HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2023-12-05
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.34% prospectus, filed Nov 26, 2025
- Assets
- $49M SEC filing, Jul 31, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 0.50% paid quarterly
- Average daily volume
- $36K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 163 top 10 are 37.7%
- Listed
- Dec 5, 2023 Nasdaq
- Tracking difference
- -0.33 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (88% of its variance, beta 1.02). These factors explain 92% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The Fund seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond to the total return performance of an index that tracks the performance of exchange traded US large cap equity securities and is designed to consist of US equities with favorable growth characteristics while maintaining what is considered to be enhanced exposure to quality while also providing reasonable exposure to value and momentum. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 163 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll Quality ETFs
- Jul 2026
- $0 latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$1.6M −3.3% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- −$4.4M −9.0% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | $0 |
| Jun 2026 | −$1.6M |
| May 2026 | $0 |
| Apr 2026 | −$2.8M |
| Mar 2026 | +$21K |
| Feb 2026 | $0 |
| Jan 2026 | $0 |
| Dec 2025 | $0 |
| Nov 2025 | $0 |
| Oct 2025 | $0 |
| Sep 2025 | −$2K |
| Aug 2025 | $0 |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 31 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLCGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 54% | 0.09% | $15.2B | +13.3% | compare |
| WAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 53% | 0.32% | $186M | — | compare |
| MGCVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap ETF | 53% | 0.05% | $10.4B | +15.6% | compare |
| EPSWisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund | 53% | 0.08% | $1.7B | +17.3% | compare |
| LDRXSGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF | 53% | 0.59% | $248M | +14.7% | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
- Holdings vs fair value
- +3.3% 27% under, 26% over · 96% covered
- Price / earnings
- 26.7 3% loss-making · 97% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 7.4 · 3.8 revenue growth +14.4%
- Above 200-day average
- 68% 62% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 3.0% of float, weighted · 3.1 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 2% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 68% net selling
- 13F holders
- +2.1% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 34.0% of weight in 7 days; 57.8% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decrease | ROLRollins Inc | 0.36% | 0.19% | −17.7% |
| Decrease | ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.26% | 0.15% | −11.0% |
| Decrease | ZZillow Group Inc | 0.23% | 0.13% | −21.8% |
| Increase | TEAMAtlassian Corp | 0.13% | 0.22% | +25.6% |
| Decrease | ACIAlbertsons Cos Inc | 0.09% | 0.01% | −81.7% |
| Increase | WDAYWorkday Inc | 0.03% | 0.12% | +177.0% |
| Increase | CRMSalesforce Inc | 0.27% | 0.35% | +30.9% |
| Increase | NTNXNutanix Inc | 0.13% | 0.20% | +10.8% |
| Decrease | SITESiteOne Landscape Supply Inc | 0.08% | 0.04% | −23.9% |
| Increase | HRBH&R Block Inc | 0.03% | 0.06% | +69.8% |
0 new, 0 exited, 12 increased and 9 decreased between the fund's two latest holdings reports; turnover 6.6%. Full holdings and history
- Authorized participants
- 4 active of 17 with agreements; top 3 did 98%
- Created · redeemed
- $47M · $10M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 99% creations 100% in kind
- Creation unit
- 25,000 shares
- Securities lending
- yes of assets on loan on average; earned 0.0 bp
- Return vs index
- -0.33 pts after fees; +0.05 before; daily s.d. 0.12
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-29 | $0.0959 | CD |
| 2026-06-25 | 2026-06-29 | $0.0651 | CD |
| 2026-03-25 | 2026-03-27 | $0.0584 | CD |
| 2025-12-23 | 2025-12-26 | $0.1212 | CD |
| 2025-09-25 | 2025-09-29 | $0.0554 | CD |
| 2025-06-25 | 2025-06-27 | $0.0673 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 5.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 5.24% | Equity (common) | US |
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 5.16% | Equity (common) | US |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 5.05% | Equity (common) | US |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 4.56% | Equity (common) | US |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 3.59% | Equity (common) | US |
| META | Meta Platforms Inc | 2.61% | Equity (common) | US |
| JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co | 2.12% | Equity (common) | US |
| V | Visa Inc | 2.06% | Equity (common) | US |
| LLY | Eli Lilly & Co | 1.97% | Equity (common) | US |
| JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 1.83% | Equity (common) | US |
| BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 1.83% | Equity (common) | US |
| XOM | ExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 1.80% | Equity (common) | US |
| TSLA | Tesla Inc | 1.78% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 1.70% | Equity (common) | IE |
| WMT | Walmart Inc | 1.57% | Equity (common) | US |
| FTNT | Fortinet Inc | 1.29% | Equity (common) | US |
| GWW | WW Grainger Inc | 1.17% | Equity (common) | US |
| KLAC | KLA Corp | 1.04% | Equity (common) | US |
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 1.02% | Equity (common) | US |
| SHW | Sherwin-Williams Co/The | 0.96% | Equity (common) | US |
| ADBE | Adobe Inc | 0.95% | Equity (common) | US |
| APP | AppLovin Corp | 0.94% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMAT | Applied Materials Inc | 0.90% | Equity (common) | US |
| COMP | Compass Inc | 0.88% | Equity (common) | US |
| QCOM | QUALCOMM Inc | 0.88% | Equity (common) | US |
| NTRA | Natera Inc | 0.86% | Equity (common) | US |
| WDC | Western Digital Corp | 0.85% | Equity (common) | US |
| FAST | Fastenal Co | 0.79% | Equity (common) | US |
| BKNG | Booking Holdings Inc | 0.77% | Equity (common) | US |
| DBX | Dropbox Inc | 0.73% | Equity (common) | US |
| FERG | Ferguson Enterprises Inc | 0.70% | Equity (common) | US |
| EA | Electronic Arts Inc | 0.70% | Equity (common) | US |
| VRSN | VeriSign Inc | 0.67% | Equity (common) | US |
| CRWD | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.64% | Equity (common) | US |
| PINS | Pinterest Inc | 0.64% | Equity (common) | US |
| MTCH | Match Group Inc | 0.61% | Equity (common) | US |
| CTAS | Cintas Corp | 0.61% | Equity (common) | US |
| FICO | Fair Isaac Corp | 0.60% | Equity (common) | US |
| EOG | EOG Resources Inc | 0.60% | Equity (common) | US |
| TJX | TJX Cos Inc/The | 0.57% | Equity (common) | US |
| IDXX | IDEXX Laboratories Inc | 0.57% | Equity (common) | US |
| TER | Teradyne Inc | 0.56% | Equity (common) | US |
| MRK | Merck & Co Inc | 0.55% | Equity (common) | US |
| CSCO | Cisco Systems Inc | 0.54% | Equity (common) | US |
| EXEL | Exelixis Inc | 0.53% | Equity (common) | US |
| MTD | Mettler-Toledo International Inc | 0.52% | Equity (common) | US |
| EXPE | Expedia Group Inc | 0.52% | Equity (common) | US |
| ADSK | Autodesk Inc | 0.51% | Equity (common) | US |
| MU | Micron Technology Inc | 0.51% | Equity (common) | US |
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 4.09% | 3.54% | 0.85% | 2.83% |
| Feb | -- | 4.60% | -2.79% | -2.39% | -0.19% |
| Mar | -- | 1.13% | -5.00% | -4.74% | -2.87% |
| Apr | -- | -5.23% | -0.12% | 9.00% | 1.22% |
| May | -- | 3.78% | 5.68% | 5.79% | 5.08% |
| Jun | -- | 4.60% | 3.59% | -1.83% | 2.12% |
| Jul | -- | 0.52% | 1.97% | 0.67% | 1.05% |
| Aug | -- | 3.77% | 4.10% | 1.31% | 3.06% |
| Sep | -- | 4.48% | 5.02% | 0.65% | 3.38% |
| Oct | -- | 0.12% | 2.04% | 1.35%* | 1.17% |
| Nov | -- | 6.22% | -0.24% | -- | 2.99% |
| Dec | 6.12% | -2.70% | -0.27% | -- | 1.05% |
| Total | 6.12% | 27.74% | 18.33% | 10.44% | 15.66% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
HQGO Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 249
Period: 252 trading days
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
HQGO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|