BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
XNYSStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.3B
- CIK
- 0000826020
- Homepage
- https://www.sabacef.com
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. It seeks to provide investors with a high level of current income, with a secondary goal of capital appreciation. It invests globally in debt and equity securities of public and private companies, which includes, investing in closed-end funds, public and private debt instruments, and other securities.
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $298M shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $1.4M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- — NYSE
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (9% of its variance, beta 0.32). These factors explain 10% of its daily moves over the last year, so most of what drives this fund is something else.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF | — | 0.40% | $16.5B | −4.9% | compare |
| PYLDPIMCO Multi Sector Bond Active ETF | — | 0.64% | $16.4B | −5.3% | compare |
| JPIEJPMorgan Income ETF | — | 0.39% | $11.2B | −3.2% | compare |
| BONDPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | — | 0.54% | $8.6B | −6.8% | compare |
| CGCPCapital Group Core Plus Income ETF | — | 0.34% | $8.5B | −6.8% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Multisector Bond category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -1.95% | 6.46% | -2.85% | 1.41% | -3.70% | -0.13% |
| Feb | -- | -2.42% | -1.57% | -3.18% | 0.51% | -2.22% | -1.78% |
| Mar | -- | 0.44% | -0.86% | -0.55% | -1.40% | 2.59% | 0.04% |
| Apr | -- | -3.37% | -1.83% | -2.05% | -1.13% | 2.23% | -1.23% |
| May | -- | -3.51% | -2.11% | 0.83% | 2.00% | 0.15% | -0.53% |
| Jun | 0.86% | -4.52% | -2.53% | -4.48% | 4.68% | -4.78% | -1.79% |
| Jul | -2.76% | 4.57% | 2.70% | 3.40% | 3.70% | 0.53% | 2.02% |
| Aug | -0.22% | 0.12% | -1.13% | 1.79% | -1.54% | -1.06% | -0.34% |
| Sep | -0.55% | -5.83% | -3.03% | 2.57% | -6.72% | -7.54% | -3.52% |
| Oct | 2.41% | -1.88% | -2.51% | 0.54% | -0.40% | -4.19%* | -1.01% |
| Nov | -3.20% | 4.44% | 5.68% | 3.98% | -3.23% | -- | 1.53% |
| Dec | 0.00% | -7.76% | -1.78% | -3.67% | -1.82% | -- | -3.01% |
| Total | -3.52% | -20.27% | -3.04% | -4.06% | -4.38% | -17.02% | -8.72% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my LLM stock analysis report for BRW:
Executive Summary
- Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10)
- Key drivers: Low volatility, positive fundamentals
- Primary risks: Limited news flow, lack of market catalysts
- Recent news sentiment impact: No recent news available, neutral sentiment prevails
Technical Analysis
- Trend Direction: Neutral (no clear trend)
- Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $7.10 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $7.32 (resistance)
- Lower Bollinger Band: $6.88 (support)
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 33.12 (neutral)
- MACD: -0.08 / Signal: -0.01 / Histogram: -0.07 (bearish, but weakening)
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available
- Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment prevails due to lack of market catalysts
- Catalyst Identification: No upcoming events or product launches reported
- Market Narrative: No clear narrative emerges from the absence of recent news
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta Interpretation: Low volatility, beta <0.8 (defensive)
- Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels: Low volatility regime persists
- Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: 6.4/10 (low volatility)
- Put/call ratios: Neutral
- Unusual activity: No unusual options activity reported
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: BRW outperforms the market
- Institutional Activity: Low volume and institutional interest signals: Defensive positioning
- Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation: Weak correlation with market (0.44)
- Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: Fairly valued
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels:
- Support: SMA 20 ($7.10), Lower Bollinger Band ($6.88)
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($7.32)
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear levels due to neutral trend
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming events or product launches reported
- Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels: Set at SMA 20 ($7.10) for risk management
Please note that this report is an objective analysis, focusing on data quality and signal clarity.
BRW Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $30K | #3593 of 4729 | +9.1% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
BRW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
BRW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2007-07-05| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-07-05 | James N Meehan | Director | Disp (D) | −26,671 | $22.50 | -$600.1K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Allan W Ditchfield | Director | Disp (D) | −2,010 | $22.50 | -$45.2K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Richard T Delaney | Director | Disp (D) | −7,649 | $22.50 | -$172.1K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Brian Dwyer | Sr. VP Product R& D | Disp (D) | −50,782 | $22.50 | -$1.14M | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Eileen Hilton | Director | Disp (D) | −4,313 | $22.50 | -$97.0K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Anne Bandi | Sr. VP Operations | Disp (D) | −37,171 | $22.50 | -$836.3K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Douglas R Burtch | Sr. VP Marketing | Disp (D) | −17,657 | $22.50 | -$397.3K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Arthur J Rothkopf | Director | Disp (D) | −4,313 | $22.50 | -$97.0K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Audrey E Sylvan | Sr. VP Product Management | Disp (D) | −41,723 | $22.50 | -$938.8K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | James Sclafani | Sr. VP Claims | Disp (D) | −58,668 | $22.50 | -$1.32M | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Nila Harrison | Sr. VP Human Resources | Disp (D) | −42,260 | $22.50 | -$950.9K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | George Christensen | Sr. VP Business Integration | Disp (D) | −18,454 | $22.50 | -$415.2K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Robert D Sadler | Sr. VP CFO | Disp (D) | −41,524 | $22.50 | -$934.3K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Mary R Hennessy | Director | Disp (D) | −4,313 | $22.50 | -$97.0K | EDGAR |
| 2007-07-05 | Jeffrey J Dailey | CEO and President | Disp (D) | −144,285 | $22.50 | -$3.25M | EDGAR |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.