RXO, Inc.(RXO)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $10.43 – $29.86
- YTD
- +97.74%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 21.62
- Straddle Price
- $3.85
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.22
- Market Cap
- $4.2B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.43% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.47 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.48% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.73% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +12.5pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +47bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +0.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.00 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -7.0% |
| Book / Price | 35.2% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 19.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -0.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.28 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $22.13 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $26.67 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 83.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.4B |
| Market Cap | $4B |
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | -0.8% | +0.35 | -0.64 | 59.5% | — |
| 42d | -3.0% | -0.10 | -0.64 | 59.5% | — |
| 63d | -4.1% | -0.20 | -0.64 | 59.5% | — |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 58.1× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $2.18 | 12% | median 10.2× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $18.79 | 16% | median 2.1× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $32.77 | 16% | median 1.0× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $22.13 | 56% | stability 70% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- TRANSPORTATION SERVICES (4700)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $4.2B
RXO Inc is a brokered transportation platform defined by technology and a nimble, asset-light business model, with the component being core truck brokerage business. Its operations also include three asset-light, brokered transportation services, all of which complement its truck brokerage business: managed transportation, last mile and freight forwarding. The company operates into one reportable segment. The operates within the transportation industry and in the same geography North America.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +6.63% | 4 |
| Feb | +3.39% | 4 |
| Mar | -2.75% | 4 |
| Apr | -2.38% | 4 |
| May | +14.38% | 4 |
| Jun | +10.28% | 4 |
| Jul | +2.42% | 3 |
| Aug | -7.96% | 3 |
| Sep | +1.49% | 3 |
| Oct | +1.38% | 3 |
| Nov | -0.25% | 4 |
| Dec | -4.25% | 4 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-07 | After-Close | 6.52% | 0.93% | 0.14x | Within |
| 2024-11-07 | After-Close | 10.72% | 0.20% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2025-02-05 | Pre-Market | 7.62% | 11.82% | 1.55x | Exceeded |
| 2025-05-07 | Pre-Market | 12.43% | 5.30% | 0.43x | Within |
| 2025-08-07 | Pre-Market | 9.07% | 4.27% | 0.47x | Within |
| 2025-11-06 | After-Close | 18.06% | 6.02% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2026-02-06 | Pre-Market | 14.24% | 2.97% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2026-05-07 | Pre-Market | 13.24% | 19.99% | 1.51x | Exceeded |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 21.62
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 104.1%
- Straddle (30D)
- $3.85
- Straddle (7D)
- $0.47
- P/C Volume
- 0.22
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 2.21
- Correlation (SPY)
- 37.8%
- R²
- 0.14
- Ann. Volatility
- 72.8%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.4%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $243.00K | 32.45% | 2025-09-30 |
| 2 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $219.30K | 29.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $152.05K | 20.30% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | Walleye Trading LLC | $119.88K | 16.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $14.62K | 1.95% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walleye Trading LLC | $10.14M | 52.01% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $3.27M | 16.79% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $1.94M | 9.93% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $1.06M | 5.43% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $1.03M | 5.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.02M | 5.24% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $597.96K | 3.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $438.33K | 2.25% | 2025-09-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-19 | Andrew M. Wilkerson | Chief Executive Officer | Gift (G) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-18 | Daniel S. Morris | Chief Accounting Officer | Grant (A) | +13,377 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-04 | Andrew M. Wilkerson | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +52,561 | $19.59 | -$790.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-24 | Jason S. Kerr | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +1,148 | $13.23 | -$11.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-24 | Andrew M. Wilkerson | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +29,845 | $13.23 | -$303.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-24 | Jeffrey D. Firestone | Chief Legal Officer | Mixed | +6,657 | $13.23 | -$67.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-24 | JAMES E HARRIS | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +7,346 | $13.23 | -$74.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | Jason S. Kerr | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +1,043 | $15.96 | -$15.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | Andrew M. Wilkerson | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +29,933 | $15.96 | -$366.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | Jeffrey D. Firestone | Chief Legal Officer | Mixed | +5,066 | $15.96 | -$62.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | JAMES E HARRIS | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +7,368 | $15.96 | -$90.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-25 | JAMES E HARRIS | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +12,026 | $14.66 | -$143.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-25 | Andrew M. Wilkerson | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +45,488 | $14.66 | -$518.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-25 | Jeffrey D. Firestone | Chief Legal Officer | Mixed | +8,790 | $14.66 | -$108.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-25 | Jason S. Kerr | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +2,694 | $14.66 | -$37.6K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MFN Partners GP, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 28,109,942 | $713.71M | $136.91M | 4 | 2026-02-17 |
| 2 | MFN Partners Management, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 27,577,666 | $700.20M | $1.24B | 1 | 2024-08-14 |
| 3 | FARHAD NANJI | 10%+ Owner | 17,310,856 | $439.52M | $23.55M | 2 | 2024-05-13 |
| 4 | MFN Partners, LP | 10%+ Owner | 17,310,795 | $439.52M | $31.69M | 3 | 2024-05-08 |
| 5 | Michael DeMichele | 10%+ Owner | 17,280,434 | $438.75M | $389.42M | 4 | 2024-12-09 |
| 6 | MFN Partners Management, LP | 10%+ Owner | 12,985,002 | $329.69M | $16.53M | 1 | 2023-11-20 |
| 7 | S JACOBS BRADLEY | Director | 2,362,921 | $59.99M | $0 | 8 | 2025-01-06 |
| 8 | Troy A. Cooper | Director | 283,161 | $7.19M | $88.2K | 4 | 2026-01-06 |
| 9 | JAMES E HARRIS | Chief Financial Officer | 130,131 | $3.30M | $0 | 14 | 2026-03-24 |
| 10 | Jeffrey D. Firestone | Chief Legal Officer | 102,732 | $2.61M | $0 | 18 | 2026-03-24 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 2.7 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | 59.5 |
| TTM Revenue | $5.7B |
| TTM Net Income | $-0.1B |
| TTM EPS | $-0.61 |
| ROE | -7.0% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.30 |