JOF JAPAN SMALLER CAPITALIZATION FUND
XNYSStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.3B
- List Date
- 1990-03-14
- CIK
- 0000859796
- Homepage
- https://www.nomura-asset.com
Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund Inc is a closed-end management investment company. Its investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation through investments in smaller capitalization Japanese equity securities. Its portfolio of investments consists of different sectors such as banks, chemicals, construction, electric appliances, financing business, food, Information and Communication, Utilities, Real Estate, and others.
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $300M shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $753K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Mar 14, 1990 NYSE
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (27% of its variance, beta 0.79); Developed markets ex-US over US (12% of its variance, beta 0.71); Emerging markets over US (5% of its variance, beta 0.12); Gold (4% of its variance, beta 0.07). These factors explain 46% of its daily moves over the last year.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | — | 0.25% | $25.8B | +31.9% | compare |
| EWJiShares MSCI Japan ETF | — | 0.49% | $23.7B | +14.6% | compare |
| EWYiShares MSCI South Korea ETF | — | 0.59% | $23.1B | +73.5% | compare |
| BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | — | 0.19% | $19.2B | +12.1% | compare |
| EWZiShares MSCI Brazil ETF | — | 0.59% | $13.9B | +40.7% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Single Country category.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -3.34% | -3.17% | 6.45% | 0.26% | -0.78% | 3.34% | 0.46% |
| Feb | 1.35% | 0.13% | -2.73% | 1.16% | 3.94% | 8.80% | 2.11% |
| Mar | 1.86% | -5.79% | 1.77% | 0.63% | 5.01% | -10.29% | -1.14% |
| Apr | -2.57% | -6.15% | 0.14% | -3.55% | 7.72% | 2.07% | -0.39% |
| May | -0.22% | -1.96% | 2.01% | 2.23% | 3.98% | 4.98% | 1.84% |
| Jun | -1.53% | -4.24% | -0.28% | -2.70% | 0.84% | -0.42% | -1.39% |
| Jul | -1.34% | 4.27% | 3.19% | 6.75% | -0.72% | -3.37% | 1.46% |
| Aug | 2.00% | -5.53% | 0.54% | 3.08% | 10.30% | 9.07% | 3.24% |
| Sep | -1.95% | -6.09% | -4.56% | 3.76% | -1.95% | 0.08% | -1.78% |
| Oct | -2.44% | -3.23% | -2.41% | -7.39% | -1.99% | -5.84%* | -3.88% |
| Nov | -9.80% | 12.50% | 5.36% | 3.15% | 4.16% | -- | 3.07% |
| Dec | -1.62% | 0.00% | 3.27% | -2.91% | 4.43% | -- | 0.63% |
| Total | -18.40% | -18.95% | 12.86% | 3.69% | 40.01% | 6.89% | 4.35% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: JOF
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a range-bound market, with the stock consolidating around $12.00.
- Recent news headlines are generally neutral, with no significant catalysts or events that could drive price action.
Primary Risks:
- The stock's beta is relatively low at 0.86, indicating moderate volatility and potential for limited market moves.
- No earnings data available, which limits the analysis of future performance.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: NEUTRAL
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Consolidating
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Range-bound
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key price levels to monitor:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $12.86
- Middle Bollinger Band: $12.33
- Lower Bollinger Band: $11.80
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (65.13)
- MACD signal: Bullish (0.22 / 0.00 / 0.22)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 71187.66
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 2763884.13
- Volume Rate of Change: -44.58%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- No significant news headlines with a material impact on the stock price.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL
Catalyst Identification:
- No upcoming events, earnings, or product launches that could drive price action.
Market Narrative:
- The recent neutral sentiment and lack of market-moving news headlines suggest a consolidating market for JOF.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Metrics:
- Beta: 0.86 (vs SPY)
- Alpha: 0.04
- Correlation: 0.55
- Stock Volatility: 0.20 Interpretation: Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
Options Market Signals:
- No options data available
Downside Protection:
- Support levels to monitor:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $11.80
- Previous lows: N/A
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
- JOF is a diversified portfolio, making it difficult to determine its sector-specific performance.
Institutional Activity:
- No unusual institutional activity or volume patterns suggesting interest.
Correlation Analysis:
- Correlation with the market (R-squared interpretation): 0.55 - moderate correlation
Relative Valuation:
- JOF's relative valuation is neutral, as the stock price has consolidated around $12.00.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $12.86
- Middle Bollinger Band: $12.33
- Lower Bollinger Band: $11.80
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- No specific levels to monitor, as the stock is currently consolidating.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- No upcoming events or earnings releases that could drive price action.
Risk Management:
- Consider stop-loss levels around $12.00 and position sizing considerations based on market conditions.
By analyzing JOF's technical indicators, news headlines, and risk metrics, we conclude that the stock is currently consolidating within a range-bound market. The lack of significant news or events suggests limited catalysts for price action in the short term. As such, our overall assessment is NEUTRAL, with a confidence level of 6/10.
JOF Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $457K | #4563 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
JOF Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
JOF Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-20| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-20 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +46,222 | $11.94 | $551.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-16 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +13,133 | $12.33 | $161.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-23 | Tina Jones | Director | Buy (P) | +950 | $10.80 | $10.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-19 | David B Chemidlin | Director | Buy (P) | +2,000 | $10.90 | $21.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-14 | Arthur Blake Laby | Director | Buy (P) | +3,306 | $7.56 | $25.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-11 | Paige Ouimet | Director | Buy (P) | +3,111 | $8.02 | $25.0K | EDGAR |
| 2023-06-29 | Rodney A Buck | Director | Buy (P) | +9,000 | $7.42 | $66.7K | EDGAR |
| 2015-07-29 | Marcia L MacHarg | Director | Buy (P) | +945 | $10.61 | $10.0K | EDGAR |
| 2013-05-31 | E. Han Kim | Director | Buy (P) | +5,000 | $8.88 | $44.4K | EDGAR |
| 2013-01-11 | David B Chemidlin | Director | Buy (P) | +130 | $7.27 | $944 | EDGAR |
| 2011-08-05 | Chor Weng Tan | Director | Exer (X) | +1,105 | $7.60 | $8.4K | EDGAR |
| 2011-08-05 | Rodney A Buck | Director | Exer (X) | +2,210 | $7.60 | $16.8K | EDGAR |
| 2009-10-08 | Chor Weng Tan | Director | Sell (S) | −1,340 | $7.68 | -$10.3K | EDGAR |
| 2008-09-17 | Rodney A Buck | Director | Buy (P) | +2,000 | $7.40 | $14.8K | EDGAR |
| 2007-12-28 | Chor Weng Tan | Director | Buy (P) | +500 | $9.46 | $4.7K | EDGAR |
JOF Insider Holdings
5 insiders · @ $11.78| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saba Capital Management, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 2,742,376 | $32.31M | $713.8K | 2 | 2026-10-20 |
| 2 | Arthur Blake Laby | Director | 3,306 | $38.9K | $25.0K | 1 | 2025-01-14 |
| 3 | Paige Ouimet | Director | 3,111 | $36.6K | $25.0K | 1 | 2024-12-11 |
| 4 | David B Chemidlin | Director | 2,432 | $28.6K | $22.7K | 2 | 2025-09-19 |
| 5 | Tina Jones | Director | 950 | $11.2K | $10.3K | 1 | 2025-12-23 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | Nport | 1.81% | $7.6M | — | 2026-05-31 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.