6.96K | <0.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $6.40K | <0.01% | 2025-09-30 |
| 25 | IHT Wealth Management, LLC | $3.70K | <0.01% | 2026-03-31 |
25 filers$129.31M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA /FI/ Custodian | $32.00M | 24.74% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $20.26M | 15.67% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $18.91M | 14.63% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $16.84M | 13.02% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $5.29M | 4.09% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $4.59M | 3.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $3.79M | 2.93% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $3.58M | 2.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $3.47M | 2.68% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $3.26M | 2.52% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.95M | 2.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $2.43M | 1.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | PEAK6 LLC | $2.43M | 1.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Crawford Fund Management, LLC | $2.21M | 1.71% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $2.05M | 1.58% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $1.01M | 0.78% | 2025-09-30 |
| 17 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $980.09K | 0.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $973.35K | 0.75% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | Walleye Capital LLC | $554.04K | 0.43% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | Walleye Trading LLC | $495.10K | 0.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $381.43K | 0.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP | $360.38K | 0.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | CSS LLC/IL | $358.69K | 0.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $84.20K | 0.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $61.81K | 0.05% | 2025-09-30 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-07-16
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-16 | John E. Hyten | Director | Disp (D) | −2,500 | $9.14 | -$22.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-16 | THOMAS M SIEBEL | CEO and Chairman of the Board | Mixed | — | $5.88 | -$3.05M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-02 | Stephen Bradley Ehikian | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | −23,039 | $9.45 | -$477.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | Hitesh Lath | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER | Mixed | +150,000 | $8.77 | -$426.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-17 | John E. Hyten | Director | Disp (D) | −2,500 | $11.03 | -$27.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-17 | Hitesh Lath | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER | Mixed | −5,202 | $10.95 | -$374.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | THOMAS M SIEBEL | CEO and Chairman of the Board | Mixed | +21,197 | $6.68 | -$4.54M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | THOMAS M SIEBEL | CEO and Chairman of the Board | Mixed | +6,182,053 | $11.16 | $68.62M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | John E. Hyten | Director | Disp (D) | −2,500 | $8.65 | -$21.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | THOMAS M SIEBEL | CEO and Chairman of the Board | Mixed | — | $5.37 | -$3.21M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | THOMAS M SIEBEL | Executive Chairman | Mixed | +25,915 | $9.27 | -$252.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-16 | John E. Hyten | Director | Disp (D) | −2,500 | $9.52 | -$23.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-15 | THOMAS M SIEBEL | Executive Chairman | Mixed | — | $5.21 | -$3.11M | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-01 | Stephen Bradley Ehikian | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | −20,101 | $8.22 | -$429.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-01 | John E. Hyten | Director | Gift (G) | — | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
31 insiders · @ $8.15
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TPG Group Holdings (SBS) Advisors, Inc. | 10%+ Owner | 14,457,617 | $117.83M | -$67.85M | 1 | 2021-03-18 |
| 2 | DAVID BONDERMAN | 10%+ Owner | 11,095,656 | $90.43M | -$470.02M | 2 | 2021-06-07 |
| 3 | JAMES G COULTER | 10%+ Owner | 10,615,186 | $86.51M | -$908.20M | 4 | 2021-06-10 |
| 4 | Lorenzo Simonelli | Director | 9,939,664 | $81.01M | -$168.35M | 1 | 2021-04-08 |
| 5 | Hughes Co Baker | Director | 9,750,476 | $79.47M | -$34.54M | 1 | 2021-04-09 |
| 6 | Baker Hughes Holdings LLC | Director | 9,580,476 | $78.08M | -$34.67M | 2 | 2021-04-23 |
| 7 | Siebel Living Trust u/a/d 7/27/93, as amended | 10%+ Owner | 7,312,599 | $59.60M | -$361.48M | 5 | 2021-07-15 |
| 8 | Robert David Schilling | EVP & Chief Commercial Officer | 1,011,327 | $8.24M | -$8.13M | 2 | 2025-10-02 |
| 9 | EDWARD Y ABBO | President and CTO | 1,006,216 | $8.20M | -$61.57M | 25 | 2024-06-17 |
| 10 | MICHAEL G MCCAFFERY | Director | 987,628 | $8.05M | -$16.52M | 7 | 2025-10-07 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-07-14
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
3 filings
· $17.0M notice value
· Last 90d:
5 filings
· $18.0M notice value
· 3 unique filers
· 40% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Thomas M. Siebel (2, $16.8M) · HITESH LATH (2, $801K) · Stephen Ehikian (1, $477K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-14 | Thomas M. Siebel | Officer and Director | 1,795,490 | $16.09M | 2026-07-14 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | Stephen Ehikian | Officer | 50,542 | $477.4K | 2026-07-01 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-30 | HITESH LATH | OFFICER | 48,619 | $426.4K | 2026-06-30 | MERRILL LYNCH | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-16 | HITESH LATH | OFFICER | 34,210 | $374.6K | 2026-06-16 | MERRILL LYNCH | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-04 | Thomas M. Siebel | Officer and Director | 74,000 | $677.8K | 2026-05-04 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-31 | Stephen Ehikian | Officer | 52,194 | $429.1K | 2026-03-31 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-27 | Jim H. Snabe | Director | 10,000 | $80.0K | 2026-03-27 | Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-17 | Thomas M. Siebel | Officer and Director | 1,946,607 | $17.13M | 2026-03-17 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-16 | HITESH LATH | OFFICER | 15,248 | $136.9K | 2026-03-16 | MERRILL LYNCH | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-02 | Thomas M. Siebel | Officer and Director | 73,500 | $810.0K | 2026-02-02 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 1.9 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | -2.5 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.3B |
| TTM Net Income | $-0.5B |
| TTM EPS | $-3.34 |
| ROE | -72.0% |