BILI Bilibili Inc. American Depositary Shares
XNAS
13.49
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
BILI
$13.49
—
Key stats
$13.49
- 52-Week Range
- $13.18 – $36.40
- YTD
- -48.82%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 28.88
- Straddle Price
- $1.59
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.44
- Market Cap
- $5.5B
- Open
- $13.55
- Day Range
- $13.47 – $13.71
- Volume
- 2,272,846
- Prev Close
- $13.47
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.12% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.06 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.94% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 5.26% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +41.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.31 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $15.43 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $14.60 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 100.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-1.1B |
Peers used for multiples: GOOGL, META, NTES, PINS, RBLX, RDDT, TTWO, U
60-Day Conviction
87%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 23, 2026
$13.44
α -0.3%
rank 41%
conviction
22%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 22, 2026
$13.23
α -1.9%
rank 41%
conviction
60%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 20, 2027
$13.02
α -3.4%
rank 41%
conviction
87%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 30.0× · 4 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 34.9× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 6.8× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 7.8× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $15.43 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $12.74 | 100% | 14 strikes · skew -0.39 |
As of 2026-10-23 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER PROCESSING & DATA PREPARATION (7374) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $5.5B
- Employees
- 8,423
- List Date
- 2018-03-28
- CIK
- 0001723690
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12
- EPS Forecast
- $0.19 (2 est.)
- Homepage
- https://www.bilibili.com
Bilibili is a Chinese online entertainment platform best known for its YouTube-like video-sharing service. Founded in 2009, it initially focused on long-form content centered around anime, comics, and gaming, or ACG, catering primarily to Generation Z users. Over time, the platform has expanded its content ecosystem to cover a broader range of interests, successfully attracting a more diverse audience beyond its original Gen Z base.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 20.21% | -20.50% | -7.41% | -21.88% | -2.39% | 29.09% | -0.48% |
| Feb | 3.56% | -11.93% | -26.48% | 3.53% | 21.65% | -16.06% | -4.29% |
| Mar | -26.00% | -18.01% | 19.47% | 11.44% | -3.48% | -17.15% | -5.62% |
| Apr | -1.00% | -11.88% | -10.27% | 13.26% | -7.85% | -3.76% | -3.58% |
| May | 0.99% | -8.63% | -22.59% | 14.06% | 4.21% | -21.09% | -5.51% |
| Jun | 7.32% | 13.58% | -4.85% | 5.03% | 16.20% | -7.24% | 5.01% |
| Jul | -29.34% | -8.60% | 21.23% | -0.92% | 6.94% | 9.27% | -0.24% |
| Aug | -11.23% | 7.03% | -15.05% | -5.58% | 6.26% | -16.01% | -5.76% |
| Sep | -21.75% | -38.23% | -11.62% | 60.03% | 25.35% | -4.88% | 1.48% |
| Oct | 12.98% | -42.78% | -1.47% | -17.25% | 6.21% | -8.80%* | -8.52% |
| Nov | -18.19% | 88.08% | -14.17% | -12.47% | -11.86% | -- | 6.28% |
| Dec | -25.82% | 39.19% | 5.73% | -9.09% | -7.35% | -- | 0.53% |
| Total | -66.74% | -52.48% | -56.26% | 20.55% | 58.00% | -49.65% | -24.43% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $14.53
SMA 50: $15.35
SMA 200: $21.17
Current: $13.48
EMA 12: $14.11
EMA 26: $14.62
MACD: -0.5042 | Signal: -0.0886
BEARISH
ADX (14): 19.99
RANGE
+DI: 20.09
−DI: 39.65
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 31.93
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 10.16
Stoch %D: 6.84
Williams %R: -88.26
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $15.69
BB Lower: $13.36
NEUTRAL
OBV: 24,538,918
Vol SMA 20: 2,737,327
Vol ROC: -22.35%
ATR: $0.43
True Range: $0.23
HV 20: 32.3%
HV 30: 33.4%
HV 60: 36.3%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-25T00:00:00 – 2026-10-23T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report - BILI
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- High volatility, high beta, and negative sentiment indicators
- Recent news headlines indicate mixed signals, with no clear catalysts driving the price
Primary Risks:
- Technical breakdown below $17.17 lower Bollinger Band support
- High options market volatility (78.0%) may lead to increased trading activity and potential mispricing
Investment Thesis: BILI's recent performance is largely driven by its high volatility, which could create opportunities for traders who can navigate the uncertain environment. However, the lack of clear catalysts and mixed news headlines increase the risk of a technical breakdown.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The sentiment analysis indicates a neutral overall sentiment, with positive sentiments from earnings releases and neutral news about company announcements. This mixed sentiment contributes to the bearish assessment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bearish
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels: Lower Bollinger Band support at $17.17, upper band resistance at $19.50
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (42.94) - potential buy signal
- MACD signal: Bullish momentum - indicates upward trend continuation
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral squeeze - no clear technical direction
Volume Analysis: Volume rate of change is negative (-27.41%), indicating decreased trading activity and potentially reduced market interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines indicate mixed signals, with positive sentiments from earnings releases and neutral news about company announcements. This mixed sentiment contributes to the bearish assessment.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral overall sentiment (Positive: 2/5, Negative: 1/5)
Catalyst Identification: No clear catalysts or upcoming events that could drive the price significantly.
Market Narrative: The mixed news sentiments and lack of clear catalysts increase the risk of a technical breakdown.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High volatility (beta = 1.58) - stock moves more than market, indicating increased risk.
Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels: Higher than average HV30 (39.8%) and HV60 (50.3%).
Options Market Signals: IV rank is medium (29.4%), indicating historically high volatility. Unusual options activity suggests potential mispricing.
Downside Protection: Lower Bollinger Band support at $17.17, which could provide some protection against a technical breakdown.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Neutral within the sector, with mixed performances from peers.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest decreased institutional interest and trading activity.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation coefficient is 0.42 (medium-strong correlation), indicating that BILI's price movement is somewhat related to market movements.
Relative Valuation: Position within a trading range, with no clear valuation signals.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $17.17 lower Bollinger Band
- Resistance: $19.50 upper Bollinger Band
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear technical levels that could trigger significant moves.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings dates, product launches, or regulatory changes.
Risk Management: Consider a stop-loss level at $17.00 to limit potential losses in case of a technical breakdown. Position sizing should be adjusted based on the current high volatility and risk profile.
Note: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. It is essential to consider your individual financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment goals before making any investment decisions.
Generated
News
All BILI news →
BILI Options Activity & IV Rank
BILI IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 52.2%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $1.59
7-DTE Move: $1.59
Days to Exp: 28 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 530
Put Volume: 232
P/C Volume: 0.438
BULLISH
Call OI: 3,337
Put OI: 3,732
P/C OI: 1.118
Total OI: 7,069
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $1.08
ATM Put: $0.51
Call %: 8.0%
Put %: 3.8%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 4,104
Chain OI: 235,268
Last Updated: 10/23/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 21st percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
21%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.30
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.10
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.13
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 20 ATM contracts, 22k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
74%
+8.0
pts
EXTREME
ATM 52.1% / Wing 60.0%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)28.9MediumOct 23
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$1.59Oct 23
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.4977
Alpha: -85.87%
Correlation: 0.4155
R-Squared: 17.3%
Stock Volatility: 46.0%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own BILI
4 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $19.3M | #1154 of 3716 | +160.9% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $11.1M | #1004 of 3138 | +28.2% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $10.2M | #1581 of 6285 | +25.7% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $164K | #2706 of 4729 | +21.8% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
BILI Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 444,026,799 (as of 2025-12-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
20 filers$133.97M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $53.11M | 39.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $18.12M | 13.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $14.79M | 11.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Yiheng Capital Management, L.P. | $10.61M | 7.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $6.55M | 4.89% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | KEYWISE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (HK) Ltd | $6.47M | 4.83% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $4.26M | 3.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $3.85M | 2.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Capula Management Ltd | $3.63M | 2.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $3.52M | 2.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.52M | 1.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Wells Fargo & Company Custodian | $1.36M | 1.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.36M | 1.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $1.18M | 0.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | One River Asset Management, LLC | $1.04M | 0.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $425.75K | 0.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Walleye Capital LLC | $413.83K | 0.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $410.42K | 0.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $289.51K | 0.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $54.50K | 0.04% | 2026-06-30 |
23 filers$100.94M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $24.63M | 24.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | LMR Partners LLP | $22.09M | 21.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Sculptor Capital LP | $16.40M | 16.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $8.31M | 8.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Walleye Trading LLC | $6.26M | 6.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $4.31M | 4.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $3.28M | 3.25% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $3.19M | 3.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | PEAK6 LLC | $1.71M | 1.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.53M | 1.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | One River Asset Management, LLC | $1.35M | 1.34% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $1.28M | 1.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $1.16M | 1.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | $1.15M | 1.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $970.71K | 0.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $759.54K | 0.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Verition Fund Management LLC | $740.80K | 0.73% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $596.05K | 0.59% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Walleye Capital LLC | $478.54K | 0.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $321.87K | 0.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $255.39K | 0.25% | 2025-09-30 |
| 22 | Capula Management Ltd | $141.35K | 0.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $18.73K | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
BILI Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-18Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-18 | Xin Fan | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +400,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-18 | Ni Li | Vice Chairwoman and COO | Award (A) | +4,000,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-18 | Rui Chen | Chairman of the Board and CEO | Award (A) | +4,000,000 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
BILI Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $13.48
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rui Chen | Chairman of the Board and CEO | 4,000,000 | $53.92M | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-18 |
| 2 | Ni Li | Vice Chairwoman and COO | 4,000,000 | $53.92M | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-18 |
| 3 | Xin Fan | Chief Financial Officer | 400,000 | $5.39M | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-18 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
14 ETFs hold BILI
14 shown · $6.99M total exposure · 0.00% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | Global X | 3.23% | $2.0M | — | 2026-10-22 |
| 2 | SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | Global X | 2.13% | $1.7M | — | 2026-10-22 |
| 3 | PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | Invesco | 1.22% | $960,881 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 4 | KOMP State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.03% | $818,358 | $2.5B | 2026-10-21 |
| 5 | TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | Nport | 0.23% | $582,359 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 6 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.00% | $440,150 | $11.0B | 2026-10-21 |
| 7 | APIE ActivePassive International Equity ETF | Nport | 0.03% | $340,719 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 8 | NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF | Nport | 0.73% | $306,252 | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 9 | PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | Invesco | 0.04% | $239,768 | — | 2026-10-21 |
| 10 | AVNC Avantis All International Core Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.04% | $38,556 | $97.4M | 2026-10-21 |
| 11 | NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | Nport | 0.03% | $17,388 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $3,536 | $27.6B | 2026-10-21 |
| 13 | AVSE Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $707 | $219.3M | 2026-10-21 |
| 14 | FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | First Trust | -0.02% | $-531,900 | $2.7B | 2026-10-21 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (8 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '21 | 2021-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '20 | 2020-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '19 | 2019-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '18 | 2018-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
Q4 2025 • period ending 2025-12-31 • filed 2026-04-16
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
23.93M
SI % of Float
7.03%
Days to Cover
7.91
Short Vol Ratio
59.1%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-23