ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.(ZIM)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $12.33 – $30.96
- YTD
- +33.23%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 39.14
- Straddle Price
- $2.88
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.50
- Market Cap
- $3.5B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.15 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.27% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 5.09% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +39.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $27.32 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $29.10 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 52.5% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-1.0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $14.81 | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 64.3× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 3.1× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 2.6× · 5 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $27.32 | 58% | stability 70% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $31.18 | 42% | 22 strikes · skew +0.23 |
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $3.5B
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd is an asset-light container liner shipping company. It offers tailored services, including land transportation and logistical services, specialized shipping solutions, including the transportation of out-of-gauge cargo, refrigerated cargo, and dangerous and hazardous cargo. Its services include Cargo Services, Digital Services, Schedules, and Shipping Trades and Lines. Geographically, it derives a majority of its revenue from the Pacific trade region.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.42% | 6 |
| Feb | +19.60% | 6 |
| Mar | -11.91% | 6 |
| Apr | -1.00% | 6 |
| May | +10.12% | 6 |
| Jun | -4.31% | 6 |
| Jul | +0.30% | 6 |
| Aug | -4.07% | 6 |
| Sep | +4.00% | 6 |
| Oct | +0.54% | 5 |
| Nov | +0.48% | 5 |
| Dec | +8.81% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6/10)
Key drivers:
- Bullish momentum from MACD crossover
- Support from SMA 20 and Bollinger Bands
- Higher beta indicates increased volatility, which may amplify market movements
Primary risks:
- Overbought conditions from RSI and Stochastic %K
- Weak trend regime according to ADX/DMI indicators
- High IV premium suggests potential for mean reversion or unexpected events
Investment thesis: ZIM's recent price appreciation is driven by a combination of technical momentum and fundamental factors. However, the stock remains overbought, and further upside may be limited until the market sentiment shifts.
Recent news sentiment impact: The neutral-to-positive news headlines have contributed to the stock's recent gains, but it is essential to consider the mixed sentiment from the last 10 articles (4 positive, 3 negative, and 3 neutral).
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term uptrend (1-2 weeks), Medium-term sideways consolidation (1-3 months)
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels include SMA 20 ($25.78) and Bollinger Bands upper band ($28.31). The lower band ($23.24) serves as a potential support level.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral range (30-70)
- MACD signal: Bullish momentum
- Bollinger Bands position: Overbought
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20 shows an increase in volume, indicating institutional interest. On-Balance Volume (OBV) also indicates a rising trend.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral-to-positive news sentiment with some negative headlines contributing to the overall mixed tone.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL.
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings report and potential product launches could impact the stock's performance.
Market Narrative: The news headlines align generally with the technical signals, but the overbought conditions suggest a need for a pullback or mean reversion before further upside can be expected.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta of 1.01 indicates above-average volatility relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are higher than historical averages, suggesting potential for mean reversion.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: High
- Put/call ratios: Bullish sentiment
- Unusual activity: None noted
Downside Protection: Support from SMA 20 and Bollinger Bands lower band ($23.24) could serve as a risk management consideration.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: ZIM's performance is above average in the shipping sector.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is increasing, with volume trends supporting this notion.
Correlation Analysis: ZIM has a moderate correlation (0.25) with SPY, indicating some link to market movements.
Relative Valuation: The stock is trading within its recent range, suggesting potential for mean reversion or breakout.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: SMA 20 ($25.78), Bollinger Bands lower band ($23.24)
- Resistance: Bollinger Bands upper band ($28.31)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: A break above the Bollinger Bands upper band or a breakdown below the SMA 20 could trigger significant moves.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings report and potential product launches.
Risk Management: Consider placing stop-loss levels at the SMA 20 ($25.78) and Bollinger Bands lower band ($23.24) to manage risk.
- IV Rank (30D)
- 39.14
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 84.7%
- Straddle (30D)
- $2.88
- Straddle (7D)
- $2.36
- P/C Volume
- 0.50
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.98
- Correlation (SPY)
- 25.1%
- R²
- 0.06
- Ann. Volatility
- 50.8%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $162.57M | 42.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Walleye Trading LLC | $96.44M | 25.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | CITIGROUP INC Custodian | $26.56M | 6.95% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $25.40M | 6.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Capula Management Ltd | $20.20M | 5.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $11.30M | 2.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $11.16M | 2.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $7.39M | 1.93% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $7.06M | 1.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $2.79M | 0.73% | 2025-09-30 |
| 11 | LMR Partners LLP | $2.60M | 0.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $2.44M | 0.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.44M | 0.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $1.23M | 0.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.16M | 0.30% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.04M | 0.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $546.00K | 0.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | CSS LLC/IL | $405.60K | 0.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | EQUITEC PROPRIETARY MARKETS, LLC | $364.00K | 0.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | PRELUDE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC | $127.13K | 0.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | FNY Investment Advisers, LLC | $0 | 0.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $120.58M | 32.33% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Walleye Trading LLC | $63.56M | 17.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $44.35M | 11.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | EQUITEC PROPRIETARY MARKETS, LLC | $43.64M | 11.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $28.80M | 7.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | LMR Partners LLP | $15.60M | 4.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $12.86M | 3.45% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $12.63M | 3.39% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Verition Fund Management LLC | $7.80M | 2.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | $7.72M | 2.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $3.29M | 0.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $3.02M | 0.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Caption Management, LLC | $2.81M | 0.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $2.00M | 0.54% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | CSS LLC/IL | $1.31M | 0.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $972.40K | 0.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC | $780.00K | 0.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Walleye Capital LLC | $748.80K | 0.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | SUMMIT SECURITIES GROUP LLC | $548.60K | 0.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-16 | Assaf Tiran | EVP Cross Suez & Atlantic BU | Sell (S) | −4,727 | $29.51 | -$139.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | Saar Dotan | EVP Countries & BD | Sell (S) | −26,544 | $29.85 | -$792.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-10 | Sami Jubran | EVP Chief Finance Officer | Sell (S) | −3,020 | $29.91 | -$90.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-09 | Assaf Tiran | EVP Cross Suez & Atlantic BU | Sell (S) | −2,312 | $30.21 | -$69.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-09 | Arik Elimelech | EVP HR & Organization | Sell (S) | −458 | $29.99 | -$13.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-09 | Saar Dotan | EVP Countries & BD | Sell (S) | −3,690 | $30.32 | -$111.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-08 | Birger Johannes Meyer-Gloeckner | Director | Sell (S) | −1,531 | $28.50 | -$43.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Eyal Ben-Amram | EVP Chief Information Officer | Sell (S) | −4,000 | $28.57 | -$114.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Nissim Yochai | EVP ZIM USA President | Sell (S) | −7,535 | $28.83 | -$217.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Xavier Destriau | EVP Chief Finance Officer | Sell (S) | −12,084 | $28.80 | -$348.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-24 | Eli Glickman | Sell (S) | −254,221 | $28.22 | -$7.17M | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-15 | Saar Dotan | EVP Countries & Business Devel | Sell (S) | −11,000 | $26.11 | -$287.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-08 | Saar Dotan | EVP Countries & Business Devel | Sell (S) | −15,000 | $25.41 | -$381.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Saar Dotan | EVP Countries & Business Devel | Sell (S) | −15,000 | $25.09 | -$376.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | Saar Dotan | EVP Countries & Business Devel | Sell (S) | −20,000 | $24.63 | -$492.6K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saar Dotan | EVP Countries & BD | 89,867 | $2.62M | -$2.44M | 6 | 2026-09-15 |
| 2 | Eyal Ben-Amram | EVP Chief Information Officer | 6,486 | $189.3K | -$114.3K | 1 | 2026-08-26 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-16 | Asaf Tiran | Officer | 4,727 | $140.5K | 2026-09-15 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-15 | Saar Dotan | Officer | 26,544 | $784.9K | 2026-09-14 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-10 | Sami Jubran | Officer | 3,020 | $86.3K | 2026-09-08 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-09 | Saar Dotan | Officer | 3,690 | $105.5K | 2026-09-08 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-09 | Asaf Tiran | Officer | 2,312 | $66.1K | 2026-09-08 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Yochai Nissim | Officer | 7,535 | $212.9K | 2026-08-24 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Destriau Xavier | Officer | 12,084 | $341.4K | 2026-08-24 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Ben-Amram Eyal | Officer | 4,000 | $113.0K | 2026-08-24 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-24 | Eliyahu Glickman | Officer | 254,221 | $6.90M | 2026-08-21 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | Dotan Saar | Officer | 11,000 | $285.0K | 2026-06-12 | Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.