RHLD Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.
XNYSStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves
- Industry (SIC)
- FINANCE SERVICES (6199) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $1.2B
- Employees
- 5,620
- List Date
- 2025-02-20
- CIK
- 0002039497
- Last Earnings
- Aug 6
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.resoluteholdings.com
Resolute Holdings Management Inc provides operating management services. The company generates recurring, long-duration management fees. It applies a differentiated approach of value creation through the systematic deployment of the Resolute Operating System (ROS) to drive performance at businesses it manages with the intention of creating value at both the underlying managed businesses. The company is managed and operated as two segments given each of Resolute Holdings and GPGI Holdings.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 9.39% | 9.39% |
| Feb | 0.00% | -15.97% | -7.99% |
| Mar | -37.93% | -9.47% | -23.70% |
| Apr | -10.01% | -16.34% | -13.18% |
| May | 31.31% | -14.02% | 8.64% |
| Jun | -4.87% | 27.74% | 11.43% |
| Jul | 24.55% | -15.68% | 4.44% |
| Aug | 66.43% | 1.35% | 33.89% |
| Sep | 7.13% | -9.58% | -1.23% |
| Oct | -0.42% | 2.34% | 0.96% |
| Nov | 22.54% | 38.07%* | 30.30% |
| Dec | 15.60% | -- | 15.60% |
| Total | 118.57% | -16.51% | 51.03% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
RHLD Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $8.9M | #1124 of 3138 | +210.6% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
RHLD Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 34 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
RHLD Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-24| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-24 | Kurt Schoen | Chief Financial Officer | Buy (P) | +375 | $117.84 | $44.2K | EDGAR |
RHLD Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $164.24| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kurt Schoen | Chief Financial Officer | 3,225 | $529.7K | $44.2K | 1 | 2026-08-24 |
RHLD Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 24, 2026Directors 11
- Joseph J Deangelo · since Feb 19, 2025
- Brian F. Hughes · since Feb 28, 2025
- Jane J. Thompson · since Feb 28, 2025
- John D. Cote · since Feb 28, 2025
- Krishna Mikkilineni · since Feb 28, 2025
- Mark R. James · since Feb 28, 2025
- Paul Galant · since Feb 28, 2025
- Roger Fradin · since Feb 28, 2025
- Thomas R. Knott · listed since Mar 2025
- Timothy O. Mahoney · since Jul 12, 2025
- Wayne M. Hewett · since Jul 12, 2025
Officers 1
- Kurt Schoen · Chief Financial Officer · since Feb 19, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (30)
| Mar 18, 2026 | John D. Cote no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Jul 12, 2025 | Wayne M. Hewett became a director |
| Jul 12, 2025 | Timothy O. Mahoney became a director |
| Mar 17, 2025 | Resolute ManCo Holdings LLC became a director |
| Mar 17, 2025 | Resolute ManCo Holdings LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 4, 2025 | Thomas R. Knott first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Mar 4, 2025 | John D. Cote first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Mar 4, 2025 | David M Cote first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Tungsten 2024 LLC became a director |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Tungsten 2024 LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Roger Fradin became a director |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Resolute Compo Holdings LLC became a director |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Resolute Compo Holdings LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Paul Galant became a director |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Mark R. James became a director |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Krishna Mikkilineni became a director |
| Feb 28, 2025 | John D. Cote became a director |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Jane J. Thompson became a director |
| Feb 28, 2025 | CompoSecure, Inc. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 28, 2025 | CompoSecure Holdings, L.L.C. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Brian F. Hughes became a director |
| Feb 19, 2025 | Thomas R. Knott became Chief Executive Officer |
| Feb 19, 2025 | Kurt Schoen became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 19, 2025 | Joseph J Deangelo became a director |
| Feb 19, 2025 | David M Cote became Executive Chairman |
| Feb 13, 2025 | Timothy Walter Fitzsimmons became a director |
| Feb 13, 2025 | Jonathan Wilk became a director |
| Feb 13, 2025 | Jonathan Wilk became President |
| Feb 13, 2025 | CompoSecure, Inc. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 13, 2025 | CompoSecure Holdings, L.L.C. became a 10% owner |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (6)
- Resolute Compo Holdings LLC · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 19, 2025
- Resolute ManCo Holdings LLC · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 19, 2025
- David M Cote · Last reported as Executive Chairman in an SEC filing dated Mar 4, 2025
- Tungsten 2024 LLC · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 4, 2025
- Timothy Walter Fitzsimmons · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 13, 2025
- Jonathan Wilk · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 13, 2025
RHLD Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-03-17What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-17 | THOMPSON JANE J. | Officer | 1,850 | $230.2K | 2026-03-17 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-17 | Fitzsimmons Timothy Walter | Director, 10% Stockholder, control | 10,000 | $318.7K | 2025-03-14 | Edward Jones | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $16.2M | $76.6B | 2026-11-06 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $14.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $5.9M | $13.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 4 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $4.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | Nport | 0.18% | $3.2M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $2.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | PSC Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.09% | $2.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.16% | $1.9M | $1.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 9 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $673,557 | $93.2B | 2026-11-06 |
| 10 | VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $592,433 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 11 | VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $511,195 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.04% | $408,370 | $1.0B | 2026-11-05 |
| 13 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.02% | $295,277 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 14 | OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | Invesco | 0.09% | $234,394 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 15 | FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.01% | $192,686 | $2.2B | 2026-11-05 |
| 16 | IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $144,487 | $19.7B | 2026-11-06 |
| 17 | WSML iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $44,268 | $656.6M | 2026-11-06 |
| 18 | VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $38,077 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 19 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.02% | $34,738 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 20 | MSML iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $27,822 | $271.8M | 2026-11-06 |
| 21 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.01% | $27,207 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 22 | ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $22,401 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 23 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.01% | $18,445 | — | 2026-11-06 |
| 24 | RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | Nport | 0.03% | $1,012 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | HDG ProShares Hedge Replication ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $769 | — | 2026-11-06 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
RHLD vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGNC AGNC Investment Corp. Common Stock | $11.2B | 893.5 | — | −18.3% | 40 |
| HWC Hancock Whitney Corporation Common Stock | $5.7B | 15.1 | −4.8% | +14.2% | 82 |
| ABCB Ameris Bancorp | $5.5B | 13.1 | +0.9% | +12.9% | 52 |
| FULT Fulton Financial Corp | $4.5B | 11.6 | −2.1% | +24.7% | 37 |
| ENVA Enova International, Inc. | $4.2B | 11.5 | +23.2% | +2.7% | 23 |
| WSFS WSFS Financial Corp | $4.0B | 14.3 | −2.3% | +45.5% | 46 |
| BFH Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. | $3.9B | 7.8 | +5.2% | +32.1% | 69 |
| BNL Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. | $3.4B | 23.6 | +8.0% | +2.7% | 20 |
| RHLD Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. | $1.2B | — | — | −11.9% | — |
| Peer median | $4.4B | 13.7 | +0.9% | +13.5% | 43 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.