GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·7mo ago
GECC Great Elm Capital. Corp. Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
GECC
—
—
Key stats
About
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- List Date
- 2010-09-01
- CIK
- 0001675033
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-03
- EPS Forecast
- $0.21 (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Palm Beach Gardens, FL
- Homepage
- https://www.greatelmcc.com
Great Elm Capital Corp is an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end management investment company. It generates both income and capital appreciation through debt and income-generating equity investments, including investments in finance businesses. The Company operates as a single reportable segment with an investment objective to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments and manages the business on a consolidated basis.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -8.93% | -4.22% | 5.51% | -2.90% | -2.48% | 2.19% | -1.80% |
| Feb | 3.91% | -8.73% | 3.35% | -2.30% | 5.81% | -10.83% | -1.47% |
| Mar | 2.10% | 0.00% | -4.61% | 3.36% | -9.58% | -19.58% | -4.72% |
| Apr | -4.56% | -1.60% | -10.80% | -4.87% | -0.69% | 2.23% | -3.38% |
| May | 8.98% | -12.75% | -1.85% | -1.38% | 6.73% | 9.89% | 1.60% |
| Jun | -2.50% | 0.16% | -2.39% | 4.04% | 0.80% | -16.15% | -2.67% |
| Jul | -6.02% | -1.97% | 7.87% | 3.57% | 1.29% | -7.39% | -0.44% |
| Aug | 10.15% | -3.79% | 19.90% | -1.79% | 2.51% | 18.28% | 7.54% |
| Sep | -3.59% | -22.82% | -1.00% | -3.60% | -10.93% | -12.00% | -8.99% |
| Oct | 0.14% | 3.96% | -8.93% | -3.01% | -11.98% | -3.35%* | -3.86% |
| Nov | -2.20% | -1.48% | 14.86% | 5.18% | 3.21% | -- | 3.91% |
| Dec | -9.68% | -17.10% | 4.47% | 5.67% | -7.91% | -- | -4.91% |
| Total | -13.50% | -53.54% | 24.38% | 1.16% | -22.87% | -35.69% | -16.68% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $5.06
SMA 50: $5.52
SMA 200: $5.75
Current: $4.91
EMA 12: $5.00
EMA 26: $5.16
MACD: -0.1569 | Signal: 0.0101
BEARISH
ADX (14): 37.01
TREND
+DI: 8.82
−DI: 23.98
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 31.85
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 2.18
Stoch %D: 4.77
Williams %R: -97.50
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $5.30
BB Lower: $4.82
NEUTRAL
OBV: -5,194,372
Vol SMA 20: 40,228
Vol ROC: -39.79%
ATR: $0.13
True Range: $0.09
HV 20: 19.5%
HV 30: 38.0%
HV 60: 40.6%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: GECC
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bullish momentum signals from MACD and RSI
- Supportive recent earnings news sentiment
- Low volatility regime
Primary Risks:
- Weak trend regime
- Lack of clear catalysts for price movement
- Limited institutional interest
Investment Thesis: GECC appears to be in a neutral zone, with bullish momentum signals and supportive earnings news sentiment. However, the weak trend regime and lack of clear catalysts may lead to limited price movement.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have had a mixed impact on GECC's stock price, with some positive news (earnings beats) and negative news (debt offering). The overall sentiment is NEUTRAL, which aligns with the neutral zone of the technical analysis.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Neutral
- Medium-term: Uptrend (SMA 50 > SMA 200)
- Long-term: Downtrend (SMA 200 > SMA 20)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Support: $5.55 (SMA 50), $5.63 (Lower Bollinger Band)
- Resistance: $6.07 (SMA 200), $6.19 (Upper Bollinger Band)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 58.54 (neutral)
- MACD: Bullish momentum signal
Volume Analysis: The volume trends indicate a neutral zone, with no clear signs of institutional interest or market participation.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headlines have been mixed, with some positive and negative events affecting GECC's stock price. The overall sentiment is NEUTRAL, which aligns with the neutral zone of the technical analysis.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is NEUTRAL, reflecting the mixed nature of recent news headlines.
Catalyst Identification: No clear catalysts have been identified recently, but upcoming earnings announcements may provide some direction for the stock price.
Market Narrative: The market narrative remains unclear, with no clear trends or signals emerging from the technical analysis or recent news headlines.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Interpretation: GECC's beta is 0.52 (vs SPY), indicating a low risk profile.
Volatility Regime: The current volatility regime is low, with a stock volatility of 0.46.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels are present at $5.55 and $5.63, which may provide some downside protection if the stock price falls.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: GECC's sector is performing relatively well, with a higher relative strength index (RSI) compared to the market.
Institutional Activity: No clear signs of institutional interest or participation in the market.
Correlation Analysis: GECC has a low correlation with the market, indicating that it may move independently of broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: GECC is trading within its expected range, with no clear signs of overvaluation or undervaluation.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: $5.55 (SMA 50), $5.63 (Lower Bollinger Band)
- Resistance: $6.07 (SMA 200), $6.19 (Upper Bollinger Band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear breakout or breakdown levels have been identified.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings announcements may provide some direction for the stock price in the near term.
Risk Management: A stop-loss level of $5.40 could be considered, with a position sizing consideration of 2% of the portfolio.
Overall Analysis: GECC appears to be in a neutral zone, with bullish momentum signals and supportive earnings news sentiment. However, the weak trend regime and lack of clear catalysts may lead to limited price movement. Investors should consider the low risk profile and the potential for support at $5.55 and $5.63 if the stock price falls.
Generated
News
All GECC news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·13mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·13mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·14mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·24mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·25mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·25mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·27mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·27mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·28mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
GECC Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.7232
Alpha: -45.45%
Correlation: 0.2196
R-Squared: 4.8%
Stock Volatility: 41.8%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own GECC
1 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $136K | #2812 of 4729 | 0.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
GECC Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
GECC Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2017-09-22Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-22 | David J. Steinberg | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −119,352 | $10.65 | -$1.27M | EDGAR |
| 2017-09-18 | Mast Capital Management, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −25,522 | $10.78 | -$275.0K | EDGAR |
| 2017-09-12 | Mast Capital Management, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −1,200 | $10.93 | -$13.1K | EDGAR |
| 2017-05-19 | Mast Capital Management, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −963,836 | $11.50 | -$11.08M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
GECC Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 23, 2026Directors 4
- Mark Kuperschmid · since Nov 3, 2016
- Richard M Cohen · since Mar 4, 2022
- Chad Perry · since Mar 15, 2022
- Jason W. Reese · since Mar 2, 2026
Officers 3
- Matthew D Kaplan · CEO and President · since Mar 4, 2022
- Keri Davis · CFO · listed since Mar 2023
- Adam M Kleinman · CCO and Secretary · listed since Jun 2022
10% owners 1
- Great Elm Group, Inc. (entity) · since Dec 29, 2020
Changes in the last 10 years (40)
| Jun 30, 2026 | Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 2, 2026 | Jason W. Reese became a director |
| Feb 27, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Matthew A Drapkin from the board in an SEC filing |
| Feb 8, 2024 | Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 31, 2023 | Keri Davis listed as CFO (previously CFO and Treasurer) in SEC filings |
| Jun 17, 2022 | Adam M Kleinman listed as CCO and Secretary (previously Chief Compliance Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jun 15, 2022 | Northern Right Capital (QP), L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 15, 2022 | NRC Partners I, LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 15, 2022 | BC Advisors LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 15, 2022 | Chad Perry became a director |
| Mar 4, 2022 | Richard M Cohen became a director |
| Mar 4, 2022 | Matthew D Kaplan became CEO and President |
| Mar 4, 2022 | Matthew A Drapkin became a director |
| Mar 2, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Randall Revell Horsey from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 2, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Peter A Reed as President and CEO in an SEC filing |
| Mar 2, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Michael C Speller from the board in an SEC filing |
| Sep 20, 2021 | Robert A Zadek became a 10% owner |
| Sep 20, 2021 | Lenders Funding LLC /California became a 10% owner |
| Mar 16, 2021 | Erik A Falk became a director |
| Dec 31, 2020 | Forest Investments, Inc. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 29, 2020 | Great Elm Group, Inc. became a 10% owner |
| Jun 7, 2019 | Mast Capital Management, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jun 7, 2019 | David J. Steinberg reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 15, 2019 | Keri Davis became CFO and Treasurer |
| Jun 4, 2018 | John J Woods became an officer |
| Nov 2, 2017 | Michael C Speller became a director |
| Sep 28, 2017 | Adam M Kleinman became Chief Compliance Officer |
| May 30, 2017 | Randall Revell Horsey became a director |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Robert Wilson became a director |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Robert Wilson became Chief Compliance Officer |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Peter A Reed became a director |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Peter A Reed became President and CEO |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Michael J. Sell became CFO and Treasurer |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Mast Capital Management, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Mark Kuperschmid became a director |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Mark C Biderman became a director |
| Nov 3, 2016 | John Edward Stuart became a director |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Forest Investments, Inc. became a 10% owner |
| Nov 3, 2016 | Eugene I Davis became a director |
| Nov 3, 2016 | David J. Steinberg became a 10% owner |
Not reported recently (13)
- Erik A Falk · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 31, 2024
- BC Advisors LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jun 27, 2022
- Northern Right Capital (QP), L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jun 27, 2022
- NRC Partners I, LP · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jun 27, 2022
- Lenders Funding LLC /California · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Oct 13, 2021
- Robert A Zadek · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Oct 13, 2021
- Peter A Reed · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 28, 2021
- John Edward Stuart · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 26, 2021
- John J Woods · Last reported as an officer in an SEC filing dated Jun 8, 2018
- Michael J. Sell · Last reported as CFO and Treasurer in an SEC filing dated Nov 13, 2017
- Robert Wilson · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 9, 2016
- Eugene I Davis · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 9, 2016
- Mark C Biderman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 9, 2016
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
GECC Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2024-03-11
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-11 | Great Elm Group, Inc. | 10% Stockholder | 1,673,900 | — | 2024-03-11 | Imperial Capital, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-08 | Great Elm Group, Inc. | 10% Stockholder | 449,950 | — | 2024-03-08 | Imperial Capital, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-07 | Great Elm Group, Inc. | 10% Stockholder | 594,525 | — | 2024-03-07 | Imperial Capital, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-06 | Great Elm Group, Inc. | 10% Stockholder | 1,054,500 | — | 2024-03-06 | Imperial Capital, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-05 | Great Elm Group, Inc. | 10% Stockholder | 142,550 | — | 2024-03-05 | Imperial Capital, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-04 | Great Elm Group, Inc. | 10% Stockholder | 348,125 | — | 2024-03-04 | Imperial Capital, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-06 | Great Elm Group, Inc. | 10% Stockholder | 104,175 | — | 2023-12-05 | Imperial Capital, LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-01 | Great Elm Group, Inc. | 10% Stockholder | 104,175 | — | 2023-12-01 | Imperial Capital, LLC | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.