TRFM AAM Transformers ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2022-07-11
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.49% prospectus, filed Feb 27, 2026
- Assets
- $248M SEC filing, Jul 31, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 0.14% paid annual
- Average daily volume
- $3.5M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 272 top 10 are 8.5%
- Listed
- Jul 11, 2022 NYSE Arca
- Tracking difference
- -0.63 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (51% of its variance, beta 1.21); Value over growth (20% of its variance, beta -0.46); Emerging markets over US (12% of its variance, beta 0.31); Small caps over large (10% of its variance, beta 0.62). These factors explain 90% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The AAM Transformers ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pence Transformers Index (the Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 272 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll Large Cap Blend ETFs
- Jul 2026
- +$31M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$83M +33.4% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$134M +54.1% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | +$31M |
| Jun 2026 | +$15M |
| May 2026 | +$36M |
| Apr 2026 | +$7.9M |
| Mar 2026 | +$5.3M |
| Feb 2026 | +$8.5M |
| Jan 2026 | +$10M |
| Dec 2025 | −$378K |
| Nov 2025 | +$4.8M |
| Oct 2025 | +$6.1M |
| Sep 2025 | +$3.5M |
| Aug 2025 | +$5.5M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 49 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (based on the Defined Large Cap Growth Index--symbol DEFILGOI) | 36% | 0.58% | $1.3B | +9.1% | compare |
| JMOMJPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 34% | 0.12% | $2.7B | +20.2% | compare |
| QQQEDirexion Shares ETF Trust Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF | 33% | — | $1.5B | +15.6% | compare |
| SPHBInvesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF | 32% | 0.25% | $907M | +27.9% | compare |
| QEWInvesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 31% | 0.25% | $30M | — | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
- Holdings vs fair value
- +1.8% 28% under, 34% over · 88% covered
- Price / earnings
- 60.7 14% loss-making · 79% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 6.3 · 5.4 revenue growth +15.8%
- Above 200-day average
- 55% 39% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 5.1% of float, weighted · 3.1 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 7% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 62% net selling
- 13F holders
- +2.4% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 25.4% of weight in 7 days; 54.4% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New position | WDAYWorkday Inc | — | 0.77% | — |
| New position | FTNTFortinet Inc | — | 0.77% | — |
| New position | HEIHEICO Corp | — | 0.76% | — |
| New position | INTUIntuit Inc | — | 0.74% | — |
| New position | ADSKAutodesk Inc | — | 0.71% | — |
| Decrease | SNDKSandisk Corp | 1.13% | 0.42% | −59.2% |
| New position | CRMSalesforce Inc | — | 0.69% | — |
| Decrease | MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 1.00% | 0.36% | −61.5% |
| Decrease | BEBloom Energy Corp | 1.14% | 0.50% | −26.1% |
| Exit | ROKRockwell Automation Inc | 0.60% | — | — |
- Authorized participants
- 7 active of 7 with agreements; top 3 did 89%
- Created · redeemed
- $84M · $49M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 99% creations 100% in kind
- Creation unit
- 25,000 shares
- Securities lending
- 6.34% of assets on loan on average; earned 13.8 bp
- Return vs index
- -0.63 pts after fees; +0.08 before; daily s.d. 0.09
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-01-05 | $0.0810 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Mount Vernon Liquid Assets Portfolio, LLC | 7.94% | Short-term investment | US |
| DASH | DoorDash Inc | 0.87% | Equity (common) | US |
| SNOW | Snowflake Inc | 0.85% | Equity (common) | US |
| XYZ | Block Inc | 0.81% | Equity (common) | US |
| ABNB | Airbnb Inc | 0.80% | Equity (common) | US |
| HWM | Howmet Aerospace Inc | 0.80% | Equity (common) | US |
| PH | Parker-Hannifin Corp | 0.80% | Equity (common) | US |
| TTWO | Take-Two Interactive Software | 0.80% | Equity (common) | US |
| DDOG | Datadog Inc | 0.78% | Equity (common) | US |
| WDAY | Workday Inc | 0.77% | Equity (common) | US |
| FTNT | Fortinet Inc | 0.77% | Equity (common) | US |
| HEI | HEICO Corp | 0.76% | Equity (common) | US |
| AME | AMETEK Inc | 0.75% | Equity (common) | US |
| INTU | Intuit Inc | 0.74% | Equity (common) | US |
| NET | Cloudflare Inc | 0.74% | Equity (common) | US |
| SO | Southern Co/The | 0.73% | Equity (common) | US |
| AXON | Axon Enterprise Inc | 0.73% | Equity (common) | US |
| TDG | TransDigm Group Inc | 0.72% | Equity (common) | US |
| PANW | Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.72% | Equity (common) | US |
| XEL | Xcel Energy Inc | 0.71% | Equity (common) | US |
| ADSK | Autodesk Inc | 0.71% | Equity (common) | US |
| AEP | American Electric Power Co Inc | 0.71% | Equity (common) | US |
| CEG | Constellation Energy Corp | 0.70% | Equity (common) | US |
| ETR | Entergy Corp | 0.70% | Equity (common) | US |
| V | Visa Inc | 0.69% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRM | Salesforce Inc | 0.69% | Equity (common) | US |
| UBER | Uber Technologies Inc | 0.69% | Equity (common) | US |
| VST | Vistra Corp | 0.68% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Credo Technology Group Holding | 0.68% | Equity (common) | US |
| GE | General Electric Co | 0.67% | Equity (common) | US |
| APH | Amphenol Corp | 0.66% | Equity (common) | US |
| NOW | ServiceNow Inc | 0.66% | Equity (common) | US |
| KEYS | Keysight Technologies Inc | 0.66% | Equity (common) | US |
| ANET | Arista Networks Inc | 0.66% | Equity (common) | US |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 0.65% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 0.65% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRWD | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.64% | Equity (common) | US |
| TER | Teradyne Inc | 0.64% | Equity (common) | US |
| GEV | GE Vernova Inc | 0.62% | Equity (common) | US |
| ALAB | Astera Labs Inc | 0.62% | Equity (common) | US |
| NEE | NextEra Energy Inc | 0.61% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMAT | Applied Materials Inc | 0.61% | Equity (common) | US |
| MPWR | Monolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.61% | Equity (common) | US |
| BA | Boeing Co/The | 0.60% | Equity (common) | US |
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 0.60% | Equity (common) | US |
| CDNS | Cadence Design Systems Inc | 0.59% | Equity (common) | US |
| RBLX | ROBLOX Corp | 0.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| DELL | Dell Technologies Inc | 0.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 0.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| WDC | Western Digital Corp | 0.57% | Equity (common) | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term investment | 8.04% | $19.9M | 2 |
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 15.78% | 0.54% | 5.59% | 1.30% | 5.80% |
| Feb | -- | -5.08% | 5.89% | -4.47% | -0.75% | -1.10% |
| Mar | -- | 6.13% | 0.02% | -6.84% | -6.35% | -1.76% |
| Apr | -- | -5.94% | -5.03% | 1.94% | 15.28% | 1.56% |
| May | -- | 9.04% | 3.88% | 10.34% | 10.61% | 8.47% |
| Jun | -- | 6.11% | 3.25% | 8.21% | 2.63% | 5.05% |
| Jul | 9.68% | 6.39% | -2.03% | 3.48% | -7.53% | 2.00% |
| Aug | -1.73% | -5.05% | 4.76% | 4.30% | 0.56% | 0.57% |
| Sep | -9.17% | -7.20% | 8.41% | 8.96% | 1.95% | 0.59% |
| Oct | -2.08% | -5.85% | 2.11% | 4.16% | -9.25%* | -2.18% |
| Nov | 5.18% | 14.41% | 11.17% | -6.13% | -- | 6.16% |
| Dec | -8.00% | 6.62% | -4.07% | 0.81% | -- | -1.16% |
| Total | -7.24% | 36.66% | 31.42% | 32.58% | 6.01% | 19.89% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: TRFM
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10) Key drivers and primary risks: * Bullish momentum signals from MACD and Stochastic %K * Bearish RSI reading could lead to near-term consolidation or correction * High volatility, potentially amplifying market moves * Recent news headlines suggest defensive positioning in healthcare ETFs
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) - Uptrend; Medium-term (1-3 months) - Range-bound; Long-term (3-12 months) - Downtrend
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels from moving averages and technical patterns: * SMA 20: $59.99 * SMA 50: $60.20 * Bollinger Bands Upper: $64.06 * Lower: $55.92
Momentum Signals: * RSI interpretation (oversold <30): Neutral * MACD signal (bullish crossover): Bullish momentum * Stochastic %K: 37.77 (oversold) * Bollinger Bands position: Mean reversion * Volume Analysis: Volume Rate of Change -95.44% suggests lower volume and potentially decreasing interest
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Defensive positioning in healthcare ETFs, no specific catalysts identified
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL (based on single news headline)
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming events or earnings releases noted
Market Narrative: Defensive positioning in healthcare ETFs could indicate a broader market rotation towards safe-haven assets, potentially impacting TRFM's performance
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta 1.76 vs SPY)
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are high compared to historical averages
Options Market Signals: * IV rank: N/A (no options data available) * Put/call ratios: N/A * Unusual activity: N/A
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations: * SMA 20: $59.99 * SMA 50: $60.20 * Bollinger Bands Lower: $55.92
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Healthcare sector performance relative to broader market (not provided)
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: * On-Balance Volume (OBV): 477964.46 * Volume Rate of Change: -95.44% suggests lower volume and potentially decreasing interest
Correlation Analysis: How stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation): * Correlation coefficient: N/A (no correlation data available)
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: * TRFM's price relative to SMA 200 ($53.13) suggests a potential mean reversion opportunity
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance levels to monitor: * SMA 20: $59.99 * SMA 50: $60.20 * Bollinger Bands Upper: $64.06 * Lower: $55.92
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: * MACD crossover above signal line (bullish momentum) * RSI reading <30 (oversold)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No earnings dates or product launches noted
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations: * Consider setting stop-loss around SMA 20: $59.99 * Monitor volume and price action to adjust risk accordingly
TRFM Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
TRFM Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|