IJUL Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July

ETF

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

IJUL — —
Key stats
About

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
ARCX
Inception
2019-06-28
Has Options
No
Fund profile
holdings as of Oct 21, 2026issuer data
Defined Outcome Buffer#84 of 429 by assets Innovator
Defined-outcome fund. The stated cap and buffer apply only from the first day of the outcome period to its last; buying in between gives different terms. See what is left in the ETF lab.
Expense ratio
0.85%
issuer, Oct 22, 2026
Assets
$257M
issuer-reported, Oct 21, 2026
Trailing yield
—
Average daily volume
$503K
30 sessions
Holdings
6
top 10 are 101.6%
Listed
Jun 28, 2019
NYSE Arca
Net asset value
$36.04
issuer, Oct 21, 2026
Closure risk, 12 months
1.2%
low · model
FrenzyCap ETF score
29
how it is built
Cost20
Liquidity23
Scale52
Diversificationn/a
Outcome period, decoded from the options in the fund's Oct 21, 2026 holdings (issuer data)
Reference asset
EFA
period ends Jun 30, 2027 (251 days)
Cap, full period
16.9%
before fees
Buffer, full period
15.0%
first losses absorbed
Reference since start
+0.2%
$104.06 on Oct 21, 2026
Upside left to the cap
16.7%
for a buyer today
Drop before the buffer starts
0.2%
unprotected from here

Moves with. US large-cap stocks (60% of its variance, beta 0.48); Developed markets ex-US over US (26% of its variance, beta 0.40); Gold (3% of its variance, beta 0.02). These factors explain 92% of its daily moves over the last year.

All 6 holdingsOverlap toolAll Buffer ETFs

Fund flows

No monthly flow reports are on file for this fund yet. New funds appear after their first quarterly filing; funds organised as unit investment trusts do not file them.

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF—0.95%$10.9B+12.7%compare
BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF—0.69%$3.2B+6.7%compare
BUFDFT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF—0.95%$2.2B+10.4%compare
BUFQFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF—1.00%$1.7B+14.8%compare
FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January—0.85%$1.5B+13.4%compare

The largest other funds in the Buffer category.

ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-10-21
Holdings
6
AUM
$256.8M
Provider
Innovator
Inception
2019-06-28
Exchange
ARCX
Data As Of
2026-10-21
Expense Ratio
0.85%
Dividend Yield
—
Distribution
—
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 6 of 6 holdings
Symbol Name Weight % Asset Class Country
— EFA 06/30/2027 1.04 C 97.10% Derivative —
— EFA 06/30/2027 103.88 P 4.45% Derivative —
— US BANK MMDA - USBGFS 9 09/01/2037 0.58% Cash/Money Market —
— Cash & Other -0.39% Cash/Money Market —
— EFA 06/30/2027 121.41 C -0.50% Derivative —
— EFA 06/30/2027 88.3 P -1.25% Derivative —
Chart
Seasonality
'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan-0.02%-1.63%5.36%0.39%2.90%1.81%1.47%
Feb1.18%-2.02%-1.97%0.95%2.77%1.54%0.41%
Mar0.44%1.61%1.96%2.03%-0.65%-2.65%0.46%
Apr0.12%-1.90%1.71%-2.53%2.81%2.47%0.45%
May-0.22%2.09%-3.57%4.86%4.14%1.77%1.51%
Jun-0.22%-4.78%2.98%-2.18%1.56%1.60%-0.17%
Jul0.08%3.18%1.74%1.72%-1.41%1.60%1.15%
Aug0.49%-3.87%-1.74%3.82%2.61%0.83%0.36%
Sep-1.67%-5.21%-2.23%1.60%1.57%-1.43%-1.23%
Oct1.48%2.37%-0.71%-3.03%-0.12%0.22%*0.04%
Nov-2.52%8.07%3.89%-0.83%0.46%--1.81%
Dec1.99%-1.00%2.73%-2.07%1.89%--0.71%
Total1.05%-3.83%10.17%4.46%20.01%7.91%6.63%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $36.04
SMA 50: $36.46
SMA 200: $35.33
Current: $35.92
EMA 12: $36.02
EMA 26: $36.14
MACD: -0.1185 | Signal: 0.0239
BEARISH
ADX (14): 12.72
RANGE
+DI: 24.21
−DI: 27.65

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 43.89
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 52.55
Stoch %D: 49.06
Williams %R: -65.11

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $36.35
BB Lower: $35.72
NEUTRAL
OBV: 1,669,592
Vol SMA 20: 12,326
Vol ROC: -71.72%
ATR: $0.24
True Range: $0.29
HV 20: 7.1%
HV 30: 7.5%
HV 60: 7.4%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.

Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.

News
All IJUL news →

IJUL Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.5018
Alpha: 2.24%
Correlation: 0.7912
R-Squared: 62.6%
Stock Volatility: 8.1%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

IJUL Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

116 filers4,357,522 shares$155.46M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 BLAIR WILLIAM & CO/IL 314,075 $11.30M 7.27% — 2026-06-30
2 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 214,203 $7.70M 4.96% — 2026-06-30
3 Berger Financial Group, Inc 199,418 $7.17M 4.61% — 2026-06-30
4 LEVEL FOUR ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC 191,865 $6.90M 4.44% — 2026-06-30
5 GTS FINANCIAL, LLC 192,190 $6.14M 3.95% — 2026-06-30
6 COMMONWEALTH EQUITY SERVICES, LLC 156,207 $5.62M 3.61% — 2026-06-30
7 Hofer & Associates. Inc 147,565 $5.33M 3.43% — 2026-09-30
8 RED CRANE WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC 147,565 $5.33M 3.43% — 2026-09-30
9 Maltin Wealth Management, Inc. 144,481 $5.22M 3.36% — 2026-09-30
10 Cornerstone Wealth, LLC/TN 122,861 $4.45M 2.86% — 2026-06-30
11 Cetera Investment Advisers Custodian 117,672 $4.23M 2.72% — 2026-06-30
12 Global Strategic Investment Solutions, LLC 89,013 $3.22M 2.07% — 2026-09-30
13 Envestnet Asset Management, Inc. 89,069 $3.20M 2.06% — 2026-06-30
14 Raymond James Financial, Inc. Custodian 88,834 $3.20M 2.06% — 2026-06-30
15 Bedel Financial Consulting, Inc. 85,469 $3.07M 1.98% — 2026-06-30
16 LPL Financial LLC Custodian 78,534 $2.82M 1.82% — 2026-06-30
17 BFI Wealth Solutions, LLC 72,421 $2.62M 1.68% — 2026-09-30
18 INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC 67,076 $2.42M 1.56% — 2026-09-30
19 Long Island Wealth Management, Inc. 65,841 $2.37M 1.52% — 2026-06-30
20 BIP Wealth, LLC 65,472 $2.36M 1.51% — 2026-06-30
21 Stratos Wealth Advisors, LLC 64,721 $2.33M 1.50% — 2026-06-30
22 HighTower Advisors, LLC 59,152 $2.13M 1.37% — 2026-06-30
23 Signal Advisors Wealth, LLC 54,742 $1.98M 1.27% — 2026-09-30
24 Talon Private Wealth, LLC 54,837 $1.97M 1.27% — 2026-06-30
25 CORRADO ADVISORS, LLC 53,482 $1.92M 1.24% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month