FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2022-06-30
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- —
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $810K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Jun 30, 2022 NYSE Arca
- Return on NAV, 1 year
- +9.0% issuer, through Sep 30, 2026 · 3 years +30.5% a year
Moves with. Gold (98% of its variance, beta 0.99). These factors explain 98% of its daily moves over the last year.
This product is not a registered investment company, so it does not file the monthly flow reports that funds file with the SEC.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLDSPDR Gold Trust, SPDR Gold Shares | — | — | $140.1B | −6.0% | compare |
| IAUiShares Gold Trust | — | 0.25% | $61.5B | −5.8% | compare |
| GLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares | — | — | $30.8B | −5.7% | compare |
| PHYSSprott Physical Gold Trust | — | — | $15.1B | −6.2% | compare |
| IAUMiShares Gold Trust Micro | — | 0.09% | $8.0B | −5.6% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Gold category.
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -1.22% | 5.95% | 11.30% | 5.34% |
| Feb | -- | -0.56% | 1.16% | 12.73% | 4.44% |
| Mar | -- | 6.58% | 7.95% | -12.59% | 0.65% |
| Apr | -- | 2.13% | 5.85% | -3.01% | 1.66% |
| May | -1.27% | 0.63% | 2.49% | -1.44% | 0.10% |
| Jun | -2.95% | -0.88% | -2.51% | -10.39% | -4.18% |
| Jul | 2.16% | 5.12% | -0.94% | -0.01% | 1.58% |
| Aug | -0.23% | 2.49% | 2.91% | 9.73% | 3.73% |
| Sep | -4.77% | 5.67% | 9.66% | -4.09% | 1.62% |
| Oct | 8.53% | 4.22% | 3.06% | -2.78%* | 3.26% |
| Nov | 2.85% | -2.73% | 6.16% | -- | 2.09% |
| Dec | -0.43% | -0.76% | 1.71% | -- | 0.17% |
| Total | 3.37% | 22.15% | 52.22% | -3.89% | 18.46% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: FGDL
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10) Key drivers: Technical support and momentum signals, low volatility, and positive beta relative to market. Primary risks: Lack of recent news, potential divergence between technical and news sentiment if significant announcements arise.
Investment thesis: FGDL's neutral bias is driven by its technical indicators, which suggest a trading range. The stock's low volatility and relatively high beta compared to the market may make it attractive for traders seeking to capitalize on mean reversion opportunities.
Recent news sentiment impact: No recent news headlines available, which reduces the influence of external factors on the analysis.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Medium-term uptrend (1-3 months) based on the SMA 50 and EMA 12 alignments. Short-term (1-4 weeks) trend is neutral due to the RSI being in a neutral range.
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $62.31
- Middle Line: $59.50
- Lower Bollinger Band: $56.70
Momentum Signals: RSI (14): 49.88 (neutral) MACD: Bullish crossover above the signal line with a histogram value of 0.98.
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20 is decreasing, indicating a possible decrease in market interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news headlines available. Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (no recent news). Catalyst Identification: None identified at this time. Market Narrative: The lack of recent news reduces the influence on the analysis. If significant announcements arise, there may be a divergence between technical and news sentiment.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: FGDL's beta is 0.74, indicating it moves less than the market (less volatile).
Volatility Regime: Low volatility based on historical and current values.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Premium vs HV30: N/A (positive = implied richer than realized)
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations will focus on the Lower Bollinger Band ($56.70) and potential stop-loss levels around $57.50.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: FGDL's sector performance is neutral relative to its peers. Institutional Activity: No unusual volume patterns or institutional interest signals available. Correlation Analysis: The stock moves relatively less than the market (R-squared = 0.32). Relative Valuation: FGDL is positioned within a trading range, with no clear valuation bias.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band ($56.70)
- Middle Line ($59.50)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band ($62.31) for a potential breakout
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings or product launch dates available.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels around $57.50, with a focus on mean reversion opportunities in the event of a breakout above the upper Bollinger Band.
I hope this analysis meets your expectations!
FGDL Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
FGDL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|